Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and most students struggle not because the material is impossibly hard but because they try to memorize hundreds of reactions instead of learning the handful of electron-pushing patterns that explain almost all of them. Rebecca's science training means she teaches students to read a mechanism the way you'd read a sentence — subject, verb, object — so new reactions become predictable rather than surprising.

Most organic chemistry frustration comes from trying to memorize hundreds of reactions instead of recognizing the handful of electronic patterns — nucleophilic attack, leaving group ability, steric effects — that drive all of them. Garrett teaches students to read arrow-pushing mechanisms as stories about electron movement, which makes predicting products and regiochemistry intuitive. His approach turns reaction maps from overwhelming charts into logical flowcharts.

Studying physics with a concentration in chemical principles at Penn means Max encounters organic chemistry from the physical side first — thermodynamics of reaction pathways, orbital interactions driving nucleophilic attacks, and the energy landscapes that determine whether a substitution or elimination wins out. That perspective lets him teach mechanisms by grounding arrow-pushing in the physics of why electrons move, not just where they go.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Daniel learned to speak it fluently through his microbiology and dental science training. He walks through arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group reactivity by emphasizing the "why" behind each electron movement — so students can predict products on exam day instead of relying on memorized templates.

Having earned a chemistry degree from Yale, Zosia spent years immersed in the subject well past the introductory orgo sequence — which means she can contextualize tricky topics like electrophilic aromatic substitution and acyl chemistry within the broader landscape of how molecules actually behave. She walks students through spectral analysis and multi-step synthesis by building from first principles of electronegativity and sterics, so each new reaction type feels like an extension of what they already know rather than a fresh page to memorize. Rated 4.9 by students.

A bio-organic chemistry degree means Alex didn't just pass orgo — the entire major was built around understanding how molecular structure dictates reactivity, from substitution and elimination selectivity to multi-step synthesis design. He breaks down each mechanism by identifying the nucleophile, electrophile, and driving force first, so students develop a repeatable framework instead of a growing pile of flashcards. That same logic scales directly into spectroscopy interpretation and retrosynthetic analysis when exams get harder.

The arrow-pushing in organic chemistry isn't arbitrary — every curved arrow represents real electron movement, and once that clicks, reactions stop feeling random. Ava tackles mechanisms by teaching students to recognize nucleophiles, electrophiles, and leaving groups as recurring characters across substitution, elimination, and addition reactions. Her chemistry background from James Madison University means she can trace those patterns from introductory orgo all the way through complex multi-step synthesis problems.

Jonathan's human biology degree and pre-med track at Cornell meant organic chemistry wasn't just a prerequisite — it was the course that connected molecular structure to everything he'd later study in physiology and biochemistry. He tackles synthesis problems and spectroscopy interpretation by linking functional group behavior back to biological relevance, which gives students a reason to care about each mechanism. Rated 4.9 by students.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and most students struggle because they try to memorize arrows instead of understanding electron flow. Abrahim unpacks each mechanism — SN1 vs. SN2, E1 vs. E2, electrophilic aromatic substitution — by starting with nucleophilicity, sterics, and leaving-group ability so the logic drives the arrow-pushing rather than the other way around. His 5.0 rating speaks to how well that approach clicks.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and David treats them that way — once a student can read electron flow through curved arrows, predicting products for substitution, elimination, and addition reactions becomes systematic rather than overwhelming. His Yale neuroscience training required two semesters of organic chemistry, and he still uses those fundamentals daily in his bioethics graduate work.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and learning to predict products means recognizing electron-density patterns, not memorizing hundreds of individual reactions. Alec's approach — honed through years of TA work in Cornell's chemistry department — emphasizes arrow-pushing logic and functional group reactivity so that substitution, elimination, and addition reactions start to feel like variations on a theme rather than separate things to memorize.

I am a person who genuinely enjoys both writing and chemistry (especially organic). To most people, this seems like an odd combination but for me it's natural. I have been able to leverage both of these skills in order to obtain a PhD in organic chemistry. Also, I have written a couple of articles about chemistry on Medium. Understandably, some students struggle in these areas and I would like to help. When I am working with students, I like to be flexible with my teaching approach. During our first session, the student and I will set goals for our time together and we will discuss your learning style. In the subsequent sessions, student and I will work together to develop a learning environment that will help you Education: - Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from the University of Notre Dame (2014) - B.S. in Biochemistry from Xavier University of Louisiana (2008) Experience: 1. 5 years working as a lecture teaching assistant for general chemistry I and organic chemistry I and II at the University of Notre Dame 2. 1 year experience tutoring a high school student in chemistry (1 hour per week) 3. 6 years experience in helping undergraduate students understand organic chemistry and biology