I hold a Bachelor's degree in Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Economics from Johns Hopkins University and a Master's degree in Biostatistics from Boston University. My academic background has given me a strong foundation in both quantitative reasoning and analytical thinking, which I bring into every tutoring session. I'm passionate about helping students build confidence in their abilities and enjoy guiding them through challenging material by breaking down complex concepts into clear, understandable steps. With over five years of tutoring and teaching experience, I've worked with students across a wide range of subjects, including middle school math, Algebra I & II, Geometry, Precalculus, AP Calculus AB/BC, AP Statistics, and college-level courses like Calculus IIII, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, and Statistics. I also specialize in standardized test preparation, offering targeted support for the SAT, ACT, and GRE math sections. Beyond math, I tutor economics at both introductory and advanced levels, including Introductory Microeconomics and Macroeconomics, Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory, Monetary Analysis, and similar courses. I enjoy helping students connect theoretical models with real-world applications and develop a strong understanding of core economic principles. My tutoring style is patient, supportive, and highly personalized. I focus on fostering deep understanding and critical thinking, tailoring my approach to fit each student's individual learning style and academic goals. Outside of tutoring, I enjoy reading, staying active, and exploring emerging technologies.

Studying both psychology and linguistics at the University of Chicago gave Sherry an unusual double lens for the SAT — the linguistics side sharpens her teaching of grammar rules, sentence structure, and rhetoric on the Writing & Language section, while the psychology side informs how she coaches students through test-day pacing and anxiety management. She scored a perfect 1600 and uses that familiarity with every section to pinpoint exactly where a student's points are slipping, whether it's evidence-based reading pairs or no-calculator algebra. Rated 5.0 by students.

A 1400 SAT and a communication background give Logan a dual advantage: he knows the test's structure cold and can clearly articulate the reasoning behind every answer choice. His approach to the Reading and Writing sections leans heavily on argument analysis — identifying claims, evaluating evidence, and spotting the rhetorical moves that the College Board loves to test. Rated 5.0 by students, he also brings strong math fundamentals from his 36 ACT composite to shore up the quantitative side.

Dennis's finance and statistics coursework at NYU means the SAT Math section plays to his strengths — he teaches students to spot the underlying algebra and data-analysis patterns that repeat across every practice test, turning unfamiliar-looking problems into familiar setups. His 1550 SAT score backs up a prep approach built on efficiency: knowing which questions to attack first, where to double-check, and how to manage the clock so careless errors don't eat into a strong performance.

Nina's biostatistics training at Columbia and Northwestern means the SAT Math section — especially data analysis, scatterplot interpretation, and multi-step algebra — plays directly to her strengths. She scored a 1550 and knows how to teach the quantitative reasoning patterns that separate a good math score from a great one, while her experience with college essays and literature gives her practical tools for the Reading and Writing sections too.

What makes John effective for SAT prep is that he teaches both halves of the exam with equal fluency — his English and drama training sharpens his approach to passage analysis and evidence-based reading, while his math and physics background means he handles the algebra, data interpretation, and problem-solving sections without switching gears. He scored a 1420 on the SAT himself and holds a perfect 36 ACT composite, so he knows how standardized tests are constructed and where they try to trip students up. Rated 4.9 by students, he builds pacing and elimination strategies tailored to each section's specific traps.

What sets Michael apart for SAT prep is genuine fluency across both halves of the exam — his Fine Arts and Global Studies background built the close-reading and analytical writing skills that drive the verbal sections, while a 1590 SAT score confirms he's equally sharp on the math side. He teaches students to spot the recurring grammar traps in Writing & Language and to translate word problems into clean algebraic setups, connecting both skills into a unified test-day strategy.

Law school at the University of Chicago sharpened exactly the skills the SAT rewards — picking apart dense passages under time pressure, spotting logical gaps, and choosing precise language over vague alternatives. Elena pairs that training with a perfect 1600 SAT score and a tutoring approach built around listening to students reason through problems so she can pinpoint the specific assumptions or misreadings costing them points. Her government, Spanish, and legal background gives her unusually natural command of both the verbal and quantitative sides of the exam.

Scoring a 1550 on the SAT while juggling a dual PhD/MD track at Northwestern says something about efficiency under pressure — Chelain knows how to maximize points per minute on both the math and evidence-based reading sections. She breaks down SAT questions by what they're actually testing (inference vs. command of evidence, heart-of-algebra vs. passport-to-advanced-math) so students stop second-guessing and start recognizing patterns. Rated 5.0 by students.

A 1560 SAT scorer with a Master's in Education from Harvard, Mimi brings a structured yet creative approach to test prep — particularly the evidence-based reading passages, where her art history and literary analysis background makes dissecting complex texts second nature. She teaches students to identify argument structure and eliminate trap answers systematically across both the reading and writing sections.

I hold a Bachelor's degree in Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Economics from Johns Hopkins University and a Master's degree in Biostatistics from Boston University. My academic background has given me a strong foundation in both quantitative reasoning and analytical thinking, which I bring into every tutoring session. I'm passionate about helping students build confidence in their abilities and enjoy guiding them through challenging material by breaking down complex concepts into clear, understandable steps. With over five years of tutoring and teaching experience, I've worked with students across a wide range of subjects, including middle school math, Algebra I & II, Geometry, Precalculus, AP Calculus AB/BC, AP Statistics, and college-level courses like Calculus IIII, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, and Statistics. I also specialize in standardized test preparation, offering targeted support for the SAT, ACT, and GRE math sections. Beyond math, I tutor economics at both introductory and advanced levels, including Introductory Microeconomics and Macroeconomics, Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory, Monetary Analysis, and similar courses. I enjoy helping students connect theoretical models with real-world applications and develop a strong understanding of core economic principles. My tutoring style is patient, supportive, and highly personalized. I focus on fostering deep understanding and critical thinking, tailoring my approach to fit each student's individual learning style and academic goals. Outside of tutoring, I enjoy reading, staying active, and exploring emerging technologies.

Studying both psychology and linguistics at the University of Chicago gave Sherry an unusual double lens for the SAT — the linguistics side sharpens her teaching of grammar rules, sentence structure, and rhetoric on the Writing & Language section, while the psychology side informs how she coaches students through test-day pacing and anxiety management. She scored a perfect 1600 and uses that familiarity with every section to pinpoint exactly where a student's points are slipping, whether it's evidence-based reading pairs or no-calculator algebra. Rated 5.0 by students.

A 1400 SAT and a communication background give Logan a dual advantage: he knows the test's structure cold and can clearly articulate the reasoning behind every answer choice. His approach to the Reading and Writing sections leans heavily on argument analysis — identifying claims, evaluating evidence, and spotting the rhetorical moves that the College Board loves to test. Rated 5.0 by students, he also brings strong math fundamentals from his 36 ACT composite to shore up the quantitative side.

Dennis's finance and statistics coursework at NYU means the SAT Math section plays to his strengths — he teaches students to spot the underlying algebra and data-analysis patterns that repeat across every practice test, turning unfamiliar-looking problems into familiar setups. His 1550 SAT score backs up a prep approach built on efficiency: knowing which questions to attack first, where to double-check, and how to manage the clock so careless errors don't eat into a strong performance.

Nina's biostatistics training at Columbia and Northwestern means the SAT Math section — especially data analysis, scatterplot interpretation, and multi-step algebra — plays directly to her strengths. She scored a 1550 and knows how to teach the quantitative reasoning patterns that separate a good math score from a great one, while her experience with college essays and literature gives her practical tools for the Reading and Writing sections too.

What makes John effective for SAT prep is that he teaches both halves of the exam with equal fluency — his English and drama training sharpens his approach to passage analysis and evidence-based reading, while his math and physics background means he handles the algebra, data interpretation, and problem-solving sections without switching gears. He scored a 1420 on the SAT himself and holds a perfect 36 ACT composite, so he knows how standardized tests are constructed and where they try to trip students up. Rated 4.9 by students, he builds pacing and elimination strategies tailored to each section's specific traps.

What sets Michael apart for SAT prep is genuine fluency across both halves of the exam — his Fine Arts and Global Studies background built the close-reading and analytical writing skills that drive the verbal sections, while a 1590 SAT score confirms he's equally sharp on the math side. He teaches students to spot the recurring grammar traps in Writing & Language and to translate word problems into clean algebraic setups, connecting both skills into a unified test-day strategy.

Law school at the University of Chicago sharpened exactly the skills the SAT rewards — picking apart dense passages under time pressure, spotting logical gaps, and choosing precise language over vague alternatives. Elena pairs that training with a perfect 1600 SAT score and a tutoring approach built around listening to students reason through problems so she can pinpoint the specific assumptions or misreadings costing them points. Her government, Spanish, and legal background gives her unusually natural command of both the verbal and quantitative sides of the exam.

Scoring a 1550 on the SAT while juggling a dual PhD/MD track at Northwestern says something about efficiency under pressure — Chelain knows how to maximize points per minute on both the math and evidence-based reading sections. She breaks down SAT questions by what they're actually testing (inference vs. command of evidence, heart-of-algebra vs. passport-to-advanced-math) so students stop second-guessing and start recognizing patterns. Rated 5.0 by students.

A 1560 SAT scorer with a Master's in Education from Harvard, Mimi brings a structured yet creative approach to test prep — particularly the evidence-based reading passages, where her art history and literary analysis background makes dissecting complex texts second nature. She teaches students to identify argument structure and eliminate trap answers systematically across both the reading and writing sections.