I'm a Chemical Engineering major at the University of Texas at Austin with a strong passion for teaching. I enjoy helping students in biology, algebra, and chemistry, focusing on building meaningful relationships that make learning engaging and approachable. Teaching not only strengthens my own understanding but also allows me to see the impact of confidence and curiosity in others. Outside of academics, I love staying active through hiking and playing sports like basketball. I also enjoy exploring new food spots, which gives me a chance to connect with different cultures and experiences.

Most SAT prep treats the Math and verbal sections as completely separate challenges, but Alison's double major in Mathematics and Business means she naturally connects quantitative reasoning with the kind of analytical reading that drives the Evidence-Based Reading and Writing sections. She scored a 1530 on the SAT and built her own prep strategy around recognizing how the test reuses structural patterns — from algebra word-problem setups to grammar questions that hinge on the same handful of rules. Her French concentration also sharpened the close-reading instincts that make a real difference on passage-based questions.

Scoring a 1460 on the SAT gave Anshu a clear map of what each section actually rewards — from evidence-based reading questions that hinge on one or two key words to the no-calculator math problems that test number properties more than computation. He breaks the test into repeatable patterns, teaching students to recognize question types quickly and avoid the traps the College Board builds into wrong answer choices. Rated 5.0 by students.

Having scored a 1410 on the SAT while simultaneously completing an associate degree through the Texas Academy of Math and Science, Jaishri knows how to perform under pressure and manage high-stakes testing alongside rigorous coursework. She breaks the exam into manageable pieces — targeting evidence-based reading strategies, grammar rule patterns, and no-calculator math techniques — so students build confidence section by section.

What makes John effective for SAT prep is that he teaches both halves of the exam with equal fluency — his English and drama training sharpens his approach to passage analysis and evidence-based reading, while his math and physics background means he handles the algebra, data interpretation, and problem-solving sections without switching gears. He scored a 1420 on the SAT himself and holds a perfect 36 ACT composite, so he knows how standardized tests are constructed and where they try to trip students up. Rated 4.9 by students, he builds pacing and elimination strategies tailored to each section's specific traps.

Second-year medical school at Baylor means Michelle lives in the world of high-stakes, timed exams — and she applies that same strategic discipline to SAT prep, where she scored a 1570. Her biochemistry training at Rice sharpens the data-interpretation and graph-reading questions on the Math section, while her science-heavy reading background translates into efficient passage analysis on the Evidence-Based Reading side.

Comparative literature trains you to read closely and argue precisely — two skills that map directly onto the SAT's evidence-based reading and writing sections, where Chloe (1540 SAT, rated 5.0) is especially strong. Her linguistics minor adds a structural understanding of grammar that turns the Writing and Language questions into pattern-matching rather than guesswork. She also covers the math side, drawing on the quantitative reasoning she sharpened during her policy studies at UT Austin.

Stanford med student with a perfect 1600 SAT, Maggie knows the test inside out — but what sets her apart is a dual background in economics and molecular biology that gives her genuine fluency on both sides of the exam, from data-heavy math questions to dense science passages in the Reading section. She pinpoints where each student is leaking points and builds targeted drills around those specific question types rather than grinding through full-length practice tests. Rated 5.0 by students.

Most SAT points are lost not on hard questions but on avoidable mistakes — misread word problems in math, rushing through evidence-based reading pairs, or second-guessing grammar corrections that were right the first time. Daniel scored a 1570 and built his approach around identifying those leak points, using the systematic thinking from his mechanical engineering training to turn each section into a repeatable process. His strength across both math and verbal means students get a single, consistent strategy for the full exam.

Cornell's Human Biology program forced Jonathan to master the same skill the SAT rewards most — pulling precise conclusions from dense, data-heavy passages under time pressure. He scored a 1550 and now teaches students to apply that same analytical discipline across both sections, from untangling no-calculator algebra to spotting the rhetorical shifts that drive evidence-based reading questions. Rated 4.9 by students.

Public health coursework at UT Austin means Eisha spends her days interpreting research data and dissecting dense scientific passages — exactly the skills that show up across SAT Reading evidence questions and Math data analysis problems. She scored a 1550 on the SAT herself and uses that experience to teach students specific timing strategies and answer-elimination techniques section by section. Rated 5.0 by students.

Pure math PhD students don't usually tutor the SAT, but Jacob's graduate-level training means the entire math section feels almost trivially structured to him — he can show students exactly why each algebra, data analysis, or passport-to-advanced-math question works the way it does. His 1550 SAT score and 5.0 tutoring rating back that up, and his writing and literature background lets him coach the Reading and Writing sections with the same rigor he brings to the quantitative side.