Award-Winning Science Tutors
serving Queens, NY

Few science tutors can move fluidly between physics, chemistry, and biology the way Jacob can — his astrophysics training covered mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism, while his coursework touched on chemical processes and biological systems at the introductory level. He approaches each topic by connecting abstract formulas to tangible phenomena, making concepts like conservation of energy or wave behavior click rather than just sit on a page.

An anthropology degree might seem distant from science, but Columbia's core curriculum put Alexander through rigorous coursework in scientific reasoning — interpreting data, evaluating experimental design, and connecting evidence to conclusions. He's especially effective at teaching students how to read graphs, parse scientific texts, and think critically about cause and effect.

Most of what trips students up in science isn't the content — it's the reading. Decoding a dense passage about photosynthesis or pulling key details from a diagram requires the same close-reading skills Molly teaches as an English professor at Fordham, and her MFA training in precise, purposeful language carries over when students need to write clear lab reports or explain experimental results in their own words.

Mimi's Masters in Education from Harvard focused on inquiry-based and object-based learning — an approach that turns science into something students can observe, question, and test rather than just read about in a textbook. Her integrated arts background means she often teaches concepts like ecosystems or states of matter through hands-on exploration and visual models, which tends to stick with students who struggle to learn from lectures alone. She's especially strong with younger and middle school learners building their first real science habits.

A neurobiology-focused biology degree from Northwestern means Nina didn't just take introductory science — she studied cellular mechanisms, genetics, and brain physiology in depth. She connects textbook concepts like mitosis or enzyme kinetics to real research contexts, which tends to make the material click faster than rote memorization. Rated 5.0 by students.

Reid treats science as a way of thinking rather than a collection of facts to memorize. He walks students through how to read data tables, design controlled experiments, and connect observations to underlying principles — the same analytical habits that show up across biology, chemistry, and earth science courses.

Running a tutoring program at a charter middle school meant Liz wasn't just teaching science content — she was figuring out how to make vocabulary-heavy units on cells, ecosystems, and states of matter land for students with dyslexia, ADHD, and other learning differences. Her special education master's gave her a toolkit of concrete strategies for breaking down dense nonfiction text and multi-step processes, which is where most science students actually get stuck. She holds a 4.7 rating across her subjects.

Sociology research at Harvard meant Solange spent years designing surveys, analyzing datasets, and defending conclusions in front of professors who demanded airtight reasoning — all of which is applied scientific method, even if the subject matter was social rather than physical. She's especially effective at teaching students to distinguish correlation from causation and to read charts and graphs with a critical eye, since those skills were daily requirements in her coursework. Her 34 ACT confirms she can handle the quantitative side of science just as comfortably as the conceptual.

A PhD in Computational Mathematics from the University of Chicago means Justin doesn't just know science — he understands the quantitative reasoning that ties physics, chemistry, and earth science together. He breaks down concepts like energy conservation, wave behavior, and data analysis by connecting them to real-world phenomena, from climate modeling to how lenses form images. Rated 5.0 by students.

A chemistry major headed to Columbia Medical School, James treats science tutoring as an exercise in building intuition — understanding why a reaction proceeds a certain way or how energy flows through a biological system, not just memorizing diagrams. He's especially sharp at bridging the gap between introductory courses and the more rigorous thinking that AP or IB-level science demands.

Applied math and computer science at Johns Hopkins means Sabira spends her days quantifying patterns and testing models — the same core loop students encounter in science when they're asked to measure, predict, and explain. She's particularly strong on the computational side of science: reading data tables, graphing relationships, and working through the math embedded in physics or chemistry problems. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Daniel's sociology degree means he spent years learning to design surveys, analyze demographic data, and apply the scientific method to real human behavior — skills that translate naturally when teaching students how to form hypotheses, control variables, and interpret results in a general science context. He's especially comfortable helping students who freeze up at graphs and data tables, since reading quantitative evidence was a daily requirement in his coursework. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Chemistry is Sung's home discipline, which means he teaches science the way a working scientist thinks about it: grounding every concept in evidence, units, and careful reasoning. Whether a student is balancing equations, interpreting lab data, or connecting molecular structure to physical properties, Sung ties abstract ideas back to observable, concrete examples.

Speech-language pathology graduate training at Columbia is surprisingly science-heavy — anatomy, neuroscience, research design — and Sherry brings that clinical lens to teaching students how biological systems work and how experiments should be structured. Her UChicago psychology and linguistics background also means she's comfortable with everything from statistical reasoning to breaking apart dense scientific terminology using morphological roots. Rated 5.0 by students.

A Yale education heavy on critical reading and analytical writing gave Maya the tools to tackle science from the comprehension side — parsing dense passages, extracting key claims from lab descriptions, and explaining results in clear, organized language. She's particularly useful for students who understand the concepts but freeze when asked to write up an experiment or interpret what a data table is actually saying. Holds a 5.0 rating.

A statistics and machine learning certificate at Princeton means Julie spends her coursework building models, testing hypotheses against real data, and evaluating whether results are statistically meaningful — all of which is applied scientific reasoning. She brings that quantitative rigor to science tutoring, especially when students need to move from memorizing definitions to actually interpreting experiments, reading graphs, and explaining what their data means. Her 4.9 rating suggests the approach lands.

Jennifer's ELA training at NYU's accelerated MAT program might seem distant from science, but teaching students to read dense nonfiction closely — pulling claims from evidence, evaluating an author's reasoning, spotting unsupported conclusions — is exactly what science coursework demands when students face lab reports, textbook passages, and data-heavy questions. She's especially useful for students who understand the concepts but struggle to articulate their thinking in written explanations or short-answer responses.

Journalism is fundamentally about investigation — gathering evidence, verifying claims, and explaining complex topics to a general audience — and Meghan applies that same discipline when walking students through scientific concepts like experimental design and data interpretation. Her Northwestern training emphasized rigorous sourcing and logical structure, which translates naturally to teaching students how to read a graph, evaluate a hypothesis, or write up lab results that actually say something clear. Rated 5.0 by students.

Three separate science degrees mean Zosia doesn't just know chemistry or biology in isolation — she understands how energy transfer in physics explains chemical bonding, which in turn drives cellular processes. That cross-disciplinary perspective is exactly what makes her effective at teaching foundational science concepts like the scientific method, experimental design, and data interpretation. She builds each session around the specific science course and topics a student is wrestling with.

Electrical engineering at Stanford required Jai to live inside physics and applied science — circuit analysis, electromagnetic theory, thermodynamics, and the math that ties them together. He approaches science tutoring by anchoring each concept to a physical intuition or real-world example before introducing the equations. Students studying for AP Physics, chemistry, or general science courses get someone who genuinely thinks in scientific terms daily.

Scoring in the 99th percentile on the MCAT required Josef to master science across disciplines — biology, chemistry, physics, and biochemistry — and he brings that integrated perspective to every session. Rather than treating each science topic as isolated, he connects ideas like energy transfer in physics to metabolic pathways in biology, showing students how the same principles reappear across fields.

Having earned a 1560 SAT — which requires sharp data interpretation and evidence-based reasoning across both sections — Sash can walk students through the analytical side of science that often trips them up: reading graphs, evaluating experimental setups, and explaining results in precise language. Her comparative literature training at Princeton also means she's unusually good at helping students decode dense scientific texts and write clear, well-structured lab reports.

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Princeton means Matthew lives in physics, thermodynamics, and applied chemistry daily — subjects that map directly onto high school science curricula. He breaks down concepts like force diagrams, energy conservation, and kinematics using step-by-step problem solving, then builds complexity so students internalize the reasoning rather than just the formulas.

Biology, chemistry, physics, and physiology all live under one roof in Garrett's teaching repertoire, which means he can trace a concept like energy transfer from a physics equation through a chemical reaction and into a biological system. That cross-disciplinary perspective is exactly what students need when science courses start connecting dots between fields. His biology degree anchors the content knowledge, while his broad coursework keeps explanations flexible.

A year as a course assistant in Harvard's math department gave Richard practice breaking down quantitative concepts for undergrads — the same skill that makes him effective at teaching the measurement, graphing, and data-analysis components of science coursework. His 36 ACT composite, which includes a perfect Science section score, confirms he can handle the evidence-based reasoning and experimental interpretation the subject demands.

Vivian's history degree trains exactly the kind of evidence evaluation that science coursework demands — weighing sources, identifying cause and effect, and building arguments from data rather than gut feeling. She applies that analytical framework to teaching students how to interpret experimental results, trace variables through a procedure, and explain their reasoning clearly in lab write-ups. Her 4.9 rating suggests the approach lands.

Biology is Judah's home turf — he's pursuing it as his major at WashU with plans for medical school — but his science tutoring extends to the foundational chemistry and physics concepts that overlap with introductory bio courses. He unpacks processes like cellular respiration or Mendelian genetics by connecting each step to a concrete, visual model rather than leaving students to memorize disconnected facts.

Rachel's history training — sifting through conflicting sources, weighing evidence, and building arguments from incomplete information — mirrors the critical thinking science coursework actually tests, especially when students need to evaluate hypotheses or explain what an experiment's results do and don't prove. Her 34 ACT confirms she can handle the data-interpretation and quantitative reasoning that show up across science topics. She's a strong fit for students who need someone to walk them through reading charts, understanding variables, and writing clear explanations of their observations.

A Stanford Human Biology degree with a bioinformatics concentration means Matthew has lived in the overlap of biology, chemistry, and data science. He unpacks scientific concepts top-down — starting with the big question a topic answers before diving into mechanisms and details. That approach is particularly effective for students who struggle when science courses feel like disconnected facts.

Noah's philosophy training built the exact logical scaffolding science demands — constructing arguments from premises, identifying flaws in reasoning, and distinguishing what evidence actually proves from what it merely suggests. He applies that same rigor to teaching students how to evaluate hypotheses, trace cause-and-effect in experimental setups, and articulate conclusions that go beyond restating observations. His 1540 SAT confirms he handles data interpretation and evidence-based reasoning at a high level.

Finance majors spend more time on data than most people realize — regression analysis, forecasting models, interpreting charts — and Vansh brings that same quantitative lens to science topics like measurement, graphing relationships, and drawing conclusions from experimental data. He's especially good at walking students through the logic of hypothesis testing, since his coursework treated every business decision as a claim that needed evidence behind it. Rated 4.8 by students.

Julia's academic research experience gives her a feel for how science actually operates: forming hypotheses, interpreting data, and revising conclusions when the evidence shifts. She applies that same iterative thinking when walking younger students through topics like forces, ecosystems, or the scientific method, making sure they understand the reasoning behind each answer.

Tony's biology degree from Yale and his preparation for medical school mean he's spent years immersed in the life sciences, from molecular genetics to physiology to organic chemistry. He breaks down scientific concepts by grounding them in biological systems he knows deeply — explaining gas exchange through lung anatomy, or enzyme behavior through metabolic pathways — giving students a concrete handle on material that can otherwise feel abstract.

Michelle's 35 ACT — which includes a dedicated Science section built around data interpretation, experimental design, and conflicting-viewpoints passages — means she's practiced exactly the kind of rapid graph reading and hypothesis evaluation that general science courses test. She teaches students to pull conclusions from tables and figures quickly, a skill that sharpens both their test performance and their ability to reason through lab work in class. Rated 4.9 by students.

Three philosophy degrees trained Moon to do exactly what science demands at its core: construct logical arguments, evaluate evidence, and identify when a conclusion doesn't actually follow from the data. That rigorous analytical habit makes her especially effective at walking students through hypothesis testing, experimental design, and interpreting results — the reasoning skills that separate students who understand science from those just memorizing facts. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Evan's 1510 SAT required him to tear apart data presentations, evaluate experimental designs, and draw conclusions from unfamiliar graphs — the same core skills that science coursework tests at every level. His English minor at Northwestern also means he can coach students through the reading-heavy side of science, from parsing dense textbook passages to writing up lab results that actually communicate what happened and why.

Noah earned a 34 ACT, which included the Science section's rapid-fire data interpretation — reading conflicting viewpoints, extracting trends from dense graphs, and evaluating experimental designs under time pressure. His Penn education in political science also trained him to weigh competing evidence and build structured arguments, a habit he carries into teaching students how to reason through scientific claims rather than just recall definitions.

Having earned a 1540 SAT — a test that leans heavily on interpreting graphs, evaluating experimental claims, and reasoning through data — Ayako brings sharper analytical skills to science than her English major might suggest. She's particularly good at helping students who can do the thinking but struggle to articulate it, since translating observations into clear written explanations is exactly where her literary training and scientific reasoning overlap. Rated 5.0 by students.

A Harvard-trained neurobiologist who now works as a scientist at a healthcare startup, Emma teaches science the way she practices it — by asking questions, designing logical approaches, and interpreting data critically. Whether a student is wrestling with cell biology, chemistry fundamentals, or experimental design, she draws on daily lab experience to make abstract concepts tangible.

A Stanford science degree and ongoing medical training give Mica unusual depth across biology, chemistry, and human physiology. She unpacks scientific concepts by tying them to tangible examples — explaining cellular respiration through what happens during exercise, or teaching the periodic table through how elements behave in actual reactions rather than in isolation.