Award-Winning Science Tutors
serving Buffalo, NY

A Human Biology major on the premed track at Cornell, Sharan teaches science by connecting abstract concepts — cell respiration, chemical bonding, energy transfer — to real systems students can visualize. He scored a 36 ACT, including the Science section, which sharpened his ability to break down data-heavy passages and experimental design questions.

Earning a pharmacy doctorate means Sophia has been steeped in biology, chemistry, and human physiology for years — not just studying them, but applying them clinically. She unpacks scientific concepts by tying them to how the body actually works, whether that's cellular respiration, enzyme kinetics, or the basics of the scientific method.

Through his math and computer science coursework at the University at Buffalo — including physics and statistics — Daniel built the quantitative backbone that underlies most middle and high school science. He's especially effective at unpacking the math inside science problems, like unit conversions, interpreting graphs, or setting up equations from word-heavy lab scenarios.

A PhD in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering means Sabry doesn't just teach science concepts — he's spent years applying them in research, from thermodynamics and fluid mechanics to reaction kinetics. He breaks down topics like energy transfer, atomic structure, and the scientific method by connecting them to real engineering problems that make abstract ideas concrete.

Neuroscience sits at the intersection of biology, chemistry, and physics, which means Deana spent her undergraduate years connecting concepts across all three disciplines. She teaches science by linking ideas together — showing how cellular processes relate to chemical reactions and energy transfer — so students build understanding they can actually apply on exams and lab work. Rated 4.9 by students.

A Ph.D. in chemistry and years teaching college-level courses mean Sourav can move fluidly across scientific disciplines — from atomic structure and chemical bonding to kinematics and energy conservation. He unpacks scientific reasoning step by step, emphasizing how to set up problems and interpret results rather than just chasing the right answer. Rated 5.0 by students.

A chemistry graduate from SUNY Geneseo with tutoring experience at the college level, James covers science from middle school physical science through AP-level chemistry and introductory physics. He excels at connecting abstract concepts — electron behavior, energy conservation, stoichiometry — to tangible examples that make them stick. Students rated him 5.0, which tracks with his ability to make dense scientific material feel approachable without dumbing it down.

Pursuing a biology degree while also tutoring chemistry and biochemistry, Michaela sees science as one interconnected story rather than isolated subjects. She unpacks concepts like the scientific method, experimental design, and data interpretation by tying them to real examples — making abstract ideas tangible whether a student is studying cells, chemical reactions, or ecosystems.

An accounting degree builds a surprisingly useful habit for science: tracking inputs and outputs with precision, whether that means balancing chemical equations or tracing energy through a system. Ryan applies that same meticulous attention to detail when walking students through measurement, unit conversions, and data tables — the unglamorous mechanics that quietly determine whether a student actually understands what an experiment showed.

A dual degree in Biochemistry and Neuroscience from Syracuse means Alex can move fluidly between disciplines — explaining how cellular respiration connects to physics concepts like energy transfer, or why the scientific method matters beyond a lab report. Now in medical school at Buffalo, he tackles everything from life sciences to chemistry with the kind of cross-subject fluency that makes complex material click. Rated 5.0 by students.

Tess's background in environmental peacemaking included hands-on sustainability education — she spent time on an organic farm in Hawaii leading student tours and teaching ecological concepts in a way that made science tangible. For younger learners especially, she connects topics like the water cycle, ecosystems, and plant biology to real-world observations that stick.

Reading-heavy science assignments — decoding a textbook passage about plate tectonics, pulling key details from a diagram caption, or writing up an observation in clear sentences — play to Caroline's strengths as an English literature graduate who's spent years teaching reading, phonics, and writing across grade levels. She treats science vocabulary the way she'd treat unfamiliar literary terms: breaking words apart, building context, and making sure students can use them in their own explanations rather than just circling them on a worksheet. Rated 4.9 by students.

A biochemistry degree means Ashutosh has spent serious time in labs — balancing equations, analyzing reaction data, and connecting molecular-level concepts to observable results. He teaches science the way he learned it: by grounding every topic, from cell biology to chemical properties, in the underlying mechanisms rather than surface-level definitions. Rated 5.0 by students.

Mimi's Masters in Education from Harvard focused on inquiry-based and object-based learning — an approach that turns science into something students can observe, question, and test rather than just read about in a textbook. Her integrated arts background means she often teaches concepts like ecosystems or states of matter through hands-on exploration and visual models, which tends to stick with students who struggle to learn from lectures alone. She's especially strong with younger and middle school learners building their first real science habits.

A neurobiology-focused biology degree from Northwestern means Nina didn't just take introductory science — she studied cellular mechanisms, genetics, and brain physiology in depth. She connects textbook concepts like mitosis or enzyme kinetics to real research contexts, which tends to make the material click faster than rote memorization. Rated 5.0 by students.

Reid treats science as a way of thinking rather than a collection of facts to memorize. He walks students through how to read data tables, design controlled experiments, and connect observations to underlying principles — the same analytical habits that show up across biology, chemistry, and earth science courses.

Running a tutoring program at a charter middle school meant Liz wasn't just teaching science content — she was figuring out how to make vocabulary-heavy units on cells, ecosystems, and states of matter land for students with dyslexia, ADHD, and other learning differences. Her special education master's gave her a toolkit of concrete strategies for breaking down dense nonfiction text and multi-step processes, which is where most science students actually get stuck. She holds a 4.7 rating across her subjects.

Sociology research at Harvard meant Solange spent years designing surveys, analyzing datasets, and defending conclusions in front of professors who demanded airtight reasoning — all of which is applied scientific method, even if the subject matter was social rather than physical. She's especially effective at teaching students to distinguish correlation from causation and to read charts and graphs with a critical eye, since those skills were daily requirements in her coursework. Her 34 ACT confirms she can handle the quantitative side of science just as comfortably as the conceptual.

A PhD in Computational Mathematics from the University of Chicago means Justin doesn't just know science — he understands the quantitative reasoning that ties physics, chemistry, and earth science together. He breaks down concepts like energy conservation, wave behavior, and data analysis by connecting them to real-world phenomena, from climate modeling to how lenses form images. Rated 5.0 by students.

Daniel's sociology degree means he spent years learning to design surveys, analyze demographic data, and apply the scientific method to real human behavior — skills that translate naturally when teaching students how to form hypotheses, control variables, and interpret results in a general science context. He's especially comfortable helping students who freeze up at graphs and data tables, since reading quantitative evidence was a daily requirement in his coursework. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Applied math and computer science at Johns Hopkins means Sabira spends her days quantifying patterns and testing models — the same core loop students encounter in science when they're asked to measure, predict, and explain. She's particularly strong on the computational side of science: reading data tables, graphing relationships, and working through the math embedded in physics or chemistry problems. Holds a 5.0 rating.

A chemistry major headed to Columbia Medical School, James treats science tutoring as an exercise in building intuition — understanding why a reaction proceeds a certain way or how energy flows through a biological system, not just memorizing diagrams. He's especially sharp at bridging the gap between introductory courses and the more rigorous thinking that AP or IB-level science demands.

Speech-language pathology graduate training at Columbia is surprisingly science-heavy — anatomy, neuroscience, research design — and Sherry brings that clinical lens to teaching students how biological systems work and how experiments should be structured. Her UChicago psychology and linguistics background also means she's comfortable with everything from statistical reasoning to breaking apart dense scientific terminology using morphological roots. Rated 5.0 by students.

Chemistry is Sung's home discipline, which means he teaches science the way a working scientist thinks about it: grounding every concept in evidence, units, and careful reasoning. Whether a student is balancing equations, interpreting lab data, or connecting molecular structure to physical properties, Sung ties abstract ideas back to observable, concrete examples.

Three separate science degrees mean Zosia doesn't just know chemistry or biology in isolation — she understands how energy transfer in physics explains chemical bonding, which in turn drives cellular processes. That cross-disciplinary perspective is exactly what makes her effective at teaching foundational science concepts like the scientific method, experimental design, and data interpretation. She builds each session around the specific science course and topics a student is wrestling with.

Scoring in the 99th percentile on the MCAT required Josef to master science across disciplines — biology, chemistry, physics, and biochemistry — and he brings that integrated perspective to every session. Rather than treating each science topic as isolated, he connects ideas like energy transfer in physics to metabolic pathways in biology, showing students how the same principles reappear across fields.

Electrical engineering at Stanford required Jai to live inside physics and applied science — circuit analysis, electromagnetic theory, thermodynamics, and the math that ties them together. He approaches science tutoring by anchoring each concept to a physical intuition or real-world example before introducing the equations. Students studying for AP Physics, chemistry, or general science courses get someone who genuinely thinks in scientific terms daily.

A statistics and machine learning certificate at Princeton means Julie spends her coursework building models, testing hypotheses against real data, and evaluating whether results are statistically meaningful — all of which is applied scientific reasoning. She brings that quantitative rigor to science tutoring, especially when students need to move from memorizing definitions to actually interpreting experiments, reading graphs, and explaining what their data means. Her 4.9 rating suggests the approach lands.

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Princeton means Matthew lives in physics, thermodynamics, and applied chemistry daily — subjects that map directly onto high school science curricula. He breaks down concepts like force diagrams, energy conservation, and kinematics using step-by-step problem solving, then builds complexity so students internalize the reasoning rather than just the formulas.

Having earned a 1560 SAT — which requires sharp data interpretation and evidence-based reasoning across both sections — Sash can walk students through the analytical side of science that often trips them up: reading graphs, evaluating experimental setups, and explaining results in precise language. Her comparative literature training at Princeton also means she's unusually good at helping students decode dense scientific texts and write clear, well-structured lab reports.

Jennifer's ELA training at NYU's accelerated MAT program might seem distant from science, but teaching students to read dense nonfiction closely — pulling claims from evidence, evaluating an author's reasoning, spotting unsupported conclusions — is exactly what science coursework demands when students face lab reports, textbook passages, and data-heavy questions. She's especially useful for students who understand the concepts but struggle to articulate their thinking in written explanations or short-answer responses.

A Yale education heavy on critical reading and analytical writing gave Maya the tools to tackle science from the comprehension side — parsing dense passages, extracting key claims from lab descriptions, and explaining results in clear, organized language. She's particularly useful for students who understand the concepts but freeze when asked to write up an experiment or interpret what a data table is actually saying. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Journalism is fundamentally about investigation — gathering evidence, verifying claims, and explaining complex topics to a general audience — and Meghan applies that same discipline when walking students through scientific concepts like experimental design and data interpretation. Her Northwestern training emphasized rigorous sourcing and logical structure, which translates naturally to teaching students how to read a graph, evaluate a hypothesis, or write up lab results that actually say something clear. Rated 5.0 by students.

Biology, chemistry, physics, and physiology all live under one roof in Garrett's teaching repertoire, which means he can trace a concept like energy transfer from a physics equation through a chemical reaction and into a biological system. That cross-disciplinary perspective is exactly what students need when science courses start connecting dots between fields. His biology degree anchors the content knowledge, while his broad coursework keeps explanations flexible.

A year as a course assistant in Harvard's math department gave Richard practice breaking down quantitative concepts for undergrads — the same skill that makes him effective at teaching the measurement, graphing, and data-analysis components of science coursework. His 36 ACT composite, which includes a perfect Science section score, confirms he can handle the evidence-based reasoning and experimental interpretation the subject demands.

Vivian's history degree trains exactly the kind of evidence evaluation that science coursework demands — weighing sources, identifying cause and effect, and building arguments from data rather than gut feeling. She applies that analytical framework to teaching students how to interpret experimental results, trace variables through a procedure, and explain their reasoning clearly in lab write-ups. Her 4.9 rating suggests the approach lands.

Three philosophy degrees trained Moon to do exactly what science demands at its core: construct logical arguments, evaluate evidence, and identify when a conclusion doesn't actually follow from the data. That rigorous analytical habit makes her especially effective at walking students through hypothesis testing, experimental design, and interpreting results — the reasoning skills that separate students who understand science from those just memorizing facts. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Noah earned a 34 ACT, which included the Science section's rapid-fire data interpretation — reading conflicting viewpoints, extracting trends from dense graphs, and evaluating experimental designs under time pressure. His Penn education in political science also trained him to weigh competing evidence and build structured arguments, a habit he carries into teaching students how to reason through scientific claims rather than just recall definitions.

While science isn't MaryAnn's primary specialty, her analytical training in psychology and her strong reading skills make her well-suited for the parts of science coursework students often struggle with most: interpreting data tables, understanding experimental design, and writing lab reports. She brings a structured, methodical approach to breaking down scientific texts and vocabulary.

While science isn't her core subject area, Michelle's strength is in reading comprehension and analytical thinking — skills that matter enormously when students are interpreting lab data, understanding textbook passages, or answering science questions on standardized tests. Her study-skills toolkit and structured approach to breaking down unfamiliar material translate well to elementary and middle school science concepts.