Award-Winning Physical Chemistry Tutors
serving San Francisco, CA

Nicholas studied biology with enough chemistry and physics depth to encounter the thermodynamic and kinetic frameworks that p-chem builds on — enzyme energetics, gas laws, equilibrium — before they get buried under pages of calculus. His 33 ACT reflects strong quantitative reasoning, and he leans on that cross-disciplinary perspective to clarify why a concept like enthalpy or a phase transition behaves the way it does at the molecular level, not just how to push through the derivation.

A dual degree in physics and mathematics from Clark University means Sarah spent years inside the exact formalism p-chem demands — solving Schrödinger equations in quantum mechanics lectures, then turning around and applying differential equations to thermodynamic systems in her math courses. That overlap lets her teach topics like partition functions, Maxwell relations, and chemical kinetics by clarifying both the physical picture and the calculus simultaneously, rather than treating them as separate hurdles.

I am currently an adjunct professor of chemistry at a small liberal arts college in the Chicago area. Previously, I worked in the chemical industry for several years as a researcher, but I've found that the most satisfying moments have come when I am able to share my expertise with someone else. Similarly, I very much enjoyed the four semesters in the graduate school when I was a teaching assistant. It gave me the opportunity to work with students and help them develop an understanding for the subject. These are the primary reasons that I have decided to go into teaching.

Enric holds a PhD in Chemistry, which means p-chem wasn't just a course requirement — it was the foundation his entire research career was built on, from quantum mechanical modeling to thermodynamic analysis at the graduate level. He teaches the subject by slowing down at the exact calculus step where a derivation goes from followable to opaque, rebuilding the physical reasoning behind each manipulation before moving forward. Rated 5.0 by students.

Pre-med coursework at Rutgers — graduating summa cum laude with a 4.0 — put Sam through the gauntlet of thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum chemistry that p-chem demands, all while building the calculus fluency needed to survive dense derivations. He approaches topics like enthalpy, entropy, and rate laws by stripping each equation back to the physical scenario it models, making the leap from math to molecular meaning less painful.

Thermodynamic state functions, quantum mechanical models, and kinetic rate laws all converge in Physical Chemistry, and most students need someone who can bridge the math and the chemistry simultaneously. Abismael's chemical engineering training put him through the full gauntlet — partial differential equations applied to heat transfer, Gibbs free energy calculations for phase equilibria, statistical mechanics. He explains each derivation from multiple angles and tests understanding with problems designed to be harder than what shows up on the exam.

Differential equations, calculus, and organic chemistry all sit in Nate's regular teaching rotation, which means he's constantly moving between the math and the chemistry that p-chem smashes together — and he knows exactly where students lose the thread between the two. He zeroes in on building intuition around concepts like chemical potential and equilibrium thermodynamics by tying each derivation back to the reaction behavior students already recognize from general and organic chemistry. Rated 5.0 by students.

Thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and kinetics all collide in physical chemistry, and the math intensity alone can be overwhelming. As a chemistry major at TCU who's worked through p-chem coursework firsthand, Nathan breaks down derivations — partition functions, the Schrödinger equation, phase diagrams — into manageable logical steps. He connects the heavy math back to the physical meaning so equations stop feeling arbitrary.

Neuroscience at the undergraduate level means Amy has already tangled with the thermodynamics and kinetics that p-chem formalizes — Nernst equation derivations, membrane energetics, and the statistical behavior of ion channels all demand that same calculus-heavy reasoning. She uses those biological touchpoints to make abstract topics like entropy and equilibrium constants feel grounded in systems students can actually picture. Rated 5.0 by students.

Thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum mechanics all converge in physical chemistry — and that's exactly where Monika's biochemistry and molecular biology training intersects. She breaks down intimidating topics like Gibbs free energy calculations and reaction rate laws by tying them to real chemical systems she studied during her PhD research. Rated 4.8 by students.

Garrett's biology degree means he already thinks in terms of systems — enzyme kinetics, membrane potentials, metabolic energy flow — which gives him a concrete anchor for the abstract math that makes p-chem so intimidating. He teaches thermodynamic and kinetic concepts by connecting derivations to the biological and chemical phenomena they describe, so something like a Gibbs free energy calculation feels like a tool rather than an exercise in symbol-pushing.

Biochemistry lab work and a dual bachelor's in arts and biochemistry mean Andrew has already applied the thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum mechanical concepts that make p-chem brutal — calculating free energy changes in enzyme systems, modeling reaction rates at the molecular level. He unpacks the heavy calculus in derivations by keeping one foot in the real chemistry, so a partition function or a phase diagram reads as a description of molecular behavior rather than an exercise in pure math. Rated 4.9 by students.

Between biochemistry, organic chemistry, and physical chemistry, Samantha sits at the intersection where biology meets the math-heavy formalism of thermodynamics and kinetics — she understands both the molecular systems and the derivations that describe them. She breaks apart intimidating topics like Gibbs free energy or chemical equilibria by tying each variable back to the biological and chemical processes students already recognize from earlier coursework. Rated 5.0 by students.