Award-Winning Physical Chemistry Tutors
serving Nashville, TN

Two biomedical engineering degrees mean Allyson has been doing the calculus-heavy thermodynamics and kinetics work that p-chem formalizes — modeling energy transfer in biological systems, working through rate equations for physiological processes — since undergrad. She zeroes in on the specific mathematical step where a derivation goes from followable to opaque, whether that's a tricky partial derivative in a Maxwell relation or the statistical reasoning inside a Boltzmann distribution. Rated 4.9 by students.

I am most passionate about biology and chemistry. I am a firm proponent of education, believing it to be absolutely necessary for an improved quality of life, and I try to impart this appreciation to all of my students.

Studying biochemistry and cell biology at Rice means Sugi already had to internalize the thermodynamic and kinetic principles that drive cellular processes — free energy calculations for metabolic reactions, equilibrium constants governing binding events — before tackling them in their pure mathematical form. She unpacks p-chem derivations by linking each variable back to the molecular behavior it quantifies, turning something like a chemical potential expression into a description of what molecules are actually doing at a phase boundary. Rated 5.0 by students.

Pre-med coursework at Rutgers — graduating summa cum laude with a 4.0 — put Sam through the gauntlet of thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum chemistry that p-chem demands, all while building the calculus fluency needed to survive dense derivations. He approaches topics like enthalpy, entropy, and rate laws by stripping each equation back to the physical scenario it models, making the leap from math to molecular meaning less painful.

Katherine's broad math and science background — spanning calculus, thermodynamics, and physics — means she's comfortable with the multivariable calculus and differential equations that make p-chem derivations so dense. She takes apart concepts like Maxwell relations and chemical potential by slowing down at the exact algebraic step where the physical intuition tends to disappear. Rated 5.0 by students.

Cornell's biological sciences curriculum put Alec through rigorous quantitative coursework, but it was his TA experience in general chemistry — running problem-solving sessions where students had to wrestle with energy, equilibrium, and rate laws — that sharpened his instinct for where p-chem concepts start to blur. He teaches the subject by slowing down at the exact calculus step where the physical meaning tends to disappear, whether that's setting up a thermodynamic cycle or interpreting what a rate constant actually tells you about molecular collisions. Rated 4.8 by students.

I am currently an adjunct professor of chemistry at a small liberal arts college in the Chicago area. Previously, I worked in the chemical industry for several years as a researcher, but I've found that the most satisfying moments have come when I am able to share my expertise with someone else. Similarly, I very much enjoyed the four semesters in the graduate school when I was a teaching assistant. It gave me the opportunity to work with students and help them develop an understanding for the subject. These are the primary reasons that I have decided to go into teaching.

This is Jacob's home turf. He earned his Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from UC Berkeley and now conducts research at Northwestern, so topics like quantum mechanics, statistical thermodynamics, and spectroscopy are part of his everyday work. He walks students through the math-heavy derivations that make p-chem notoriously difficult, connecting each equation back to the physical picture it describes.

Biochemistry lab work and a dual bachelor's in arts and biochemistry mean Andrew has already applied the thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum mechanical concepts that make p-chem brutal — calculating free energy changes in enzyme systems, modeling reaction rates at the molecular level. He unpacks the heavy calculus in derivations by keeping one foot in the real chemistry, so a partition function or a phase diagram reads as a description of molecular behavior rather than an exercise in pure math. Rated 4.9 by students.

Pursuing a dual Ph.D./Pharm.D. at UConn with graduate work in medicinal chemistry means Xhesika encounters the thermodynamic and kinetic formalism of p-chem as daily working tools — calculating drug stability, modeling reaction pathways, predicting how molecular interactions shift with temperature and pressure. She teaches derivations like Maxwell relations and Clausius-Clapeyron by tying each variable back to the pharmacological systems where she actually uses them, so the math carries chemical weight instead of feeling like abstract symbol-pushing.

A PhD in chemical engineering means Alexander spent years deriving and applying the exact thermodynamic frameworks — equations of state, phase equilibria, transport phenomena — that p-chem students encounter stripped of their engineering context. His biosystems engineering background adds a second layer, connecting statistical mechanics and kinetics to real molecular systems rather than leaving them as abstract formalisms. Rated 4.9 by students.

Medical school at Tufts demands fluency in the thermodynamics and kinetics that p-chem students dread — Eric works through Gibbs free energy calculations, entropy-driven processes, and rate equations daily in a clinical science context, which keeps the material grounded rather than purely abstract. His economics background also sharpens the kind of quantitative modeling and equilibrium thinking that translates surprisingly well to topics like chemical potential and phase diagrams.

Biomedical engineering at BU and Tufts meant Anthony lived in the math that makes p-chem intimidating — differential equations, thermodynamic modeling, and the kinetics of biological systems — long before applying it to physical chemistry specifically. His research background studying neurodegenerative disease therapies keeps him fluent in the quantitative reasoning behind concepts like Gibbs free energy, phase equilibria, and reaction rate theory. Rated 4.9 by students, he connects each derivation to the physical system it describes so the notation carries real meaning.