Award-Winning Physics Tutors
serving Aurora, CO

Engineering students live in physics — Colton spent four years at UVA applying Newton's laws, conservation of energy, and circuit analysis to real biomedical problems. He explains kinematics and free-body diagrams by building each solution from a clear diagram forward, so students learn to set up problems correctly instead of hunting for the right equation to plug numbers into.

An astronomy major lives inside physics — from Newtonian mechanics governing planetary orbits to electromagnetism explaining how stars radiate energy. Rohith uses that deep, applied understanding to unpack force diagrams, conservation laws, and wave behavior in ways that go well beyond formula sheets.

Understanding physics means learning to translate a word problem into a diagram, then into an equation — and that translation step is exactly where most students get stuck. Michelle breaks down that process explicitly, teaching students to identify forces, draw free-body diagrams, and choose the right kinematic or energy equation before touching a calculator. Her current graduate studies in physical therapy keep her fluent in biomechanics and applied physics concepts.

Studying mechanical engineering means Christian solves physics problems daily — force diagrams, energy conservation, rotational dynamics, thermodynamics — at a level well beyond introductory courses. He teaches students to start every problem by identifying what physical principle applies before touching a single equation, which eliminates the guesswork that trips most people up. That structured approach transfers across mechanics, electricity, and waves.

Free-body diagrams and energy bar charts are where Lena starts every mechanics problem — getting the physical picture right before any equation shows up on the page. Her sociology degree trained her to break complex systems into interacting parts, a habit that transfers surprisingly well to analyzing forces, momentum, and multi-object scenarios. Rated 5.0 by students.

Studying engineering physics at Colorado School of Mines, Jude lives in the world of force diagrams, energy conservation, and wave mechanics every day. He approaches physics tutoring like a lab partner — asking questions, sketching diagrams together, and walking through the reasoning behind each equation rather than just handing students a formula sheet. That interactive method turns intimidating multi-step problems into manageable chains of logic.

An engineering physics degree from the Colorado School of Mines means Cody didn't just study physics — he solved real engineering problems using Newtonian mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and quantum theory across four years of intensive coursework. He teaches the subject by connecting equations to physical intuition, so students understand why F=ma produces a specific trajectory rather than just plugging numbers into formulas. His SAT score of 1440 hints at the broad analytical skills he brings, but it's the depth of his physics training that sets his tutoring apart.

Kinematics, Newton's laws, energy conservation, wave behavior — Graham doesn't just teach these topics, he uses them every day in his astrophysics program at CU Boulder. That daily fluency means he can explain a concept multiple ways until one clicks, whether a student needs a mathematical derivation or a real-world analogy involving orbits and collisions. His 5.0 rating speaks to how well that flexibility works.

A physics degree doesn't just mean Evan studied the subject — it means he spent years wrestling with free-body diagrams, conservation laws, circuit analysis, and wave mechanics at a level well beyond the introductory course. He unpacks each problem by identifying which principles apply and why, so students learn to think like physicists rather than hunt for the right equation. Rated 5.0 by his students.

A mechanical engineering degree from WashU means Caroline didn't just study physics — she applied it daily, from fluid dynamics to stress analysis. She teaches students to set up free-body diagrams and energy conservation problems by connecting the math to physical intuition, making kinematics and Newton's laws click rather than feel like formula hunts.

Benjamin's finance and economics training at Notre Dame runs on the same quantitative backbone that physics demands — modeling systems, isolating variables, and reasoning through multi-step problems where one misstep cascades. He brings a toolkit of computation shortcuts and pattern-recognition tricks to kinematics and energy problems that make the math faster and less error-prone. Holds a 5.0 rating from students.

Emily approaches physics problems the way her science training taught her: sketch the situation, identify the forces, then translate the diagram into math. That structured method is especially useful for kinematics and Newton's laws, where students often know the equations but struggle to set problems up correctly. Her background in neurobiology also means she's comfortable with the biophysics applications that make the subject feel more relevant.

A pre-med and computing double major at Notre Dame, Aidan has worked through the full gauntlet of calculus-based physics — mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics — alongside organic chemistry and upper-level math, so he knows how to move between the physical intuition and the algebra without losing either thread. His 35 ACT reflects that quantitative sharpness, and he's especially effective at teaching students to recognize when a problem is really about conservation laws versus when it's a force-balance scenario, so the right approach clicks before pencil hits paper.

Holding degrees in both mechanical and electrical engineering, Steve has solved the full spectrum of physics problems professionally — from statics and dynamics in mechanical systems to electromagnetism in circuit design. That dual perspective is especially useful when students hit the transition from mechanics to E&M, since he can show how the same problem-solving structure carries across both halves of a physics course. Rated 4.9 by students.

Cornell's chemical engineering program put Rahul through four years of mechanics, fluid dynamics, and thermodynamics problems that demand real physical intuition — not just plugging into formulas. He pushes students to understand why a conservation law applies before setting up the math, building the kind of conceptual reasoning that makes multi-step problems feel manageable rather than chaotic. Rated 4.9 by students.

Most physics struggles come down to one thing: not knowing how to start a problem. Phillip teaches a systematic approach — draw the diagram, identify the forces, pick the right coordinate system — that turns intimidating multi-step problems into a sequence of smaller, solvable ones. He's taken physics through the college level as part of his biomedical engineering degree at Brown and knows exactly where conceptual gaps tend to hide.

Akarsh's cellular and molecular biology training — both bachelor's and master's — required grinding through the same mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism that physics students face, particularly in biophysics coursework where forces, pressure gradients, and energy transfer aren't optional. He tackles problem sets by first isolating which physical law is actually at work, then mapping the math onto it step by step, so students stop guessing at formulas and start reasoning through solutions.

Studying mechanical engineering at Harvard means Christopher doesn't just remember physics — he's actively building on it every semester, from Newtonian mechanics and thermodynamics to electromagnetism and wave behavior. He breaks down complex problems by teaching students to draw clean free-body diagrams, identify which conservation law applies, and translate word problems into solvable equations. That systematic approach turns intimidating multi-step problems into manageable sequences.

Medical school at the Medical College of Wisconsin demands a command of mechanics, fluid dynamics, and thermodynamics that goes well beyond intro-level physics — Abrahim applies those principles daily in contexts like blood pressure dynamics and respiratory mechanics. His biology degree from UCLA (cum laude) and a 34 ACT underscore the quantitative chops he brings to breaking down force diagrams, energy conservation setups, and multi-step kinematics problems. Rated 5.0 by students.

A Caltech economics and computer science graduate, Brian brings serious quantitative depth to physics — from Newtonian mechanics and energy conservation through electromagnetism and wave behavior. He teaches students to set up problems systematically, identifying which principles apply before touching a single equation, which is the skill that separates students who understand physics from those who just memorize formulas.

Ian approaches physics problems by teaching students to draw the situation before writing a single equation — free-body diagrams for mechanics, circuit sketches for electricity, ray diagrams for optics. That habit of visualizing forces and interactions before jumping to math is what separates students who understand physics from those who just hunt for formulas. His 5.0 rating speaks to how well that method lands.