Award-Winning Geometry Tutors
serving Spokane, WA

A Stanford math degree paired with a history PhD in progress means Najja toggles daily between formal mathematical reasoning and the kind of argumentative writing that underpins geometric proofs — making two-column and paragraph proofs feel less foreign to students who think of themselves as "not math people." He unpacks the logic behind circle theorems, triangle inequalities, and angle-side relationships by treating each theorem as a claim that needs evidence, much like a historical argument.

Teaching geometry as adjunct faculty at Washington State University gave Moayad a clear picture of which proof techniques and spatial reasoning skills trip students up most — particularly when problems layer angle relationships on top of triangle congruence or circle properties. His two math degrees mean he can unpack the formal logic behind each theorem while keeping the visual intuition front and center.

Proofs are usually the first place Geometry students feel lost — suddenly math requires written arguments, not just calculations. Alice teaches students to read diagrams like stories, identifying congruence relationships and angle properties that make each proof's logic visible. She treats every problem as a puzzle with a strategy to uncover, which turns Geometry's abstract side into something approachable.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students feel lost, because suddenly math asks them to explain *why* something is true instead of just computing an answer. Cory tackles this by walking through the logic of congruence, similarity, and parallel-line theorems as a conversation — asking questions that lead a student to construct the argument themselves. That approach builds the deductive reasoning skills that carry well beyond the geometry classroom.

I am a professional scientist with multiple years of experience in the biopharmaceutical field. I have spent time in the classroom with elementary aged students and am comfortable with this age group. I am also familiar with AP classes and ACT/SAT preparation. I look forward to sharing my love of learning with students and helping them achieve academic goals!

An econometrics degree is built on modeling relationships between variables — and in geometry, that same instinct for structure kicks in when students need to see how angle relationships, congruence criteria, and parallel line properties connect inside a single diagram. Chica teaches students to read a geometric figure the way she'd read a dataset: identify what you know, figure out what's linked, and build toward the answer step by step. Rated 5.0 by students.

Proofs are usually where Geometry students panic, but the logic behind them is surprisingly close to building a written argument — something Avalon spent four years practicing in USC's honors reading and writing program. She applies that same structured reasoning to angle relationships, triangle congruence, and circle theorems, walking through each proof step by step.

Flying airplanes requires constant mental geometry — calculating descent angles, visualizing approach paths in three dimensions, and reasoning about distances and bearings on navigation charts. Jon's commercial aviation training at the University of North Dakota means he can ground abstract concepts like angle relationships and triangle properties in real-world spatial problems that make the material feel less theoretical. He's especially comfortable with the measurement and application side of the subject, where precision actually matters.

I am an undergraduate earning my Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington. I have already earned my Associate's of Arts with honors through the running start program, and graduated high school as a Valedictorian. I have worked with Disability Resource Services in taking notes for students, and have also offered assistance with homework to other students. As an engineering student, I am able to use my experience to offer assistance with math. I am also able to tutor in chemistry since I have already completed the general chemistry series. I believe that education is extremely important in life, not only for the purpose of knowledge, but also for the determination and ambition that learning teaches us. Understanding concepts not only takes time, but also dedication. As a student who has also attended many tutoring hours, I have come to understand that concepts sometimes require different approaches to finally have that idea click.

Working with Varsity is flexible and fun. I worked for over 25 years as a civil engineer solving flooding problems and improving fish habitat. I changed careers to teaching math about five years ago. I have taught high school math from Algebra I to AP Calculus. I enjoy working with people to achieve their academic goals. When I am not doing math I like to sail, ski rock climb and cook. I look forward to meeting you!

I'm a tutor who loves the moment when a concept finally clickswhether that's solving a calculus problem or debugging a first Python script. With experience teaching math from elementary to college level and professional training in full-stack development, I help students build confidence alongside competence in both math and programming. At Mathnasium, I worked with groups of 4-6 students at different levels, learning to adapt quickly to different learning styles. I bring that same flexibility to teaching HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python, and other programming languages. I don't just give answersI guide students to discover solutions themselves because that's what sticks. Whether it's explaining why a for-loop isn't working, walking through derivatives, preparing for the SAT, or building a first web page, I focus on understanding over memorization. I'm patient but direct, and I adjust my approach based on what's actually working for each student. My goal is simple: make learning feel achievable, not intimidating, and give students tools they can use long after our sessions end.

Julie's philosophy coursework at Princeton — where every paper is essentially a proof built from premises to conclusion — trained her in exactly the kind of structured reasoning geometry demands. She applies that logical rigor to coordinate geometry, transformations, and circle properties, teaching students to see how each theorem connects rather than treating them as isolated facts. Rated 4.9 by students.

Proofs trip up a lot of geometry students because they require a completely different kind of thinking — constructing logical arguments instead of just computing answers. Kirstie's liberal arts background actually strengthens her approach here, since she treats geometric proofs the way she'd treat building a persuasive essay: claim, evidence, reasoning. She also covers the computational side, from triangle congruence to circle theorems.

Proofs are where most geometry students freeze up — the leap from calculating angles to constructing logical arguments feels like a different subject entirely. Paula bridges that gap by connecting each theorem back to something visual and concrete, whether it's triangle congruence or parallel line relationships. Her psychology background gives her a sharp read on where a student's reasoning breaks down.

Materials science is a field where you're constantly thinking about how structures behave — crystal lattices, grain boundaries, stress distributions across shapes — so Jennifer's engineering background gives her a natural fluency with the spatial reasoning geometry demands. She unpacks problems involving angle relationships and properties of polygons by connecting them to the physical intuition she built studying how real materials are structured. Rated 5.0 by students.

Proofs trip up a lot of Geometry students because they require a completely different kind of thinking — constructing logical arguments instead of just computing answers. Michelle approaches proofs and spatial reasoning the way she approaches scientific problems: systematically, breaking each claim into smaller pieces until the conclusion becomes obvious.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students get stuck, because suddenly math asks them to argue logically instead of just compute. Ian approaches proof-writing the way he approaches physics derivations at Yale — step by step, with each claim grounded in a specific theorem or postulate. He also covers triangle congruence, circle theorems, and coordinate geometry with the same structured clarity.

Proofs are usually where geometry goes from comfortable to confusing — suddenly students need to justify every step with logic instead of just measuring. Matt approaches geometric reasoning as a structured argument, walking through angle relationships, congruence criteria, and parallel-line theorems in a way that makes each proof feel like solving a puzzle rather than following a script.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students get stuck, because suddenly math requires constructing an argument instead of computing an answer. Samuel's background in algorithmic and combinatorial thinking — he served as a teaching assistant for a discrete math course — translates directly to teaching logical reasoning, from triangle congruence proofs to circle theorems.

Cornell's biological engineering program threw Mary into years of modeling physical systems — fluid flow through channels, stress on biomaterials, device dimensions — all of which demand precise geometric reasoning about shapes, cross-sections, and spatial relationships. She brings that practical fluency to topics like circle theorems, properties of quadrilaterals, and area-volume calculations, making abstract definitions feel grounded in real measurement. Rated 5.0 by students.

A chemistry major at Harvard, James is used to thinking in three dimensions — molecular geometries, orbital shapes, bond angles — which gives him a natural fluency with the spatial reasoning geometry requires. He tackles circle theorems and polygon properties by encouraging students to sketch, label, and reason through diagrams before jumping to formulas, building the kind of geometric intuition that makes even multi-step problems feel manageable. Rated 4.9 by students.

Proofs are usually where geometry students panic, but they're really just structured arguments — and Dane approaches them that way. Studying engineering at Duke sharpened his spatial reasoning across topics like congruence, similarity, and coordinate geometry, and he teaches students to visualize relationships before translating them into formal logic.

Proofs are usually where geometry goes from manageable to frustrating — suddenly students need to justify every step with logic instead of just calculating angles. Maggie approaches proof-writing as a skill closer to constructing an argument than solving an equation, a perspective sharpened by her dual background in science and the liberal arts. She also covers coordinate geometry, triangle congruence, and circle theorems with the same emphasis on reasoning over rote steps.