Award-Winning Organic Chemistry Tutors
serving Savannah, GA

Working in a cancer biology research lab means Yasheen encounters the organic chemistry behind drug design and molecular signaling every day — not as textbook problems, but as real questions about how functional groups determine a molecule's behavior in living systems. She connects that bench-level intuition to the arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and carbonyl reactivity students need to master in their orgo courses. Rated 5.0 by students.

Biochemistry majors don't just pass organic chemistry — they keep using it, which means Addison is building on reaction mechanisms and functional group behavior in courses well beyond the introductory sequence at Rice. That ongoing exposure to carbonyl chemistry, stereochemistry, and arrow-pushing in biological contexts gives her a practical fluency that makes tutoring sessions feel less like reviewing old notes and more like working through the material with someone who still thinks in it daily.

I am a person who genuinely enjoys both writing and chemistry (especially organic). To most people, this seems like an odd combination but for me it's natural. I have been able to leverage both of these skills in order to obtain a PhD in organic chemistry. Also, I have written a couple of articles about chemistry on Medium. Understandably, some students struggle in these areas and I would like to help. When I am working with students, I like to be flexible with my teaching approach. During our first session, the student and I will set goals for our time together and we will discuss your learning style. In the subsequent sessions, student and I will work together to develop a learning environment that will help you Education: - Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from the University of Notre Dame (2014) - B.S. in Biochemistry from Xavier University of Louisiana (2008) Experience: 1. 5 years working as a lecture teaching assistant for general chemistry I and organic chemistry I and II at the University of Notre Dame 2. 1 year experience tutoring a high school student in chemistry (1 hour per week) 3. 6 years experience in helping undergraduate students understand organic chemistry and biology

Between organic chemistry lectures, TA sessions, and the pre-med gauntlet at Northwestern, Manideep has worked through reaction mechanisms from multiple angles — teaching arrow-pushing to struggling students while simultaneously applying it in his own advanced coursework. He zeroes in on spectroscopy interpretation and retrosynthetic thinking, two areas where students often panic because they require synthesizing everything learned all semester into a single problem. Rated 5.0 by students.

Pre-med biology students often have a unique relationship with organic chemistry — it's the course that connects their cellular biology knowledge to the molecular logic underneath it. Alina, currently on the pre-med track at UGA with a neuroscience emphasis, tackles reaction mechanisms by linking functional group behavior back to the biological molecules she studies daily, turning abstract arrow-pushing into something that clicks. Rated 5.0 by students.

I am a 3rd year bio major at GT with minors in biochemistry and computer science. My tutoring subjects are math, bio, and chem. I have tutored for a few years, and I have also TAed! My favorite subjects are general chemistry and molecular biology (: My personal belief is that anyone can enjoy a subject once they truly understand it.

A biochemistry degree means Adel didn't just pass organic chemistry — he built on it, connecting reaction mechanisms to the enzyme kinetics and metabolic pathways that came next. That sequencing gives him a clear sense of which concepts (arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, carbonyl reactivity) students need to truly internalize versus which details they can look up later. Rated 5.0 by students.

Leah's neurobiology degree required her to understand organic chemistry from the biological side — how enzyme active sites exploit nucleophilicity, why drug molecules need specific stereochemistry, how functional groups determine whether a compound crosses a cell membrane. She brings that applied perspective to teaching topics like carbonyl reactivity and chirality, grounding each mechanism in real biochemical context. Rated 5.0 by students.

Teaching general and organic chemistry as a graduate TA at the University of Tennessee means Taylor has walked hundreds of students through the exact moments where orgo gets confusing — arrow-pushing that suddenly involves three steps, or stereochemistry problems where every answer choice looks plausible. That repetition sharpened her ability to diagnose where someone's reasoning breaks down, especially in nucleophilic addition and substitution mechanisms, and rebuild it on the spot. Rated 5.0 by students.

Karim's dual background in psychology and biology means he studied organic chemistry as a prerequisite for medical school — the same context most of his students are in right now. He zeroes in on functional group transformations and carbonyl chemistry, breaking down why electrons move where they do so that unfamiliar exam problems become solvable puzzles.

Matthew self-identifies as someone who genuinely loves organic chemistry — which, for a biochemistry graduate, meant he didn't just survive the course but kept returning to it as a tutor while others moved on. That enthusiasm shows up in how he teaches arrow-pushing and reaction mechanisms: he connects each transformation to the biochemical context where it actually matters, making patterns like nucleophilic additions and carbonyl reactivity feel logical rather than arbitrary. Rated 5.0 by students.

Reaction mechanisms are a language, and Matthew teaches students to read them fluently — arrow pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations all follow patterns that become predictable once you see the underlying logic. His chemistry major at Williams included organic coursework as part of the pre-med track, so he knows exactly which reactions and concepts show up again in biochemistry and on the MCAT.

Beverly's chemistry degree means she didn't just pass organic chemistry — she built her entire academic foundation on understanding how molecules behave, from electron density maps to the logic behind substitution and elimination pathways. She teaches arrow-pushing as a skill you practice like a language, walking through each mechanism step by step until students can predict products on their own without flipping back to reaction tables.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Andrew teaches students to read them fluently. He unpacks arrow-pushing for substitution, elimination, and addition reactions by tying each mechanism back to nucleophilicity, sterics, and leaving-group ability — so students predict products instead of memorizing hundreds of individual reactions.

Reaction mechanisms are stories — each arrow push has a reason rooted in electronegativity, sterics, or orbital overlap. Daniel unpacks those reasons for every major reaction class, from nucleophilic substitutions and eliminations through carbonyl chemistry, so students can predict products on unfamiliar problems instead of relying on flashcard recall.

Chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech means Brittany doesn't just study organic reactions in a textbook — she applies them in the context of reaction kinetics, process design, and molecular-scale engineering problems. That engineering lens sharpens how she teaches arrow-pushing and functional group transformations, breaking each mechanism into a sequence of logical steps rather than a block of content to memorize.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and Stephen spent much of his biochemistry degree tracing electron movement through arrow-pushing problems. He teaches students to recognize nucleophile-electrophile patterns so they can predict products rather than relying on brute-force memorization of hundreds of reactions. That pattern-recognition approach turns a notoriously overwhelming course into something systematic.

Reaction mechanisms are a language, and Aaron teaches students to read them fluently — arrow pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations all follow patterns that become predictable once you know what to look for. His chemistry degree gave him years of practice connecting structure to reactivity, from substitution and elimination basics through multi-step synthesis problems.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Amin earned an entire master's degree becoming fluent in them. He teaches students to read electron flow the way you'd read a sentence — identifying nucleophiles, leaving groups, and stereoelectronic effects so that predicting products becomes a reasoning exercise, not a memorization marathon. Rated 4.5 by students.

Jonathan's human biology degree and pre-med track at Cornell meant organic chemistry wasn't just a prerequisite — it was the course that connected molecular structure to everything he'd later study in physiology and biochemistry. He tackles synthesis problems and spectroscopy interpretation by linking functional group behavior back to biological relevance, which gives students a reason to care about each mechanism. Rated 4.9 by students.

Reaction mechanisms click when you understand electron movement — why a nucleophile attacks one carbon over another, how steric hindrance redirects a pathway, what drives an elimination versus a substitution. Enric's PhD in Chemistry means he's spent years thinking at the mechanistic level and can unpack arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and retrosynthetic analysis in ways that make each reaction type feel logical rather than arbitrary.

Reaction mechanisms, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations all require a kind of visual logic that's unlike anything in general chemistry. Greg's chemical engineering background at Vanderbilt gave him deep exposure to organic reaction pathways, and he teaches students to trace electron movement step by step so they can predict products instead of relying on memorization.

Max spent much of high school independently pursuing organic chemistry through coursework and projects well beyond what was required — the kind of deep, self-driven study that builds real fluency with reaction types and synthesis logic. His chemistry degree from MIT and mathematical instincts mean he approaches problems like retrosynthetic analysis and multi-step mechanism design as structured puzzles, breaking each one into clear decision points. Rated 5.0 by students.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Casey reads them fluently after years of bioengineering coursework that demanded constant fluency in electron-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations. She teaches students to recognize patterns across reaction types — why nucleophilic additions behave the way they do, how leaving groups dictate substitution vs. elimination — so each new chapter feels like a variation on something familiar rather than a fresh nightmare.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and learning to read them — arrow pushing, stereochemistry, regiochemistry — requires a different kind of thinking than most science courses demand. Kevin studied organic chemistry as part of his biomedical engineering curriculum, where understanding molecular behavior was essential rather than optional. He walks students through each mechanism type until the logic behind substitution, elimination, and addition reactions becomes second nature.

Reaction mechanisms are essentially stories told with curved arrows, and the trick is learning to read them rather than memorize hundreds individually. Mark approaches organic chemistry by teaching students to recognize patterns — nucleophilic attacks, leaving group stability, steric effects — so they can predict products on reactions they've never seen before. His chemistry coursework at Notre Dame keeps these concepts fresh and grounded in real molecular behavior.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry — if you can't follow electron movement through a nucleophilic substitution or an elimination, every new reaction feels like something to memorize from scratch. Cassandra teaches students to recognize the patterns that repeat across seemingly different reactions: leaving group quality, steric effects, acid-base behavior. That pattern-recognition approach, sharpened by her biology and biochemistry background, turns a notoriously overwhelming course into something students can actually reason through.

Studying physics with a concentration in chemical principles at Penn means Max encounters organic chemistry from the physical side first — thermodynamics of reaction pathways, orbital interactions driving nucleophilic attacks, and the energy landscapes that determine whether a substitution or elimination wins out. That perspective lets him teach mechanisms by grounding arrow-pushing in the physics of why electrons move, not just where they go.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Jon spent his Master's work at Princeton immersed in that language daily. He unpacks arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group reactivity by tying each mechanism back to the electron behavior driving it, so students build intuition instead of relying on rote memorization. His TA students at Princeton gave him reviews strong enough to earn a teaching award — a good sign for anyone staring down a semester of orgo.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and spotting nucleophilic attacks or predicting stereochemical outcomes requires genuine pattern recognition, not rote memorization. Lauren's chemistry minor at Duke and her hands-on lab research give her a practical fluency with functional group reactivity that she translates into clear, step-by-step reasoning for each mechanism type.