Award-Winning Biostatistics Tutors
serving Brooklyn, NY

I am and have always been committed to education and helping students in any way I can to achieve their academic goals.

Sima's Master of Science in Epidemiology with a concentration in Biostatistics means she doesn't just teach survival analysis, regression modeling, and study design — she uses them daily in her cancer research at Mount Sinai. She walks students through everything from interpreting p-values to building multivariate models, grounding each concept in real epidemiological datasets.

Three years teaching high school biology in New Jersey meant Sasha was constantly designing assessments and interpreting student performance data — skills that map directly onto biostatistics concepts like distributions, variability, and drawing valid inferences from samples. Her master's in science education and undergraduate biology training give her a dual grasp of both the life science context behind biological datasets and the statistical reasoning needed to analyze them. She breaks down topics like chi-square tests and descriptive statistics by rooting them in the kinds of biological questions that make the math feel purposeful.

Nina is finishing a doctorate in biostatistics at NYU after completing her master's at Columbia, which means she lives and breathes this subject — logistic regression for clinical outcomes, survival curves, study design for epidemiological research. She was a teaching assistant in Columbia's biostatistics department and brings that classroom-tested ability to unpack dense material into clear, structured explanations. If you're wrestling with SAS output or trying to interpret an odds ratio for a thesis, she's been there recently.

Wall Street research demands a kind of statistical fluency that translates surprisingly well to biostatistics — Frank spent years dissecting datasets, evaluating risk models, and stress-testing assumptions before pivoting to teaching statistics at both the AP and college level. He breaks down concepts like hypothesis testing, probability distributions, and regression by emphasizing the logic behind choosing a method, drawing on the same analytical rigor he applied to financial research. His MBA and quantitative background give him a practical, numbers-first approach that cuts through the abstraction many students struggle with.

Graduate coursework in Health Services Administration means Alan regularly encounters the statistical side of healthcare — interpreting study outcomes, evaluating public health data, and understanding how measures like relative risk and confidence intervals shape administrative decisions. His biology degree gives him the scientific literacy to contextualize the datasets, while his 5.0 rating speaks to how clearly he breaks down concepts like hypothesis testing and descriptive statistics for students who find the quantitative side intimidating.

Earning her Master of Science in Global Health from Duke meant Andria lived inside biostatistics — designing studies, running regression analyses, and interpreting p-values in the context of real epidemiological data. She unpacks concepts like confidence intervals, odds ratios, and survival analysis by grounding them in the public health questions they're built to answer.

Karista's PhD in Environmental Science meant analyzing messy field data — the kind where uneven sample sizes, non-normal distributions, and confounding variables force you to think carefully about which statistical approach actually fits. That experience designing and defending her own analyses carries over directly when she teaches concepts like ANOVA, multivariate regression, and experimental design in biostatistics. Rated 5.0 by students.

Neurobiology research at UT Austin meant Hiral couldn't just run experiments — she had to make sense of the data coming out of them, from deciding whether a t-test or ANOVA fit her experimental design to interpreting p-values that determined whether her results meant anything at all. That direct experience wrangling biological datasets gives her a practical grip on concepts like probability, measures of central tendency, and hypothesis testing. Rated 5.0 by students.

Graduate coursework in global health and population at Harvard means Sarah's biostatistics training is rooted in real epidemiological research — calculating measures of association, building regression models, and interpreting results in the context of population-level health questions. Her undergraduate biology degree adds fluency with the scientific reasoning behind study design, so she can unpack why a particular statistical test fits a given dataset rather than just drilling the formula. Rated 5.0 by students.

Courtney's graduate research in aquatic ecology means she's wrestled with the messy, real-world datasets that make biostatistics click — figuring out which test to run when sample sizes are uneven, or whether a correlation in field data actually holds up under regression. That experience analyzing ecological patterns, combined with her MS in Biology, grounds her teaching of concepts like experimental design, ANOVA, and data interpretation in the biological questions that give the numbers meaning. Rated 5.0 by students.

Elliot's PhD in neuroscience meant wrestling with the kinds of biological datasets where choosing the wrong statistical test can invalidate years of research — from analyzing neural firing rates with repeated-measures designs to modeling dose-response curves with logistic regression. That firsthand experience with experimental data makes him especially sharp at teaching concepts like power analysis, ANOVA, and survival analysis, because he's had to defend those choices in his own published work. Rated 5.0 by students.

Casey's bioengineering degree required designing and analyzing experiments where statistical choices — picking the right test for biological variability, interpreting p-values from cell culture data, calculating sample sizes for meaningful results — were baked into every project. That training means she teaches concepts like probability distributions, hypothesis testing, and regression by tying them to the kinds of biological datasets students will actually encounter in research and clinical coursework.

Courage's training sits at an unusual intersection — dual bachelor's degrees in computer science and biological/physical sciences, plus a master's in environmental science — which means he's worked with biological datasets from both the programming and the scientific sides. That crossover makes him especially sharp at teaching concepts like data distributions, hypothesis testing, and regression analysis using tools like Python and SQL, bridging the gap between understanding the biology behind a study and actually crunching the numbers.

Kimanthi's biomedical engineering training at Duke meant designing experiments that demanded careful statistical thinking — selecting appropriate tests, calculating power, and interpreting results from biological datasets. Now in medical school, she teaches biostatistics concepts like hypothesis testing and regression by grounding them in the clinical and laboratory scenarios where they actually come up. Rated 5.0 by students.

Irene's PhD in Mathematics and Computer Science means she approaches biostatistics from the pure quantitative side — probability theory, distributions, and the mathematical proofs underlying tests like ANOVA and chi-square that most biology-focused instructors skip over. For students who struggle less with the clinical context and more with the math itself, that depth is exactly what closes the gap. Rated 4.9 by students.

Sitting at the intersection of biology and statistics, biostatistics trips up students who are strong in one field but shaky in the other. Pallavi's dual background — a master's in biology plus a BS in economics with a policy concentration — means she's fluent in both experimental design and the quantitative methods (regression, survival analysis, hypothesis testing) that make sense of biological data.

Biochemistry and psychology together mean Nathaniel has designed experiments on both the molecular and behavioral sides — two domains where the datasets look completely different but the statistical logic (choosing tests, interpreting p-values, understanding variance) is the same. That dual training makes him particularly good at explaining when to apply specific methods like t-tests, ANOVA, or correlation analysis, because he's had to think through which tool fits which kind of biological question. Rated 5.0 by students.