Scoring a 36 ACT composite means John knows exactly how the English section tries to trip students up — from comma splice traps to rhetorical strategy questions buried in transition sentences. His English and Drama background gives him a natural ear for the grammar and style conventions the test rewards, and he teaches students to spot the patterns that make 75 questions in 45 minutes manageable.

Scoring a perfect 36 ACT composite means Sugi knows exactly how the English section tests grammar — from comma splices and apostrophe rules to rhetorical strategy questions about paragraph organization. She breaks each question type into a decision tree so students can identify what's being tested before they even look at the answer choices. Rated 5.0 by students.

Medical school trains you to read dense passages fast and extract exactly what matters — Jiatian applies that same triage instinct to the ACT English section, where 75 questions in 45 minutes rewards quick, decisive editing over deliberation. As a Rice AB graduate now finishing med school, she treats each underlined portion as a rule-based decision point, drilling students on the specific punctuation and rhetorical patterns the test repeats until choosing the right fix becomes automatic.

Biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins means Bidyut writes with the kind of tight, technical precision that maps perfectly onto ACT English — every word in a research paper has to earn its place, just like every answer choice on conciseness and redundancy questions. He teaches the section's punctuation rules (especially comma placement and apostrophe usage) as a small, memorizable set rather than something to guess at, and tackles the rhetorical strategy questions by training students to think like editors deciding what a paragraph actually needs. His 36 ACT composite and 5.0 rating back that up.

Most ACT English mistakes come down to a handful of grammar patterns — comma splices, subject-verb agreement across long phrases, and misplaced modifiers — that repeat throughout the test. Alyssa teaches students to spot these specific patterns quickly, drawing on her own 35 composite score and her experience editing college-level writing.

I'm currently a freshman at Rice University studying applied math. I've always had a love for sharing knowledge with others, and I started tutoring when I was a junior in high school. As a former AP student and a National AP Scholar, I have the experience necessary to guide my students through challenging curriculum. Though I specialize in tutoring mathematics and physics, I am experienced with and am happy to tutor a broad range of subjects.

Public health writing is all about clarity under constraint — distilling complex data into clean, unambiguous prose — and Eisha carries that editorial discipline into the ACT English section, where trimming redundancy and choosing precise transitions account for a huge chunk of the questions. Her 36 ACT composite means she's already navigated every question type at the highest level, and she teaches the punctuation and rhetorical strategy rules as a repeatable system students can apply in under 30 seconds per question. Rated 5.0 by students.

I'm a freshman at Rice University, and planning to major in Mathematical Economic Analysis and Computer Science. I'm also a student athlete and a starting member of The Rice University Men's Golf Team so I understand time is crucial and will do my best to help you understand and not just memorize concepts so you don't have to spend time every week trying to understand the same thing. A lot of math concepts repeat themselves in high school and college. My core is in math and that is where I will be most efficient in helping a student. Aside from that, please let me know if you have any questions or need anything.

Scoring a 35 ACT composite while deep in a biology program means Harsh learned to treat the English section like a lab protocol — systematic, rule-based, no guessing. He zeroes in on the punctuation and sentence structure patterns the test loves to recycle, teaching students to identify exactly which rule is being tested before even glancing at the answer choices. His Health Science Scholars training at UT Austin keeps his editing instincts sharp through constant scientific writing and revision.

Business students at Michigan Ross write and revise constantly — case memos, executive summaries, pitch decks — all demanding the same tight, no-fluff prose the ACT English section rewards when it asks about redundancy, conciseness, and logical transitions. Chaya channels that daily editing habit into teaching the specific punctuation and rhetorical strategy patterns the test cycles through, so students build a repeatable decision process instead of guessing by ear.

I am a prematriculant student at the University of Chicago. In high school I took advanced STEM courses at the University of North Texas through a high school program called the Texas Academy of Math and Science. I love taking high level math courses, but I get even more excited when I can help friends and classmates in courses I have already taken. I believe that having a solid understanding of math concepts builds you up for success in any field. I have experience as a teaching assistant in pre-calculus and calculus and have experience tutoring and assisting students in high school math, calculus, and differential equations. When preparing students for standardized tests like the ACT and SAT, I focus on filling any gaps in material and teaching new techniques for making the test easier and quicker to take. I have used and perfected these techniques while taking the ACT and SAT myself and have had success on both tests. I am also a National Merit Finalist.

A dual Computer Science and English major, Miguel lives in both rule-based and rhetorical thinking — the CS side makes him systematic about the punctuation and sentence-structure conventions the ACT recycles, while the English side sharpens his instinct for the passage-level questions about tone, organization, and conciseness. He scored a 35 ACT composite and teaches students to treat each underlined section as a quick decision tree: identify the rule being tested, eliminate the choices that violate it, move on. Rated 4.9 by students.