# SAT Mathematics : Working with Inequalities and Absolute Value

## Example Questions

← Previous 1

The formula above gives the monthly cost, , of running a food truck, where the driver works  hours and  gallons of gasoline are used for driving and operating the truck. If, in a particular month, it costs more than $3,500 to run the truck and no more than 220 gallons of gas were used, what is the minimum number of hours that the driver worked that month? Possible Answers: 96 140 95 480 Correct answer: 96 Explanation: You are given in this question that the equation C = 24h + 5y describes the cost to run a food truck and are asked to calculate the minimum number of hours the driver of the truck worked that month if the truck used no more than 220 gallons of gas. To find the minimum number of hours worked, you need to use the maximum number of gallons of gas that could have been used – 220. Substituting this value in for y gives you: C = 25h + 5(220) = 25h + 1100 You are also told that it costs more than$3500 to run the truck for the month. You can then turn the equation into an inequality and solve for a range of values for h. Remember that saying that it costs at least $3500 is the same as saying that 3500 is less than or equal to the information given on the right side of the equation: 3500 < 25h + 1100 Subtracting 1100 from both sides and dividing both sides by 25 gives you: 2400 < 25h 96 < h If h is is greater than or equal to 96, then the smallest number of hours worked must be 96. ### Example Question #1 : Inequalities & Absolute Value Which of the following provides the full solution set to the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: When you're working with absolute values and inequalities, recognize that there are two cases that will satisfy the inequality: either the terms within the absolute value directly satisfy the inequality, or they satisfy the "opposite" (flip the sign and multiply by -1). For example, if , then either or . For this problem, here is how the two cases will map out: 1) Satisfy the inequality directly: means that 2) Flip the inequality sign and multiply the numeric value by -1: , so This can feel abstract, so it's helpful to test one number for each case to see if it really works. For case 1, try a value greater than 6, so you might try 7. because 8 > 7, so you have this right. For case 2, try a number less than -8, such as -9. because the absolute value of -8 is 8, and 8 is greater than 7. ### Example Question #1 : Inequalities & Absolute Value Which of the following provides the full solution set for the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: When you're working with inequalities and absolute values, make sure that you cover both cases that would satisfy the inequality. 1) The terms within the absolute value directly satisfy the inequality. Here that's: , so and . 2) The "flip the sign and multiply by -1" case. Here that's: (note that the inequality sign is flipped, and the value to the right of that sign is multiplied by -1) , so ### Example Question #4 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value Which of the following represents the full solution set for the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: When you're working with absolute values and inequalities, you must always consider both cases that satisfy the inequality. Either the terms within the absolute value satisfy the inequality directly, or they satisfy the "opposite case" in which you reverse the inequality sign and multiply the side opposite the absolute value by -1. (The proof for this: if , then either or - in that second case, you flip the sign and multiply 10 by -1) So let's examine both cases: 1) The direct case allows you to add to both sides and subtract from both sides to get: So . At this point you may want to do a quick check to ensure that a number slightly less than -2 does satisfy the inequality provided. If you choose -3, you'll see that it does work: 5 -2(-3) gives you 11, and that does work with the given inequality. 2) The opposite case Again, you'll add to both sides to move that term to a positive value on the right of the inequality sign (always try to avoid multiplying/dividing by negatives in inequalities as it is easy to forget to flip the sign), and add to both sides to isolate the variable. This yields: So . Again, you may wish to quickly plug in a number that just satisfies this inequality to make sure it works with the original. If you choose 8, then you'd have the absolute value of 5-16, which gives you 11, proving that this inequality does work. Your solution set is then or ### Example Question #5 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value Which of the following represents the complete solution set for the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: Whenever you're working with inequalities and absolute values, you should consider two cases: 1) the expression within the absolute value directly satisfies the inequality, and 2) the expression within the absolute value satisfies the opposite of the inequality (flip the sign and multiply the other expression by -1). Let's consider both cases here: 1) The expression directly satisfies the inequality: Subtract from and add to both sides so that you isolate the variable on the left. That yields: You may also want to quickly try a number that just barely satisfies this inequality to ensure that it works with the given information. If you try , you'll see that you have: which is which is a "close win" for the inequality, helping to confirm your work here. 2) The expression satisfies the "opposite case" in which you flip the sign and multiply the right-hand expression by -1: Here, add and to both sides to yield: , which reduces to . Here you may again wish to do a quick test; if you choose something just less than , like perhaps , you can confirm. This way you'd have: . This means that which again is a "close win," supporting that your work is correct. The correct answer is then: ### Example Question #6 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value Which of the following represents the complete solution set for the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: Whenever you're dealing with absolute values and inequalities, you should consider both of two cases that form the full solution set. In case 1, the expression within the absolute value directly satisfies the inequality. In case two, the expression within the absolute value satisfies the opposite, where you reverse the inequality sign and negate the expression opposite the absolute value (that explanation sounds complicated, but the example will help). Let's examine both cases for this question. Case 1 - The expression satisfies the inequality directly. Here that would mean that . You can then subtract from both sides and add to both sides to isolate the variable: It's always a good idea to check a number that just barely satisfies your new inequality to make sure that your answer works. Here if you try 14, you'll see that the given inequality becomes . That works out to , a 'close win' that tells you that your inequality works. Case 2 - The expression satisfies the opposite of the inequality. Here you need to do two things: reverse the inequality sign, and multiply the entire right side of the inequality by -1. That would give you: Adding and to both sides isolates the variable: And then finish the division: Again, try a number that just barely satisfies the inequality to check that you got it right. If you use 0, then you'll see that the given inequality becomes 8 > 5, which is another close win. Therefore, the correct answer is or . ### Example Question #7 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value Which of the following represents the complete solution set for the inequality above? Possible Answers: Correct answer: Explanation: Whenever you're dealing with absolute values and inequalities, you need to consider two possibilities. In case one, the expression within the absolute value directly satisfies the inequality. In case two, the expression within the absolute value will satisfy the opposite, taken by flipping the inequality sign and negating the entire other side of the inequality (think "a is greater than 1 or less than negative-one" --> case two is that "less than negative..." case). Let's examine both here. Case 1 Here you can subtract from both sides and add to both sides to isolate the variable: Then divide both sides by and you have: It's a good idea to try a number that just barely satisfies your new inequality to ensure that it fits with the given inequality. If you try here, you'll see that you have a fit: simplifies to , proving that you have a fit. Case 2 (notice that the sign is flipped, and all terms on the right are negated) Here you can add to both sides and subtract from both sides to get: So Notice here that this does not add new information. Any number less than is already less than and you've already tried a number between them (1) to ensure that it works. So the full solution set here is just any number less than , making the correct answer . ### Example Question #6 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value If an election analyst receives a bonus when her prediction "p" is within 12 votes of the actual number, "a," the scenario in which she receives her bonus is expressed by the inequality below. According to this inequality, which of the following expresses the full range of possible values for "p" if the actual number of votes, "a" for a particular candidate is 127, and the analyst received her bonus? Possible Answers: or Correct answer: Explanation: If the analyst receives her bonus when , and she received her bonus when the actual number of votes, "a" was 127, we can substitute 127 into the inequality as follows So, to get rid of the inequality signs, we need a situation where or where the first inequality can be simplified to and the second, to So, in order for the analyst to receive her bonus, p must be between 115 and 139, or ### Example Question #7 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value If , in terms of y, what is the full range of possible values for x? Possible Answers: or or Correct answer: Explanation: In this example, we can eliminate the absolute value signs by creating two paths, one in which we hold the sign, and one in which we flip the sign and multiply one side by -1. In this case, these two options are as follows and So, simplified, we can see that and so, ### Example Question #8 : Working With Inequalities And Absolute Value A home is considered to be outside of market value in a particular market if its appraised price, "p" is more that$10,000 away from 90% of the median home value in the neighborhood, "m."

Which of the following inequalities represents a scenario in which a home is outside of market value in this market?

Possible Answers:

Correct answer:

Explanation:

In this case, we'll want to note that it doesn't matter if the home is overvalued by over 10,000 away from 90% of the median home value, or undervalued to this extent. So, we need to utilize absolute values to address that the "distance" between p and 90% of m should be greater than 10,000, as shown in the correct answer.

← Previous 1