Award-Winning College Physics Tutors
serving Baton Rouge, LA

Let me tell you a little bit about myself. I have a Bachelors degree and two Masters degrees in Mathematics from the United States Naval Academy, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Georgia. All of my degrees were earned with at least a 3.9 GPA and I earned the honor of being named the top math major from my undergraduate institution when I graduated. I have also had the pleasure of teaching mathematics at two different colleges and started tutoring math and physics over 20 years ago. Please allow me to accompany you on the exciting journey of exploration into math and physics!

College-level physics ramps up fast, especially when courses introduce calculus-based mechanics or electromagnetism for the first time. Charles works through these topics as part of his mechanical engineering curriculum at Yale, so he can walk through derivations of torque, moment of inertia, or Gauss's law with the fluency of someone who applies them in lab and design projects regularly.

Three science-focused bachelor's degrees — including biology — meant Garrett sat through the full calculus-based physics sequence and kept coming back to it in physiology and physical chemistry, where concepts like fluid dynamics, pressure gradients, and energy transfer show up again and again. That repeated exposure across disciplines gives him an intuitive feel for when to apply conservation of energy versus momentum, or how to reason through a thermodynamics problem without getting lost in the formalism. His 1530 SAT speaks to the quantitative sharpness he brings to each session.

A chemistry degree from Yale means Zosia spent years in courses where physics does the heavy lifting — thermodynamics driving reaction spontaneity, quantum mechanics explaining atomic structure, electrostatics governing molecular interactions — so she knows these concepts from the inside out. She's particularly effective at teaching students to translate word-heavy problem statements into clean free-body diagrams or energy bar charts before touching an equation. Rated 4.9 by students.

Thermodynamics is where Rahul lights up — it was his favorite corner of Cornell's chemical engineering program, and that enthusiasm shows when he's walking someone through heat engines, entropy, or the first and second laws in a college physics context. His engineering training means he treats every problem as a physical system first and an equation second, pushing for the conceptual reasoning behind each step rather than formula-matching. Rated 4.9 by students.

Pursuing an MD at Stanford after a double major in economics and molecular/cellular biology, Maggie brings a pre-med perspective to college physics that makes topics like optics, fluid dynamics, and wave mechanics feel immediately relevant rather than abstract. She's especially sharp at teaching students to set up problems cleanly — translating a physical scenario into the right free-body diagram or energy equation before doing any math. Rated 5.0 by students.

Biomedical engineering at Yale means Ellie applies physics daily — from fluid dynamics in circulatory models to electromagnetic principles in medical imaging. She breaks down topics like torque, wave optics, and circuit analysis by connecting them to real systems she encounters in her coursework and research. Rated 5.0 by students.

Theater might not scream physics, but Amber's breadth across math and science tutoring — from calculus to chemistry to AP-level coursework — means she's comfortable with the quantitative reasoning that college physics demands, and her 5.0 rating confirms students agree. She's particularly effective at teaching the problem-setup habits that separate students who flounder from those who don't: sketching free-body diagrams, identifying conservation laws, and translating word problems into equations before plugging in numbers. Her ACT 35 reflects the kind of cross-disciplinary sharpness that keeps pace with fast-moving, concept-dense courses.

Studying computer science and applied math at Harvard means Derek uses physics constantly — from electromagnetism in circuit design to mechanics in computational modeling. He tackles college-level topics like Lagrangian dynamics and wave equations by connecting the math to physical intuition, making dense derivations feel less abstract.

Biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins means Christine solves physics problems daily that most students only see in textbooks — fluid dynamics in blood flow, pressure gradients across membranes, mechanics of prosthetic joints — giving her a concrete, application-heavy lens for the material. She's particularly strong on the thermodynamics and mechanics portions of college physics, where her coursework overlaps most directly with standard problem sets. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Having served as a teaching assistant for Differential Equations and Mechanics at Notre Dame, Jeffrey has already spent time explaining the exact concepts — torque, oscillations, coupled systems — that trip up students in university physics courses. His mechanical engineering PhD work at Rice deepens that fluency, especially in thermodynamics and rotational dynamics where the math gets dense fast. He's rated 4.9 by students.

Molecular biology might seem like a different world from physics, but Agustin's coursework lives in the overlap — diffusion equations, fluid dynamics in cellular transport, and the thermodynamics behind protein folding all demand real physics fluency. He pairs that life-sciences perspective with strong quantitative chops (1560 SAT) to break down mechanics and energy problems in ways that click for students who think more naturally in biological terms than abstract force diagrams.

Environmental engineering is essentially physics with consequences — Kate's master's work required her to model fluid flow, heat transfer, and pressure systems in real infrastructure, which means she's solved the same types of problems that show up on college physics exams but with actual design constraints attached. That applied perspective makes her particularly effective at teaching students to set up force balances and energy equations from a physical scenario rather than reverse-engineering from a formula sheet. Rated 4.9 by students.