Award-Winning ACT English Tutors
serving Portland, OR

Punctuation, pronoun clarity, sentence structure, rhetorical strategy — the ACT English section packs a lot of grammar concepts into 45 minutes. Dylan teaches students to categorize each question type on sight so they can move through passages efficiently without losing accuracy. Rated 5.0 by students, he draws on his education degree to make grammar rules stick rather than feel arbitrary.

I'm a strong believer that education can be fun, and address learning with a sense of humor and a positive attitude. My approach to learning tends to be very communication-based, and often driven by how the client I'm working with feels they learn best. As a result, I tend to provide structure and guidance in a more flexible learning environment.

Most ACT English mistakes come down to a handful of grammar patterns — comma usage, subject-verb agreement across long modifying phrases, and redundancy. Heather scored a 35 ACT composite and approaches the section almost like a code: once students learn the dozen or so rules the test recycles, their accuracy jumps dramatically. She also digs into the rhetorical strategy questions that separate a 30 from a 35.

Hi, I'm Nic :) I have a Masters in philosophy and a Bachelors in computer science. I've worked as an educator for over a decade, thoroughly enjoy tutoring high school students, and can't wait to start working with you (or your student) towards persistent academic success! Feel free to reach out with any questions, https://linktr.ee/nickhh

Neuroscience papers at Brown demand airtight prose — every misplaced modifier or ambiguous pronoun gets flagged in peer review, and Owen has internalized that editorial reflex through years of scientific writing. He applies it to the ACT English section by teaching students to treat each underlined segment as a specific rule being tested (comma after introductory clause, parallel structure, redundant phrasing) rather than reading for what "sounds right." His 33 ACT composite confirms the approach holds up under test-day pressure.

Most ACT English mistakes come down to a handful of recurring grammar rules — subject-verb agreement across long clauses, comma usage with nonessential information, and rhetorical effectiveness questions about tone and organization. Daniel drills these patterns until students spot them instinctively, then layers in pacing strategies so nothing gets left on the table. He earned a 33 ACT composite and reads voraciously, which keeps his grammatical instincts sharp.

A Classics degree from Reed means Marilyn spent years translating Latin prose with surgical attention to grammar — parsing verb agreement, modifier placement, and clause structure in ways that map almost perfectly onto what the ACT English section tests. She scored a 34 ACT composite and uses that grammatical fluency to teach students the punctuation and sentence-level rhetoric questions as rule-based decisions, not guesswork. Rated 4.8 by students.

Scoring a 33 ACT composite while on USC's pre-med track means Nikita balances scientific precision with strong language instincts — she knows the grammar rules the English section cycles through, but she also teaches the rhetorical strategy questions where you have to judge whether a sentence actually earns its place in a passage. Her Spanish minor adds a second grammar system that sharpens her ability to explain English conventions like subject-verb agreement and pronoun reference from the ground up, not just by ear. Rated 5.0 by students.

I am open to helping students practice speaking, reading, and writing without any judgment. I am open to helping you learn Chinese or Japanese no matter where you are in the learning process.

Finishing an honors English thesis on Octavia Butler and Toni Morrison means Sammi has spent years dissecting how sentences are built — the kind of close editorial reading that maps directly onto the ACT English section's questions about sentence structure, redundancy, and paragraph organization. Her 33 ACT composite backs up that instinct, and she's especially sharp at teaching students to recognize when an answer choice adds words without adding meaning, a trap the test sets constantly.

As a computer engineering student at Michigan, Paul reads and writes code all day — and the ACT English section rewards that same instinct for spotting exactly where something breaks in a sequence of otherwise functional parts. He scored a 32 ACT composite and is particularly effective at teaching the punctuation and sentence structure rules the test cycles through, since he treats each question like a syntax error: identify the rule being violated, apply the fix, move on.

I am applying to medical schools to attend Fall 2016 and I like to play basketball, go backpacking and volunteer with youth in my free time.

I am a recent graduate of the University of Colorado at Boulder. I received my Bachelor of Science in Chemical and Biological Engineering with a minor in French. During my time at CU, I studied abroad in Paris, as well as being a Teaching Assistant for Chemistry, Biology, and Fluid Mechanics for engineers and often helped my peers with homework. During the summer and fall I teach percussion for a local high school marching band. While I tutor a variety of math and science topics, my favorite subjects are chemistry and physics, as I love exploring the ways in which the world works. Education is of the highest importance to me, and I wish to share this passion with my students. In my spare time, I like to read suspense novels, play a variety of string instruments, and play Legend of Zelda.

Comma rules, pronoun agreement, and sentence structure questions make up the bulk of ACT English, but the real challenge is learning to hear the difference between what sounds right and what is right. Laura breaks the 75-question section into targetable grammar patterns so students stop second-guessing themselves and start recognizing errors on sight. Her own 32 ACT composite backs up the approach.

Comma rules, subject-verb agreement across long clauses, and rhetorical ordering questions make up the bulk of ACT English — and each one has a learnable pattern. Edward scored a 36 composite and approaches this section by drilling the specific grammar conventions that appear most frequently, then layering in the passage-level strategy questions that many students overlook. His background as a writer means he can explain why a rule exists, not just that it does.

I am in my second year at MIT studying mathematics, and I am currently doing a research project in Spectral Graph Theory. I have been a tutor since my junior year in high school, and I enjoy teaching all levels of math; everything from pre-algebra through calculus and linear algebra! I focus primarily on making sure that the definitions and processes given in class make intuitive sense, so that math can begin to feel like second nature.

A Creative Writing degree from Carnegie Mellon and induction into Sigma Tau Delta (the English honors society) meant Sydney spent four years dissecting sentence-level craft — parallelism, punctuation as pacing, cutting every unnecessary word — which is essentially what the ACT English section tests at speed across five passages. She scored a 35 ACT composite and brings a writer's instinct for why concise phrasing beats bloated alternatives, turning the rhetorical strategy questions from guesswork into quick editorial calls. Rated 4.9 by students.

The IB program drills a particular kind of writing discipline — structured arguments, precise language, relentless editing — and Vansh carried that training straight into his aerospace engineering work at Georgia Tech, where technical writing leaves zero room for ambiguity. That combination makes him especially sharp on the ACT English questions testing conciseness and sentence placement, where students need to cut wordiness and reorganize logic under time pressure rather than just fix punctuation. His 36 ACT composite and 5.0 rating back it up.

I am 22 years old and just graduated from the University of Kentucky with a double degree in French and Biochemistry. I have been a tutor for over a year now at UK's tutoring center. I believe that anyone can learn anything with enough practice and encouragement, and I love helping students overcome challenges and gain more self-confidence!

I am a sophomore at the Georgia Institute of Technology and am working towards a major in Computer Engineering. I have been tutoring students of all ages and backgrounds in various math topics ranging from elementary school math to AP Calculus throughout high school. I love teaching math and always find it amazing to watch my students grow and improve in their mathematical abilities. While helping students with standardized testing, we go through several tricks and tactics that have helped my students succeed and have fun in the process. I am also well versed in Physics and have spent 3 years taking the highest levels of physics courses. I love playing all sports (especially soccer) and enjoy playing the guitar in my free time as well.

I am excited to help anyone who might need it!

Public policy writing at the college level is essentially an exercise in tight, rule-governed prose — every sentence has to be clear, concise, and structurally sound, which is exactly what the ACT English section tests at speed. Dana applies that editorial training to the rhetorical strategy and conciseness questions where students tend to lose the most points, teaching them to treat each passage as a draft that needs trimming rather than a puzzle to decode. Her perfect 36 ACT composite confirms the approach holds up under test conditions.

Scoring a 36 ACT composite means Tracy didn't just survive the English section — she mastered the specific punctuation, conciseness, and rhetorical strategy patterns it cycles through, and she teaches those patterns as a learnable rulebook rather than a guessing game. Her economics background reinforces a data-driven approach: identify which question types cost you the most points, drill those rules first, and stop wasting time on what you already know. Rated 4.9 by students.

Punctuation rules and rhetorical effectiveness questions trip up different types of students on ACT English, and Richard diagnoses which category is costing points before drilling the fixes. His 36 ACT composite means he's navigated every question type — comma splices, dangling modifiers, transition logic, redundancy — and can explain the reasoning behind each answer choice. A Government major at Harvard, he brings genuine comfort with written English to every session.

Most ACT English mistakes come down to a handful of grammar patterns — comma splices, subject-verb agreement across long phrases, and misplaced modifiers — that repeat throughout the test. Alyssa teaches students to spot these specific patterns quickly, drawing on her own 35 composite score and her experience editing college-level writing.

Running a tutoring program at a Boston charter school meant Liz spent years watching middle schoolers make the exact same grammar mistakes the ACT English section exploits — subject-verb disagreement buried inside long sentences, comma splices connecting independent clauses, and transitions that don't actually connect anything. Her special education training sharpened her ability to break those rules into small, explicit steps instead of relying on "does it sound right," which is particularly effective for students whose ears haven't been reliable guides. Her 34 ACT composite and 4.7 rating confirm the approach holds up under test conditions.