Award-Winning Geometry Tutors
serving Fort Worth, TX

Hi y'all! I hold my Master of Science in Psychology of Sport and my Bachelor of Science in both Psychology and Applied Human and Sport Physiology. I have many years of tutoring under my belt, working with people of all levels from elementary school through college in hard science subjects (Biology, Chemistry, and Mathematics), a few social sciences (History, Psychology, Economics), and language arts. When not tutoring, I love playing soccer and I even coach a youth team. I love encouraging students to learn, grow, and think critically for themselves.

I am qualified to tutor many subjects, my favorite subject by far is math, specifically calculus. Math is a subject almost universally hated, and I believe that is mainly due to the narrow way in which it is taught. I have ADHD, and I often don't understand things the first time they are explained to me, meaning over the years I have had to figure out different ways of looking at information. Oftentimes, all a student needs is for something to be explained in a different way, and I love watching people finally understand a concept. Everyone learns differently, but everyone can learn.

Proofs are usually the moment geometry goes from "I get this" to "I'm completely lost." Adam tackles that transition head-on, teaching students to build logical arguments step by step — whether they're proving triangle congruence or working through angle relationships with parallel lines. His classroom teaching experience in Dallas ISD means he's seen every common misconception and knows how to untangle it.

Rudy's applied mathematics degree means he's comfortable with the abstract reasoning geometry demands, but his education studies background is what shapes how he actually teaches it — breaking down angle relationships, similarity, and transformations into steps students can follow and reproduce on their own. Currently in grad school for secondary education, he knows the specific places where high school geometry curricula lose students and adjusts accordingly.

Proofs are where most geometry students panic, but they're really just structured arguments — and as someone pursuing a PhD that revolves around building written arguments, Adam knows how to teach logical reasoning. He walks students through angle relationships, triangle congruence, and circle theorems with an emphasis on understanding *why* each step follows from the last.

Salman's cell and molecular biology training required constant spatial reasoning — visualizing protein structures, membrane geometry, and molecular angles — which maps directly onto the kind of thinking geometry demands. He teaches concepts like transformations, area relationships, and coordinate geometry by grounding each one in a visual model before moving to any formula. Rated 4.8 by students.

Proofs are usually the first place Geometry students feel lost, because suddenly math requires written logical arguments instead of just calculations. Samuel's training in political science sharpened his ability to construct and evaluate logical reasoning, and he applies that skill to walk through two-column and paragraph proofs step by step.

Proofs are where most geometry students get stuck — they can identify a triangle's properties but freeze when asked to build a logical argument from postulates. Nathan approaches proofs as a skill that transfers directly from his chemistry training, where constructing step-by-step reasoning is second nature. He also covers coordinate geometry, angle relationships, and circle theorems.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students get stuck — the jump from calculating angles to constructing logical arguments is a real shift in thinking. Tanner walks through each proof as a chain of reasoning, teaching students to identify postulates and theorems that bridge the gap between given information and what they need to show.

Proofs trip up a lot of Geometry students because they require a completely different kind of thinking — constructing logical arguments instead of just computing answers. Michelle approaches proofs and spatial reasoning the way she approaches scientific problems: systematically, breaking each claim into smaller pieces until the conclusion becomes obvious.

Cognitive science — Sugi's major at Rice — is fundamentally about how people build mental models, and geometry is one of the few math subjects where that matters enormously: students who can't visualize a rotation or mentally decompose a figure into simpler shapes will struggle no matter how many theorems they memorize. Sugi teaches the visualization first, then layers in the formal reasoning for congruence, similarity, and circle properties so that proofs feel like describing something you can already see. Rated 5.0 by students.

Proofs are usually where geometry goes from manageable to frustrating — suddenly students need to justify every step with logic instead of just calculating angles. Maggie approaches proof-writing as a skill closer to constructing an argument than solving an equation, a perspective sharpened by her dual background in science and the liberal arts. She also covers coordinate geometry, triangle congruence, and circle theorems with the same emphasis on reasoning over rote steps.

Proofs are usually where geometry students panic, but they're really just logical arguments written in a specific format. Mackenzie teaches students to read a diagram like a puzzle — identifying congruent triangles, parallel-line angle relationships, or circle theorems before ever picking up a pencil. That visual-first strategy makes even two-column proofs and coordinate geometry problems feel approachable.

Proofs are where most geometry students get stuck — the leap from calculating angles to constructing logical arguments feels like a different subject entirely. Jonathan breaks that transition down by teaching students to identify given information, spot congruence relationships, and build each proof step by step. His 4.9 rating speaks to how well that structured approach clicks.

Proofs are usually the moment geometry stops feeling intuitive and starts feeling impossible. Aditi teaches students to read a diagram like a puzzle — identifying congruent triangles, parallel-line angle relationships, or circle theorems before writing a single statement. Her science background at Rice also means she naturally connects geometric reasoning to real spatial problems.

Proofs trip up a lot of geometry students because they demand a completely different kind of thinking — logical reasoning instead of computation. Jessy tackles this by teaching students to map out their reasoning visually before writing a single line of proof. She also covers the computational side, from triangle congruence to circle theorems, with an emphasis on understanding why each formula works.

Proofs are usually the make-or-break moment in geometry, and Carter treats them as logic puzzles rather than rote exercises. He walks through each proof by identifying what's given, what's needed, and which theorem bridges the gap — a structured reasoning style he honed studying philosophy and applied math at Brown. Students consistently rate him 5.0.

Proofs are usually where Geometry students hit a wall — the jump from calculating angles to constructing logical arguments feels like a completely different subject. Meagen's English background actually gives her an edge here, since she's trained in building structured, evidence-based arguments. She applies that same reasoning framework to two-column proofs, triangle congruence, and geometric logic.

Teaching Calculus I & II and Organic Chemistry as a TA at Rice means Sakibul has spent years explaining abstract ideas through diagrams and spatial models — skills that translate directly to geometry, where a well-labeled figure often unlocks an entire proof. His applied mathematics background gives him a knack for connecting geometric concepts like circle theorems and polygon properties back to the algebraic reasoning students already know, making new material feel less like a separate subject and more like an extension of familiar tools.

Proofs are usually the make-or-break topic in Geometry, and most students struggle because they've never been asked to build a logical argument in math before. Vinson treats each proof as a puzzle: identify what's given, figure out what tool applies (congruence postulates, parallel-line theorems, similarity criteria), and chain the steps together. That structured thinking comes naturally from his computational math training at Rice.

Proofs are where most geometry students freeze — the jump from calculating angles to constructing logical arguments feels completely different from earlier math. Kenan teaches proof-writing as a step-by-step reasoning skill, connecting each theorem back to the spatial intuition students already have from working with shapes and diagrams.

Proofs are often the first time a math class asks students to explain their reasoning rather than just compute an answer, and that shift trips up a lot of geometry students. Kendall teaches a structured approach to two-column and paragraph proofs while also covering the spatial reasoning behind angle relationships, congruence, and similarity. She treats each theorem as a tool to understand, not just a formula to apply.

Proofs are usually where geometry students panic, because suddenly math asks them to build logical arguments instead of just computing answers. Layla approaches proofs the way her engineering training taught her to approach design problems: identify what you know, figure out what you need, and map a path between them. She also digs into congruence, similarity, and circle theorems with the same structured thinking.

Most geometry struggles actually start with not knowing how to read a diagram — which angles matter, which sides correspond, what information is hiding in plain sight. Molly's editing background (she worked on multiple newspapers) trained her to extract key details from cluttered material, and she applies that same close-reading instinct to breaking down geometric figures before jumping into any calculations or proofs.

The IB program's emphasis on mathematical reasoning — where you can't just memorize formulas but have to justify every step — gave Kinjal a deep comfort with the kind of structured thinking geometry demands. She unpacks circle theorems, polygon properties, and geometric constructions by tying each one back to the underlying logic, so students see why a proof works rather than just mimicking its format. Rated 5.0 by students.

Proofs tend to be the sticking point in Geometry, where students suddenly need to justify each step rather than just compute an answer. Eric approaches proof-writing the way he approaches essay structure in his English major at Dartmouth: every claim needs evidence, and every line should logically follow the last. That framework turns intimidating two-column and paragraph proofs into a manageable skill.

I am most passionate about biology and chemistry. I am a firm proponent of education, believing it to be absolutely necessary for an improved quality of life, and I try to impart this appreciation to all of my students.

Working in a UTHealth research lab, Emily reads molecular structures and cell diagrams all day — skills that translate directly to interpreting geometric figures, identifying relationships between shapes, and reasoning through spatial problems. Her triple-science background in biochemistry and cell biology means she approaches topics like symmetry, congruence, and properties of polygons with the same precision she brings to analyzing lab data.

Proofs are usually the first time a math student has to explain *why* something is true, not just show that it works — and that's where Geometry gets intimidating. John teaches students to build logical arguments step by step, whether they're proving triangle congruence or working through circle theorems, so the reasoning becomes a tool rather than an obstacle.

Most geometry struggles Kim sees aren't really about geometry — they're about a student not realizing which earlier concept (ratios, equation-solving, spatial vocabulary) is actually blocking them. Her approach is diagnostic: she pinpoints the specific gap first, then rebuilds the connection so that topics like triangle congruence or circle theorems stop feeling like guesswork. Rated 5.0 by students.

Proofs are often the first time students have to build a logical argument in math, and David's training in formal reasoning — across computer science and graduate work at Columbia and UChicago — translates directly to teaching students how to structure geometric proofs step by step. He also tackles the spatial reasoning behind congruence, similarity, and circle theorems, making sure students understand the 'why' behind each property.

Biochemistry might seem far from geometry, but Malcolm's Rice coursework in molecular structure — where visualizing 3D shapes, bond angles, and spatial arrangements is constant — built exactly the kind of spatial intuition that makes geometric reasoning click. He tackles the subject from the measurement and logic side, teaching students to set up problems involving circles, arc lengths, and sector areas with the same precision he brings to lab work.

Proofs are where most geometry students stall — not because the logic is hard, but because nobody taught them how to organize what they already see. James breaks down two-column and paragraph proofs into a repeatable process, connecting angle relationships and congruence theorems to visual reasoning. His triple-science background means he treats geometry as a tool for thinking, not just a set of formulas to memorize.

Proofs are usually where Geometry students panic, but they're essentially just logical arguments built one step at a time — something Chelsea does constantly as an engineering major. She tackles everything from triangle congruence and circle theorems to coordinate geometry, emphasizing how to structure reasoning so that proofs feel like puzzles rather than mysteries.

Proofs are where most geometry students panic — the leap from calculating angles to constructing a logical argument feels enormous. Samantha approaches proof-writing as a thinking skill rather than a formula, walking through each statement-reason pair until the structure becomes second nature. Her background spans everything from elementary math to differential equations, so she connects geometric reasoning to the bigger mathematical picture.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students feel lost, because suddenly math asks them to argue logically instead of just compute. Michael approaches geometric reasoning as a form of structured writing — each step needs a clear justification, whether it's proving triangle congruence or working through circle theorems. His background in both math and writing at Rice makes him especially effective at teaching students to build those logical chains.

Proofs are usually the first thing that makes geometry feel different from every math class before it — suddenly students need to justify each step with a theorem, not just get the right number. Katelyn walks students through the logic of two-column and paragraph proofs while also strengthening their spatial reasoning for problems involving congruence, similarity, and circle theorems.

Art history is essentially a geometry education in disguise — Sarah spent years at Vanderbilt analyzing perspective lines in Renaissance paintings, symmetry in Islamic tile patterns, and the proportional systems architects use to design everything from cathedrals to modern museums. That trained eye for spatial relationships translates directly when she teaches students to reason through properties of shapes, angle relationships, and geometric constructions.

Proofs are what make geometry unique in a high school math sequence, and they're also what makes students panic. Jacob, a pure math PhD student whose entire field runs on proof-writing, teaches students to build geometric arguments step by step — from setting up given information to choosing the right congruence theorem to close the logic.

Proofs are usually the first place geometry students hit a wall — suddenly math requires structured logical arguments instead of just calculations. Casey walks through each proof by identifying what's given, what's needed, and which theorem connects the two, turning an intimidating format into a repeatable process. She also covers the spatial reasoning side, from triangle congruence to circle theorems, with a visual approach shaped by her engineering training.