Cory scored a 33 on the ACT and approaches each section the way an engineer would — breaking problems into repeatable steps, especially on the Math and Science portions where time pressure trips up most students. His chemical engineering background makes him particularly sharp at teaching the data interpretation and graph-reading skills that dominate ACT Science. Rated 4.9 by students, he also covers the English and Reading sections with a structured, strategy-first method.

Neuroscience training at Agnes Scott means Daniyal reads ACT Science passages the way they're designed to be read — pulling conclusions from figures and experimental setups without getting bogged down in the background text. That same analytical wiring carries into Math and Reading, and his 35 composite shows he can back it up across all four sections. His 4.5 rating comes from students who appreciate how he connects each section's quirks into a coherent test-day strategy.

Robert's math major means the ACT's Math section is home turf, but his real versatility shows across the rest of the exam — he tutors everything from French to AP U.S. History to college biology, so the Reading and Science sections don't require him to fake fluency in unfamiliar content. He earned a 35 composite and uses that cross-disciplinary range to build section-by-section plans that address each student's actual weak spots rather than running generic practice tests.

Growing up homeschooled gave Jordan a front-row seat to how individualized instruction actually works — something that translates directly to ACT prep, where a one-size-fits-all study plan almost never moves the needle. His Classics-focused Letters degree sharpens the rhetorical and close-reading skills that drive the English and Reading sections, while his 33 composite means he's walked through the full exam himself. He builds section-by-section plans around each student's actual weak spots rather than drilling generic practice sets.

Philosophy trained Carson to dissect arguments and spot logical structure — skills that translate directly to the ACT's Reading and English sections, where most points hinge on identifying an author's reasoning or choosing the clearest revision. His 35 composite means the Math and Science sections are equally covered, and he leans on that analytical background to teach students how to evaluate answer choices by elimination rather than gut instinct. Rated 4.9 by students.

Blake scored a 32 ACT composite while balancing a rigorous biochemistry courseload, so he knows how to prep efficiently across all four sections — especially the Science reasoning, where his lab background makes data interpretation second nature. He breaks the test into skill sets rather than subject silos, teaching students to spot the reading strategies that work in English, Reading, and Science alike. His approach emphasizes timed practice and targeted review so students stop losing points to pacing mistakes.

Studying history and American studies at Columbia trained Rachel to do exactly what the ACT Reading and English sections demand — dissect arguments, weigh evidence, and move through dense passages quickly and precisely. Her 35 composite reflects genuine strength across all four sections, and her IB and AP background means the Math and Science content isn't foreign territory either. Rated 4.9 by students.

A year studying in Lausanne, Switzerland sharpened Meredith's reading comprehension and analytical writing in ways that map directly onto the ACT's English and Reading sections — parsing dense arguments quickly and spotting rhetorical structure under time pressure. Her 33 composite and broad teaching range across math, science, French, and literature mean she can genuinely address weaknesses in every section rather than coaching around them. Rated 4.5 by students.

Economics and international studies coursework means Joseph spends his days parsing data, building arguments, and reading dense material under pressure — which maps neatly onto every section of the ACT, from the Science section's graph-heavy passages to the Reading section's social science articles. He earned a 35 composite and teaches students to treat the English section's grammar questions as a finite set of rules worth memorizing cold, freeing up mental energy for the trickier rhetorical strategy problems. Rated 5.0 by students.

Growing up in a family of educators gave Nathan a sharp eye for how people actually learn under pressure — a skill that translates directly to ACT prep, where knowing the content is only half the battle. He scored a 33 composite and draws on his computer science and writing backgrounds to cover the full exam, from the logic-heavy Math section to the argument structure questions that trip students up on English and Reading.

Greg scored a 32 on the ACT and brings a math-heavy toolkit to every section — his BS in Mathematics means the Math and Science portions get broken down into efficient, pattern-based strategies rather than brute-force problem solving. He also coaches students through the English and Reading sections by teaching them to eliminate answer choices systematically, which is especially useful for students who overthink passage-based questions.

Georgia Tech's Industrial and Systems Engineering program sits at the crossroads of math, data analysis, and logical reasoning — which means Ilesh trained daily in exactly the quantitative and analytical thinking the ACT tests across Math, Science, and even the evidence-based Reading questions. He earned a perfect 36 composite and uses that full-score perspective to show students not just what the right answers look like, but why the wrong ones are designed to be tempting. Rated 5.0 by students.