Amber teaches across chemistry and physics — from balancing redox equations to breaking down kinematics problems — and her 35 ACT confirms she can tackle science content at a high level. Her approach connects scientific reasoning to real-world examples, making abstract concepts like energy conservation or stoichiometry click. Rated 5.0 by students.

Patrick's dual degrees in English Literature and Linguistics from the University of Chicago might not scream science, but linguistics is fundamentally a science — building hypotheses about language structure, testing them against data, and revising models when the evidence doesn't fit. That same cycle of observation, prediction, and analysis is exactly what students need when tackling the scientific method, classifying phenomena, or interpreting experimental results. His 35 ACT confirms he can handle the quantitative and data-reading demands that science coursework throws at students.

Currently pursuing a doctorate studying tiger ecology at UW-Madison, Karann lives science daily — building population models, analyzing field data, and connecting biology to physics and chemistry in ways textbooks rarely capture. Whether a student is wrestling with the scientific method, energy transfer, or ecosystems, she teaches them to think like a working scientist rather than just memorize vocabulary.

The quantitative rigor of Sophie's Applied Math degree at Brown translates directly to science tutoring, especially when students hit calculation-heavy topics like stoichiometry, kinematics, or data interpretation. She walks through the underlying math step by step, so students stop second-guessing their setup and start trusting their problem-solving process.

Running experiments in a business program means Maddy knows her way around hypothesis testing, data collection, and drawing conclusions from numbers — the same core skills science courses assess when students have to interpret graphs or explain experimental outcomes. Her ACT score of 33 confirms she can handle the analytical reading and quantitative reasoning that science material demands, and her 5.0 rating suggests she makes those connections stick.

At LearningRx, James taught cognitive skills alongside academic content — which means he's used to showing students how to actually process and retain scientific information, not just re-read it before a test. His economic policy minor involved interpreting data sets and understanding cause-and-effect relationships, skills he now applies to teaching topics like graphing experimental results and tracing how variables interact. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Two physics degrees and a master's in atmospheric and space sciences mean Richard can teach science as a unified way of thinking — observation, hypothesis, quantitative reasoning — rather than a collection of disconnected facts. Whether a student needs to understand energy conservation, wave behavior, or thermodynamic processes, he connects each concept back to real physical phenomena.

Having taught comparative religion and communications at UW-Madison, Sarah knows how to take dense, unfamiliar material and make it accessible — a skill that carries over when students need to grasp scientific classification systems, trace cause-and-effect in natural processes, or make sense of technical vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots. Her graduate work in Asian languages and cultures required rigorous research methods, and she brings that same emphasis on careful observation and evidence-based reasoning to science topics.

A microbiology PhD student who's spent years at the lab bench, Madeline explains scientific concepts by grounding them in real experiments — how cells actually divide, what happens when you culture bacteria, why ecosystems respond to change the way they do. She makes the scientific method feel like a natural way of asking questions rather than a list of steps to memorize.

A physics degree covers an enormous swath of science — mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, wave behavior, atomic structure — and Michael uses that breadth to tackle general science topics with real depth. He explains concepts by building them from first principles, so students understand *why* a formula works before they ever plug in numbers.

Jacob's Communication master's program at Illinois State involves research design, survey methodology, and statistical analysis — skills that overlap heavily with the scientific method students are expected to master in general science courses. He teaches the logic behind hypothesis formation and data interpretation by drawing on his own experience running studies, which makes abstract concepts like variables and controls feel concrete. His 33 ACT and 4.9 rating speak to both his analytical ability and his clarity as a tutor.

Shona's applied math background gives her a quantitative lens that translates naturally into science — interpreting data tables, setting up unit conversions, and reasoning through experimental design all draw on skills she uses daily. She's especially effective at bridging the gap when students understand a science concept verbally but freeze when the problem involves equations or graph analysis.

Jonas approaches science the way he approaches a difficult text: by slowing down, identifying the key variables, and building an argument from evidence. His background in Classical Greek — a discipline rooted in early scientific and philosophical inquiry — gives him a unique lens for teaching students how to think systematically about hypotheses and experimental design.

Running a K-8 tutoring program meant Dylan had to explain everything from simple machines to the water cycle to students at wildly different levels — which forced him to get creative with analogies and build explanations from scratch rather than defaulting to textbook language. His political science coursework at UW-Madison also sharpened his ability to evaluate evidence and construct arguments, skills that translate well when students need to interpret data tables or explain experimental outcomes in their own words.

A PhD mathematician who also teaches physics and astronomy, Aaron approaches science by emphasizing the quantitative reasoning underneath the concepts — unit analysis, graph interpretation, and building equations from physical intuition. He's particularly effective at bridging the gap when a student understands the science conceptually but freezes at the math embedded in it.

While science isn't Julia's primary discipline, her experience tutoring across a wide range of subjects means she can support students working through general science concepts and assignments. She's particularly strong at breaking down reading-heavy science material — interpreting data tables, understanding experimental design, and writing lab reports clearly.

Studying Materials Science & Engineering at UW-Madison, Adam tackles science from a hands-on, applied perspective — understanding how chemical reactions, physical forces, and energy concepts show up in real-world materials and systems. He's strong at connecting abstract scientific principles to concrete examples that make them easier to remember.

Studying biology at UW-Madison means Miriam lives in the details of scientific thinking every day — designing experiments, interpreting data, and connecting concepts across chemistry and life sciences. She teaches students to approach science the same way a researcher would: ask what's actually happening, break it into manageable parts, and build understanding from there.

Professional journalism requires exactly the kind of rapid research and synthesis that science demands — Olivia regularly dives into unfamiliar technical fields, decodes specialized terminology, and explains complex processes in clear language on deadline. That skill translates well when students need to parse dense textbook passages, make sense of diagrams, or write up lab results in plain English. Her 1580 SAT confirms she handles data and evidence-based reasoning with precision.

A zoology degree means Eitan spent years moving between biology, chemistry, organic chemistry, and ecology — not as isolated classes but as interconnected systems. That cross-disciplinary training lets him explain why a concept like pH matters in both a chemistry beaker and a living cell, or how thermodynamics governs everything from enzyme kinetics to weather patterns. Students working with him get someone who treats science as one coherent story rather than a set of disconnected facts.

Connor's applied math background at UW-Madison gives him a quantitative edge when tackling science topics like data interpretation, unit conversions, and experimental design — the same skills that earned him a 33 ACT composite. He breaks down scientific reasoning into logical steps, making it easier to connect hypotheses to evidence in biology, chemistry, and physics problems alike.

I'm fluent in R, Python, SQL, and M (MUMPS). This September I will be pursuing a Master's degree in data science. I'm available to tutor GRE, ACT, and SAT math as well as other math, statistics, and economics subjects. Although I am most passionate about math, I'm also happy to help students with general testing strategies and preparation for the other parts of the standardized exams.

Teaching kindergartners in South Korea meant Chloe had to make abstract ideas concrete every single day — explaining how plants grow, why ice melts, or what happens when you mix colors — using simple language and hands-on demonstrations. That instinct for translating complex processes into clear, step-by-step explanations carries over to science tutoring, where she zeroes in on helping students read diagrams, understand cause-and-effect relationships, and put scientific observations into their own words.

Breanna's Master's in Education and background in human development give her a practical read on how students actually learn scientific concepts — not just what's in the textbook, but which misconceptions are getting in the way. She zeroes in on skills like interpreting diagrams, understanding cause-and-effect relationships, and connecting vocabulary to real phenomena, adjusting her approach based on each student's developmental level. Her ACT score of 32 confirms she can handle the content across earth science, life science, and physical science.

Zach is a biochemistry major at UW-Madison who has already completed physics, biology, intro chemistry, and organic chemistry — so he's not teaching from a textbook summary but from recent, hands-on experience. He unpacks tough concepts like reaction mechanisms, cellular respiration, or kinematics by connecting them to real examples that make the logic click.

Between her genetics and microbiology coursework, hands-on lab research, and experience co-teaching a microbiology lab at UW-Madison, Samantha covers science from the molecular level up to whole-organism physiology. She unpacks difficult concepts — like gene expression, cellular respiration, or chemical bonding — by tying them to real experimental scenarios students can visualize. Rated 5.0 by students.

Wolly's graduate work in Marriage and Family Therapy draws heavily on research methods, behavioral science, and interpreting clinical studies — skills that map directly onto understanding experimental design, variables, and evidence-based reasoning in general science coursework. His communications background also means he's sharp at breaking down dense scientific vocabulary and helping students articulate what they're observing in labs and readings.

A computer science major with a math emphasis, Sarah is trained in the systematic, evidence-driven thinking that underpins all scientific reasoning — forming hypotheses, isolating variables, and interpreting quantitative results. She's especially comfortable with the math-heavy side of science, whether that's calculating rates, converting units, or reading data off a graph and explaining what it actually means. Rated 4.9 by students.

Four years in a STEM-focused high school academy gave Almira daily immersion in scientific reasoning — designing experiments, interpreting data, and connecting observations back to underlying principles. She's especially strong at teaching students how to read graphs, set up calculations with proper units, and write lab conclusions that demonstrate real understanding.

A math degree from UW-Madison means Joseph spent years immersed in the quantitative backbone of science — unit analysis, modeling rates of change, interpreting graphs of experimental data — and he brings that fluency to the measurement and calculation-heavy parts of science coursework. He's especially useful when students hit the physics or chemistry topics where the math suddenly feels like the real obstacle, since he can untangle the formulas and show students what each variable actually represents. Rated 5.0 by students.

Studying Biology at UW–Madison means Halle is immersed in science every day, from cellular respiration pathways to experimental design and data analysis. She unpacks scientific concepts by stripping away jargon and rebuilding ideas in plain language, making sure students can explain the "why" behind a process rather than just labeling a diagram. Her 5.0 student rating backs up that approach.

India's math-and-science emphasis within her Liberal Arts program means she's actively working through the same quantitative and lab-based material her students encounter — balancing equations, interpreting data tables, and connecting abstract concepts to observable results. That proximity to the coursework keeps her explanations grounded in the specific sticking points students actually hit. Rated 4.8 by students.

A math major might seem like an unusual pick for science, but Mingxi's quantitative training at UW-Madison is exactly what makes her effective at breaking down formulas, unit conversions, and data interpretation — the skills that trip up most science students. She approaches science problems the same way she approaches math: by teaching the reasoning behind each step rather than handing over an answer.