Award-Winning College Physics Tutors
serving Ogden, UT

A physics degree means Kendall didn't just pass college physics — she lived in it for four years, building fluency across mechanics, E&M, waves, and thermal physics from the theory up. She's particularly good at walking through the conceptual leaps that textbooks gloss over, like why you can treat a pulley system as a single equation or when to switch from force analysis to energy methods. Rated 5.0 by students, with a 35 ACT backing up her quantitative chops.

Grey earned his B.S. in Physics from the University of Utah, which means college-level mechanics, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics aren't abstract textbook topics for him — they're the core of his training. He emphasizes hands-on problem solving, walking through free-body diagrams, circuit analysis, and wave equations step by step until the physics clicks. Rated 4.7 by students.

College-level physics ramps up fast, especially when calculus-based mechanics or electromagnetism enter the picture. Matthew has worked in BYU's physics help lab throughout his applied physics degree, troubleshooting everything from Gauss's law problems to multi-step thermodynamics derivations with students in real time. That daily exposure to where people get stuck makes him efficient at diagnosing and clearing up confusion.

I enjoy helping students build confidence in chemistry, physics, and the ACT. I just finished up my sophomore year studying biomedical engineering with a 3.99 GPA. While at school, I am a peer tutor for general chemistry, organic chemistry, and physics 1. I love getting to know my students and helping them out with their unique concerns. I have a very problem-based teaching philosophy where we work through lots of practice problems together. I can't wait to meet you! Let's connect!

Eric's mechanical engineering background means he didn't just study college physics — he applied it, working through statics, dynamics, and thermodynamics problems where getting the setup wrong has real design consequences. That engineering instinct shows when he breaks down force diagrams or walks through energy conservation scenarios, because he treats each problem as something to reason through physically, not just solve algebraically. Rated 5.0 by students.

Three physics-related bachelor's degrees give Avram an unusually deep undergraduate perspective on the subject — he's worked through mechanics, electromagnetism, and modern physics multiple times across different programs, which means he knows exactly where the conceptual gaps tend to hide. He breaks down wave phenomena and optics problems by connecting the math back to physical intuition, so equations feel like descriptions of real behavior rather than symbols to manipulate. His 1520 SAT reflects the quantitative precision he brings to problem solving.

A computer science degree from UCLA means Michael spent semesters deep in the physics that underpins simulation and graphics — kinematics, force modeling, energy systems — and his 1560 SAT confirms the quantitative chops to handle calculus-based problem solving. He teaches students to treat each physics problem like debugging code: isolate what you know, identify the governing principle, then execute step by step until the answer falls out.

College-level physics layers calculus and more rigorous problem-solving onto the conceptual foundations from high school, and Samantha's Cornell science background means she's fluent in both the math and the theory. She breaks down topics like rotational dynamics, electric fields, and thermodynamic cycles using visual models and step-by-step dimensional analysis that keep the problem-solving process clear.

Two physics degrees — a B.S. and a PhD — mean Zhengdong has worked through every layer of the college physics sequence, from introductory Newtonian mechanics all the way to quantum theory and advanced electrodynamics. He's particularly effective at teaching students to translate a physical scenario into the right mathematical framework, whether that's setting up free-body diagrams in mechanics or applying Gauss's law to symmetric charge distributions. Rated 4.8 by students.

Molecular biology might seem like a different world from physics, but Agustin's coursework lives in the overlap — diffusion equations, fluid dynamics in cellular transport, and the thermodynamics behind protein folding all demand real physics fluency. He pairs that life-sciences perspective with strong quantitative chops (1560 SAT) to break down mechanics and energy problems in ways that click for students who think more naturally in biological terms than abstract force diagrams.

Chemical engineering at Vanderbilt means Greg solves physics problems daily — fluid mechanics, heat transfer, thermodynamics, and force balances are baked into every core course, so his explanations come from repeated, hands-on application rather than textbook summaries. His math double major gives him the calculus fluency to walk through derivations cleanly, especially when problems involve integration over continuous systems or solving second-order differential equations of motion. Rated 5.0 by students.

Running an immunology lab at Columbia University Medical Center means Matthew applies physics daily in ways most tutors haven't — calibrating imaging equipment, analyzing force and pressure data in tissue samples, and troubleshooting instruments that depend on optics and electromagnetism. That hands-on fluency, combined with a physics degree and a 35 ACT, lets him teach college-level mechanics and E&M problems by connecting equations to the physical systems they actually describe.

Environmental engineering is essentially physics with consequences — Kate's master's work required her to model fluid flow, heat transfer, and pressure systems in real infrastructure, which means she's solved the same types of problems that show up on college physics exams but with actual design constraints attached. That applied perspective makes her particularly effective at teaching students to set up force balances and energy equations from a physical scenario rather than reverse-engineering from a formula sheet. Rated 4.9 by students.

Three science-focused bachelor's degrees — including biology — meant Garrett sat through the full calculus-based physics sequence and kept coming back to it in physiology and physical chemistry, where concepts like fluid dynamics, pressure gradients, and energy transfer show up again and again. That repeated exposure across disciplines gives him an intuitive feel for when to apply conservation of energy versus momentum, or how to reason through a thermodynamics problem without getting lost in the formalism. His 1530 SAT speaks to the quantitative sharpness he brings to each session.

When a college physics problem looks like pure abstraction — a block on a frictionless ramp, a charge in a uniform field — Dylan's instinct is to sketch it out, graph it, and show what's physically happening before touching an equation. That visual, graphical approach comes from his physics major at Vanderbilt, where he's simultaneously studying classics and computer science, giving him an unusual ability to translate dense quantitative reasoning into clear, intuitive language. He holds a 4.5 rating and a 36 ACT composite.

College-level physics demands more than plug-and-chug — problems in electrodynamics, rotational mechanics, or thermodynamics often require combining multiple principles in a single solution. Pranav digs into these multi-step problems as a Biomedical Engineering student at Johns Hopkins, where physics underpins much of his coursework. He walks through derivations and problem-solving strategies that build real fluency with the material rather than surface-level familiarity.

Premed coursework and a computing degree at Notre Dame meant Aidan sat through the full sequence of calculus-based physics — mechanics, E&M, waves — while simultaneously learning to think algorithmically about complex problems. That combination is particularly useful when students hit the wall where physics stops being plug-and-chug and starts requiring multi-step reasoning, like connecting free-body diagrams to energy methods or translating a word problem into the right integral. His 35 ACT speaks to the quantitative fluency he brings to those tougher setups.