Award-Winning Organic Chemistry Tutors
serving Boston, MA

Teaching two Chemistry 101 lab sections gave Davis hands-on experience explaining reaction mechanisms, functional group behavior, and electron-pushing arrows to students encountering them for the first time. He approaches organic chemistry as a language of patterns — once students learn to read electron density and leaving-group tendencies, synthesis problems become far more manageable.

I am also a first year medical student at the Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston. I have extensive experience with premedical classes and have taken and tutored the MCAT exam. I placed in the 97th percentile of the MCAT exam and I understand what the test takers want students to know and how to bridge the gap between knowing the material and doing well on the test. I am always excited when a student finally has that "ah-ha" moment and declares that they now can see how all of these seemingly separate scientific topics are actually all related. The MCAT no longer seems scary, but turns into a means of truly learning this material and providing a strong foundation for the future.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Marc learned that language thoroughly during his biochemistry degree, where every biosynthetic pathway demanded fluency with nucleophilic attacks, stereochemistry, and electron-pushing. He walks through each mechanism step by step, connecting arrow-pushing to the actual energetics driving the reaction.

Tufts Biomedical Science coursework gave Sarah repeated exposure to organic chemistry concepts well beyond a single semester — she's traced reaction mechanisms through pharmacology, biochemistry, and molecular biology, which means she knows how carbonyl reactivity and functional group transformations actually show up downstream. She breaks multi-step synthesis problems into decision points: what's the nucleophile, what's leaving, and what drives the reaction forward. Rated 5.0 by students.

I am currently a Ph.D. student at Harvard University in the department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology.

I am a graduate of Boston University (BU) as of 2012, and I recently graduated from Tufts University in 2014. I have received my Bachelors of Science in Biomedical Engineering from BU, and I have earned my Masters of Science degree in the same field at Tufts. I currently work as a research scientist in Cambridge studying therapies for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease. My tutoring experience stems from my involvement in the National Honor Society at Xaverian Brothers High School where I tutored Freshman and Sophomore classes in our mathematics and science, specifically Algebra, Calculus and Biology. Furthermore, after being inducted in the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society at BU, I led tutoring sessions specifically geared to Engineering principles such as mechanics, physics, and mathematics. As an engineer, my favorite subjects to study are High School to College Mathematics as well as the Sciences (Physics, Chemisty, Biology) because it gives the mind a great workout! I am a generally upbeat and motivated individual which is essentially translated to my tutoring strategies; if you can somehow make the subject engaging, the more chances the student will want to learn the material! I enjoy that "A-ha!" moment when the student fully and finally understands a concept! In my spare time, I am a competitive ballroom dancer, theater aficionado and a scientific researcher in biomedical engineering!

I am an avid skier and outdoorswoman, and a passionate fan of Boston sports. As a tutor, I offer a broad range of scientific subjects, including Physics, Chemistry and Biology, and I am particularly passionate about Biochemistry and Microbiology. I also offer and enjoy test prep, including the SAT and independent school entrance exams such as the ISEE and SSAT. As an educator, I am passionate about helping every student, because I believe that everyone has the potential to succeed in Science and excel on standardized tests. I love the subjects I tutor and I strive to help my students appreciate the value of knowledge so they understand not only the material, but why it is relevant and important in their lives.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and Natasha teaches them the way she learned them in her biomolecular engineering program — by tracing electron movement step by step until the logic feels inevitable rather than arbitrary. She digs into arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group reactivity by asking students to predict products before revealing answers, building real intuition for how molecules behave.

Nicole's graduate work in Cellular and Molecular Biology at Duke means she's constantly tracing biochemical pathways back to the organic reactions that drive them — carbonyl additions, acyl substitutions, the functional group chemistry that makes metabolism possible. That daily immersion gives her a way of teaching arrow-pushing and reaction prediction that's rooted in seeing these mechanisms actually matter, not just memorizing reagent tables. Rated 4.9 by students.

Reaction mechanisms start making sense when you can trace electron movement step by step — arrow pushing, nucleophilic attacks, leaving groups. Will's pre-med concentration at Boston University meant semesters of organic chemistry where he learned to connect functional group behavior to real biochemical pathways. Rated 5.0 by students, he breaks down synthesis problems into logical chains rather than memorization marathons.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Michael learned to speak it fluently during his Chemistry & Chemical Biology program at Cornell. He teaches students to trace electron movement through substitution, elimination, and addition reactions so they can predict products instead of relying on memorized shortcuts.

Chemical engineering at Columbia and MIT means Kelsey has worked through organic chemistry from both the academic and applied sides — synthesis design, reaction kinetics, and process-level thinking about how functional group transformations scale beyond a single flask. She digs into the thermodynamic and kinetic reasoning behind selectivity questions, like why one reaction pathway dominates under specific conditions, giving students a problem-solving framework they can carry into exams. Rated 4.9 by students.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and they stop being intimidating once you learn to read electron movement like a story rather than memorize arrow-pushing patterns. Vaibhav's cellular and molecular biology program at Pitt required extensive organic chemistry coursework, so he teaches substitution, elimination, and addition reactions through the lens of someone who's applied them in biochemical contexts. He unpacks each mechanism by starting with why electrons move, then building to predicting products.

I'm well versed in areas of General Chemistry, as well as Algebra and Geometry.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and Claire — who earned her chemistry degree from Amherst — teaches them by tracing electron movement through each step of substitution, elimination, and addition reactions. Instead of memorizing hundreds of individual reactions, her students learn to predict products by understanding nucleophilicity, sterics, and leaving group ability. That pattern-recognition approach is what got her a 5.0 rating.

Pursuing biochemistry at Tufts while prepping for medical school means Suraj has worked through organic chemistry with the kind of rigor that comes from needing every mechanism to stick — not just for one exam, but for MCAT prep and upper-level biochemistry courses that build directly on it. He zeroes in on where a student's reasoning breaks down mid-mechanism, whether it's misidentifying the nucleophile in an addition-elimination or losing track of stereochemistry through a multi-step synthesis, and rebuilds the logic from that exact point. Rated 5.0 by students.

I am currently a second year medical student at Tufts University. I was a tutor for fpur years at Brigham Young University, and I love helping people learn! I tutor Economics, Math and all the basic sciences. I really enjoy tutoring these subjects because my students and I work together to understand the principles underlying the problems, which helps us remember everything better and makes studying more enjoyable. My tutoring theory is that students either know the answer or know how to find it, and together we can make that happen.

I have always enjoyed teaching even when I was in grade school helping my friends with their homework. I live for that 'aha!' moment with a student! I have tutored off and on for the past 10 years both as a tutor in math and chemistry and later as a teaching assistant in chemistry during graduate school. I love to meet students where they are and build from there. We break complex concepts into digestible pieces to build upon where your understanding already is.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and learning to predict products means recognizing electron-density patterns, not memorizing hundreds of individual reactions. Alec's approach — honed through years of TA work in Cornell's chemistry department — emphasizes arrow-pushing logic and functional group reactivity so that substitution, elimination, and addition reactions start to feel like variations on a theme rather than separate things to memorize.

Cornell's biology curriculum threw Raphael into organic chemistry as the bridge between general chemistry and the biochemistry he needed for his pre-med track — meaning he learned reaction mechanisms through the lens of biological relevance, not just isolated transformations on an exam. He tackles arrow-pushing and functional group reactivity by zeroing in on the "why" behind electron movement, building each mechanism step from nucleophile-electrophile logic so students can reason through unfamiliar problems on their own. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and most students struggle because they try to memorize arrows instead of understanding electron flow. Abrahim unpacks each mechanism — SN1 vs. SN2, E1 vs. E2, electrophilic aromatic substitution — by starting with nucleophilicity, sterics, and leaving-group ability so the logic drives the arrow-pushing rather than the other way around. His 5.0 rating speaks to how well that approach clicks.

Reaction mechanisms are the backbone of organic chemistry, and students who try to memorize each one individually run out of mental storage by the second exam. Bintou's chemistry training at Penn taught her to classify reactions by electron behavior — nucleophilic attack, leaving group stability, carbocation rearrangement — so patterns emerge instead of isolated steps. She teaches students to predict products by reading the mechanism, not by recognizing a specific example they've seen before.

Reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry are less about memorizing hundreds of arrows and more about recognizing a handful of recurring patterns — nucleophilic attacks, leaving group stability, and electron density shifts. Aidan studied organic chemistry as part of Notre Dame's premed track and teaches students to predict products by understanding why electrons move, not just where.

Max spent much of high school independently pursuing organic chemistry through coursework and projects well beyond what was required — the kind of deep, self-driven study that builds real fluency with reaction types and synthesis logic. His chemistry degree from MIT and mathematical instincts mean he approaches problems like retrosynthetic analysis and multi-step mechanism design as structured puzzles, breaking each one into clear decision points. Rated 5.0 by students.

Biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins means Nicholas encounters organic chemistry where it intersects with real applications — polymer biomaterials, drug delivery systems, and the functional group chemistry that governs how molecules interact with biological tissue. He teaches reaction types by grounding them in that engineering context, turning abstract arrow-pushing into something students can visualize and reason through. Rated 4.8 by students.

Reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry are essentially molecular storytelling — electron pairs move, bonds break and form, and stereochemistry shifts in predictable ways. Andrew's molecular biology training required deep fluency with organic reactions at the biomolecular level, so he teaches arrow-pushing and functional group transformations as logical sequences rather than steps to memorize.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Troy spent two semesters teaching that language as an organic chemistry TA. He walks students through arrow-pushing, stereochemical outcomes, and retrosynthetic analysis by emphasizing the handful of recurring electronic patterns that make hundreds of reactions predictable rather than random.

A bio-organic chemistry degree means Alex didn't just pass orgo — the entire major was built around understanding how molecular structure dictates reactivity, from substitution and elimination selectivity to multi-step synthesis design. He breaks down each mechanism by identifying the nucleophile, electrophile, and driving force first, so students develop a repeatable framework instead of a growing pile of flashcards. That same logic scales directly into spectroscopy interpretation and retrosynthetic analysis when exams get harder.

Most students dread organic chemistry because it feels like a new language, but the logic underneath reaction mechanisms is surprisingly consistent once someone lays it out clearly. Ade approaches each reaction type — substitution, elimination, addition — by teaching students to read electron movement and predict products rather than memorize hundreds of individual reactions.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Casey reads them fluently after years of bioengineering coursework that demanded constant fluency in electron-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations. She teaches students to recognize patterns across reaction types — why nucleophilic additions behave the way they do, how leaving groups dictate substitution vs. elimination — so each new chapter feels like a variation on something familiar rather than a fresh nightmare.