A Harvard English lit degree might not scream science, but Ema's five years of math tutoring — covering everything from basic measurement to pre-calculus — means she's comfortable with the quantitative backbone of science: unit conversions, graphing data, and working through formulas. Her 33 ACT confirms she can handle cross-disciplinary reasoning, and her instinct for breaking word problems into manageable steps carries over naturally to interpreting experiments and explaining results.

A sociology major at Yale spends a surprising amount of time with research methods — designing surveys, interpreting statistical outputs, and evaluating whether evidence actually supports a claim — and Katrina brings that training to science material where students need the same skills to work through experiments and data tables. Her 32 ACT confirms she can handle the quantitative side, and her instinct for asking "what does this result actually tell us?" pushes students past surface-level memorization.

As a screenwriting major at USC, Kiersten spends her days building narratives from cause and effect — which is essentially what science asks students to do when tracing how one variable triggers a chain of outcomes in an experiment. She scored a 1550 on the SAT, confirming she can handle evidence-based reasoning and data interpretation, and her experience tutoring charter school juniors means she knows how to make dense material accessible without dumbing it down.

An English and French literature background might not scream science, but Carla's analytical training — close reading, building arguments from textual evidence, and identifying patterns across complex material — maps well onto interpreting data, understanding experimental write-ups, and explaining results clearly. She's particularly useful for students who can handle the concepts but struggle to articulate their reasoning in lab reports or written responses. Holds a 5.0 rating.

John's drama training at the BFA level actually builds a surprisingly useful science skill: reading a scenario closely, identifying what's really being asked, and constructing a clear, logical explanation under pressure. His 1580 SAT confirms he can handle data interpretation and evidence-based reasoning at a high level, and his editorial work at the Los Angeles Review of Books means he's especially sharp at helping students write lab reports and scientific explanations that are precise and well-organized.

Two years as an undergraduate teaching assistant for a developmental physiology course gave Raquel deep practice explaining concepts like cell signaling, organ system integration, and homeostasis to students encountering them for the first time. She also led biology tutoring through the Science National Honor Society in high school. That combination of college-level TA work and years of one-on-one sessions means she can adjust her explanations from introductory vocabulary all the way up to AP-level experimental design.

Between her public health minor and pre-med preparation at UCLA, Nicole built a deep working knowledge of biology, chemistry, and physical science that she's reinforced through years of tutoring in each. She's especially skilled at teaching students how to connect abstract concepts — like energy transfer or cellular processes — to concrete, observable phenomena. Her experience teaching science in classrooms in the Philippines and Honduras also sharpened her ability to explain ideas without relying on jargon.

Studying visual and environmental studies means Tom spends his coursework at the intersection of observation and analysis — documenting how systems interact, interpreting what he sees, and building arguments from evidence, which is essentially the scientific method applied through a different lens. He's particularly strong at teaching students to read diagrams, pull meaning from visual data, and articulate their reasoning clearly, since those skills overlap heavily with his arts training. His 1560 SAT confirms the analytical horsepower behind the creative background.

Earning a bachelor's in earth sciences and pursuing a master's in geospatial technology at USC means Krista lives and breathes scientific thinking. She tackles everything from middle school life science to high school chemistry, emphasizing how to design experiments, interpret data, and explain results using precise scientific language.

Linguistics training at NYU sharpened Naama's ability to break complex systems into patterns and rules — a skill that maps directly onto how science asks students to classify, predict, and explain natural phenomena. She's especially effective at helping students decode the dense vocabulary in science textbooks, since dissecting Latin and Greek roots is second nature to someone who studies language for a living. Her psychology coursework also means she can teach research design and the scientific method from firsthand experience.

A double physics degree gives Gerardo the depth to tackle science topics ranging from Newtonian mechanics to energy conservation and wave behavior. He breaks down scientific reasoning into clear, logical steps — the same structured thinking he uses when connecting formulas to lab observations and real-world phenomena.

Zoe's English major at UCLA doesn't scream science, but journalism and editing trained her to do exactly what science assignments ask: read dense material carefully, pull out the key claims, and explain them in clear, organized language. She's a strong fit for students who understand the concepts but struggle to write up lab reports, explain experimental results, or put scientific reasoning into complete sentences.