Scoring a 36 ACT composite while juggling a chemical engineering curriculum at Washington and Lee means Alex learned to read and edit fast — a skill that pays off on the English section's 75 questions in 45 minutes, where hesitation on any single punctuation or rhetoric question eats into the clock. His medical school training at Arizona adds another layer: writing and revising under pressure is now second nature, and he teaches the section's recurring patterns (verb-tense shifts, pronoun agreement, passage-level organization) as a systematic checklist rather than a feel-it-out exercise.

I'm a rising sophomore at Georgia Institute of Technology. I love teaching and got a lot of practice from tutoring my brother. Physics is probably my favorite subject to teach.

I'm a 24-year old teacher/tutor. I am a very personable, outgoing person and I enjoy making connections with others- especially when I can make people feel comfortable no matter what the setting- and I find that those who have less to say usually have the most important things to say! Tutoring provides me with a platform in which I am able to help others gain confidence in their work and watch them discover abilities they may not have known that they have. Above all, this is what I most love about tutoring and teaching.

Applying to law school means Alexis lives in the world of precise, persuasive writing — catching redundancies, tightening arguments, and making every word earn its place, which is essentially what the ACT English section asks you to do 75 times in 45 minutes. Her 32 ACT composite and triple-major background in the humanities give her a deep comfort with the passage-level rhetoric and organization questions, not just the punctuation drills. Rated 5.0 by students.

Theater training builds a surprisingly useful skill for the ACT English section: Tucker spent years analyzing scripts for rhythm, structure, and intent, which translates directly into the rhetorical strategy questions about author purpose and passage organization. His 33 ACT composite and 5.0 rating confirm he backs up that instinct with the hard grammar rules — he teaches the punctuation and sentence-structure conventions as a short, memorizable playbook so students stop second-guessing what "sounds right."

I am a Math and Science expert, and I would love to help you or your student reach their potential. I offer flexible hours, I am easy to get along with, and I have effective methods. I take pride in helping others learn. I have a BS in mechanical engineering so there isn't a high school or college math class I haven't taken. I'm a Physics dork as well! Outside of tutoring, I love the outdoors, sports (especially the Cardinals and Suns!), and science-fiction. I look forward to working with you!

Punctuation rules and rhetorical strategy questions trip up most ACT English test-takers, and Claire addresses both by teaching students to hear sentence structure — where a comma actually belongs, why a transition word changes an argument's direction. She scored a 32 ACT composite and now applies that same analytical precision to her medical coursework and the medical ethics course she taught at Midwestern.

Law school trains you to read sentences the way the ACT English section demands — zeroing in on whether every word earns its place, whether clauses connect logically, and whether punctuation follows actual rules instead of instinct. Mladen's JD and psychology background mean he can break down both the grammar conventions and the rhetorical strategy questions, especially the ones about passage organization and redundancy that reward careful editorial thinking. His 33 ACT composite confirms the approach works under real test conditions.

Scoring a 32 ACT composite, Isabel knows the English section rewards a specific skill: hearing the difference between correct and awkward phrasing in context. She drills punctuation rules, subject-verb agreement, and rhetorical strategy questions until students can spot errors at the pace the test demands.

Most ACT English mistakes come down to a handful of grammar rules applied inconsistently — comma splices, pronoun-antecedent agreement, and misplaced modifiers account for a huge share of missed points. Lindsay, who scored a 35 composite, teaches students to spot these patterns by reading like an editor rather than a test-taker. Once students learn to hear the error before they see the answer choices, their accuracy and speed both jump.

Jacob's psychology and theater training made him a close reader of subtext — figuring out what a sentence is trying to do and whether it's actually doing it, which is the exact skill behind the ACT English section's rhetorical strategy and passage organization questions. His 35 ACT composite and 5.0 rating back up an approach that teaches grammar conventions as a short, memorizable rulebook rather than a guessing game. He's especially sharp on the conciseness questions where students need to recognize that the shortest correct answer is almost always the right one.