I am a rising sophomore studying civil engineering at Cornell University. I enjoy tutoring math (algebra-calculus 3), high school and college physics, Spanish, and writing. I have experience tutoring throughout high school, where I was the head of a peer-tutoring program. I have continued tutoring in college as well.

Most ACT Reading struggles come down to time management: four passages in 35 minutes leaves almost no room for re-reading. Hailey teaches a strategic passage-ordering method and shows students how to use line references and paragraph structure to locate answers without reading every word. Her 32 ACT composite and 5.0 rating speak to how well the approach works.

Most ACT Reading mistakes come from time pressure, not comprehension — students understand passages but can't consistently answer 40 questions in 35 minutes. Elliot teaches a triage strategy: how to identify question types, when to skim versus close-read, and how to eliminate answer choices that paraphrase the passage just enough to seem right. Rated 5.0 by students.

I am currently a resident physician at Northwestern Hospital.

I am in my second year at MIT studying mathematics, and I am currently doing a research project in Spectral Graph Theory. I have been a tutor since my junior year in high school, and I enjoy teaching all levels of math; everything from pre-algebra through calculus and linear algebra! I focus primarily on making sure that the definitions and processes given in class make intuitive sense, so that math can begin to feel like second nature.

Most ACT Reading struggles come down to time, not comprehension — four passages in 35 minutes leaves almost no room for re-reading. Danielle scored a 36 composite and teaches an active-reading method that captures main idea and tone on the first pass, so students spend their time answering rather than searching. She's especially effective at demystifying the paired-passage and natural science sections that tend to slow students down.

Chemical engineering coursework means years of reading dense technical papers and extracting exactly the information that matters — a habit Olivia carries into ACT Reading prep, especially on the natural science and social science passages where students tend to get buried in detail. She teaches a first-pass strategy: skim for the author's argument structure, then use that map to answer inference and purpose questions without rereading entire paragraphs. Her 34 ACT composite and 4.9 student rating back up the method.

I am here to help with pre-med coursework, MCAT prep, and many other classes. I am frequently available for online tutoring.

Reading scientific papers for her materials science career taught Jennifer to extract an author's argument quickly — a skill that maps directly onto ACT Reading's tight 35-minute window. She teaches students a passage-mapping technique that prioritizes locating evidence over rereading, turning each set of questions into a targeted search rather than a memory test.

Neuroscience coursework means Mary spends her days reading primary research papers packed with competing hypotheses and dense methodology sections — exactly the kind of rapid comprehension the ACT Reading section's natural science and social science passages demand. With a 35 ACT composite and a 4.8 student rating, she teaches students to isolate an author's main argument before diving into questions, so they stop wasting time re-reading and start treating each passage as a structured claim they can pick apart efficiently.

Reading comprehension on the ACT is a speed game — four passages in 35 minutes leaves almost no room for re-reading. Naomi teaches a passage-mapping technique that captures the argument structure on the first read, so students can answer inference and detail questions without hunting through paragraphs. Her own 35 composite reflects how well that strategy performs under real test conditions.

Every ACT Reading passage type — prose fiction, social science, humanities, natural science — rewards a slightly different reading strategy, and most students lose points by treating them all the same. Juliette's literature and history background gives her a natural advantage in teaching students how to adjust their approach depending on whether they're tracking a narrative arc or extracting an argument. She scored a 35 composite and is rated 5.0 by students.