What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Evaluating Reports Based On Data, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for Statistics.
Study Evaluating Reports Based On Data in Statistics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the correct meaning of a 95% confidence level in a report?
Tap card or press Space to flip
The method captures the true parameter in 95% of samples. It's about the long-run performance of the interval construction method.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 40
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Evaluating Reports Based On Data, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for Statistics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: The method captures the true parameter in 95% of samples. It's about the long-run performance of the interval construction method.
Answer: Median. Median resists the pull of high-income outliers.
Answer: 95% of such intervals capture the true parameter. The method produces intervals that contain the parameter 95% of the time.
Answer: The method captures the true value in 95% of repeated samples. Not that we're 95% sure about this specific interval.
Answer: Reject H0. Since p<α, the result is statistically significant.
Answer: Randomized experiment. Random assignment controls for confounding variables.
Answer: Not statistically significant at α=0.05 (interval includes 0). CI contains null value 0, so fail to reject H0.
Answer: Significance may occur even when the effect is small. Large samples can detect tiny, meaningless differences.
Answer: Random assignment. Randomly assigning treatments balances confounders across groups.
Answer: Selection bias; sample likely differs from the target population. Convenience samples are not randomly selected from the population.
Answer: Statistically significant at α=0.05 (interval excludes 0). All values in CI are positive, showing a real difference.
Answer: Probability of data at least as extreme, assuming H0 is true. Not the probability that H0 is true.
Answer: Truncated axis exaggerates visual differences. Makes small differences appear larger than they are.
Answer: Voluntary response bias. Self-selected respondents don't represent the population.
Answer: Half the interval width. The ± value represents the margin of error.
Answer: Every same-size sample has an equal chance of selection. SRS ensures unbiased representation of the population.
Answer: Probability of data at least as extreme, assuming H0. Measures how likely the observed data would occur if the null hypothesis were true.
Answer: Strong selection bias; results may not represent the population. Volunteers differ systematically from non-volunteers.
Answer: A result with p≤α. The p-value must be less than or equal to the significance level.
Answer: Association does not imply a cause-and-effect link. Correlation doesn't prove one variable causes changes in another.
Answer: Mean is not resistant; median is more appropriate. Outliers inflate the mean but don't affect median.
Answer: Reject if θ0 is not in the 95% CI. If the null value falls outside the CI, it's unlikely given the data.
Answer: A p-value (or enough information to compute it). Compare p to α to determine significance.
Answer: 2. Margin = (52−48)/2=2.
Answer: Causal claim is not justified without random assignment. Observational studies can't establish causation due to potential confounders.
Answer: Fail to reject H0. Since p>α, the result is not statistically significant.
Answer: Self-selection confounding; groups may differ before treatment. Without randomization, treatment groups aren't comparable.
Answer: Reject H0; results are statistically significant at level α. Small p-values indicate data unlikely under null hypothesis.
Answer: Strong selection bias from self-selection. Only those with strong opinions tend to respond.
Answer: Was the study a randomized experiment (not just observational). Only randomized experiments can establish causation, not observational studies.
Answer: Likely sampling error range around the estimate (at a stated level). MOE quantifies uncertainty due to random sampling variability.
Answer: Significance is about chance; importance is about effect size/impact. Small effects can be significant with large samples.
Answer: Fail to reject H0 at α=0.05. Since 0 is inside [−1,4], the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Answer: Association only; causation is not justified without random assignment. Observational studies can't control for all confounders.
Answer: A variable related to both explanatory and response variables. It affects both variables, creating a spurious relationship.
Answer: Statistically significant but possibly not practically important. Very small p-value doesn't guarantee the effect matters in practice.
Answer: Relative change can exaggerate impact without the absolute difference. "200% increase" from 1 to 3 is only 2 units.
Answer: Reject H0 at α=0.05. Since 0 is outside [2,5], the null hypothesis is rejected.
Answer: Season/temperature is a confounding variable. Both increase in summer; correlation doesn't imply causation.
Answer: Random assignment to treatment and control groups. Randomization eliminates confounding variables by balancing groups.