Assignment And Delegation Within Scope

Help Questions

NCLEX-PN › Assignment And Delegation Within Scope

Questions 1 - 3
1

An RN asks the LPN/VN to oversee a UAP assisting with ambulation for a 79-year-old client admitted for dehydration who is now stable (blood pressure 118/70 mm Hg, pulse 84/min) but reports dizziness when standing. The client has a fall-risk wristband and uses a walker. What is the LPN/VN's PRIORITY action in this scenario?

Ask the UAP to ambulate the client to the bathroom alone to promote independence

Teach the client how to use the walker safely and evaluate understanding

Instruct the UAP to obtain orthostatic vital signs before ambulation and report results to the LPN/VN

Delegate to the UAP to document the client’s intake and output for the shift

Explanation

This question tests assignment and delegation within the LPN/VN scope, specifically prioritizing safety in delegation decisions. The priority framework is fall prevention and safe ambulation for at-risk clients. Instructing the UAP to obtain orthostatic vital signs before ambulation is the priority action because it provides objective data about the client's cardiovascular response to position changes, essential for preventing falls in a dizzy, dehydrated client. Having the UAP ambulate alone (A) is unsafe given the dizziness and fall risk. Documenting I&O (C) is important but not the immediate priority over safety assessment. Teaching walker use (D) is within LPN/VN scope but not the priority when immediate safety assessment is needed. The decision-making principle is to prioritize safety assessments before mobilizing at-risk clients, and UAPs can obtain vital signs under proper direction. A transferable strategy for effective delegation is to always ensure safety parameters are assessed before delegating mobility tasks for clients with fall risks or orthostatic symptoms.

2

While rounding, the LPN/VN reviews information a UAP documented for a 64-year-old client with heart failure who is on fluid restriction. Data from the last 4 hours: intake 240 mL, urine output 60 mL, weight up 2 lb (0.9 kg) from yesterday, and new bilateral ankle swelling noted by the UAP. The RN is available on the unit. The LPN/VN should NOTIFY the RN when...

the UAP documents that the client ate 75% of breakfast

the client’s intake over 4 hours is 240 mL on a fluid restriction plan

the client’s urine output over 4 hours is 60 mL and the client reports no discomfort

the client’s weight is up 2 lb (0.9 kg) from yesterday with new ankle swelling

Explanation

This question tests assignment and delegation within the LPN/VN scope, specifically recognizing findings requiring RN notification. The priority framework is identifying signs of fluid volume excess in heart failure requiring intervention. The 2-pound weight gain with new ankle swelling indicates worsening fluid retention in a heart failure client, requiring immediate RN assessment and potential intervention adjustments. The fluid intake of 240 mL over 4 hours (B) is within expected limits for fluid restriction. Urine output of 60 mL over 4 hours (C) equals 15 mL/hr, which is low but not immediately critical if the client is comfortable. Documentation of food intake (D) is routine information not requiring immediate notification. The decision-making principle is that sudden weight gain with new edema in heart failure clients indicates decompensation requiring prompt RN assessment and intervention. A transferable strategy for effective delegation is to immediately report findings suggesting worsening of the primary condition, particularly weight gain and edema changes in heart failure clients.

3

During the shift, the RN directs the LPN/VN to supervise a UAP who is taking vital signs on assigned clients. The UAP reports these findings: a 72-year-old with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has respirations 28/min and oxygen saturation 88% on room air; a 60-year-old with hypertension has blood pressure 148/86 mm Hg; a 39-year-old with gastroenteritis has temperature 99.1°F (37.3°C); a 51-year-old postoperative day 2 client has pain 4/10. Which finding should the LPN/VN report to the RN?

Pain 4/10 on postoperative day 2 in the 51-year-old client

Temperature 99.1°F (37.3°C) in the 39-year-old client

Oxygen saturation 88% on room air with respirations 28/min in the 72-year-old client

Blood pressure 148/86 mm Hg in the 60-year-old client

Explanation

This question tests assignment and delegation within the LPN/VN scope, specifically recognizing abnormal findings that require RN notification. The priority framework is recognizing critical values and understanding the chain of communication in delegation. The oxygen saturation of 88% with tachypnea in a COPD client represents acute respiratory compromise requiring immediate RN assessment and intervention. The blood pressure of 148/86 (B) is elevated but not critically high for a hypertensive client and can be monitored. The low-grade temperature of 99.1°F (C) in a gastroenteritis client is expected and not immediately concerning. Pain of 4/10 on postoperative day 2 (D) is within expected parameters and manageable with scheduled interventions. The decision-making principle is that findings indicating potential respiratory failure, cardiovascular instability, or significant changes from baseline require immediate RN notification. A transferable strategy for effective delegation is to prioritize reporting findings that threaten ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) or represent significant deterioration from the client's baseline condition.