Cell–Cell Junctions and Extracellular Matrix (2A)
Help Questions
MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems › Cell–Cell Junctions and Extracellular Matrix (2A)
In an intestinal epithelial model, a cytokine exposure causes internalization of occludin and claudins from the apical junctional complex. TEER decreases, but the rate of endocytosis of a labeled nutrient transporter at the apical membrane is unchanged. Based on the vignette, which conclusion is most consistent with the affected cellular process?
Paracellular barrier function is compromised while transcellular transporter trafficking can remain intact, indicating selective disruption of tight junctions
Cell–cell mechanical adhesion must fail because claudins are the primary cadherins that link actin between adjacent cells
Transcellular nutrient uptake must decrease because tight junction proteins directly form nutrient transporter pores
Cell–ECM attachment must increase because tight junction loss upregulates integrin binding, raising TEER
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Tight junctions create paracellular barriers through transmembrane proteins like occludin and claudins, while transcellular transport occurs through specific transporters and is regulated independently. In this vignette, cytokine-induced internalization of tight junction proteins reduces barrier function without affecting transporter endocytosis. Choice A is correct because tight junction disruption specifically compromises the paracellular barrier (decreased TEER) while transcellular transport mechanisms remain functional, as evidenced by unchanged nutrient transporter trafficking. Choice B is incorrect as tight junction proteins form paracellular barriers, not nutrient transporter pores, and transcellular transport uses distinct membrane proteins. Understanding that paracellular and transcellular pathways are independently regulated helps predict how specific perturbations affect epithelial function.
Keratinocytes from a patient with skin blistering show normal tight junction protein localization but reduced desmoglein expression at cell borders. In a mechanical stretch assay, the monolayer tears at cell–cell boundaries despite normal cell viability. Based on the vignette, which conclusion is most consistent with the disrupted cellular interaction?
Failure of gap junction communication prevents calcium diffusion, directly weakening the extracellular matrix
Failure of integrin-mediated focal adhesions decreases cell–substrate binding, causing detachment rather than intercellular tearing
Failure of desmosome-mediated linkage to intermediate filaments reduces resistance to mechanical stress at cell–cell contacts
Failure of tight junction sealing increases paracellular permeability, leading to osmotic swelling and tearing
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Desmosomes are specialized adhesive junctions that link intermediate filaments between cells through desmosomal cadherins like desmoglein, providing mechanical strength to tissues under stress. In this vignette, reduced desmoglein expression specifically compromises desmosome function while other junctions remain normal. Choice D is correct because desmosomes are the primary junctions responsible for resisting mechanical stress by anchoring intermediate filaments, and their disruption explains why the monolayer tears at cell-cell boundaries under stretch. Choice B is incorrect as normal tight junction localization indicates barrier function is intact, and tight junctions don't primarily provide mechanical strength. The specific tearing at cell-cell boundaries rather than cell detachment confirms the defect is in intercellular adhesion (desmosomes) rather than cell-substrate adhesion (integrins).
A carcinoma cell line is treated with an antibody that blocks a specific integrin required for binding to laminin in basement membrane-like matrices. In 3D culture, treated cells fail to maintain a hollow, polarized acinar structure and instead form disorganized clusters, while E-cadherin expression levels remain unchanged. Which statement best describes how the targeted ECM interaction influences cellular behavior?
Loss of laminin–integrin signaling strengthens desmosomes, forcing cells into clusters by increasing intermediate filament tension
Loss of laminin–integrin signaling disrupts cell–ECM cues needed for polarity and organized tissue architecture despite preserved cell–cell adhesion protein expression
Loss of laminin–integrin signaling primarily blocks paracellular sealing by tight junctions, which directly determines acinar lumen formation
Loss of laminin–integrin signaling increases gap junction coupling, causing disorganization by equalizing intracellular ion concentrations
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Laminin in basement membranes provides crucial positional cues through integrin binding that establish and maintain epithelial polarity and tissue architecture in 3D environments. In this vignette, blocking laminin-binding integrins disrupts normal acinar morphogenesis despite preserved cell-cell adhesion proteins. Choice D is correct because laminin-integrin signaling provides essential ECM-derived cues for establishing apical-basal polarity and organizing cells into hollow structures; without these signals, cells form disorganized clusters despite maintaining cell-cell adhesion capability. Choice B is incorrect as the primary defect is in ECM signaling for polarity, not tight junction sealing, and lumen formation requires proper polarization cues beyond just barrier function. The maintenance of E-cadherin expression confirms that cell-cell adhesion machinery is intact, highlighting the specific requirement for ECM signals in tissue organization.
A study compared fibroblast migration on 2D hydrogels coated with either collagen I or laminin. Cells were treated with a blocking antibody against integrin that binds collagen I but not laminin. Migration speed decreased only on collagen I surfaces; cell–cell contacts were unchanged. Which statement best describes how the targeted ECM interaction influences cellular behavior?
Blocking the collagen-binding integrin primarily disrupted tight junction sealing, increasing paracellular leak and slowing migration
Blocking the collagen-binding integrin increased desmosome assembly, immobilizing cells by strengthening intermediate filaments
Blocking the collagen-binding integrin reduced focal adhesion formation on collagen I, limiting traction needed for migration
Blocking the collagen-binding integrin enhanced gap junction coupling, synchronizing movement and thereby reducing single-cell speed
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Integrins are transmembrane receptors that bind specific ECM proteins and link them to the actin cytoskeleton, forming focal adhesions that generate traction forces necessary for cell migration. In this vignette, blocking the collagen-binding integrin specifically prevents cell-ECM interactions on collagen I surfaces. Choice D is correct because integrin-collagen binding is essential for focal adhesion formation on collagen substrates, and without these adhesions, cells cannot generate the traction forces needed for migration. Choice B is incorrect as integrins mediate cell-ECM, not cell-cell interactions, and do not directly affect tight junctions. The specificity of the effect (only on collagen I, not laminin) and unchanged cell-cell contacts confirm that the mechanism involves direct ECM-integrin interactions rather than secondary effects on cell junctions.
During formation of a polarized epithelial layer, a CRISPR edit deletes the cytoplasmic tail of E-cadherin, leaving its extracellular domain intact. Cells still bind each other transiently but fail to form a stable, continuous sheet; tight junction proteins remain punctate and do not form continuous belts. What effect would be expected if this change occurs?
Primary loss of integrin binding to ECM prevents E-cadherin extracellular binding, explaining unstable cell–cell adhesion
Primary loss of gap junction conductance prevents cadherin clustering, explaining punctate tight junction proteins
Increased desmosome assembly compensates for cadherin truncation, restoring tight junction belts and stable polarity
Reduced linkage of cadherins to the actin cytoskeleton impairs adherens junction maturation, secondarily preventing robust tight junction organization
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). E-cadherin's cytoplasmic tail links to the actin cytoskeleton through catenins, and this linkage is essential for adherens junction maturation and subsequent establishment of other junctional complexes. In this vignette, deleting E-cadherin's cytoplasmic tail prevents stable adherens junction formation despite intact extracellular binding. Choice A is correct because the cadherin-actin linkage is required for adherens junction maturation, which must occur before tight junctions can properly organize into continuous belts; without this, cells maintain only transient adhesions and tight junction proteins remain punctate. Choice C is incorrect as the defect is in cadherin-actin coupling, not integrin-ECM binding, and E-cadherin's extracellular domain remains functional. The sequential assembly of junctional complexes means that defective adherens junctions prevent proper tight junction organization.
Epithelial cells were treated with a calcium chelator that rapidly disrupts cadherin-dependent adhesion. Within minutes, lateral membranes separated and β-catenin redistributed from the membrane to the cytosol, while claudin staining at apical junctions became discontinuous. Based on the vignette, which conclusion is most consistent with the observed junction changes?
Chelating calcium strengthens tight junction sealing by promoting claudin polymerization
Disrupting cadherin adhesion destabilizes adherens junctions and secondarily impairs tight junction organization
Chelating calcium primarily breaks hemidesmosomes, causing loss of apical junction proteins
Disrupting cadherin adhesion selectively blocks connexin pore formation without affecting other junctions
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Cell–cell junctions like tight junctions regulate permeability, while ECM provides structural support and signaling cues. In this vignette, the interdependence of adherens and tight junctions in epithelial cells is examined. Choice A is correct because it accurately describes how disrupting cadherin adhesion destabilizes adherens junctions and impairs tight junction organization, as evidenced by β-catenin redistribution and discontinuous claudin staining. Choice C is incorrect as it mistakenly suggests calcium chelation strengthens tight junctions, a common misconception since calcium is required for cadherin function. Ensure understanding of specific junction functions and ECM roles in cellular processes; apply this to predict effects of their disruption, such as barrier defects in inflammatory conditions.
Chondrocytes were cultured in 3D matrices containing either high-density hyaluronan or low-density hyaluronan, with identical collagen content. High-density hyaluronan increased cell rounding and decreased proliferation; blocking CD44 (a hyaluronan receptor) restored proliferation without changing cell–cell contact frequency. Which conclusion is most consistent with the vignette?
ECM glycosaminoglycan content can regulate cell cycle behavior through receptor-mediated signaling independent of cell–cell junction number
Hyaluronan reduces proliferation by strengthening tight junctions that prevent growth factor entry
Hyaluronan effects require gap junction closure to prevent metabolite sharing between cells
CD44 blockade restores proliferation by increasing desmosome assembly and tissue tensile strength
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Cell–cell junctions like tight junctions regulate permeability, while ECM provides structural support and signaling cues. In this vignette, the influence of ECM glycosaminoglycan on chondrocyte proliferation is examined. Choice D is correct because it accurately describes how high hyaluronan regulates cell cycle via CD44 signaling independently of junction number, as blockade restores proliferation. Choice B is incorrect as it confuses ECM with tight junctions, a common misconception since hyaluronan signals, not seals. Ensure understanding of specific junction functions and ECM roles in cellular processes; apply this to predict effects of their disruption, such as in cartilage maintenance.
A carcinoma cell line showed reduced surface E-cadherin and increased invasion through a collagen matrix in a Boyden chamber assay. Re-expression of E-cadherin decreased invasion without changing integrin levels. What effect would be expected if E-cadherin is restored?
Increased cell–cell adhesion that limits dissociation from the primary cluster, reducing invasive migration
Decreased basement membrane attachment because cadherins compete with integrins for ECM binding
Increased paracellular permeability because adherens junctions primarily create diffusion pores
Increased intercellular metabolite exchange because cadherins form connexon-like channels
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell–cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Cell–cell junctions like tight junctions regulate permeability, while ECM provides structural support and signaling cues. In this vignette, the impact of E-cadherin on carcinoma cell invasion through a collagen matrix is examined. Choice C is correct because it accurately describes how restoring E-cadherin increases cell–cell adhesion, limiting dissociation and invasive migration as observed in the Boyden chamber assay. Choice B is incorrect as it confuses cadherins with integrins, a common misconception since cadherins mediate cell–cell, not cell–ECM adhesion. Ensure understanding of specific junction functions and ECM roles in cellular processes; apply this to predict effects of their disruption, such as enhanced metastasis in low E-cadherin tumors.
In a skin biopsy from a patient with a blistering disorder, immunostaining shows normal levels of E-cadherin at cell–cell borders but markedly reduced staining for the integrin $b16 subunit at the basal surface of keratinocytes. Histology reveals separation at the dermal–epidermal junction after mild mechanical stress. Which cellular interaction is most directly impaired, best explaining the tissue-level phenotype?
Tight junction sealing that restricts paracellular water movement across the epidermis.
Hemidesmosome-mediated anchoring of keratin intermediate filaments to the basement membrane.
Adherens junction cadherin clustering that links actin networks between neighboring keratinocytes.
Gap junction communication that synchronizes keratinocyte proliferation across the tissue.
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell-cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Hemidesmosomes are specialized cell-ECM junctions that anchor epithelial cells to the basement membrane through integrin α6β4, connecting keratin intermediate filaments to laminin in the ECM. In this vignette, reduced α6β4 integrin with normal E-cadherin indicates specific hemidesmosome dysfunction. Choice A is correct because hemidesmosomes provide the critical attachment between basal keratinocytes and the basement membrane, and their disruption causes dermal-epidermal separation characteristic of blistering disorders. Choice B is incorrect as tight junctions regulate paracellular permeability, not basement membrane attachment. Understanding epithelial architecture requires recognizing that hemidesmosomes anchor cells to ECM while desmosomes connect cells laterally.
In a polarized epithelial monolayer grown on Transwell inserts, investigators used CRISPR to reduce expression of claudin-1 while leaving E-cadherin unchanged. After confluence, they measured transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and apical-to-basolateral flux of a 3 kDa fluorescent dextran. Compared with control, claudin-1–reduced monolayers showed lower TEER and higher dextran flux, while cell number and viability were unchanged. Which conclusion is most consistent with these findings about the altered cellular interaction?
Reduced claudin-1 disrupts tight junction strand integrity, increasing paracellular permeability without requiring changes in adherens junctions.
Reduced claudin-1 strengthens apical–basal polarity cues, tightening the paracellular seal and thereby increasing TEER.
Reduced claudin-1 decreases gap junction conductance, lowering TEER by limiting ion movement through connexons between cells.
Reduced claudin-1 primarily weakens desmosome-mediated mechanical coupling, increasing shear-induced cell loss and secondarily raising dextran flux.
Explanation
This question tests understanding of cell-cell junctions and ECM in cellular organization (Foundational Concept 2). Tight junctions, composed of proteins like claudins and occludins, form selective barriers that regulate paracellular permeability between epithelial cells. In this vignette, reducing claudin-1 expression specifically impairs tight junction integrity while leaving adherens junctions (E-cadherin) intact. Choice B is correct because claudin-1 is a key structural component of tight junction strands, and its reduction directly increases paracellular permeability to ions (lowering TEER) and small molecules (increasing dextran flux). Choice A is incorrect as it confuses tight junctions with desmosomes, which provide mechanical strength rather than permeability control. To verify understanding, remember that tight junctions control paracellular transport while adherens junctions and desmosomes provide mechanical adhesion.