Amortize Bond Discounts And Premiums
Help Questions
CPA Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR) › Amortize Bond Discounts And Premiums
A for-profit company issued $800,000 of 9% bonds payable at a premium of $24,000 on January 1, 20X1. Interest is paid annually each December 31, and the bonds mature in 6 years. The company uses the straight-line method under U.S. GAAP. Which statement correctly describes the amortization of the bond premium during 20X1?
Premium amortization increases interest expense and decreases the carrying amount of the bonds.
Premium amortization decreases interest expense and decreases the carrying amount of the bonds.
Premium amortization is reported as a financing cash inflow and does not affect interest expense.
Premium amortization decreases interest expense and increases the carrying amount of the bonds.
Explanation
This question tests the conceptual understanding of bond premium amortization effects under U.S. GAAP. The key facts are: bonds issued at a premium, straight-line amortization method, and the need to understand both income statement and balance sheet impacts. Premium amortization reduces interest expense below the stated rate (making the effective rate closer to the market rate) and decreases the carrying amount of bonds toward face value at maturity. ASC 835-30 requires systematic amortization of premiums to adjust interest expense to reflect the effective borrowing rate. Option A incorrectly states that premium amortization increases interest expense. Option C incorrectly states that premium amortization increases the carrying amount when it actually decreases it toward face value. Option D incorrectly treats premium amortization as a cash flow item when it's a non-cash adjustment. Professional judgment requires understanding that premium amortization serves to align reported interest expense with economic reality, reducing the stated rate to approximate the market rate at issuance while systematically reducing the liability to its maturity value.
A governmental entity (governmental activities) issued $2,000,000 of 7% bonds payable at 96 on January 1, 20X1. Interest is paid annually each December 31, and the bonds mature in 10 years. The government uses the straight-line method to amortize the bond discount for government-wide financial statements under U.S. GAAP. What is the carrying amount of the bonds at December 31, 20X1, after recording the first year’s interest and discount amortization?
$1,928,000
$1,920,000
$1,936,000
$1,960,000
Explanation
This question tests the carrying amount of bonds after discount amortization for governmental entities using straight-line method. The key facts are: $2,000,000 bonds issued at 96 creating a $80,000 discount, 10-year term with annual payments, and straight-line amortization for government-wide statements. The annual discount amortization is $80,000 ÷ 10 years = $8,000, increasing the carrying amount from $1,920,000 to $1,928,000 at December 31, 20X1. GASB standards permit straight-line amortization for governmental activities when preparing government-wide financial statements. Option A ($1,920,000) incorrectly shows no amortization. Option C ($1,936,000) incorrectly amortizes $16,000 (perhaps doubling the amount). Option D ($1,960,000) incorrectly amortizes $40,000 (perhaps using 2 years or wrong calculation). When applying professional judgment to governmental bond accounting, remember that government-wide statements follow accrual accounting similar to GAAP, requiring systematic amortization of discounts and premiums over the bond term.
A not-for-profit entity issued $1,200,000 of 5% bonds payable at 98 on January 1, 20X1, with interest paid annually each December 31 and a 3-year term. The entity uses the effective interest method under U.S. GAAP; the market (effective) rate at issuance was 6%. How does the first year’s discount amortization affect the statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 20X1, using the indirect method?
Add back the discount amortization to change in net assets because it is a noncash increase to interest expense.
Report the discount amortization as an operating cash outflow separate from interest paid.
Report the discount amortization as a financing cash outflow because it reduces bonds payable.
Subtract the discount amortization from change in net assets because it is a noncash increase to interest expense.
Explanation
This question tests the cash flow statement presentation of bond discount amortization under the indirect method. The key facts are: bonds issued at a discount, effective interest method used, and indirect method cash flow presentation for a not-for-profit entity. Discount amortization increases interest expense but involves no cash payment, so under the indirect method, it must be added back to the change in net assets to arrive at cash from operations. ASC 230 requires non-cash expenses to be added back when reconciling from accrual-based net income to cash flows from operations. Option B incorrectly subtracts the amortization, which would double-count the non-cash expense. Option C incorrectly treats amortization as a separate cash outflow when it's non-cash. Option D incorrectly classifies the amortization as a financing activity when it affects operating activities through interest expense. When applying professional judgment to cash flow statements, remember that all non-cash charges to expense (depreciation, amortization of intangibles, and amortization of bond discount) are added back under the indirect method.
A not-for-profit organization issued $750,000 of 7% bonds payable at a premium of $15,000 on January 1, 20X1. Interest is paid semiannually each June 30 and December 31, and the bonds mature in 10 years. The organization uses the straight-line method under U.S. GAAP. What is the effect of bond premium amortization on interest expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 20X1?
Interest expense is unchanged because premium amortization is recorded directly to bonds payable.
Interest expense decreases by $750 because premium amortization reduces interest expense.
Interest expense increases by $750 because premium amortization is added to interest expense.
Interest expense decreases by $1,500 because the full annual premium amortization is recorded at June 30.
Explanation
This question tests the effect of bond premium amortization on interest expense with semiannual payments. The key facts are: $750,000 bonds with $15,000 premium, 7% stated rate, semiannual payments, 10-year term (20 periods), and straight-line method. Under straight-line, semiannual premium amortization is $15,000 ÷ 20 periods = $750, which reduces interest expense for each six-month period. ASC 835-30 requires premium amortization to reduce interest expense, bringing the effective rate below the stated rate. Option A incorrectly states premium amortization increases interest expense. Option C incorrectly doubles the amortization amount and suggests recording a full year at interim. Option D incorrectly states premium amortization doesn't affect interest expense. When applying professional judgment to bonds with frequent payment schedules, ensure the amortization period count matches the payment frequency (semiannual = 2 per year) and that premium amortization consistently reduces reported interest expense each period.