Account For Proprietary Funds

Help Questions

CPA Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR) › Account For Proprietary Funds

Questions 1 - 8
1

A municipality operates a water utility accounted for as an enterprise fund. During the year, the utility received $2.0 million in operating revenues, incurred $1.8 million in operating expenses (including depreciation), and the city council approved a $0.3 million transfer to the general fund to support public safety. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, what financial statement impact does the event have on the enterprise fund’s change in net position?

Report the $0.3 million as a liability until repaid because it benefits public safety activities

Report the $0.3 million as an operating expense, reducing operating income and change in net position

Report the $0.3 million as a transfer out (nonoperating), reducing change in net position but not operating income

Report the $0.3 million as a reduction of operating revenues because it is a return of excess charges to taxpayers

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to distinguish between operating and nonoperating activities, with transfers between funds classified as nonoperating items. The key fact is that the $0.3 million represents a transfer from the enterprise fund to the general fund, not a payment for goods or services. The correct answer (B) properly classifies this as a transfer out in the nonoperating section, which reduces change in net position but does not affect operating income. Answer A incorrectly treats the transfer as an operating expense, which would misstate the utility's operating performance. Answer C incorrectly suggests recording a liability, but transfers are recognized when authorized and do not create obligations. Answer D incorrectly characterizes the transfer as a reduction of revenues, but transfers are reported separately from revenues. The professional judgment framework is that transfers between funds are always reported as nonoperating items to preserve the integrity of operating performance metrics.

2

A city’s internal service fund (central print shop) sells printing services primarily to the city’s own departments, but during the year it also provided $0.2 million of services to an external nonprofit organization at market rates. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, what financial statement impact does the event have on the internal service fund’s reporting?

Report the $0.2 million as a deferred inflow until the nonprofit’s grantor approves the charges

Report the $0.2 million as operating revenue of the internal service fund because it is exchange-like and provided to an external party

Report the $0.2 million as a special item directly in net position because it is outside the city’s normal operations

Report the $0.2 million as an interfund reimbursement because all internal service fund revenues must be eliminated

Explanation

GASB standards permit internal service funds to report revenues from services provided to external parties as operating revenues when they represent exchange transactions. The key fact is that the print shop provided services to an external nonprofit at market rates, making this an exchange transaction with an outside party. The correct answer (A) properly classifies the $0.2 million as operating revenue because it represents an exchange transaction with an external party. Answer B incorrectly suggests all internal service fund revenues must be eliminated, but only interfund transactions are eliminated. Answer C incorrectly applies special item treatment to normal service revenues. Answer D incorrectly suggests deferring revenue recognition based on the customer's funding source. The decision rule is that internal service funds report external sales as operating revenues, while interfund services are eliminated only in government-wide reporting.

3

A municipality’s water utility is accounted for as an enterprise fund. During the year, the fund acquired a new pumping station for $5.0 million, financed by $1.0 million of cash and $4.0 million of long-term debt. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, what financial statement impact does the event have on the enterprise fund’s net position components at acquisition?

Increase net investment in capital assets by $1.0 million and report the $4.0 million debt as a liability; net investment reflects capital assets net of related debt

Increase net investment in capital assets by $5.0 million because capital assets are reported gross of related debt in proprietary funds

Increase unrestricted net position by $5.0 million because capital acquisitions are reported as expenditures rather than assets in proprietary funds

Increase net investment in capital assets by $1.0 million because it equals the portion financed with cash; report the $4.0 million debt as restricted net position

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to report net position in three components, with 'net investment in capital assets' calculated as capital assets less accumulated depreciation less outstanding debt related to acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. The key facts are that the pumping station cost $5.0 million with $4.0 million financed by debt, leaving only $1.0 million as the net investment. The correct answer (C) properly increases net investment in capital assets by $1.0 million (the equity portion) and reports the $4.0 million as a liability. Answer A incorrectly ignores the related debt in calculating net investment. Answer B incorrectly suggests reporting debt in restricted net position rather than as a liability. Answer D incorrectly applies governmental fund accounting by treating capital acquisitions as expenditures. The decision rule is that net investment in capital assets equals the carrying value of capital assets minus related outstanding debt, regardless of how the assets were financed.

4

A municipality’s water utility (an enterprise fund) received a $1.5 million capital contribution from a real estate developer to help finance water lines for a new subdivision; the contributed assets will be owned and maintained by the utility. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, which accounting treatment is appropriate for the transaction?

Record the $1.5 million as an interfund transfer in because it benefits a business-type activity

Record the asset at fair value and report an extraordinary item because the transaction is unusual and infrequent

Record the $1.5 million as operating revenue because it increases resources available for operations

Record the contributed capital asset at acquisition value and report a capital contribution (nonoperating revenue) increasing net position

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to report capital contributions from external parties as nonoperating revenues that increase net position. The key fact is that the developer contributed $1.5 million in capital assets that will be owned and maintained by the water utility. The correct answer (B) properly requires recording the contributed assets at acquisition value and reporting a capital contribution as nonoperating revenue. Answer A incorrectly classifies capital contributions as operating revenue. Answer C incorrectly treats an external contribution as an interfund transfer. Answer D incorrectly applies the extraordinary item classification, which GASB has eliminated. The professional framework is that capital contributions from external parties are reported as nonoperating revenues, distinct from both operating revenues and transfers, and increase the net position of the proprietary fund.

5

A state government’s toll road is reported as an enterprise fund. The enterprise fund issued 10-year revenue bonds and is preparing its statement of net position under GASB standards. Which factor affects the classification of liabilities in the proprietary fund?

Whether the bonds were issued at a premium, which requires classifying the entire bond liability as current

Whether the enterprise fund has an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months after the reporting date, which determines current versus noncurrent classification

Whether the bonds are expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources, which determines fund liability recognition

Whether the bonds are backed by the state’s full faith and credit, which determines whether they are reported as deferred inflows

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to present a classified statement of net position distinguishing between current and noncurrent assets and liabilities based on the one-year criterion. The key fact is determining which liabilities will be due and payable within 12 months of the reporting date. The correct answer (C) properly identifies that current versus noncurrent classification depends on whether the enterprise fund has an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months. Answer A incorrectly focuses on the backing of bonds rather than timing of payment obligations. Answer B incorrectly applies the governmental fund concept of 'expendable available financial resources' to proprietary funds. Answer D incorrectly suggests that premium issuance affects current/noncurrent classification. The professional framework is that proprietary funds follow business-type accounting principles, classifying liabilities as current when due within one year or the operating cycle, whichever is longer.

6

A local government is preparing the statement of net position for its proprietary funds under GASB standards. One enterprise fund has a $3.0 million long-term note payable due in 8 years and a related $0.3 million principal payment due within the next fiscal year; the fund expects to pay the $0.3 million from existing current assets. Which factor affects the classification of liabilities in the proprietary fund?

Classify $3.0 million as deferred inflows because the note payable relates to future-period services

Classify $0.3 million as current and $2.7 million as noncurrent because the current portion is due within 12 months and will be liquidated with current assets

Classify the entire $3.0 million as current because proprietary funds present liabilities in order of liquidity

Classify $0.3 million as noncurrent because it will be paid from current assets rather than restricted resources

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to classify liabilities as current or noncurrent based on when they are due and payable, following business-type accounting principles. The key fact is that $0.3 million of the principal is due within 12 months and the fund expects to use current assets for payment. The correct answer (B) properly classifies $0.3 million as current (due within one year) and $2.7 million as noncurrent. Answer A incorrectly suggests all liabilities are current in proprietary funds. Answer C incorrectly classifies the current portion as noncurrent based on the payment source. Answer D incorrectly treats debt obligations as deferred inflows. The decision rule is that proprietary funds classify the portion of long-term debt due within one year as current, regardless of the source of payment, following standard business accounting practices.

7

A municipality operates a parking garage accounted for as an enterprise fund. At year-end, the fund has $0.4 million of accounts receivable from monthly customers and estimates that $0.02 million will be uncollectible. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, which accounting treatment is appropriate for the transaction?

Record accounts receivable but report the $0.02 million as a deferred outflow of resources because it relates to future periods

Record accounts receivable and an allowance for uncollectible accounts, with bad debt expense (or allowance adjustment) reported in the enterprise fund’s operating results

Record the receivable only in the government-wide statements because proprietary funds do not report receivables

Recognize revenue only when cash is collected and do not record an allowance because enterprise funds use the cash basis

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to use full accrual accounting, including recognition of receivables and related allowances for uncollectible accounts. The key fact is that the parking garage has earned revenues with collection risk that must be properly reflected in the financial statements. The correct answer (B) properly requires recording accounts receivable and an allowance for uncollectible accounts, with bad debt expense reported in operating results. Answer A incorrectly suggests enterprise funds use cash basis accounting. Answer C incorrectly treats the allowance as a deferred outflow rather than a contra-asset. Answer D incorrectly suggests proprietary funds don't report receivables in fund statements. The decision rule is that proprietary funds follow business-type accounting, recognizing revenues when earned and establishing allowances for estimated uncollectible amounts as operating expenses.

8

A city’s electric utility is reported as an enterprise fund and has a bond covenant requiring a minimum debt service coverage ratio based on net revenues. Near year-end, management considers recording a planned $0.6 million transfer to the general fund as an operating expense to present lower net revenues for rate-setting purposes. Under GASB standards for proprietary funds, how should the city comply with the debt covenant requirement in its financial reporting?

Defer recognition of the transfer until the next fiscal year because covenant calculations are not part of GAAP reporting

Reclassify the transfer as an interfund loan payable to avoid affecting the coverage ratio

Record the transfer as a nonoperating transfer out and evaluate covenant compliance using the covenant definition of net revenues, with disclosure if noncompliance occurs

Record the transfer as an operating expense because enterprise funds follow business-type reporting and transfers are part of operating costs

Explanation

GASB standards require proprietary funds to report transfers as nonoperating items and to provide appropriate disclosures when debt covenants may be violated. The key fact is that the transfer must be properly classified regardless of management's rate-setting objectives, and covenant compliance must be evaluated based on the covenant's specific definitions. The correct answer (B) properly requires recording the transfer as a nonoperating item and evaluating covenant compliance using the covenant's definition of net revenues, with disclosure if noncompliance occurs. Answer A incorrectly classifies transfers as operating expenses. Answer C incorrectly suggests deferring recognition to manipulate covenant calculations. Answer D incorrectly suggests reclassifying the transfer as a loan to avoid covenant impacts. The professional framework is that financial reporting must follow GAAP classifications regardless of rate-setting or covenant considerations, with appropriate disclosure of any covenant violations or potential violations.