Defining Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)

Help Questions

AP Physics 1 › Defining Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)

Questions 1 - 10
1

A block oscillates on a frictionless surface. For displacement $x$, its acceleration is $a=-\omega^2 x$. Is the motion SHM?

Yes, because the acceleration is proportional to $-x$.

Yes, because the speed is constant throughout the motion.

No, because equilibrium is at maximum displacement.

No, because acceleration must be proportional to velocity for SHM.

Explanation

This question assesses the skill of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM) in AP Physics 1. SHM is characterized by a restoring force proportional to and opposite the displacement, resulting in acceleration a = -ω²x. The given acceleration a = -ω²x directly matches this form, confirming SHM for the block. This equation implies sinusoidal motion with constant frequency ω. Choice A is a distractor because SHM requires acceleration proportional to displacement, not velocity. A useful strategy is to recall that SHM solutions satisfy the differential equation d²x/dt² = -ω²x, and check if the system fits.

2

A block attached to a spring experiences a restoring force $F=-kx$ and a small constant friction force. Is the motion SHM?

No, because equilibrium must occur at maximum displacement.

Yes, because the restoring force is proportional to $-x$ at all times.

Yes, because friction makes the period constant.

No, because the net force is not strictly proportional to $-x$ due to friction.

Explanation

This question assesses the skill of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM) in AP Physics 1. SHM is defined by a restoring force strictly proportional to and opposite the displacement, without additional terms. The presence of a small constant friction force adds a non-proportional component, disrupting the exact F = -kx form. Thus, the motion is damped oscillation, not ideal SHM. Choice A is a distractor because it ignores how friction alters the net force away from pure proportionality. For real-world systems, identify if dissipative forces prevent the ideal SHM condition.

3

A mass on a spring experiences a restoring force $F_x=-k(x-x_0)$, where $x_0$ is a constant offset. Does the motion about equilibrium qualify as SHM?

Yes; because the force is proportional to displacement from equilibrium, $x-x_0$.

No; because equilibrium must occur at $x=0$ for SHM.

Yes; because the force is proportional to velocity when passing through $x_0$.

No; because the force is not proportional to the position $x$ measured from the origin.

Explanation

This question assesses the understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM) in AP Physics 1. Simple harmonic motion requires a restoring force that is proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium position, not necessarily from the origin. This force must be opposite in direction, so F = -k (x - x_eq) qualifies, where x_eq is the equilibrium point. In this case, F_x = -k (x - x_0) shows equilibrium at x = x_0, and the force is proportional to the displacement from there, making it SHM. One distractor, choice C, wrongly insists equilibrium must be at x=0, but SHM can occur around any equilibrium point. To identify SHM in various systems, always check if the net force or acceleration follows the form F = -kx or a = -(k/m)x relative to equilibrium.

4

A block oscillates in one dimension with acceleration given by $a_x=-(k/m)x$ for displacement $x$ from equilibrium. Which conclusion about the motion is correct?

The motion is SHM only if the speed is constant.

The motion is SHM because acceleration is proportional to $x$ and opposite in direction.

The motion is not SHM because equilibrium occurs at maximum displacement.

The motion is not SHM because acceleration is zero at equilibrium.

Explanation

This question assesses the understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM) in AP Physics 1. Simple harmonic motion is defined by a restoring force proportional to displacement from equilibrium and opposite in direction. This leads to acceleration a = - (k/m) x, where k/m is a constant. The given a_x = -(k/m) x exactly matches this form, confirming it is SHM. One distractor, choice A, wrongly claims the motion is not SHM because acceleration is zero at equilibrium, but that is actually a characteristic of SHM. To identify SHM in various systems, always check if the net force or acceleration follows the form F = -kx or a = -(k/m)x relative to equilibrium.

5

A block on a frictionless horizontal track is attached to a spring. When displaced a distance $x$ from equilibrium, the spring exerts a restoring force $F_x=-kx$ toward equilibrium. The block is released from rest. Which statement best determines whether the resulting motion is simple harmonic?

No; the restoring force must be proportional to velocity for SHM.

No; equilibrium occurs at maximum displacement, not at $x=0$.

Yes; any motion that repeats is simple harmonic.

Yes; the restoring force is proportional to displacement and opposite in direction.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM). Simple harmonic motion requires a restoring force that is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium and points in the opposite direction, mathematically expressed as F = -kx. In this scenario, the spring provides exactly this type of force: F_x = -kx, where the negative sign indicates the force opposes the displacement. The proportionality to x (not x² or x³) and the opposing direction are both essential criteria for SHM. Choice B incorrectly suggests any repeating motion is SHM, but periodicity alone is insufficient without the specific force relationship. To identify SHM, always check if the restoring force or acceleration follows the form proportional to -x.

6

A mass on a horizontal spring experiences a restoring force $F_x=-k x$ for $|x|<0.10,\text{m}$, but for larger displacements the force becomes constant in magnitude, $F_x=-k(0.10,\text{m}),\text{sgn}(x)$. The mass is released from $x=0.20,\text{m}$. Is the resulting motion SHM?

No, because equilibrium occurs when the speed is maximum.

No, because the restoring force is not proportional to displacement for the entire motion.

Yes, because the force always points toward equilibrium.

Yes, because the motion is symmetric about equilibrium.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM). Simple harmonic motion requires the restoring force to be proportional to displacement from equilibrium for the entire motion: F = -kx. In this problem, the force follows Hooke's law (F = -kx) only for small displacements |x| < 0.10 m, but becomes constant in magnitude for larger displacements. Since the mass is released from x = 0.20 m, it experiences a constant-magnitude force (not proportional to x) during part of its motion. This violates the SHM requirement that F ∝ -x throughout the entire oscillation. Choice A incorrectly focuses on symmetry rather than force proportionality, while choice C only considers force direction. To verify SHM, ensure the restoring force maintains linear proportionality to displacement throughout the entire range of motion.

7

A small cart is attached to a device that provides a force $F_x=-bv$ opposite its velocity $v$. When displaced and released, the cart returns toward equilibrium and overshoots repeatedly. Does this motion qualify as simple harmonic?

Yes, because the force is always directed toward equilibrium.

Yes, because equilibrium is located at the turning points.

No, because SHM cannot be periodic.

No, because SHM requires a restoring force proportional to displacement, not velocity.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM). Simple harmonic motion requires a restoring force proportional to displacement from equilibrium and opposite in direction: F = -kx. In this problem, the device provides a force Fx = -bv that is proportional to velocity, not displacement. While this force opposes motion and can cause oscillations (as the cart overshoots equilibrium repeatedly), it does not meet the fundamental requirement for SHM. Choice A incorrectly focuses only on the force direction, while choices C and D contain factual errors about SHM. To identify SHM, always verify that the restoring force depends on position (F ∝ -x), not on velocity, time, or other variables.

8

A glider on an air track is attached to two identical springs, one on each side. When displaced a distance $x$ to the right, the net restoring force is measured as $F_x=-2kx$. The glider is released. Is its motion SHM?

Yes; because equilibrium occurs where the speed is maximum, at $x=A$.

No; because the restoring force must be constant magnitude for SHM.

No; because two springs make the motion nonperiodic.

Yes; because the net restoring force is proportional to $-x$.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM). Simple harmonic motion requires a restoring force proportional to the negative of displacement from equilibrium. With two identical springs attached on opposite sides, when the glider moves right by distance x, the left spring stretches (pulling left with force -kx) and the right spring compresses (pushing left with force -kx), giving a net force F_x = -2kx. This net force is still directly proportional to -x, just with a larger proportionality constant (2k instead of k), which satisfies the SHM requirement. Choice B incorrectly assumes multiple springs prevent periodicity, but the combined effect still produces the required linear restoring force. To identify SHM with multiple springs, calculate the net force and verify it follows F = -(constant)x.

9

A buoy oscillates vertically in water. Measurements show that for small vertical displacements $y$ from equilibrium, the net upward force is $F= -ky$ (downward when $y>0$). Ignoring drag, is the buoy’s motion simple harmonic?

Yes; because the restoring force is proportional to $-y$.

No; because equilibrium occurs at maximum displacement where the buoy turns around.

No; because SHM is only possible with springs, not buoyancy.

No; because the restoring force must be proportional to velocity.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM) with buoyancy forces. Simple harmonic motion requires a restoring force proportional to the negative displacement from equilibrium, F = -ky. The measurements show exactly this relationship for the buoy's vertical motion, where the net upward force is F = -ky (negative when displaced upward, positive when displaced downward). This linear restoring force will produce SHM regardless of whether it originates from a spring, buoyancy, or any other physical mechanism. Choice A incorrectly limits SHM to spring systems, missing that any linear restoring force produces SHM. To identify SHM, focus on the mathematical form of the force law F = -ky, not the specific physical mechanism creating that force.

10

A mass on a vertical spring oscillates about its equilibrium position. If $y$ is displacement from equilibrium, the net force is measured as $F_y=-ky$ (gravity already accounted for). Is the motion simple harmonic?

Yes; because the net restoring force is proportional to $-y$.

Yes; because the restoring force is proportional to velocity.

No; because gravity prevents SHM in vertical motion.

No; because equilibrium must be where the mass momentarily stops at maximum $y$.

Explanation

This question tests understanding of defining simple harmonic motion (SHM). Simple harmonic motion requires that the net force be proportional to the negative of displacement from equilibrium. For a vertical spring system, when gravity is already accounted for in the equilibrium position, the net force F_y = -ky shows the required proportionality to displacement y. The negative sign ensures the force always points toward equilibrium, and the linear relationship with y satisfies the SHM criterion. Choice B incorrectly suggests gravity prevents vertical SHM, but gravity only shifts the equilibrium position without affecting the oscillatory behavior about that point. To verify SHM in vertical systems, measure forces relative to the equilibrium position (where spring force balances weight) and check for F = -ky.

Page 1 of 7