Written Presentations with Introduction, Development, Conclusion

Help Questions

AP Japanese Language and Culture › Written Presentations with Introduction, Development, Conclusion

Questions 1 - 10
1

Based on the writing prompt, Does the introduction effectively introduce the topic and purpose?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 文化(ぶんか)比較(ひかく)。日本(にほん)の祭(まつ)りと、あなたが知(し)る別(べつ)の文化(ぶんか)の祭(まつ)りを比(くら)べる。

導入(どうにゅう)で両方(りょうほう)の文化(ぶんか)と比較(ひかく)の観点(かんてん)を示(しめ)し、目的(もくてき)を述(の)べる。

本文(ほんぶん)は例(れい)や理由(りゆう)で論理(ろんり)的(てき)に展開(てんかい)する。

結論(けつろん)で要点(ようてん)をまとめ、締(し)めくくる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)を少(すく)なくとも二(ふた)つ、難(むずか)しい漢字(かんじ)はふりがな付(つ)き、敬体(けいたい)で書(か)く。

本文の例が少なく、導入の目的が後半でぶれる印象がある

比較する文化が示されず、目的も曖昧で導入が成立しにくい

文化と観点、目的を明確に示し、本文への流れも自然である

接続語がほとんどなく、導入から本文へのつながりが弱い

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write about a cultural comparison between Japanese festivals and festivals from another culture, which requires organizing ideas effectively. Choice A is correct because it demonstrates a clear structure with logical development and appropriate use of transition words, fulfilling the prompt's requirements by clearly presenting both cultures, the comparison perspective, and the purpose. Choice B is incorrect because the introduction fails to identify the cultures being compared and has an unclear purpose, which can lead to confusion and a lack of focus throughout the presentation. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: lack of clear purpose in introductions and insufficient support in body sections.

2

Based on the writing prompt, How well does the body develop the main points with examples or arguments?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 個人(こじん)経験(けいけん)。高校(こうこう)での重要(じゅうよう)な経験(けいけん)を一(ひと)つ選(えら)び、影響(えいきょう)を省察(しょうさつ)する。

導入(どうにゅう)で状況(じょうきょう)と経験(けいけん)を明確(めいかく)に示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は出来事(できごと)の経過(けいか)と学(まな)びを、例(れい)や根拠(こんきょ)で論理(ろんり)的(てき)に述(の)べる。

結論(けつろん)で要点(ようてん)をまとめ、今後(こんご)へのつながりを示(しめ)す。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)を少(すく)なくとも二(ふた)つ、難(むずか)しい漢字(かんじ)はふりがな付(つ)き、敬体(けいたい)、俗語(ぞくご)禁止(きんし)。

話題が別の経験へ移り、中心の経験が見えにくくなる

経験の経過と学びを示し、さらに具体例で根拠を補っている

出来事の順序が不明で、例も少なく主張が伝わりにくい

結論のまとめがなく、本文の内容が途中で終わっている

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write about an important high school experience and reflect on its impact, which requires organizing ideas effectively with logical progression. Choice B is correct because it shows the progression of the experience and learning, supplemented with concrete examples that provide evidence, meeting the prompt's requirement for logical development. Choice A is incorrect because it lacks clear chronological order and has few examples, making the main argument difficult to understand. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: unclear chronological sequences in narratives and insufficient concrete examples to support claims.

3

Based on the writing prompt, Which section of the presentation could be improved for better cohesion?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 現在(げんざい)の出来事(できごと)分析(ぶんせき)。学校(がっこう)での省(しょう)エネ活動(かつどう)を一(ひと)つ設定(せってい)し、意義(いぎ)と課題(かだい)を分析(ぶんせき)する。

導入(どうにゅう)で活動(かつどう)と重要性(じゅうようせい)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は効果(こうか)と課題(かだい)を例(れい)で支(ささ)え、段落(だんらく)を分(わ)けて述(の)べる。

結論(けつろん)で要点(ようてん)をまとめ、提案(ていあん)で締(し)める。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難漢字(なんかんじ)はふりがな、敬体(けいたい)。

本文で接続語が少なく、効果と課題の関係がつかみにくい

導入は活動と目的が明確で、接続語もあり流れが整っている

本文は例が十分で、段落分けも明確で論理の流れが保たれる

結論は要点をまとめ、提案で締めくくり全体に収束している

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to analyze a school energy-saving activity, which requires clear transitions between discussing effects and challenges. Choice B is correct because it identifies that the body section has few transition words, making the relationship between effects and challenges difficult to grasp, thus needing improvement for better cohesion. Choice D is incorrect because it suggests the body has sufficient examples and clear paragraph divisions with maintained logical flow. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: insufficient transition words in the body section and unclear relationships between different aspects of analysis.

4

Based on the writing prompt, Is the conclusion effective in summarizing the main points and providing closure?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 個人(こじん)経験(けいけん)。部活動(ぶかつどう)での失敗(しっぱい)と学(まな)びを述(の)べ、考(かんが)え方(かた)の変化(へんか)を示(しめ)す。

導入(どうにゅう)で時期(じき)と出来事(できごと)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は原因(げんいん)・対応(たいおう)・結果(けっか)を、例(れい)で支(ささ)えながら展開(てんかい)する。

結論(けつろん)で学(まな)びを要約(ようやく)し、今後(こんご)の行動(こうどう)につなげる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難漢字(なんかんじ)はふりがな、敬体(けいたい)。

結論で新しい出来事を長く述べ、要約より説明が中心になる

結論が本文と別話題になり、経験の影響が見えにくくなる

結論で学びをまとめ、さらに今後の行動へつなげて締めくくる

結論がなく、本文の最後で話が途切れて終わってしまう

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write about a failure in club activities and the resulting learning, which requires a conclusion that connects to future actions. Choice A is correct because it summarizes the learning and connects it to future actions, providing effective closure that meets the prompt's requirements. Choice B is incorrect because it introduces new events at length in the conclusion, focusing on explanation rather than summary, which fails to provide proper closure. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: introducing new information in conclusions instead of summarizing and failing to connect learning to future applications.

5

Based on the writing prompt, Does the introduction effectively introduce the topic and purpose?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 説得(せっとく)。学校(がっこう)の図書館(としょかん)利用(りよう)を増(ふ)やす取組(とりく)みの必要性(ひつようせい)に賛成(さんせい)の立場(たちば)で述(の)べる。

導入(どうにゅう)で課題(かだい)と立場(たちば)、目的(もくてき)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は理由(りゆう)と例(れい)を挙(あ)げ、さらに反対意見(はんたいいけん)にも触(ふ)れる。

結論(けつろん)で要点(ようてん)をまとめ、提案(ていあん)で締(し)める。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難漢字(なんかんじ)はふりがな、敬体(けいたい)、俗語(ぞくご)禁止(きんし)。

導入で課題と立場、目的を述べ、しかし本文へ自然につなげる

導入で課題と立場を示さず、目的も書かれないため焦点が弱い

結論が要約にならず、新しい話題を加えて終わりが曖昧になる

本文が同じ理由を繰り返し、論点が整理されず冗長になる

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write persuasively about the need to increase library usage, which requires clearly stating the issue, position, and purpose in the introduction. Choice B is correct because it states the issue, position, and purpose in the introduction, while also naturally connecting to the body, meeting all requirements for an effective introduction. Choice A is incorrect because it fails to present the issue and position, and doesn't state the purpose, resulting in a weak focus. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: incomplete introductions that fail to establish all required elements and unclear statement of position in persuasive writing.

6

Based on the writing prompt, Is the conclusion effective in summarizing the main points and providing closure?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 文化(ぶんか)比較(ひかく)。日本(にほん)の贈(おく)り物(もの)の習慣(しゅうかん)と、あなたが知(し)る別(べつ)の文化(ぶんか)の贈答(ぞうとう)を比(くら)べる。

導入(どうにゅう)で二文化(にぶんか)と観点(かんてん)(場面(ばめん)・言葉(ことば)・配慮(はいりょ))、目的(もくてき)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は共通点(きょうつうてん)と相違点(そういてん)を例(れい)で支(ささ)え、論理(ろんり)的(てき)に述(の)べる。

結論(けつろん)で比較(ひかく)の要点(ようてん)をまとめ、学(まな)びで締(し)めくくる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難漢字(なんかんじ)はふりがな、敬体(けいたい)、敬意(けいい)ある表現(ひょうげん)。

結論で共通点と相違点を要約し、その結果として学びを示して終える

結論がなく、比較の要点が整理されないまま文章が終わってしまう

結論で別の文化の批判に移り、比較の目的から外れて締めくくれない

結論で新しい例を増やし、まとめより説明が長くなって収束しない

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to compare gift-giving customs between Japanese culture and another culture, which requires summarizing key points and learning in the conclusion. Choice A is correct because it summarizes both similarities and differences, and presents the resulting learning, providing effective closure to the cultural comparison. Choice B is incorrect because it lacks a conclusion entirely, leaving the comparison points unorganized and the text ending without proper closure. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: missing conclusions in comparative essays and failure to synthesize learning from cultural comparisons.

7

Based on the writing prompt, Which section of the presentation could be improved for better cohesion?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 現在(げんざい)の出来事(できごと)分析(ぶんせき)。地域(ちいき)での食品(しょくひん)ロス削減(さくげん)の取組(とりく)みを一(ひと)つ設定(せってい)し、意義(いぎ)と影響(えいきょう)を分析(ぶんせき)する。

導入(どうにゅう)で出来事(できごと)と重要性(じゅうようせい)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は背景(はいけい)・効果(こうか)・課題(かだい)を例(れい)で支(ささ)える。

結論(けつろん)で要点(ようてん)をまとめ、今後(こんご)を述(の)べる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)を少(すく)なくとも二(ふた)つ、難(むずか)しい漢字(かんじ)はふりがな付(つ)き、敬体(けいたい)、配慮(はいりょ)ある表現(ひょうげん)。

導入は出来事と目的が明確で、接続語も適切に用いられている

本文で接続語が不足し、段落間の関係が見えにくくなる

結論は要点をまとめ、今後へ結び付けて全体を締めくくっている

本文は背景と効果が整理され、例もあり段落間のつながりがある

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to analyze a local food waste reduction initiative, which requires organizing ideas effectively with proper transitions. Choice D is correct because it identifies that the body section lacks sufficient transition words, making the relationships between paragraphs unclear and reducing cohesion. Choices A, B, and C incorrectly suggest that those sections are well-structured with appropriate transitions and organization. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: insufficient transition words between paragraphs and unclear relationships between different sections of the presentation.

8

Based on the writing prompt, Does the introduction effectively introduce the topic and purpose?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 文化(ぶんか)比較(ひかく)。日本(にほん)の正月(しょうがつ)の過(す)ごし方(かた)と、あなたが知(し)る別(べつ)の文化(ぶんか)の新年(しんねん)行事(ぎょうじ)を比(くら)べる。

導入(どうにゅう)で両文化(りょうぶんか)と観点(かんてん)(家族(かぞく)・食(しょく)・あいさつ等(など))、目的(もくてき)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は共通点(きょうつうてん)と相違点(そういてん)を例(れい)で支(ささ)え、段落(だんらく)ごとに整理(せいり)する。

結論(けつろん)で学(まな)びをまとめる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難(むずか)しい漢字(かんじ)はふりがな付(つ)き、敬体(けいたい)。

導入で観点だけ述べ、比較する文化が示されず目的も不明確である

本文が同じ説明を繰り返し、比較の軸が途中でぼやけてしまう

結論が弱く、要点が整理されないまま終わる印象が残る

導入で二つの文化と観点を示し、さらに目的を明確に述べている

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to compare New Year celebrations between Japanese culture and another culture, which requires clearly identifying both cultures in the introduction. Choice B is correct because it shows that the introduction presents both cultures and the comparison perspective, and clearly states the purpose, meeting all requirements for an effective introduction. Choice A is incorrect because it only mentions the perspective without identifying the cultures being compared, leaving the purpose unclear. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: failure to identify all elements required in the introduction and unclear statement of purpose.

9

Based on the writing prompt, How well does the body develop the main points with examples or arguments?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 説得(せっとく)。授業(じゅぎょう)での端末(たんまつ)利用(りよう)を増(ふ)やすべきかを論(ろん)じる。

導入(どうにゅう)で論点(ろんてん)と立場(たちば)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は理由(りゆう)を二点(にてん)以上(いじょう)示(しめ)し、具体例(ぐたいれい)や反対意見(はんたいいけん)への応答(おうとう)を入(い)れる。

結論(けつろん)で要約(ようやく)し、提案(ていあん)で締(し)める。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)二(ふた)つ以上(いじょう)、難漢字(なんかんじ)はふりがな、敬体(けいたい)。

理由を複数示し、しかし具体例と反対意見への応答も入れている

理由が一つだけで、例や根拠が少なく説得力が弱い

接続語が不足し、理由同士の関係が示されず読みにくい

立場が途中で変わり、論点が散らばって主張が定まらない

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write a persuasive piece about increasing device use in classrooms, which requires presenting multiple reasons with examples and addressing counterarguments. Choice A is correct because it presents multiple reasons, includes concrete examples, and addresses opposing viewpoints, fulfilling all requirements for effective body development. Choice D is incorrect because it only provides one reason with few examples or evidence, resulting in weak persuasive power. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: insufficient reasons and examples in persuasive writing and failure to address counterarguments.

10

Based on the writing prompt, Is the conclusion effective in summarizing the main points and providing closure?

【作文(さくぶん)課題(かだい)】

次(つぎ)の条件(じょうけん)で、学術(がくじゅつ)的(てき)な発表(はっぴょう)文(ぶん)を日本語(にほんご)で書(か)きなさい。

場面(ばめん): 説得(せっとく)。学校(がっこう)教育(きょういく)での技術(ぎじゅつ)利用(りよう)に賛成(さんせい)か反対(はんたい)かを述(の)べる。

導入(どうにゅう)で論点(ろんてん)と立場(たちば)を示(しめ)す。

本文(ほんぶん)は理由(りゆう)と例(れい)で論理(ろんり)的(てき)に展開(てんかい)し、反対意見(はんたいいけん)にも触(ふ)れる。

結論(けつろん)で主張(しゅちょう)と根拠(こんきょ)を要約(ようやく)し、締(し)めくくる。

条件(じょうけん): 300〜350字(じ)、各段落(だんらく)に接続(せつぞく)語(ご)を少(すく)なくとも二(ふた)つ、難(むずか)しい漢字(かんじ)はふりがな付(つ)き、敬体(けいたい)、政治(せいじ)的(てき)に偏(かたよ)る話題(わだい)は避(さ)ける。

結論がなく、本文の最後で突然終わり締めくくれない

接続語が少なく、結論が本文と切れて読みにくくなる

結論で新しい例を増やし、要点の整理が不十分で終わる

主張と理由を簡潔にまとめ、その結果として今後の課題も示す

Explanation

This question tests AP Japanese Language and Culture writing skills, specifically the ability to produce coherent presentations with a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. In writing, a clear introduction sets the context and states the purpose, the body develops main points with details, and a conclusion summarizes and provides closure. In this prompt, students were asked to write a persuasive piece about technology use in education, which requires organizing ideas effectively with a strong conclusion. Choice C is correct because it concisely summarizes the main argument and reasons, and additionally presents future challenges, providing effective closure to the presentation. Choice B is incorrect because it lacks a conclusion entirely, ending abruptly without proper closure, which fails to meet the structural requirements of the prompt. To help students: Emphasize the use of transition words for cohesion, practice writing outlines before drafting, and encourage peer reviews to identify areas for improvement. Watch for: missing conclusions and failure to summarize main points effectively in the final paragraph.

Page 1 of 2