Identify Supporting/Relevant Details
Help Questions
AP Japanese Language and Culture › Identify Supporting/Relevant Details
本文:桜(さくら)の花見(はなみ)は春の習慣(しゅうかん)として広い世代に親しまれる。公園では場所取りの規則(きそく)があり、近年は騒音(そうおん)を避け夜桜(よざくら)を控える例もある。会社は短時間の昼休みに花を眺めた。短い開花(かいか)期間が人々の気持ちを急がせる。本文に基づき、「花見が社会のマナーと結び付く」ことを支える記述はどれか。
開花期間は長く、急ぐ必要はない。
桜は春に咲き、多くの人に親しまれる。
公園で場所取りの規則があり騒音も配慮された。
会社は昼休みに花を眺めることがある。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. The passage discusses cherry blossom viewing and asks which statement supports that hanami is connected to social manners. Choice B is correct because it specifically mentions rules for reserving spots in parks and considerations about noise levels, directly showing how flower viewing involves social etiquette and community standards. Choice A is incorrect because while it states cherry blossoms bloom in spring and are enjoyed by many, this doesn't demonstrate any connection to social manners or etiquette. To help students identify relevant supporting details, teach them to look for specific examples of rules, regulations, or behavioral expectations. Use comparison charts to distinguish between general cultural descriptions and specific examples of social norms.
次の文章に基づき、主旨「新幹線(しんかんせん)の開業(かいぎょう)が移動(いどう)と経済(けいざい)を変えた」を支える詳細はどれか。1964年(ねん)、東海道新幹線が開業し、東京(とうきょう)と大阪(おおさか)の移動時間が大幅(おおはば)に短縮(たんしゅく)された。出張(しゅっちょう)が日帰(ひがえ)りで可能(かのう)になり、観光客(かんこうきゃく)も増えた。駅周辺(えきしゅうへん)にはホテルや店が集まり、地域(ちいき)の雇用(こよう)が生まれた。安全(あんぜん)運行(うんこう)のため、保守点検(ほしゅてんけん)の仕組(しく)みも整えられた。
新幹線は飛行機より遅いとだけ書かれている。
保守点検は不要になったと説明している。
開業後、観光客は全て減ったと述べている。
移動時間が短縮され、日帰り出張が可能になった。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. In this passage, details about reduced travel time enabling same-day business trips support the main idea that the Shinkansen's opening transformed transportation and the economy. Choice A is correct because it directly supports the main idea by providing clear evidence of how shortened travel times changed business practices. Choice B is incorrect because it contradicts the passage, which states that tourists increased rather than decreased after the opening. To help students, encourage practice in identifying the main idea first, then distinguishing between primary and secondary details. Use graphic organizers to map out text structures, highlighting how details support central themes.
本文:関東大震災(かんとうだいしんさい)は1923年(ねん)に起(お)こり、東京(とうきょう)と横浜(よこはま)に大(おお)きな被害(ひがい)を与(あた)えた。火災(かさい)が広(ひろ)がり、多(おお)くの家(いえ)が焼(や)けたため、人々(ひとびと)は避難(ひなん)の重要性(じゅうようせい)を学(まな)んだ。その後(ご)、耐震(たいしん)基準(きじゅん)の整備(せいび)や公園(こうえん)の防災(ぼうさい)利用(りよう)が進(すす)み、学校(がっこう)でも訓練(くんれん)が定着(ていちゃく)した。本文によれば、「震災が防災意識を高めた」という主張(しゅちょう)を裏付(うらづ)ける記述(きじゅつ)はどれか。
東京と横浜に被害を与えた点
1923年に起こったと述べる点
火災が広がり多くの家が焼けた点
耐震基準の整備や訓練が定着した点
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. In this passage about the Great Kanto Earthquake, the main claim is that the disaster raised disaster prevention awareness (震災が防災意識を高めた). Choice C is correct because it directly demonstrates this heightened awareness through concrete actions - the establishment of earthquake-resistant building standards and the institutionalization of disaster drills in schools. Choice D about fire damage is incorrect because it describes the disaster itself, not the resulting increase in prevention awareness. To help students, emphasize looking for cause-and-effect relationships where the detail shows a result or consequence of the main claim. Practice identifying temporal markers like "その後" (after that) which often introduce supporting evidence of change or development.
本文:高齢化(こうれいか)が進む地域では、買い物弱者(じゃくしゃ)支援(しえん)が注目(ちゅうもく)される。市は移動販売車(いどうはんばいしゃ)を週(しゅう)3回運行(うんこう)した。利用者(りようしゃ)は「会話(かいわ)が増え安心した」と話す。商店街(しょうてんがい)も見守り(みまもり)活動(かつどう)に参加した。本文に基づき、「支援が生活の安心につながる」ことを示す証拠はどれか。
利用者が会話が増え安心したと話した。
支援は不要だと市が判断した。
商店街は昔からにぎやかである。
移動販売車が週3回運行された。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. In this passage about support for elderly shoppers, the question asks for evidence that support leads to peace of mind in daily life. Choice B is correct because it provides direct testimony from users saying "conversations increased and I felt relieved," explicitly connecting the support service to emotional well-being and security. Choice A is incorrect because while it describes the service (mobile sales trucks operating 3 times weekly), it doesn't show the impact on users' sense of security. To help students, teach them to identify direct quotes and testimonials as strong supporting evidence for claims about feelings or experiences. Practice distinguishing between descriptions of services and evidence of their impact on people.
本文:作家(さっか)の村上春樹(むらかみはるき)(Haruki Murakami)は海外翻訳(かいがいほんやく)が多く、国際的(こくさいてき)に読まれている。講演(こうえん)では日常(にちじょう)の孤独(こどく)を静かに描く重要性(じゅうようせい)を語った。書店(しょてん)は特設(とくせつ)コーナーを設け、読書会(どくしょかい)も開かれた。若者は英訳(えいやく)で読み比べた。本文に基づき、「影響力が国内外に広がる」ことを示す根拠はどれか。
講演で孤独を描く重要性を語った。
書店はいつも同じ配置で販売した。
若者は小説を全く読まないと述べた。
海外翻訳が多く、国際的に読まれている。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. The passage discusses author Haruki Murakami and asks for evidence showing his influence spreads domestically and internationally. Choice B is correct because it directly states he has many overseas translations and is read internationally, providing clear evidence of global reach and influence. Choice A is incorrect because while it mentions a lecture about depicting loneliness, this doesn't demonstrate domestic or international influence—it only describes his literary philosophy. To help students identify evidence of influence or reach, teach them to look for concrete indicators like translations, international readership, or global recognition. Practice distinguishing between an author's themes/philosophy and evidence of their actual impact or reach.
本文:茶道(さどう)は客(きゃく)への敬意(けいい)を形にする文化である。亭主(ていしゅ)は道具(どうぐ)を清め、季節(きせつ)の菓子(かし)を用意する。客は静かに一礼(いちれい)し、茶碗(ちゃわん)を回して味わう。先生(せんせい)は「所作(しょさ)が心を整える」と説明した。本文に基づき、「茶道が敬意を表す作法である」ことを補強する記述はどれか。
客は急いで茶を飲むと書かれている。
先生は道具の値段を説明した。
亭主が道具を清め、季節の菓子を用意する。
茶道は日本で広く知られている。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. The passage discusses tea ceremony and asks which statement reinforces that it's a practice expressing respect. Choice A is correct because it describes specific respectful actions: the host purifies tools and prepares seasonal sweets, showing careful preparation and consideration for guests, which are concrete manifestations of respect. Choice B is incorrect because stating tea ceremony is widely known in Japan doesn't demonstrate how it expresses respect—it only indicates popularity. To help students identify supporting details about cultural practices, teach them to look for specific actions, preparations, or rituals that demonstrate the underlying values. Use visual organizers to connect concrete actions with abstract concepts like respect or hospitality.
本文:新幹線(しんかんせん)は1964年に開業(かいぎょう)し、移動時間(いどうじかん)を大きく短縮(たんしゅく)した。出張(しゅっちょう)が日帰りになり、観光(かんこう)も広域(こういき)化した。駅周辺(えきしゅうへん)にはホテルが増え、地方(ちほう)の名産(めいさん)も売られた。安全(あんぜん)運行のため点検(てんけん)体制も強化された。本文に基づき、「新幹線が経済活動を広げた」ことを示す根拠はどれか。
安全運行のため点検体制が強化された。
出張が日帰りになり観光も広域化した。
1964年に開業したと記されている。
移動時間は短縮されなかったと述べた。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. In this passage about the Shinkansen, the question asks for evidence that the bullet train expanded economic activity. Choice B is correct because it provides concrete examples of economic changes: business trips became day trips and tourism expanded to wider areas, both directly showing increased economic activity and mobility. Choice A is incorrect because while it mentions safety inspections being strengthened, this relates to operational safety rather than economic expansion. To help students, teach them to identify specific examples of business changes, tourism growth, or commercial development as evidence of economic impact. Use cause-and-effect diagrams to show how transportation improvements lead to economic changes.
本文:富士山(ふじさん)は信仰(しんこう)と観光の両面(りょうめん)を持つ。登山道(とざんどう)では入山料(にゅうざんりょう)の協力(きょうりょく)を呼びかけ、混雑(こんざつ)期は人数制限(にんずうせいげん)も検討された。地元(じもと)は清掃(せいそう)活動を続け、案内板(あんないばん)も多言語(たげんご)化した。登山者は「静けさが守られた」と感じた。本文に基づき、「保全策が環境と体験を守る」ことを支える記述はどれか。
富士山は高い山として知られている。
地元が清掃活動を続け、案内板を多言語化した。
登山道はいつも空いていると述べた。
入山料は信仰とは無関係だと断定した。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. The passage discusses Mt. Fuji and asks which statement supports that conservation measures protect both environment and visitor experience. Choice A is correct because it provides concrete examples of conservation actions: locals continuing cleanup activities and multilingual signage, showing efforts to maintain the environment while improving visitor accessibility and experience. Choice B is incorrect because simply stating Mt. Fuji is known as a tall mountain provides no information about conservation efforts or their effects. To help students identify relevant supporting details, teach them to look for specific conservation actions and their dual benefits. Use T-charts to categorize details that show environmental protection versus visitor experience enhancement.
本文:祇園祭(ぎおんまつり)は疫病(えきびょう)退散(たいさん)を願い始まった。今も山鉾(やまほこ)巡行(じゅんこう)が続き、町衆(まちしゅう)は保存会(ほぞんかい)で技術を継承(けいしょう)する。観光客が増え、交通規制(こうつうきせい)やごみ対策(たいさく)も整えられた。本文に基づき、「祭りが地域を支える伝統である」ことを支える記述はどれか。
祭りは昔から多くの人に知られている。
観光客が増え、交通規制が実施された。
山鉾巡行が今も続き、技術が継承される。
町衆は観光より静けさを優先した。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. In this passage about the Gion Festival, the main idea is that the festival is a tradition that supports the community. Choice B is correct because it directly supports this main idea by showing how the festival continues through yamahoko processions and how townspeople preserve techniques through preservation societies, demonstrating ongoing community involvement. Choice A is incorrect because while it mentions increased tourists and traffic regulations, this doesn't support the idea of tradition supporting the community—it's more about managing modern challenges. To help students, encourage them to first identify the main claim in the question stem, then look for details that directly demonstrate how tradition actively supports the community. Use graphic organizers to map relationships between traditional practices and community benefits.
本文:日本のアニメ産業(さんぎょう)は海外(かいがい)でも人気が高い。ある調査(ちょうさ)では配信(はいしん)視聴者(しちょうしゃ)が5年で約2倍と報告された。制作現場(せいさくげんば)では人手不足(ひとでぶそく)が課題で、専門学校(せんもんがっこう)は実習(じっしゅう)を増やした。若手(わかて)は共同制作(きょうどうせいさく)で経験を積む。本文に基づき、「人気拡大が新たな対応を促した」ことを示す証拠はどれか。
アニメは昔から日本に存在している。
制作現場の課題はすでに解決した。
配信視聴者が5年で約2倍と報告された。
専門学校が実習を増やし人材育成を進めた。
Explanation
This question evaluates the ability to identify supporting details in a passage, a crucial skill in AP Japanese Language and Culture. Supporting details are specific pieces of information that reinforce the main idea or argument presented in a text. The passage discusses Japan's anime industry and asks for evidence that growing popularity prompted new responses. Choice B is correct because it shows a direct response to industry challenges: vocational schools increased practical training to develop human resources, demonstrating how the industry is adapting to meet growing demand. Choice A is incorrect because while it provides data about viewership doubling, it only shows the popularity increase without demonstrating any response or adaptation to that growth. To help students, teach them to distinguish between evidence of a problem/trend and evidence of responses to that problem/trend. Practice identifying cause-and-effect relationships where growth or change leads to specific adaptive actions.