What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Create Cohesion Among Claims And Counterclaims, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 8th Grade Writing.
Study Create Cohesion Among Claims And Counterclaims in 8th Grade Writing with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which transition best signals that you are adding another supporting reason?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Furthermore. Adds additional support to strengthen the argument.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 58
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Create Cohesion Among Claims And Counterclaims, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 8th Grade Writing.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Furthermore. Adds additional support to strengthen the argument.
Answer: In conclusion. Signals the final restatement of main argument.
Answer: Commentary (analysis) sentence. Explains how evidence supports the reason or claim.
Answer: Specifically. Narrows focus to introduce precise details.
Answer: Show clear shift to counterclaim, then return to and strengthen the claim. Maintains argument flow while addressing opposing views.
Answer: therefore. Shows logical consequence of credible evidence.
Answer: This proves my point because students need help. Combines sentences with 'because' to show reasoning.
Answer: However. Signals contrast or opposition to the previous statement.
Answer: This evidence shows that. Explicitly links evidence to the argument's main point.
Answer: This argument overlooks that. Points out weaknesses in the opposing argument.
Answer: It attributes evidence to a credible source. Establishes credibility and authority for evidence.
Answer: According to. Properly attributes the source of evidence.
Answer: Although. Acknowledges opposing view before introducing your stronger argument.
Answer: If the data continue to decline. Sets up conditional relationship between data and action.
Answer: To clarify relationships among ideas and guide the reader through the logic. Transitions show how ideas connect and help readers follow the argument.
Answer: Although. Acknowledges opposing view before presenting counterargument.
Answer: Thus. Indicates logical conclusion from presented evidence.
Answer: Thus. Indicates a logical conclusion drawn from evidence.
Answer: However. Shows opposition between two contrasting viewpoints.
Answer: however. Contrasts the positive appearance with negative reality.
Answer: In fact. Emphasizes the truth of the rebuttal evidence.
Answer: Replace with: "This evidence supports the claim.". Vague pronouns harm cohesion; specific references clarify.
Answer: Moreover. Adds another benefit to strengthen the argument.
Answer: This suggests that. Connects evidence directly to the main argument.
Answer: On the other hand. Introduces an opposing or different perspective.
Answer: For instance. Introduces specific examples or evidence.
Answer: To maintain focus and strengthen connections among ideas. Reinforces central concepts without redundancy.
Answer: Some may argue that. Formally acknowledges opposing viewpoints.
Answer: Because the policy is costly, it should change. Uses causal relationship to combine choppy sentences.
Answer: In other words. Rephrases complex ideas for better understanding.
Answer: However. Contrasts the opposing viewpoint with the first statement.
Answer: Therefore. Shows a logical consequence or result.
Answer: Therefore. Shows logical conclusion from the preceding reason.
Answer: Therefore. Shows logical conclusion from the preceding reason.
Answer: Logical flow created by linking claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Cohesion connects ideas smoothly through transitions and references.
Answer: In other words. Restates ideas more simply for clarity.
Answer: Similarly. Shows likeness between two ideas or examples.
Answer: Some may argue that. Acknowledges opposing views respectfully and objectively.
Answer: Additive transition phrase. These phrases connect additional supporting points.
Answer: Logical flow that clarifies links among claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Creates smooth connections that help readers follow the argument structure.
Answer: To signal the relationship between ideas and guide the reader. Transitions create logical connections between different parts of an argument.
Answer: Admittedly. Acknowledges opposing views before refuting them.
Answer: Although it may work in some cases. Concedes partial validity while maintaining overall disagreement.
Answer: Nevertheless. Dismisses counterclaim and returns to main argument.
Answer: Use a clear reference phrase such as "this claim" or "this position". Specific references prevent confusion and maintain clarity.
Answer: As a result. Shows causal relationship between sleep and attendance.
Answer: This argument overlooks that. Points out flaws in the counterclaim's reasoning.
Answer: For example. Introduces specific evidence to illustrate the reason.
Answer: therefore. Indicates logical conclusion based on strong evidence.
Answer: For example. Introduces specific evidence to illustrate a general point.
Answer: To refer back to a prior idea and avoid repetition. Creates cohesion by connecting to previous content.
Answer: It explicitly links a claim to its reason (cause-and-justification). "Because" shows why the claim is valid.
Answer: Although. Concedes a point before presenting the main argument.
Answer: Logical flow created by linking claims, reasons, and evidence clearly. Cohesion ensures smooth connections between argument components.
Answer: According to the report. Cites source to establish credibility of evidence.
Answer: To make reasons consistent and easier to follow. Creates rhythm and clarity in presenting multiple points.
Answer: Use a clause like "This shows that…". Explicitly links evidence to its supporting reason.
Answer: as a result. Shows consequence following from the stated cause.