Observe and Record Changes

Help Questions

5th Grade Science › Observe and Record Changes

Questions 1 - 10
1

The data table shows Amir’s temperature measurements when he mixed substances (no hot or cold water was added).

MixtureStart tempTemp after 1 minuteOther observations
Water + salt22°C22°CSalt dissolved, no bubbles
Vinegar + baking soda22°C18°CLots of bubbles, fizzing
Water + sand22°C22°CSand settled, water cloudy then clearer

Based on the observations, which mixture shows evidence of a chemical change?

Vinegar + baking soda, because it bubbled and the temperature dropped.

Water + sand, because the water looked cloudy while stirring.

Water + salt, because the salt dissolved in the water.

Water + sand, because the sand settled to the bottom.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically recognizing evidence of change through temperature drops and bubbles as signs of chemical reactions. When observing mixing investigations, students need to compare before and after to identify changes and distinguish observations from predictions, noting indicators like temperature shifts or gas. For this question, students mixed water with salt (no change), vinegar with baking soda (bubbles and cooling), and water with sand (settling). Choice C is correct because it identifies the key observations of bubbling and temperature drop, which indicate a chemical change. This shows the student understands that comparing before and after reveals changes and chemical changes show specific indicators like gas or temperature shifts. Choice A represents a common error where students confuse physical dissolving with chemical change. This typically happens because 5th graders may not understand that comparing to before is essential and might think any mixing that hides a substance is chemical. To help students: Use graphic organizers to compare before/after properties and practice distinguishing physical (reversible, like dissolving) from chemical changes (new substances, like gas production). Watch for: Students who only record after and forget before for comparison or miss temperature or gas evidence because focused on visibility.

2

The data table shows Maya’s observations when she mixed two clear liquids. Based on the observations, which evidence best suggests a solid formed in the mixture?

Data Table: Two Clear Liquids Mixed

The mixture became cloudy white and tiny particles settled on the bottom.

The mixture turned green because the colors mixed together.

The mixture was in a plastic cup instead of a glass cup.

The mixture stayed clear and looked the same as before.

Explanation

This question tests 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically recognizing evidence of solid formation from mixing liquids. When observing mixing investigations, students need to use specific descriptions and recognize that cloudy appearance and settling particles indicate solid formation. Choice A is correct because it uses specific descriptive terms ('cloudy white' and 'tiny particles settled') that clearly indicate a solid formed when two clear liquids mixed, showing the student understands how to identify and describe evidence of new substance formation. Choice C represents a common error where students make up observations that didn't happen (turning green from clear liquids), which typically happens because 5th graders may confuse what they expect or imagine with what they actually observe. To help students: Practice describing exactly what they see - demonstrate mixing clear liquids that form precipitates and have students describe the cloudiness and settling. Watch for: Students who invent observations based on expectations rather than recording what their senses actually detect.

3

The student recorded notes while mixing 2 tablespoons of baking soda with 30 mL of vinegar. Which observation is most specific and helpful?

Student Notes (Amir)

  • "It reacted a lot."
  • "It changed."
  • "Bubbles started immediately and foam rose about 2 cm in 10 seconds."
  • "I think it made a new substance."

"It reacted a lot."

"It changed."

"Bubbles started immediately and foam rose about 2 cm in 10 seconds."

"I think it made a new substance."

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically evaluating recording quality by identifying specific observations over vague ones. When observing mixing investigations, students need to use specific descriptions not vague terms and record observations using their senses (see, feel temperature, hear, smell) to provide evidence of change; for this question, students mixed baking soda and vinegar and observed bubbles and foam. Choice B is correct because it uses specific descriptive terms like 'bubbles started immediately' and measurable details like 'foam rose about 2 cm in 10 seconds'; this shows the student understands that observations must be specific and descriptive to serve as reliable evidence. Choice A represents a common error where students use vague language like 'it reacted a lot' without saying how; this typically happens because 5th graders may not yet realize the importance of specific language in science for others to understand or replicate. To help students: Model specific observation language with examples (say 'bubbles formed and foam rose 2 cm' not 'it reacted') and practice identifying good observations (specific, sensory, measurable) versus weak ones (vague, opinion-based). Watch for: Students who write 'it changed' without describing how, or who blur lines between what they think and what they observe, like mixing opinions with facts.

4

Based on the observations, why did Yuki measure temperature during the mixing test?

Yuki's Temperature Record

  • Cup 1 (Baking soda + water): $21^{\circ}C$ before, $21^{\circ}C$ after; no bubbles
  • Cup 2 (Vinegar + water): $21^{\circ}C$ before, $21^{\circ}C$ after; no bubbles
  • Cup 3 (Baking soda + vinegar): $21^{\circ}C$ before, $17^{\circ}C$ after; lots of bubbles​

To decide which mixture looked the clearest.

To measure how loud the fizzing sound was.

To find out if the cup was a different color after mixing.

To check whether the mixture changed temperature without adding hot or cold water.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically recognizing temperature as evidence of chemical change without external influence. When observing mixing investigations, students need to use specific descriptions and note properties like temperature to identify energy changes; for this question, students mixed baking soda and vinegar and observed a temperature drop and bubbles. Choice B is correct because it recognizes that observations must be based on senses like temperature measurement to detect changes without adding heat or cold; this shows the student understands that multiple observations provide stronger evidence for reactions. Choice D represents a common error where students focus on irrelevant properties like clarity instead of key indicators like temperature; this typically happens because 5th graders may not recognize which observations matter most, like energy changes in reactions. To help students: Emphasize measuring properties with tools like thermometers in examples such as baking soda-vinegar (cools, bubbles) versus plain mixing (no change). Watch for: Students who expect to see microscopic changes or miss temperature because they focus only on visuals like bubbles.

5

The data table shows Sofia’s observations when she mixed different substances in clear cups. Based on the observations, which mixture shows the strongest evidence that a new substance formed?

Data Table: Mixing Investigation

Baking soda + vinegar, because lots of bubbles formed and the cup felt cooler.

Oil + water, because the liquids separated into two layers after stirring.

Salt + water, because the salt dissolved and the water stayed clear.

Sand + water, because the sand settled to the bottom after a minute.

Explanation

This question tests 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically recognizing evidence of change that indicates a new substance formed. When observing mixing investigations, students need to note multiple properties like color, temperature, texture, and gas production to identify chemical changes versus physical changes. Choice C is correct because it identifies two key indicators of chemical change: gas production (bubbles) and temperature change (cup felt cooler), showing the student understands that multiple types of observations provide stronger evidence of new substance formation. Choice A represents a common error where students confuse physical changes (dissolving) with chemical changes, which typically happens because 5th graders may not yet understand that dissolving is reversible while chemical changes create new substances. To help students: Create a T-chart comparing physical changes (dissolving, mixing, separating) with chemical changes (bubbling, temperature change, color change, new substance formed). Watch for: Students who think any change means a new substance formed, without distinguishing between physical and chemical changes.

6

Based on the observations in Jamal's notebook, which statement best describes the type of change when he mixed salt and water?

Jamal's Notebook Entry (Oct. 15)

  • Before: "Clear water in cup. White salt crystals in spoon."
  • During: "Crystals got smaller when I stirred. No bubbles."
  • After: "Water stayed clear. I could not see crystals, but it still tasted salty (not tested in class)."

It was a chemical change because the salt disappeared completely.

It was a chemical change because clear liquids always mean a reaction.

It was a physical change because bubbles always mean dissolving.

It was a physical change because the salt dissolved and no gas formed.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically using observations as evidence to classify physical versus chemical changes based on indicators like gas absence. When observing mixing investigations, students need to distinguish observations from predictions or opinions and compare before and after to identify changes; for this question, students dissolved salt in water and noticed it became clear with no bubbles. Choice B is correct because it correctly identifies the observable evidence of no gas and dissolving as signs of a physical change; this shows the student understands that evidence comes from what we actually observe, like lack of new products. Choice A represents a common error where students confuse visibility changes like disappearing crystals with chemical reactions; this typically happens because 5th graders may think any 'disappearance' means a new substance without checking for indicators like bubbles or temperature. To help students: Compare good observations (specific, sensory-based like 'no bubbles, still tastes salty') to weak ones (opinion-based like 'it must be chemical'), and practice classifying changes in examples like salt dissolving (physical) versus baking soda-vinegar (chemical). Watch for: Students who only record after without baseline comparison, or who blur opinions like 'it reacted' with observable facts.

7

The student wrote: “The mixture reacted.” Based on observing and recording changes, what is the best way to improve that sentence?

Replace it with, “It changed because all mixtures always change.”

Replace it with, “It was awesome and I liked it.”

Replace it with, “It probably made new molecules that we cannot see.”

Replace it with a specific observation like, “Bubbles formed for 30 seconds and the cup felt cool.”

Explanation

This question tests 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically using specific descriptive language rather than vague terms. When observing mixing investigations, students need to replace vague statements like 'reacted' with specific sensory observations about what actually happened. Choice A is correct because it replaces the vague term with specific, observable details ('Bubbles formed for 30 seconds and the cup felt cool'), showing the student understands observations must be specific and descriptive. Choice C represents a common error where students try to explain invisible molecular changes they cannot actually observe, which typically happens because 5th graders may think scientific observations should include explanations about atoms and molecules they've heard about. To help students: Practice the 'Instead of... Try...' strategy - instead of 'it reacted,' try 'bubbles formed and the temperature dropped 4 degrees.' Watch for: Students who use scientific vocabulary they've heard (reacted, molecules, atoms) instead of describing what they can actually observe with their senses.

8

The student recorded observations for oil and water.

Chen’s notes:

  • Before: water was clear; oil was yellow and clear.
  • After shaking 10 seconds: tiny droplets everywhere, looked cloudy.
  • After 5 minutes: two layers formed again (yellow layer on top, clear layer on bottom).

Based on the observations, how can you tell this was a physical change and not a chemical change?

The two liquids separated back into layers, which is easy to reverse.

The oil was yellow, so it must have changed into a new substance.

The student shook the cup, so it was definitely a chemical change.

The mixture formed bubbles, so a new substance must have formed.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically using observations as evidence to distinguish physical from chemical changes by noting reversibility. When observing mixing investigations, students need to compare before and after states to identify changes and recognize that physical changes can often be reversed without new substances forming. For this question, a student mixed oil and water, which became cloudy then separated back into layers. Choice B is correct because it recognizes that the separation back into layers shows the change is reversible, indicating no new substance formed. This shows the student understands that evidence comes from what we actually observe, like reversibility as a sign of physical change. Choice A represents a common error where students assume bubbles always mean a new substance without context. This typically happens because 5th graders may not yet recognize which observations matter most and confuse temporary mixing with permanent chemical changes. To help students: Practice identifying reversible changes with examples like oil-water separation versus baking soda-vinegar bubbles, and use before/after comparisons to build evidence. Watch for: Students who confuse prediction with observation or expect all mixtures to form new substances without checking reversibility.

9

The data table shows Maya mixing two clear liquids. Which observation is the best evidence that a solid formed from the liquids?

Maya's Data Table

TimeObservation
Before mixingBoth liquids were clear.
10 seconds after mixingThe mixture turned cloudy white.
2 minutes after mixingWhite particles collected at the bottom.
5 minutes after mixingThe liquid on top looked clearer, and the white solid stayed at the bottom.

The mixture turned cloudy white 10 seconds after mixing.

White particles collected at the bottom 2 minutes after mixing.

The liquid on top looked clearer after 5 minutes.

Both liquids were clear before mixing.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically identifying specific observations like particle formation as evidence of a new solid. When observing mixing investigations, students need to record observations using their senses and compare before and after to identify changes; for this question, students mixed two clear liquids and observed cloudiness, then white particles settling. Choice C is correct because it correctly identifies the key observation of white particles collecting at the bottom, indicating a solid precipitate formed; this shows the student understands that comparing before and after reveals changes like new solids. Choice B represents a common error where students focus on initial changes like cloudiness without recognizing the settling as stronger evidence; this typically happens because 5th graders may not understand that comparing to before is essential for confirming outcomes like solid formation. To help students: Use timelines in graphic organizers for before/during/after, and model examples like mixing solutions that form precipitates (white particles) versus just cloudy mixtures. Watch for: Students who miss the most important evidence like settling particles because they focus on irrelevant observations like initial color, or who forget to compare after to before states.

10

The data table shows Yuki’s observations when mixing food coloring solutions.

MixtureBefore MixingAfter Mixing
Blue water + yellow waterblue liquid and yellow liquidgreen liquid, no bubbles, same temperature
Vinegar + baking sodaclear liquid and white powderlots of bubbles, foam, mixture felt cooler

Based on the observations, which mixture is most likely only a physical change?

Blue water + yellow water, because the color change is expected from mixing colors.

Vinegar + baking soda, because foam and bubbles mean only colors mixed.

Blue water + yellow water, because any color change always makes a new substance.

Vinegar + baking soda, because the mixture felt cooler and made bubbles.

Explanation

This question tests a 5th grader's ability to observe and record changes when substances are mixed (NGSS 5-PS1-4), specifically comparing before/after to distinguish physical color mixing from chemical changes with bubbles or temperature shifts. When observing mixing investigations, students need to note multiple properties and recognize that simple color changes without other indicators are often physical. For this question, blue and yellow water mixed to green with no other changes, while vinegar and baking soda produced bubbles and cooled. Choice A is correct because it recognizes the color change as expected from mixing without new substances, indicating a physical change. This shows the student understands that comparing before and after reveals changes, and lacks of indicators like bubbles mean no chemical reaction. Choice D represents a common error where students assume any color change means a new substance. This typically happens because 5th graders may not recognize which observations matter most and overgeneralize color changes. To help students: Practice mixing colors versus reactive mixtures, using organizers to list properties and identify physical versus chemical signs. Watch for: Students who think all color changes are chemical or miss temperature/bubble evidence in reactive mixtures.

Page 1 of 4