What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Integrating Information From Multiple Texts, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 4th Grade ELA.
Study Integrating Information From Multiple Texts in 4th Grade ELA with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the best definition of a supporting detail in an informational text?
Tap card or press Space to flip
A fact or example that explains or proves the main idea. Supporting details provide evidence for the main idea.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 77
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Integrating Information From Multiple Texts, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 4th Grade ELA.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: A fact or example that explains or proves the main idea. Supporting details provide evidence for the main idea.
Answer: A text that provides information you use to learn or explain. Sources give you facts and ideas to use.
Answer: Additionally. This transition shows you're building on previous information.
Answer: Use categories and list details from Text 1 and Text 2 under each. Categories help compare and combine related information systematically.
Answer: The most important point the author wants you to understand. It's the central message or key concept.
Answer: Bees pollinate, which helps plants make seeds. This combines cause and effect from both texts into one idea.
Answer: Both wolves and lions live in social groups. Highlights the shared trait while acknowledging different group names.
Answer: Not integration. Simply listing facts without connecting them isn't integration.
Answer: The most important point the author wants the reader to understand. The main idea is the central message the author communicates.
Answer: Both texts give the same or matching facts about a point. Confirmation occurs when texts provide consistent information.
Answer: Bees pollinate plants, which helps plants make seeds. Links cause (pollination) to effect (seed production) from both texts.
Answer: They give different or opposing information about the same point. Contradiction means texts present conflicting facts or views.
Answer: Explain one point using details from both texts. This shows true integration, not separation.
Answer: A specific fact or example that supports the main idea. Key details provide evidence and examples for main concepts.
Answer: Use it as a confirmed point and cite it as supported by both texts. Agreement between sources strengthens the reliability of information.
Answer: Combine key details from both texts into one clear understanding. Merging facts from two sources creates comprehensive knowledge.
Answer: Less rain can cause drought, which reduces crop growth. This links the cause-effect chain from both texts logically.
Answer: Combine key details from both texts to explain the topic clearly. Integration means merging information from multiple sources.
Answer: Identify the shared topic and your purpose for reading. Establishing common ground ensures texts can be meaningfully combined.
Answer: Additionally. This transition shows you're building on previous information.
Answer: To understand the topic more completely using both sources. Multiple sources provide broader, deeper understanding than one alone.
Answer: Similarly. This word indicates ideas share common characteristics.
Answer: A transition that signals addition, such as "Additionally,". The sentence needs a word to connect the ideas.
Answer: Confirm facts, include both texts, and keep the meaning accurate. These steps ensure accurate, complete integration.
Answer: Combine key details from both texts into one clear understanding. Integration means merging information to create unified knowledge.
Answer: Name the text or author when you use that information. Attribution gives credit and shows where information originated.
Answer: However. This transition signals opposing or different information.
Answer: Check evidence and source quality; do not state both as equally true. Evaluate credibility rather than presenting contradictions as equal.
Answer: Paraphrasing uses your words; copying repeats the author's words. One shows comprehension; the other doesn't.
Answer: It includes accurate facts from both texts and explains how they connect. Knowledgeable writing synthesizes and relates information from sources.
Answer: Restating information in your own words without changing meaning. It shows understanding by using different words.
Answer: Note the disagreement and check which text has stronger evidence. Evaluate evidence quality to determine which source is more reliable.
Answer: Paraphrase it once and note that both texts support it. Avoid repetition by combining shared information.
Answer: Check each text for evidence and consider reliability and date. Evaluate which source has stronger support.
Answer: Note the conflict and check evidence and source reliability. Acknowledging differences and evaluating credibility ensures accuracy.
Answer: State only the most important points in your own words. Summarizing requires condensing and rephrasing key ideas.
Answer: Are both texts mainly about the same subject or idea. This question directly checks if texts share the same central topic.
Answer: Identify the shared topic and purpose for reading both texts. Start by finding what both texts discuss and why you're reading.
Answer: Group ideas by subtopic, not by "Text 1 then Text 2.". Topic-based organization creates coherent writing.
Answer: Together, both texts show recycling reduces waste and saves resources. A strong conclusion synthesizes the combined insights from both sources.
Answer: Identify the shared topic and each text's main idea. Start by finding what both texts discuss.
Answer: B. Option B combines sources; A keeps them separate.
Answer: Use accurate facts and key ideas from both texts in your own words. Knowledgeable writing shows understanding through accurate synthesis.
Answer: Additionally. This word connects related information smoothly.
Answer: According to Text 1…, and Text 2 adds that…. Clearly identifies each source while smoothly connecting their ideas.
Answer: Use two-column notes labeled Text 1 and Text 2. This method prevents mixing up which information came from which source.
Answer: Hurricanes form over warm water because it provides energy. Connects the location fact with the scientific reason behind it.
Answer: Paraphrase key points and use short, accurate quotations only when needed. Paraphrasing prevents plagiarism while preserving meaning.
Answer: Main idea is the central point; details explain or prove it. Main ideas are broad; details provide specific support.
Answer: A detail that supports the topic and helps answer your question. Select relevant details that directly address your purpose.
Answer: Combine matched points into one paragraph and cite both sources. True integration blends information rather than listing separately.
Answer: Combine key ideas from both texts into one clear understanding. Integration means merging information to create unified knowledge.
Answer: Integrating combines ideas from both texts; summarizing uses one text. Integration uses multiple sources; summarizing focuses on one.
Answer: You used details from both texts to explain the same idea. True integration blends sources, not lists them.
Answer: B. B shows connections between texts; A is vague.
Answer: Include it only if it is relevant and clearly label it as from that text. Single-source details need clear attribution to maintain accuracy.
Answer: Restate the idea in your own words without changing meaning. Rewording prevents plagiarism while preserving original meaning.
Answer: The reason the author wrote, such as to inform or explain. Authors write to achieve specific goals.
Answer: However. This transition indicates contrasting or opposing information.
Answer: Erosion has causes, and people can reduce it with prevention methods. Connects problem (causes) with solution (prevention) from both texts.
Answer: Identify the shared topic and purpose of each text. Start by finding what both texts discuss to ensure proper integration.
Answer: State the main idea and list supporting key details. This method separates central concepts from supporting evidence.
Answer: Deserts get little rain, but rainforests get heavy rain all year. Uses "but" to clearly show opposing rainfall patterns.
Answer: A Venn diagram. Overlapping circles visually organize similarities and differences.
Answer: Also. This transition word signals additional information follows.
Answer: However. This transition indicates contrast between sources.
Answer: Does every sentence support the same topic and focus question. Unity ensures all content serves your main purpose.
Answer: A two-column notes chart labeled Text 1 and Text 2. Columns keep each text's information organized separately.
Answer: However. This word shows opposing or different ideas.
Answer: Combine them: state the fact and include the example as support. Examples illustrate facts, so pairing them strengthens your point.
Answer: Important facts, examples, definitions, or explanations. These elements provide the substance needed for integration.
Answer: B. B credits the source; A uses personal opinion.
Answer: Recognize them as synonyms and restate the idea in your own words. Different terms for the same concept should be unified in your writing.
Answer: Nocturnal animals, such as owls, are active during the night. Combines definition with example while using different wording.
Answer: Paraphrase and use only key facts, not the author's exact sentences. Paraphrasing shows comprehension while avoiding plagiarism.
Answer: Facts and examples that explain or prove the main idea. These specific details support the central claim.
Answer: Topic sentence, detail from Text 1, detail from Text 2, concluding sentence. This structure logically presents integrated information.