English Language Arts: Text Structure (TEKS.ELA.9-12.9.B) Practice Test

Tourists arrive to the San Antonio River Walk as if stepping into a timeless postcard, yet the path itself tells time differently. Beginning with today's flood-control gates humming beneath café chatter, the essay rewinds to 1921, when the river tore through downtown and made catastrophe the city's most persuasive architect. It then splices 1938 civic blueprints with the 1968 world's fair, a montage that shows policy and spectacle bargaining over the river's future, before leaping again to present-day restoration of native plants along the Mission Reach. By circling forward and back—juxtaposing emergency with celebration, engineering memos with strolling musicians—the narrative recasts a leisure corridor as an archive of choices. The structure is less a line than a braid: each strand, a decade's argument about safety, beauty, and commerce, crosses and tightens the others. The effect is to make every umbrella and barge a footnote to earlier storms, every mural an annotation to bond elections. In that arrangement, the reader is not merely entertained but conscripted into stewardship; tomorrow's photographs, the braid implies, will splice in our own votes, our own planting days, our own routines of watching water behave and remembering why.

Policy memos often ask for a single fix to algorithmic bias, so this proposal deliberately refuses a straight line from problem to solution. It opens with consequences—a denied loan, a misrouted ambulance—because the stakes, not the math, must lead. Only then does it rewind to sources: skewed training data, proxy variables, and organizational incentives that prize speed over redress. A third movement inventories partial remedies already tried and found wanting, from superficial "debiasing" checklists to opacity cloaked as trade secret. Finally, the document advances a layered architecture: dataset governance with versioned audits; model cards tied to use contexts; appeal channels staffed by humans authorized to override; and a public harms registry that forces learning across agencies. By nesting these modules and looping evaluation back to the opening harms, the structure argues that accountability is not a toggle but a system with feedback. The reader never forgets what failure looks like, because each component is justified against the lived consequences that began the brief. The result is persuasion through design: the organization of the pages enacts the remedy itself—preventing any one fix from carrying more weight than it can bear.