English Language Arts: Presenting Research (TEKS.ELA.9-12.12.J)
Help Questions
Texas High School ELA › English Language Arts: Presenting Research (TEKS.ELA.9-12.12.J)
You completed a mixed-methods study on the economic and grid reliability impacts of expanding utility-scale solar and storage in Texas. Findings include region-specific cost savings, ERCOT peak-load smoothing, and county-level job shifts derived from proprietary utility data under NDA. Audience: a joint hearing of Texas House Energy Resources and Senate Business & Commerce committees, attended by members, staffers, and ERCOT analysts. Constraints and resources: 8-minute briefing plus 5-minute Q&A; Capitol hearing room podium and projector; no live internet; avoid sharing identifiable utility data; goal is to inform pending committee decisions.
Which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach will most effectively communicate these complex findings to this audience within the constraints?
Set up a 36×48 academic poster in the hallway and hold informal conversations after the hearing.
Deliver a concise policy briefing with a pre-rendered slide deck (high-contrast cost–benefit and reliability graphs; no live demos), a one-page executive summary handout, and a clear 60-second topline opening; keep technical methods on backup slides and reserve the last 3 minutes for targeted Q&A with ERCOT staff.
Run a live dashboard demo pulling real-time ERCOT data over Wi‑Fi to showcase variability.
Read aloud a 12-page narrative memo so the full reasoning is on the record.
Explanation
B aligns policy-briefing norms with a sophisticated audience, showcases complex results via clear visuals, respects time, avoids internet dependence and NDA limits, and allocates Q&A. A mismatches the setting; C violates tech constraints and risks time; D ignores time and audience expectations.
You ran a multi-site randomized study using Bayesian hierarchical models to evaluate dual-language literacy curricula in Texas high schools. Findings show heterogeneous treatment effects by baseline proficiency and robustness to multiple priors. Audience: literacy researchers and applied statisticians at a national academic conference in Austin. Constraints and resources: 20-minute talk with 10-minute Q&A; full AV support; emphasis on transparent methods, reproducibility, and accessible slides; no student-identifying data.
Which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach best fits this audience and context?
Host a community listening circle with student storytellers and no slides.
Distribute a two-page policy brief and take questions without visuals.
Switch to a poster and stand during the poster hour instead of using the scheduled talk slot.
Give a structured research talk with slides that present the research question, design, Bayesian model specification and diagnostics, preregistered analysis plan, robustness checks, and effect plots with intervals; provide an accessible slide deck and a QR to an anonymized repository; leave 10 minutes for methods-focused Q&A.
Explanation
D matches academic conference norms and the audience's expertise, foregrounds complex methods and reproducibility, and uses accessible visuals. A, B, and C do not meet the expectations for a scheduled research talk or adequately convey technical rigor.
You mapped flood exposure and drainage gaps in colonias across Hidalgo and Cameron counties using LiDAR, parcel-level data, and community surveys. Findings highlight clusters of high-risk blocks, costed mitigation options, and realistic timelines. Audience: bilingual community leaders, neighborhood association heads, and county emergency managers in a Rio Grande Valley session. Constraints and resources: 12-minute slot, community center projector, limited internet, simultaneous interpretation available, materials must be understandable to non-technical leaders, and no household identifiers may be shown; goal is near-term coordination on funding applications.
Which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach will most effectively convey the research and drive action within these constraints?
Deliver a bilingual, multimodal briefing: offline slide deck with high-contrast, anonymized maps and icons; printed one-page action checklist in both languages; speak in plain terms paced with the interpreter; close with a 2-minute next-steps discussion inviting agency contacts.
Offer a 40-minute technical workshop on LiDAR processing, including live code walkthroughs.
Email a 20-page hydrology white paper the night before and present without visuals.
Run a live web GIS demo requiring a stable connection that shows parcel addresses to illustrate risk.
Explanation
A tailors mode, visuals, language, and pacing to a bilingual, non-technical audience, works offline, protects privacy, and ends with actionable steps. B exceeds time and expertise; C lacks accessibility and engagement; D depends on unreliable internet and violates privacy.
You developed a predictive risk model for process upsets using multi-plant sensor streams across three Gulf Coast facilities, showing a 35% reduction in false alarms and 6-hour earlier warning on leading indicators. Audience: safety and operations managers at a Houston Ship Channel industry consortium. Constraints and resources: strict 10-minute slot plus 5-minute Q&A before shift change; boardroom display; no external file sharing on USBs, but you may connect your own laptop; confidentiality prohibits naming plants or showing raw sensor traces; goal is to secure a limited-scope on-site pilot.
Which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach best serves this audience and objective under the constraints?
Give a motivational talk without data, focusing on human-interest safety stories.
Read a 25-page technical report with detailed proofs and appendices.
Present a concise executive technical briefing from your laptop: preloaded slides with redacted performance metrics, confusion matrices, and two anonymized case vignettes; provide a one-page pilot scope handout with timeline and resource asks; end with a clear pilot proposal and reserve 3 minutes for Q&A.
Facilitate a half-day hands-on training on the modeling software to build capacity.
Explanation
C aligns with a technical operations audience, fits the tight time window, respects security and confidentiality, and directly advances the pilot decision. A lacks evidence, B ignores time and audience needs, and D exceeds available resources.
You have completed a statewide economic analysis of Texas renewable energy policy, quantifying county-by-county job impacts, tax revenues, and grid reliability trade-offs. Audience: staffers from the Texas House Energy Resources Committee and budget analysts who expect clear recommendations supported by confidence intervals. Resources: a static slide deck with annotated charts and county heat maps; a two-page executive summary you can print. Constraints: 12-minute agenda slot, one projector, unreliable Capitol Wi‑Fi (no live links/dashboards), embargo on firm-level data (no raw data sharing). Purpose: inform near-term budget decisions with concise, actionable options.
Given the audience, content, resources, and constraints, which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach will most effectively communicate your findings?
Submit a long-form op-ed to a statewide newspaper and email the link to staffers the morning of the hearing.
Host a 60-minute interactive webinar with live polling and a real-time dashboard demo.
Deliver a tightly structured oral policy briefing with a printed two-page executive summary and a static, annotated slide deck; avoid live links and conclude with three prioritized budget options.
Circulate the full technical manuscript with all datasets attached to committee members and skip a formal presentation to allow independent review.
Explanation
A concise oral policy briefing supported by printed executive summary and static, annotated slides matches policymakers' needs, showcases complex findings clearly, and respects time, Wi‑Fi, and data-privacy constraints. The other options either mismatch purpose, exceed resources/time, or violate embargoes.
You conducted a multi-site, quasi-experimental study on dual-language programs across Texas districts, including sensitivity analyses and a measurement model. Audience: researchers and methodologists at a regional academic conference who expect methodological transparency. Resources: full AV support, a methods-first slide deck, a preregistration and de-identified replication package you can link. Constraints: 20-minute talk plus 5-minute Q&A; professional, research-focused setting. Purpose: present results and elicit technical feedback on design and robustness.
Which presentation mode, format, and delivery approach best fits this scholarly context?
Give a 20-minute oral conference presentation with a methods-first slide deck that visualizes the design, displays key effect sizes with 95% CIs, and links to preregistration and code; invite technical Q&A.
Facilitate a community town hall in the exhibit hall using simplified language and no statistics to broaden accessibility.
Create a glossy newsletter for district administrators highlighting only success stories and testimonials.
Submit a poster to the undergraduate session and let the results speak for themselves without verbal explanation.
Explanation
An oral conference talk with a methods-first slide deck and links to open materials aligns with audience expectations, showcases complex methods and results, and fits time and AV resources. The distractors mismatch audience, purpose, or format.
You synthesized research on heatwave-driven ER admissions and grid strain during recent ERCOT conservation appeals for a Houston hospital network's executive committee. Audience: healthcare executives and clinical leaders seeking actionable thresholds. Resources: permission to distribute a one-page executive brief and show static slides in the boardroom. Constraints: 8-minute slot on a packed agenda, no external file-sharing or live demos. Purpose: translate risk into clear, immediate staffing triggers.
What delivery choice will most effectively communicate your findings within these constraints?
Publish a detailed white paper and ask members to read before the meeting; use the slot for open discussion with no visuals.
Schedule a 45-minute training workshop with role-play and breakout rooms the following week.
Stream a live data dashboard connected to real-time grid alerts to illustrate volatility and answer questions interactively.
Present a concise executive oral brief supported by two static, high-contrast slides and a one-page leave-behind summarizing risk thresholds, confidence ranges, and three staffing triggers.
Explanation
A brief, executive-level oral presentation with static visuals and a one-page handout translates complex evidence into decisions and fits the strict time and tech limits. The other options either exceed time, rely on disallowed tech, or offload comprehension to pre-reading.
You completed a mixed-methods evaluation of flood mitigation projects in Rio Grande Valley colonias, combining hydrologic models with resident interviews. Audience: county commissioners, city engineers, and colonia community organizers; many attendees are bilingual (Spanish/English). Resources: basic projector, printed bilingual handouts, and large-format static maps. Constraints: limited internet, ADA needs (large fonts, high contrast), 15-minute slot with time for interpretation. Purpose: align on priorities for the next grant application.
Which presentation approach best communicates your complex findings to this audience under these conditions?
Submit a dense 30-page technical report in English only and rely on attendees to read it later; skip presenting to leave time for public comments.
Provide a bilingual, multimodal briefing: deliver an oral presentation paced for interpretation, use large-font translated slides with simple static maps, and hand out Spanish/English one-page summaries for reference.
Use an advanced GIS live demo requiring high-speed internet to showcase parcel-level models; invite attendees to interact on their devices.
Record a podcast episode with academic colleagues discussing theory and share the link with community leaders.
Explanation
A bilingual, multimodal briefing with accessible, static visuals and translated handouts matches audience needs, respects tech and ADA constraints, and conveys complex results clearly. The other options either ignore language/accessibility, rely on unreliable tech, or mismatch the setting.