Mathematical Process Standards>Selecting Tools and Techniques to Solve Problems(TEKS.Math.8.1.C)

Help Questions

Texas 8th Grade Math › Mathematical Process Standards>Selecting Tools and Techniques to Solve Problems(TEKS.Math.8.1.C)

Questions 1 - 3
1

Find the intersection of $y=1.6x-12.3$ and $y=-0.25x+18.4$ to the nearest hundredth. Which tool would you choose as the best option?

graphing calculator

spreadsheet

mental estimation

paper-and-pencil algebra

Explanation

A graphing calculator quickly graphs both lines and computes their intersection to decimal accuracy. Solving by hand with these decimals is slower and prone to arithmetic errors. A spreadsheet is not ideal for solving two equations graphically, and mental estimation cannot deliver coordinates to the nearest hundredth.

2

While shopping, decide quickly which is the better buy: 24 oz for $4.59 or 28 oz for $5.19. What technique is best for a fast, reasonable decision without exact calculation?

paper-and-pencil algebra

graphing calculator

spreadsheet

mental estimation

Explanation

Mental estimation is fastest and sufficient: compare unit prices by rounding and cross-multiplying. For example, $4.59\times 28\approx 4.6\times 28=128.8$ and $5.19\times 24\approx 5.2\times 24=124.8$, so the 28 oz option is slightly cheaper per ounce. A calculator or spreadsheet is slower for an aisle decision, and paper-and-pencil is unnecessary.

3

Solve exactly for $x$: $\frac{3}{4}x - 5 = \frac{1}{2}x + 7$. For an exact solution, which tool/technique should you use?

spreadsheet

paper-and-pencil algebra

mental estimation

graphing calculator

Explanation

Paper-and-pencil algebra lets you clear fractions and isolate $x$ to get an exact value without rounding. Mental estimation will not be precise. A graphing calculator could approximate by graphing two lines but adds setup and may not give an exact fractional answer. A spreadsheet does not handle symbolic manipulation cleanly here.