Developing and sustaining foundational language skills: Generating Questions About Text (TEKS.ELA.8.5.B)

Help Questions

Texas 8th Grade ELA › Developing and sustaining foundational language skills: Generating Questions About Text (TEKS.ELA.8.5.B)

Questions 1 - 7
1

On a patchwork of ball fields and picnic tables, Brookside Park had always looked carefully trimmed. Last spring, the city began a rewilding pilot there: mowing less often, planting native bunchgrasses, and leaving fallen branches as habitat. Within weeks, joggers pointed out a red-tailed hawk circling above the creek, and a neighbor said she saw a coyote at dawn. Ecologists argue that taller grasses shelter insects that attract birds, which can reduce rodents. Pet owners worry that hidden litter, ticks, or bolder wildlife will make the park feel less safe. Maintenance crews say cutting mowing to once a month in summer saves money they can use fixing the eroded trail. A youth baseball coach wonders whether outfields will stay playable. Others ask who benefits most; the shadier corners are cooler for seniors, but wheelchairs snag more easily on long stems near the sidewalk. The city promises to measure outcomes—biodiversity counts, complaints, and costs—before expanding the program. Meanwhile, a local news segment framed the debate as wild versus tidy, though the pilot looks more like a patchwork than a takeover. As you read, you may notice how evidence and values intertwine in the way people talk about the same grass.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

In what season did crews reduce mowing at Brookside Park?

Which city has the largest park system in the country?

How do the contrasting perspectives (ecologists, pet owners, maintenance staff, and coaches) complicate the claim that rewilding restores balance, and what additional evidence would most help you judge between them?

Do you prefer wild parks or tidy parks?

Explanation

Choice C pushes readers to analyze multiple viewpoints and evaluate what further evidence is needed, promoting critical thinking during reading. The others are literal (A), unrelated (B), or opinion-based and answerable without careful reading (D).

2

At Maple Street Middle in Houston's East End, a crowded PTA meeting fills the cafeteria with voices that switch fluidly between English and Spanish. The district has proposed expanding a dual-language program that pairs science and history lessons with literacy in both languages. Supporters point to research suggesting that students who develop stronger first-language skills read more deeply in English later, and they note how families feel welcomed when classroom posters and read-alouds reflect multiple cultures. A math teacher recounts how Lucia, a seventh grader who translates for her grandmother at doctor visits, code-switches in class to pull in peers who might otherwise stay silent. Skeptics ask whether bilingual instruction slows test prep or divides students into tracks. A parent who moved to Houston for refinery work wants his daughter to fit in fast; another worries about resources when textbooks are already worn. The principal frames the decision as an investment choice: do limited funds go toward materials and teacher training now in hopes of long-term gains, or toward immediate boosts like tutoring and devices? As the microphones pass around the room, the debate mixes data, identity, and the practical math of time.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

How many languages are mentioned in the meeting?

In what specific ways does the anecdote about Lucia's code-switching function as evidence for the benefits of dual-language instruction, and what counterevidence would you look for to test that claim?

Which Texas city is closest to the state border with New Mexico?

What is culture?

Explanation

Choice B asks readers to evaluate how an example supports a claim and to consider counterevidence, which deepens comprehension. The others are literal (A), unrelated (C), or overly broad (D).

3

At the Railway Heritage Museum, a new exhibit on a 1930s yard workers' strike invites visitors to read history by comparing artifacts. In one case, a company newsletter praises management's safety plan and blames outsiders for unrest. Across the aisle, mimeographed handbills from the workers demand shorter shifts and point to foremen's favoritism. A photograph shows police lined along the depot steps while onlookers crowd the street. The curator's labels are brief, leaving viewers to infer links: Did the safety plan come before or after injuries rose? Were the outsiders labor organizers or simply workers from another shop? An audio clip of a retired brakeman recalls fear the night the lights went out, but his memory trails off when asked who cut the power. The final panel asks visitors to sketch a timeline using the pieces on display. What's missing is as notable as what's present: no payroll ledgers, no court transcripts, no voice from the women who brought food to the picket line. The exhibit suggests that interpretation depends not just on evidence, but on the sequence and context in which evidence appears.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

How does the curator's sequencing of artifacts shape your judgment about who bears responsibility for the escalation, and how might a different arrangement lead to a different interpretation?

In what decade did the strike occur?

Do museums sometimes use photographs?

How many miles of track does the national rail network have?

Explanation

Choice A focuses on how structure and curation influence interpretation, prompting analysis beyond surface facts. The others are literal (B), answerable without careful reading (C), or unrelated (D).

4

After a parched winter, the Edwards Aquifer dips lower than usual, and San Antonio officials propose tighter watering rules as spring arrives. Farmers east of the city watch their pecan leaves curl, arguing that orchards planted decades ago can't survive repeated cutbacks. Urban residents point to dry creek beds and the endangered salamanders that depend on steady springflow; conservation groups warn that once the underground pressure drops, recovery can lag even after rains. A regional model projects several possible paths for the next three months, from modest recharge to extended deficit. Water managers weigh a tiered plan: stricter limits in high-use neighborhoods and on commercial landscapes, with exemptions for small farms that meet efficiency standards. Business leaders worry about hotel and restaurant jobs if the city looks unkempt all summer, while equity advocates note that low-income renters already use less water and would shoulder proportionally larger fines. The debate rarely names it outright, but it turns on what counts as fairness and how much uncertainty decision makers can tolerate. The council's vote will set a precedent for the next drought, when the stakes may be higher.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

What is the name of the aquifer discussed?

Why is water important to people?

Who wants to protect jobs more, business leaders or conservation groups?

Which assumption about fairness underlies the proposed tiered restrictions, and how would your judgment change if the model's uncertainty range widened or the recovery lagged longer than expected?

Explanation

Choice D asks readers to probe underlying assumptions and consider how uncertainty affects decisions, which promotes deeper analysis. The others are literal (A), overly broad (B), or surface-level recall (C).

5

In a drought-prone year, the Rio Grande thins into a chain of slow pools, and arguments about who gets the next gallon grow louder. The author traces water from snowmelt and springs through canals, pumps, and pipes to fields, cities, and wildlife refuges. Farmers cite century-old compacts and say orchards cannot be switched off like a faucet; municipal leaders argue fast-growing neighborhoods need reliability to prevent skyrocketing bills; biologists warn that when the river fails to reach coastal estuaries, fish nurseries collapse. Layered over these claims are cross-border obligations and aquifer withdrawals that are legal yet difficult to measure. A proposed pipeline from a rural county promises relief for a metro area but sparks fear of "water export" hollowing out local futures. The article highlights small successes—drip irrigation, lawn buybacks, leak repairs—but keeps returning to trade-offs: price signals versus equity, conservation goals versus economic development. In its final scene, a public meeting in the Valley ends without a vote; instead, members ask for models that show who gains, who loses, and how climate trends shift that balance over the next decade.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

In what ways do historical water agreements and current growth patterns complicate who "deserves" water, and how does the author signal a preferred solution?

How many gallons does a person use daily?

Is the Rio Grande in Texas?

What is the Spanish translation of "agua"?

Explanation

Option A prompts analysis of competing claims, context, and authorial stance. The other choices are surface-level, general-knowledge, or unrelated and do not engage the passage's central complexities.

6

On Friday nights in a South Texas town the stadium lights glow, and the town's mascot—a character stitched on jackets and painted on storefront windows—gathers the crowd under one banner. Lately, that symbol stands at the center of dispute. Students and some alumni argue the image caricatures a culture, turning identity into costume; others say the mascot is harmless tradition, a decades-old emblem of grit that unites rivals and raises booster funds. The article follows a student-led forum, where speakers describe experiences of exclusion, while a band parent worries that changing merchandise would drain the music budget. The author notes that school policy allows a vote, but only current seniors and faculty can cast ballots, leaving elementary families and graduates without a formal voice. He also observes how language shapes choices: calling the issue "political" nudges principals to delay, while calling it "belonging" invites counseling staff to offer alternatives. By the end, a committee recommends retiring some costumes but keeping the nickname—an attempt to split the difference—prompting the question of whether compromise prevents harm or simply rebrands it. Meanwhile, local businesses worry that a change could dull the town's recognizable branding during football season.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

Which mascot is the funniest?

What colors are the team's uniforms?

When did the mascot first appear?

Whose perspectives are amplified or minimized when the community frames the mascot debate as "tradition versus change," and how does that framing shape possible outcomes?

Explanation

Option D examines perspective, framing, and consequences—key interpretive layers for critical reading. The other options focus on trivial, factual, or unrelated details that do not deepen comprehension.

7

Each spring, students file into silent rooms to take statewide tests that promise comparable data. The author describes a growing movement to replace some exams with portfolios—collections of essays, lab reports, performances, and reflections—arguing that real work shows learning better than bubbles. But he also notes that portfolios can magnify inequities: a school with small classes and art studios curates richer evidence than a campus juggling staff shortages. District leaders worry colleges and legislatures still demand uniform metrics; teachers ask how many hours meaningful feedback would take on top of coaching, bus duty, and family conferences. The piece profiles two classrooms: one uses a rubric sharpened by community reviewers; another pilots a short test plus a mini-portfolio to check both breadth and depth. Numbers still matter, the author concedes, yet numbers alone miss growth in voice, collaboration, and persistence. By the close, a panel debates whether to phase in a hybrid system, acknowledging the trade-off between statewide comparability and authentic demonstration will not disappear, only be managed more transparently. Parents in surveys express fatigue with high-stakes days but also ask for clear signals about readiness for college or careers.

Which question would most effectively deepen your understanding as you read this passage?

What is the exact number of hours students spend testing?

How does the author weigh the need for statewide comparability against authentic demonstrations of learning, and what evidence supports that evaluation?

Are portfolios like art projects?

Which acronym does the test use?

Explanation

Option B probes the author's evaluation of trade-offs and the evidence used, which promotes deeper critical analysis. The other choices are factual, simplistic, or irrelevant to the passage's core argument.