Multiple Genres: Analyzing Argumentative Texts By Identifying The Claim (TEKS.ELA.6.8.E.i)
Help Questions
Texas 6th Grade ELA › Multiple Genres: Analyzing Argumentative Texts By Identifying The Claim (TEKS.ELA.6.8.E.i)
First-period yawns and drooping eyes are not a sign of laziness; they are a sign that our schedule works against how preteens and teens actually sleep. Scientists explain that growing bodies fall asleep later and need more rest to think clearly. When schools have moved the first bell even 30 minutes later, they report better attendance, higher participation in class, and safer commutes because students are more alert. Some people worry that after-school activities would run too late. But small adjustments—like shifting practice times or rotating club days—can protect those activities while giving everyone a healthier start. Starting later would not change how hard we work; it would help us work smarter. Teachers could begin with students who are ready to learn, not fighting to stay awake. Families would see calmer mornings, and buses would carry students who are less rushed and more focused. If our goal is learning, then we should build a schedule that supports it from the very first bell.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Our school should start classes later in the morning to support student learning.
Schools that moved the first bell 30 minutes later saw better attendance.
Some people worry after-school activities would run too late.
Many students eat breakfast at home before coming to school.
Explanation
A is the central claim: the author argues the school should start later to improve learning. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that ____. Enrichment: Compare this claim to an argument that opposes later start times; how do the central claims differ?
Imagine a corner of our library where students can design, build, and solve problems—without needing expensive gadgets. A student-run makerspace would invite us to create with cardboard, tape, string, and simple tools, turning ideas into real prototypes. This hands-on work builds creativity and teamwork while connecting to science and technology skills we use in class. We could upcycle materials from home, keeping costs low and reducing waste. Some worry that a makerspace might be noisy or messy. That's a fair concern, but we can set clear rules, schedule quiet hours, and store projects neatly in labeled bins. Volunteers could train student leaders to supervise and help peers. The makerspace would not replace the library's quiet reading areas; it would add a new option for learning by doing. When students design bridges, craft models, or test simple circuits, they learn to plan, revise, and persevere. Our library can be more than shelves of books—it can be a launchpad for ideas we build with our own hands.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Students can upcycle materials from home to keep costs low.
The library should add a student-run makerspace to boost hands-on learning.
Some people worry the space might be noisy or messy.
Projects could be stored neatly in labeled bins to stay organized.
Explanation
B is the central claim: the author argues for creating a student-run makerspace in the library. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that ____. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument that the library should remain strictly quiet; how do the claims conflict?
Parks should welcome everyone, not just on cool mornings but on hot afternoons too. Right now, many visitors cut their time short because the sun makes benches and playgrounds uncomfortable. Installing more shaded seating—like canopies over benches and clusters of trees near play areas—would keep parks usable longer each day. Shade helps grandparents watch their grandchildren, allows people to rest between games, and lets families enjoy picnics without worrying about overheating. Some say the city doesn't have the budget. However, community sponsorships, small grants, and volunteer tree-planting events can lower costs while building pride in shared spaces. Shade also protects equipment from heat damage, saving money over time. Our parks already have great features such as walking paths and courts, but they're not fully accessible when the sun drives people away. With more shaded seating, parks become comfortable places for reading, chatting, and playing—through every season, for every age. That simple change would invite more neighbors outside and keep our community active.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Our parks already have walking paths and sports courts that people enjoy.
Community sponsorships and grants can help reduce costs for improvements.
The city should add more shaded seating in parks to make them comfortable for everyone.
Some say the city does not have the budget for more shade structures.
Explanation
C is the central claim: the author argues the city should add shaded seating in parks. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that ____. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument prioritizing new sports equipment instead; how do the claims focus resources differently?
Screens help us learn, but we also need practice thinking and connecting without them. A monthly screen-free day at school would give students time to talk face-to-face, write by hand, build models, and move around more. Teachers could plan activities like debates, lab stations, reading circles, and outdoor observation walks. These choices boost focus, strengthen social skills, and give eyes and posture a break. Some people argue that technology is essential for modern learning. That's true—but one day a month won't take technology away. It will balance our habits and remind us we can learn in many ways. After screen-free days, classes could reflect on what worked and bring the best ideas back into regular lessons. We would still use devices often; we would just make room for different kinds of thinking. With a simple routine, we can reduce distractions, build community, and return to our screens with better purpose and attention.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Teachers could plan debates, lab stations, and outdoor observation walks.
Technology is essential for modern learning in many classes today.
Students need breaks for their eyes and posture during the school day.
The school should have a monthly screen-free day to balance how we learn.
Explanation
D is the central claim: the author argues for a monthly screen-free day at school. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that ____. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument for daily device use in every class; how do the claims define effective learning?
Think about how you feel when your alarm rings before the sun is up. Middle schoolers need enough sleep to think clearly, solve problems, and be kind to one another. That is why our school should start classes later in the morning. Scientists report that kids our age naturally fall asleep later, so waking up at dawn fights the body's clock. When school starts later, students arrive more alert, attendance improves, and tardiness drops. Teachers spend less time re-explaining directions because brains are ready to learn. Some families worry that a later start would complicate bus routes or after-school jobs. Those concerns matter, but they can be solved by adjusting practice times and coordinating transportation. A schedule that matches students' biology is a smart investment. If we truly value learning, we should organize the day to help students do their best. Even a small shift, like thirty minutes, can reduce yawns and raise grades without costing extra money.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Our school should start classes later in the morning so students learn better.
When school starts later, attendance improves and tardiness drops.
Some families worry that a later start would complicate bus routes or jobs.
The sun rises at different times in different seasons.
Explanation
A is correct because it states the author's central claim: school should start later. B is a supporting detail, C is a counterclaim, and D is an unrelated fact. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that school should begin later to help students learn. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an article arguing to keep current start times; how do the claims differ?
Walk through our hallways after lunch, and you will spot trash cans stuffed with empty plastic bottles. That waste is a problem we can solve. Our school should ban single-use plastic water bottles and install more refill stations. Disposable bottles take years to break down and often end up in rivers and oceans, where animals mistake them for food. Refill stations encourage students to bring reusable bottles, which are cheaper over time and keep water cold throughout the day. Some people say banning bottles would inconvenience visitors or students who forget a container. But we can keep a few paper cups by fountains for emergencies and sell affordable reusable bottles in the office. Other schools that made this change reported cleaner campuses and lower trash pick-up costs. If we want to show real leadership on the environment, we should stop relying on throwaway plastics and make refilling the easy, normal choice.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Disposable bottles take years to break down and often harm wildlife.
Our school should ban single-use plastic water bottles and install more refill stations.
Some people say banning bottles would inconvenience visitors or forgetful students.
Aluminum is the most common metal in Earth's crust.
Explanation
B is correct because it states the author's central claim. A is a supporting detail, C presents a counterclaim, and D is an unrelated fact. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that the school should stop using disposable bottles and switch to refilling. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument that favors recycling bins over bans; which claim is stronger and why?
Budgets measure what a community values. If we truly value students' growth, we must protect and expand arts education at our school. Drawing, music, theater, and dance are not extras; they are engines of learning. When students create, they practice persistence, make original connections, and communicate ideas in powerful ways. Studies link arts participation with higher attendance and improved performance in core subjects because curious minds show up ready to learn. Some argue that limited funds should go only to tested subjects. But narrowing the day squeezes out the very experiences that make learning meaningful. Arts teachers also collaborate with science and history classes, helping students model a cell in clay or stage a debate as a performance. Communities with strong arts programs see higher family engagement at shows and exhibits. If we want well-rounded problem solvers, we should invest in the arts, not cut them.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
Studies link arts participation with higher attendance and better performance in core subjects.
Some instruments are made of wood while others are made of brass.
Our school should protect and expand arts education because it drives learning and student growth.
Some argue limited funds should go only to tested subjects.
Explanation
C is correct because it states the author's central claim. A is a supporting detail, B is an unrelated fact, and D is a counterclaim. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that the school should invest in and grow arts education. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument that prioritizes only math and reading; how do the claims reflect different values?
Phones buzz with messages, games, and videos designed to grab attention. In class, that constant pull competes with reading, discussion, and problem solving. To protect focus and kindness on campus, our school should require students to keep phones off and stored away during class time. When distractions drop, participation rises, and more voices are heard. Teachers can move faster because they are not policing screens, and students talk to each other face-to-face. Some students worry they need phones for safety or translation. Safety plans already include office phones, and translation tablets can be checked out as needed. Families can reach the office in emergencies. Schools that adopted away-for-the-day policies report fewer arguments sparked by posts and more eye contact in hallways. We should choose a learning environment that prioritizes attention and relationships over notifications.
Which statement expresses the author's claim?
When distractions drop, participation rises, and more voices are heard.
Most phones contain glass, metals, and plastic.
Some students worry they need phones for safety or translation.
Students should keep phones off and stored away during class to protect focus and kindness.
Explanation
D is correct because it states the author's central claim. A is a supporting detail, B is an unrelated fact, and C is a counterclaim. Extension: Restate the claim in your own words. Scaffold: The author's main argument is that phones should be put away during class to support learning and relationships. Enrichment: Compare this claim with an argument for unrestricted phone use; which claim better supports a productive classroom?