What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Evidence In Text, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for SAT Reading and Writing.
Study Evidence In Text in SAT Reading and Writing with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify a phrase that introduces an author's opinion.
Tap card or press Space to flip
In my view. Signals the author's personal perspective or viewpoint.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 37
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Evidence In Text, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for SAT Reading and Writing.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: In my view. Signals the author's personal perspective or viewpoint.
Answer: A broad summary sentence. A broad summary encapsulates the overarching theme, offering stronger support for the main idea than isolated details.
Answer: Contradictory evidence. Evidence that goes against or undermines the main point.
Answer: Is the evidence relevant and reliable. Quality evidence must connect to the claim and be trustworthy.
Answer: Studies show regular exercise releases endorphins. Scientific research directly supports the mood claim.
Answer: For example, ... Common transition phrase introducing supporting examples.
Answer: Primary source evidence. Original documents provide the most authentic evidence.
Answer: Provides precise support from the original source. Exact words preserve the author's original meaning.
Answer: Supports the argument with empirical data. Data provides measurable proof for the claim.
Answer: However. Shows opposition or difference between two ideas or statements.
Answer: Increases the argument's credibility and persuasiveness. Diverse evidence types strengthen overall persuasion.
Answer: An argument opposing the main claim. Presents an alternative viewpoint to consider.
Answer: The choice that matches the claim's exact scope. Evidence must precisely align with the claim's boundaries to avoid overgeneralization, ensuring targeted and accurate support.
Answer: Quantitative evidence. Numbers and data provide measurable proof.
Answer: To assess its effectiveness in supporting the argument. Evaluate how well evidence backs up the main claim.
Answer: Overgeneralization. Makes sweeping claims without sufficient support.
Answer: B: "shortsighted". The term 'shortsighted' conveys negative judgment, providing clear evidence of the author's critical stance toward the plan.
Answer: It directly supports the claim without extra assumptions. Relevance is determined by the quote's ability to provide straightforward validation to the claim, avoiding the need for additional inferences.
Answer: B: "X finished before Y". Quote B provides a direct comparative outcome, evidencing X's superior speed relative to Y in the given context.
Answer: Answer first, then choose the evidence that best supports it. Determining the answer initially ensures selection of evidence that aligns most closely with the interpreted claim in paired questions.
Answer: For instance. Introduces a specific case that illustrates the general point.
Answer: Authoritative evidence. References an expert source for credibility.
Answer: Anecdotal evidence. Personal stories provide relatable, human examples.
Answer: Evidence is factual support; commentary is interpretation or opinion. Evidence provides objective data or facts from the text, whereas commentary involves the author's subjective analysis or viewpoint.
Answer: Statistical evidence. Uses numerical data to support the recommendation.
Answer: Specific details or quotes from a text used to support an argument. Direct quotes and facts from the passage that back up your point.
Answer: Anecdotal evidence. Personal experience provides individual perspective.
Answer: B: "It might happen.". Option B uses modal language indicating possibility rather than certainty, directly evidencing the speaker's uncertainty.
Answer: As a result. Connects an outcome directly to its preceding cause.
Answer: Identify the relevant evidence that supports your claim. Choose evidence that directly connects to your point.
Answer: A specific detail from the text. Specific details offer more precise and robust support compared to vague generalizations in validating claims within the text.
Answer: Choose the quote that most directly and completely supports it. The most direct quote provides clearer, more comprehensive validation without requiring further interpretation to connect to the claim.
Answer: A: "after the change, errors dropped". Option A demonstrates a temporal relationship implying causation between the change and reduced errors, supporting cause-and-effect.
Answer: To support claims or arguments with concrete details. Evidence transforms opinions into convincing arguments.
Answer: To support or substantiate a claim or argument. Evidence strengthens your position by providing proof.
Answer: Authoritative evidence. Experts lend credibility through specialized knowledge.
Answer: Quote A. Quote A offers quantifiable data directly linking the policy to cost reduction, making it the strongest supporting evidence.