What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Inferences And Claims From Statistics, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for PSAT Math.
Study Inferences And Claims From Statistics in PSAT Math with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which claim is supported: A 95% confidence interval for a proportion is (0.30,0.36). Is 0.40 plausible?
Tap card or press Space to flip
No, because 0.40 is outside (0.30,0.36). Values outside the interval are implausible at this confidence level.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 251
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Inferences And Claims From Statistics, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for PSAT Math.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: No, because 0.40 is outside (0.30,0.36). Values outside the interval are implausible at this confidence level.
Answer: A random sample from the population. Random selection ensures each member has equal chance, avoiding bias.
Answer: The sample must be randomly selected from that population. Only random samples can represent the entire population without bias.
Answer: A variable related to both treatment and outcome that distorts the effect. Affects both variables, making it unclear if treatment truly causes the outcome.
Answer: Some groups in the population are inadequately represented or missing. Sampling frame doesn't include all population members.
Answer: Results may be biased; generalization is not reliable. Self-selected samples are biased and not representative.
Answer: The claim p=0.60 is not supported by this interval. 0.60 lies outside the interval, so it's not a plausible value for p.
Answer: Response caused by belief in treatment rather than the treatment itself. Psychological response to inactive treatment.
Answer: Nonresponse bias occurs when nonresponders differ systematically from responders. This can make the sample unrepresentative of the full population.
Answer: The results may be biased and not representative. Self-selection creates bias toward those with strong opinions.
Answer: A random sample from the population. Random sampling ensures each member has equal chance of selection, avoiding bias.
Answer: Yes, because 50 is within [47,53]. The claimed value falls inside the confidence interval.
Answer: 15. The point estimate is the interval's midpoint: (12+18)/2=15.
Answer: It decreases as n increases. Larger samples provide more information, reducing uncertainty.
Answer: The population means likely differ (evidence of a difference). Non-overlapping CIs suggest statistically significant difference.
Answer: The sampling method favors certain outcomes. Some groups are over/underrepresented due to sampling method.
Answer: Generalizing to the population is not justified (voluntary response bias). Self-selected volunteers aren't representative of the general population.
Answer: Can infer causation, but cannot generalize to population. Without random sampling, results don't extend beyond the sample.
Answer: μ=52 is plausible at the 95% level. The CI contains 52, so that value is plausible.
Answer: A random sample from the population. Random sampling ensures each population member has equal chance of selection.
Answer: Yes, they overlap (common values from 13 to 14). Intervals overlap when they share at least one common value.
Answer: A treatment with no active ingredient used for comparison. Controls for psychological effects of receiving treatment.
Answer: 47% to 57%. Add and subtract margin of error: 52%±5%.
Answer: It becomes narrower. Larger samples give more precise estimates with less variability.
Answer: p=0.60 is not plausible at the 95% level. The CI excludes 0.60, so that value is implausible.
Answer: The true p is plausibly between 0.42 and 0.58. We're 95% confident the interval captures the true proportion.
Answer: Correlation alone does not imply causation. Correlation measures association, not causal relationship.
Answer: A randomized experiment with controlled treatment assignment. Random assignment eliminates confounding variables.
Answer: Sampling bias occurs when the sampling method favors certain outcomes. This creates systematic differences between the sample and population.
Answer: Nonresponse bias. Missing responses can systematically differ from obtained responses.
Answer: The claim p=0.5 is plausible given the data. The CI contains 0.5, so we can't reject that value.
Answer: The sample must be random and representative of the population. Random sampling ensures the sample reflects population characteristics.
Answer: Undercoverage bias. Some groups have no chance of selection, making the sample unrepresentative.
Answer: Stratified random sampling. Ensures representation from each subgroup by sampling within predefined strata.
Answer: A strong negative linear association (not proof of causation). Correlation measures association strength/direction, never proves causation.
Answer: To reduce bias from expectations of subjects or researchers. Prevents knowledge of treatment from influencing results.
Answer: Association only; causation is not justified (likely confounding). Both may be caused by a third variable (e.g., summer weather).
Answer: The result is unlikely due to random chance alone. The observed difference is too large to attribute to chance.
Answer: "Is associated with" (not "causes"). Observational studies can't prove causation due to potential confounding variables.
Answer: Little to no linear relationship. Points show no clear upward or downward trend.
Answer: The probability of results at least as extreme, assuming the null is true. Smaller p-values indicate stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
Answer: Median. Median resists influence from extreme values.
Answer: 4. Margin of error =226−18=4.
Answer: The difference is small relative to variability; the effect may be weak. Large overlap suggests the difference may not be practically significant.
Answer: No; interval includes 50% (from 48% to 56%). Interval [48%,56%] contains 50%, so majority isn't certain.
Answer: It decreases, roughly proportional to n1. Larger samples give more precise estimates.
Answer: A random sample from the target population. Random sampling ensures the sample represents the population without bias.
Answer: Some groups are systematically underrepresented. Sampling method excludes or undersamples certain population segments.
Answer: Invalid; a higher mean does not imply all values are larger. Groups can overlap even when means differ.
Answer: Can generalize to population, but cannot infer causation. Without random assignment, we can't establish causation.
Answer: A variable related to both the explanatory and response variables. Confounders create false associations by affecting both variables being studied.
Answer: The method captures the true value about 95% of the time. In repeated sampling, 95% of intervals would contain the true parameter.
Answer: A randomized controlled experiment. Random assignment of treatments controls for confounding variables.
Answer: Random sampling from the population. Random sampling ensures the sample represents the population without bias.
Answer: Generalization to the population, not causation by itself. Random sampling enables inference about populations, not causes.
Answer: Experiments impose treatments; observational studies do not. Experiments manipulate variables; observational studies only observe.
Answer: estimate±margin of error. The interval extends from estimate minus ME to estimate plus ME.
Answer: 95% of such intervals would contain the true parameter. The confidence level refers to the long-run capture rate of the method.
Answer: Half the width of the confidence interval. Margin of error extends equally above and below the point estimate.
Answer: Correlation does not imply causation; a confounder (season) is likely. Both variables are influenced by a third factor (warm weather).
Answer: A plausible interval is p \pm m. The true value likely falls within m units of the estimate.
Answer: Response bias (leading question). Question wording pushes respondents toward a particular answer choice.
Answer: The true difference is positive (evidence that one mean is larger). All values in CI are positive, so first mean exceeds second.
Answer: Interquartile range (IQR). IQR uses middle 50%, unaffected by extremes.
Answer: Nonresponders differ systematically from responders. Missing responses aren't random, creating systematic bias.
Answer: The claim μ=15 is consistent with this interval. 15 lies within the interval, so it's a plausible value for μ.
Answer: A random sample from the target population. Random sampling ensures each member has equal chance of selection.
Answer: Sample is a subset; population is the entire group. Sample is selected from population to make inferences about the whole.
Answer: You may claim causation, but not generalize to the population. Random assignment allows causal claims; no random sampling limits scope.
Answer: You may generalize to the population and claim causation. Both conditions are met for causal inference about the population.
Answer: It decreases. Larger samples provide more precise estimates with smaller margins.
Answer: Association only, not causation. Without random assignment, confounding variables prevent causal claims.
Answer: 46. Point estimate is the midpoint: (40+52)÷2=46.
Answer: The population from which the sample was randomly selected. Random sampling allows generalization from sample to population.
Answer: 3. Width is 18−12=6, so margin of error is 6÷2=3.
Answer: 2U−L. Half the interval width equals the margin of error.
Answer: A variable related to both the explanatory and response variables. Can create false relationships between variables of interest.
Answer: A randomized experiment. Only experiments with controlled manipulation can establish causation.
Answer: About 95% of intervals from repeats would capture the true value. If we repeated sampling many times, 95% contain the parameter.
Answer: 95% of intervals from repeated samples contain the true value. If we repeated sampling many times, 95% would capture the parameter.
Answer: The method captures the true parameter in 95% of repeated samples. The interval construction method, not individual intervals.
Answer: Nonresponse bias. Missing responses may differ systematically from those who do respond.
Answer: To support generalizing results from the sample to the population. Ensures the sample represents the entire population fairly.
Answer: Association only (not causation). Without random assignment, confounding variables prevent causal claims.
Answer: The sample must be randomly selected from the population. Random selection ensures the sample represents the entire population without bias.
Answer: Bias when nonresponders differ systematically from responders. Creates systematic differences between those who respond and those who don't.
Answer: Selection bias; the sample underrepresents evening and weekend shoppers. Missing key groups leads to unrepresentative results.
Answer: The means likely differ (evidence of a difference). Non-overlapping intervals suggest statistically significant difference.
Answer: The sample must be representative (ideally random). Unbiased sampling ensures the sample reflects the population.
Answer: Association (not causation). Observational studies can show relationships but cannot prove one causes the other.
Answer: CI width =2× (margin of error). Margin of error extends from center to each endpoint.
Answer: Random assignment in a controlled experiment. Only experiments with random assignment can establish causation.
Answer: Randomly assign subjects to treatments and keep other conditions the same. Random assignment ensures treatment groups are comparable.
Answer: Voluntary response bias; the sample is not representative of all voters. Self-selected participants don't represent the broader population.
Answer: Causation (cause-and-effect) may be claimed. Random assignment allows researchers to isolate treatment effects.
Answer: A randomized experiment with controlled treatment assignment. Random assignment of treatments controls for confounding variables.
Answer: Sample statistics tend to be closer to the population value. Larger samples reduce random variation around the true value.
Answer: It makes the interval narrower. More data reduces sampling variability, creating more precise estimates.
Answer: Nonresponders differ systematically from responders. Missing data patterns can skew results.
Answer: Yes; 0.40 is in [0.38,0.46]. Values inside the confidence interval are plausible.