Subtract and Represent Vectors Graphically
Help Questions
Pre-Calculus › Subtract and Represent Vectors Graphically
For vectors drawn tail-to-tail at the origin, $\vec v = \langle 4, 0\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle 1, 0\rangle$. Using $\vec v-\vec w=\vec v+(-\vec w)$, what are the components of $\vec v-\vec w$?
$\langle -3, 0\rangle$
$\langle 5, 0\rangle$
$\langle 3, 0\rangle$
$\langle 4, 1\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it as addition of the opposite. Vector subtraction is defined as adding the opposite: v - w = v + (-w), where -w is the vector with the same magnitude as w but pointing in the opposite direction, having components -w = ⟨-w₁, -w₂⟩. For v = ⟨4, 0⟩ and w = ⟨1, 0⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨4 - 1, 0 - 0⟩ = ⟨3, 0⟩. Choice A is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, giving ⟨3, 0⟩. Choice B adds the vectors instead of subtracting them, calculating v + w = ⟨5, 0⟩ when we need v - w. To check your work, verify that v = w + (v - w) using vector addition—if you add w back to your result v - w, you should get v: ⟨1, 0⟩ + ⟨3, 0⟩ = ⟨4, 0⟩ ✓.
Let $\vec v = \langle -1, 4\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle 3, -2\rangle$. Since $\vec v-\vec w=\vec v+(-\vec w)$ and $-\vec w=\langle -w_1, -w_2\rangle$, what is $\vec v-\vec w$ in component form?
$\langle -4, 6\rangle$
$\langle -3, -8\rangle$
$\langle -4, 2\rangle$
$\langle 2, 2\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it as addition of the opposite. To subtract vectors component-wise, subtract the corresponding components: if v = ⟨v₁, v₂⟩ and w = ⟨w₁, w₂⟩, then v - w = ⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩. For v = ⟨-1, 4⟩ and w = ⟨3, -2⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨-1 - 3, 4 - (-2)⟩ = ⟨-4, 6⟩. Choice A is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, giving ⟨-4, 6⟩. Choice D makes an arithmetic error in the subtraction, calculating ⟨-4, 2⟩ instead of ⟨-4, 6⟩ by incorrectly computing 4 - (-2) = 2 rather than 6. Remember that vector subtraction is not commutative: v - w and w - v are different vectors pointing in opposite directions, so order matters in subtraction unlike addition.
Vector $\vec v$ points 2 units east and 1 unit north, so $\vec v = \langle 2, 1\rangle$. Vector $\vec w$ points 5 units east and 3 units north, so $\vec w = \langle 5, 3\rangle$. Using component-wise subtraction (equivalently $\vec v-\vec w=\vec v+(-\vec w)$), what is $\vec v-\vec w$?
$\langle 3, 2\rangle$
$\langle -3, -2\rangle$
$\langle 7, 4\rangle$
$\langle -7, -4\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it using component-wise subtraction. To subtract vectors component-wise, subtract the corresponding components: if v = ⟨v₁, v₂⟩ and w = ⟨w₁, w₂⟩, then v - w = ⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩. For v = ⟨2, 1⟩ and w = ⟨5, 3⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨2 - 5, 1 - 3⟩ = ⟨-3, -2⟩. Choice C is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, giving ⟨-3, -2⟩. Choice B reverses the subtraction order, computing w - v instead of v - w, which gives the opposite vector with all signs flipped: ⟨3, 2⟩. Remember that vector subtraction is not commutative: v - w and w - v are different vectors pointing in opposite directions, so order matters in subtraction unlike addition.
For vectors $\vec v = \langle 6, -1\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle -2, 3\rangle$, what are the components of $-\vec w$ (the opposite vector used in $\vec v-\vec w=\vec v+(-\vec w)$)?
$\langle -6, 1\rangle$
$\langle -2, -3\rangle$
$\langle 2, 3\rangle$
$\langle 2, -3\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it as addition of the opposite, specifically finding the opposite vector. If w = ⟨w₁, w₂⟩, then -w = ⟨-w₁, -w₂⟩, which means we negate both components; this gives a vector with the same length but pointing in the exact opposite direction. For w = ⟨-2, 3⟩, we compute -w = ⟨-(-2), -3⟩ = ⟨2, -3⟩. Choice B is correct because it properly negates both components for -w, giving ⟨2, -3⟩. Choice A only negates one component when finding -w, but the opposite of a vector requires negating both components. When finding the opposite of a vector, -w = ⟨-w₁, -w₂⟩, negate every component; this creates a vector with identical magnitude but pointing in the exactly opposite direction (180° rotation).
For vectors $\vec v = \langle 1, -3\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle -4, 2\rangle$, use $\vec v-\vec w=\langle v_1-w_1,, v_2-w_2\rangle$ (equivalently $\vec v+(-\vec w)$). What is $\vec v-\vec w$?
$\langle 5, -5\rangle$
$\langle -3, -1\rangle$
$\langle -4, -6\rangle$
$\langle -5, 5\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it using the component-wise formula. To subtract vectors component-wise, subtract the corresponding components: if v = ⟨v₁, v₂⟩ and w = ⟨w₁, w₂⟩, then v - w = ⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩. For v = ⟨1, -3⟩ and w = ⟨-4, 2⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨1 - (-4), -3 - 2⟩ = ⟨5, -5⟩. Choice C is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, giving ⟨5, -5⟩. Choice B reverses the subtraction order, computing w - v instead of v - w, which gives the opposite vector with all signs flipped: ⟨-5, 5⟩. Key to vector subtraction: remember that v - w = v + (-w), so you can either subtract components directly (⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩) or add the opposite vector (-w), both methods give the same result.
For vectors $\vec v = \langle 3, 2\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle -1, 5\rangle$, what are the components of $\vec w-\vec v$? (Recall that vector subtraction is not commutative, and $\vec w-\vec v=\vec w+(-\vec v)$.)
$\langle 4, 3\rangle$
$\langle -2, -7\rangle$
$\langle -4, -3\rangle$
$\langle 2, 7\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and the non-commutative nature of this operation. To subtract vectors component-wise, subtract the corresponding components: if v = ⟨v₁, v₂⟩ and w = ⟨w₁, w₂⟩, then w - v = ⟨w₁ - v₁, w₂ - v₂⟩. For v = ⟨3, 2⟩ and w = ⟨-1, 5⟩, we compute w - v = ⟨-1 - 3, 5 - 2⟩ = ⟨-4, 3⟩. Choice B is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, giving ⟨-4, 3⟩. Choice A computes v - w instead of w - v, which gives ⟨4, -3⟩, the opposite vector with all signs flipped. Remember that vector subtraction is not commutative: v - w and w - v are different vectors pointing in opposite directions, so order matters in subtraction unlike addition.
Let $\vec v = \langle 2, -4\rangle$ and $\vec w = \langle -3, 1\rangle$. Which statement correctly compares $\vec v-\vec w$ and $\vec w-\vec v$? (Use the idea that subtracting is adding the opposite.)
$\vec v-\vec w = \vec w+\vec v$
$\vec v-\vec w = \vec v+\vec w$
$\vec v-\vec w = -,(\vec w-\vec v)$
$\vec v-\vec w = \vec w-\vec v$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of the non-commutative nature of vector subtraction. Vector subtraction is not commutative: v - w ≠ w - v in general; in fact, v - w = -(w - v), meaning they point in opposite directions with the same magnitude. Computing both: v - w = ⟨2 - (-3), -4 - 1⟩ = ⟨5, -5⟩ and w - v = ⟨-3 - 2, 1 - (-4)⟩ = ⟨-5, 5⟩, we see that w - v = -(v - w), confirming they have equal magnitudes but opposite directions. Choice B is correct because it correctly identifies the relationship v - w = -(w - v). Choice A incorrectly assumes vector subtraction is commutative, claiming v - w = w - v, when in fact they are opposites. Remember that vector subtraction is not commutative: v - w and w - v are different vectors pointing in opposite directions, so order matters in subtraction unlike addition.
Suppose $\vec v$ and $\vec w$ are drawn tail-to-tail from the same point. Using the tip-to-tip method for vector subtraction, how is $\vec v-\vec w$ represented graphically?
The vector from the tip of $\vec w$ to the tip of $\vec v$.
The vector from the tip of $\vec v$ to the tip of $\vec w$.
The vector from the tip of $\vec v$ to the tail of $\vec w$.
The vector from the tail of $\vec v$ to the tail of $\vec w$.
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it graphically using the tip-to-tip method. Graphically, when vectors v and w are drawn from the same initial point (tail-to-tail), the vector v - w is represented by the vector from the tip of w to the tip of v, forming a triangle. To find v - w graphically, we can rewrite it as v + (-w): first draw v, then draw -w (the opposite of w), place the tail of -w at the head of v, and the resultant from the tail of v to the head of -w is v - w. Choice C is correct because it properly describes the tip-to-tip method, going from the tip of w to the tip of v. Choice A describes the graphical vector going from the tip of v to the tip of w, but v - w goes from the tip of w to the tip of v (the opposite direction). For the tip-to-tip graphical method, place both vectors tail-to-tail and draw the difference vector from the tip of what you're subtracting (w) to the tip of what you're subtracting from (v).
For vectors $\vec v=\langle 0,-3\rangle$ and $\vec w=\langle -2,4\rangle$, what is $\vec v-\vec w$? (Equivalently, compute $\vec v+(-\vec w)$.)
$\langle 2,7\rangle$
$\langle -2,-7\rangle$
$\langle 2,-7\rangle$
$\langle -2,1\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it as addition of the opposite. Vector subtraction is defined as adding the opposite: v - w = v + (-w), where -w is the vector with the same magnitude as w but pointing in the opposite direction, having components -w = ⟨-w₁, -w₂⟩. For v = ⟨0, -3⟩ and w = ⟨-2, 4⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨0 - (-2), -3 - 4⟩ = ⟨2, -7⟩. Choice B is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly, properly handling the double negative in the first component. Choice C makes an arithmetic error in the subtraction, calculating ⟨-2, -7⟩ instead of ⟨2, -7⟩, likely by incorrectly handling the subtraction of the negative first component. Key to vector subtraction: remember that v - w = v + (-w), so you can either subtract components directly (⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩) or add the opposite vector (-w), both methods give the same result. To check your work, verify that v = w + (v - w) using vector addition—if you add w back to your result v - w, you should get v.
An object’s displacement over two steps is represented by vectors $\vec v=\langle 6,0\rangle$ and $\vec w=\langle 1,0\rangle$ drawn from the same starting point. The difference $\vec v-\vec w$ can be found as $\vec v+(-\vec w)$. What are the components of $\vec v-\vec w$?
$\langle 7,0\rangle$
$\langle 6,1\rangle$
$\langle 5,0\rangle$
$\langle -5,0\rangle$
Explanation
This question tests understanding of vector subtraction and how to represent it algebraically using components. Vector subtraction is defined as adding the opposite: v - w = v + (-w), where -w is the vector with the same magnitude as w but pointing in the opposite direction, having components -w = ⟨-w₁, -w₂⟩. For v = ⟨6, 0⟩ and w = ⟨1, 0⟩, we compute v - w = ⟨6 - 1, 0 - 0⟩ = ⟨5, 0⟩. Choice B is correct because it applies the component subtraction formula correctly. Choice C reverses the subtraction order, computing w - v instead of v - w, which gives the opposite vector with all signs flipped. Key to vector subtraction: remember that v - w = v + (-w), so you can either subtract components directly (⟨v₁ - w₁, v₂ - w₂⟩) or add the opposite vector (-w), both methods give the same result. To check your work, verify that v = w + (v - w) using vector addition—if you add w back to your result v - w, you should get v.