Natural Selection Effects

Help Questions

Middle School Life Science › Natural Selection Effects

Questions 1 - 10
1

A population of bacteria has variation in antibiotic resistance: some are resistant (R) and some are not resistant (N). An antibiotic is added to the environment. The table shows the number of bacteria after 24 hours.

Start: R = 10, N = 990

After antibiotic: R = 800, N = 5

Which explanation best describes natural selection in this population using the evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

Resistant bacteria survived and reproduced more in the presence of the antibiotic, so resistance became much more common in the population.

The model shows that individual bacteria evolve into a new species within 24 hours.

The antibiotic caused non-resistant bacteria to become resistant because they needed to survive.

All bacteria became healthier and more advanced because antibiotics always improve populations.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process by which certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as antibiotic resistance in bacteria, where resistant individuals survive and multiply in the presence of the antibiotic. The evidence from the table shows a dramatic shift, with resistant bacteria increasing from 1% to over 99% after 24 hours, due to their higher reproduction. To check understanding, compare starting and ending numbers to see if the advantageous trait dominates. A common misconception is that antibiotics cause bacteria to become resistant individually, but selection amplifies pre-existing resistance. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies toward those that enhance survival. Over generations, this can lead to widespread resistance in bacterial populations.

2

In a population of beetles, there is trait variation in shell color: light tan and dark brown. A bird predator hunts by sight on dark soil after a wildfire. The table shows the number of adult beetles that survived to reproduce each year.

Table (Adults that survived to reproduce):

Year 0: Light 50, Dark 50

Year 1: Light 18, Dark 42

Year 2: Light 10, Dark 45

Year 3: Light 6, Dark 47

Which explanation best describes how natural selection changed the trait distribution in this population over generations? (Remember: natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

The strongest beetles survived regardless of color, so shell color changed only by chance.

The wildfire caused individual light beetles to turn dark during their lifetimes so they could survive on the dark soil.

Because birds could see light beetles more easily on dark soil, dark beetles survived and reproduced more, so the population became mostly dark over generations.

The beetle population improved by becoming darker, which is always better for beetles in any environment.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process by which certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as the light and dark shell colors in the beetle population, favoring those that provide a survival advantage in the changed environment. The evidence from the table shows a shift in population composition, with dark beetles increasing from 50% to about 89% by year 3, indicating higher survival and reproduction rates for dark beetles on the dark soil. To check understanding, compare the survival numbers across years and identify if the trait linked to better camouflage correlates with increased frequency. A common misconception is that individuals change their traits during their lifetime, like light beetles turning dark, but natural selection operates on populations through differential reproduction. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by allowing individuals with advantageous traits to pass them on more successfully. Over multiple generations, this leads to adaptations that better suit the population to its environment.

3

A population of insects varies in body color: green and brown. In a forest, a disease kills many insects, but it does not affect survival differently for green vs. brown insects. The table shows trait frequencies before and after the disease.

Before disease: 50% green, 50% brown

After disease: 49% green, 51% brown (population size greatly reduced)

Which statement about natural selection is supported by this evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

Natural selection favored brown insects because the disease made brown insects morally better survivors.

Because survival did not differ by color, the small change in percentages is more consistent with chance (genetic drift) than with selection on color.

Natural selection must have occurred because the population size changed a lot, even if color did not affect survival or reproduction.

The disease created brown color in insects that were originally green.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process by which certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, but in this case, the disease did not favor green or brown insect colors differently, leading to no selective shift. The evidence from the table shows only a minor change from 50% to 51% brown, consistent with random genetic drift rather than selection. To check understanding, assess if survival differences by trait exist; if not, selection is not at work. A common misconception is that any population change means selection occurred, but drift can cause shifts without trait-based advantages. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies only when traits affect fitness. Over generations, distinguishing selection from drift helps explain evolutionary patterns.

4

A student writes: “After a drought, the plants evolved deeper roots so they could reach water.” The class collected data from a plant population that varies in root depth: shallow vs. deep. During drought years, plants with deep roots produced an average of 60 seeds each, while shallow-root plants produced an average of 10 seeds each. Over 5 generations, the percent of deep-root plants increased from 40% to 75%.

Which claim about natural selection is incorrect in the student’s statement when compared to the evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

The student is incorrect because it suggests individual plants changed their roots because they needed water, instead of describing changes in trait frequency in the population over generations.

The student is incorrect because natural selection cannot act on reproduction; it only acts on survival.

The student is correct because the data prove that deep roots are always the best trait in every environment.

The student is correct because any drought automatically makes all plants develop deeper roots in the same generation.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process by which certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as shallow and deep roots in plants, favoring deep roots for better water access during droughts. The evidence shows deep-root plants increasing from 40% to 75% over five generations due to higher seed production (60 vs. 10). To check understanding, evaluate statements against data to see if they describe population shifts or individual changes. A common misconception is that organisms evolve traits out of need, but selection requires heritable variation. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies through differential success. Over generations, this refines populations without purposeful individual adaptation.

5

A population of rabbits varies in fur thickness: thin and thick. A colder climate lasts for many winters. The table shows the percent of rabbits with thick fur over time.

Year 1: 30% thick

Year 5: 45% thick

Year 10: 70% thick

Which prediction about future generations is supported by the data if the climate stays cold? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

The percent of thick-fur rabbits will likely continue to increase because thick fur is linked to higher survival and reproduction in cold conditions.

Fur thickness will stop changing because natural selection only works for exactly 10 years.

Every rabbit will grow thick fur during its lifetime because cold temperatures force individuals to change.

Thin fur will become most common because natural selection always favors the rarest trait.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process by which certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as thin and thick fur in rabbits, favoring thick fur for better insulation in a persistently cold climate. The evidence from the table shows thick fur increasing from 30% to 70% over 10 years, supporting continued rise if conditions persist. To check understanding, extrapolate the trend and predict future percentages based on ongoing selection pressure. A common misconception is that all individuals change, like growing thicker fur, but selection works through differential reproduction. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies to match environmental demands. Over generations, this adapts populations to sustained changes like climate shifts.

6

A population of mice shows variation in fur thickness: thin fur and thick fur. A colder-than-usual winter lasts for several years.

Data collected:

  • Generation 1 offspring per adult (average): thin fur = 1.2, thick fur = 2.8
  • Trait distribution:
    • Start of study: 55% thin fur, 45% thick fur
    • After 4 generations: 20% thin fur, 80% thick fur

Which statement about trait distribution is supported by the evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

There was no need for variation in fur thickness; all mice would have survived equally if they tried hard enough.

Because thick fur looks better, predators avoided thick-fur mice, proving that appearance alone determines survival.

Thick-fur mice had higher reproduction in the cold, so the thick-fur trait became more common in the population over generations.

Each thin-fur mouse grew thicker fur during the cold winter, so the population changed without needing reproduction differences.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process where certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as thin and thick fur in mice, favoring those that enhance survival and reproduction in colder conditions. The evidence shows population change through higher reproduction rates for thick-fur mice (2.8 offspring per adult versus 1.2), resulting in the trait distribution shifting from 45% to 80% thick fur over four generations. To check understanding, examine the average offspring per trait and verify if the population percentages change in favor of the trait with higher reproductive success. A common misconception is that individuals can grow new traits like thicker fur in response to the environment and pass them on, but natural selection works on heritable variations already present. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by promoting traits that lead to more offspring in specific environments. Over generations, this adapts populations to challenges like cold winters without any individual effort or choice.

7

In a population of lizards, there is variation in leg length: short legs and long legs. A new predator arrives that catches lizards more easily in open areas. Lizards with long legs can run faster across open ground.

Evidence:

  • In one breeding season, out of 100 short-legged lizards, 20 survived to reproduce.
  • Out of 100 long-legged lizards, 60 survived to reproduce.
  • After 5 generations, the population changed from 50% long-legged to 85% long-legged.

What evidence shows natural selection at work in this population? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

Each lizard stretched its legs during its lifetime to escape the predator, and then its offspring inherited longer legs.

The predator directly created longer legs in lizards by changing their bodies when it chased them.

Long-legged lizards had higher survival to reproduction than short-legged lizards, and the proportion of long-legged lizards increased over generations.

Long legs are the best trait, so the population improved by becoming mostly long-legged.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process where certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as short and long legs in lizards, favoring longer legs for better escape from predators in open areas. The evidence shows population change with long-legged lizards having higher survival (60 out of 100 versus 20), leading to an increase from 50% to 85% long-legged over five generations. To check understanding, evaluate if the trait with higher survival to reproduction increases in frequency, matching the population data trends. A common misconception is that individuals stretch or change their traits through use and pass them on, but natural selection operates on genetic variations already in the population. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by enhancing the proportion of beneficial traits via reproductive advantages. Over generations, this results in populations better suited to threats like new predators.

8

A population of insects includes two wing types: wide wings and narrow wings. A stormy season becomes common. Wide wings help insects glide longer, but narrow wings help them maneuver in strong gusts.

Evidence:

  • In calm years, wide-wing insects produce an average of 30 offspring; narrow-wing insects produce 20.
  • In stormy years, wide-wing insects produce an average of 12 offspring; narrow-wing insects produce 28.
  • The last 6 years have been stormy.

Which explanation best describes how natural selection is likely affecting the population now? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

The storms will create a brand-new wing type in the next generation, so past variation is not important.

Narrow wings will likely become more common because insects with narrow wings have higher reproductive success in stormy years.

The insects will choose to grow narrower wings because they can sense the storms and decide to change.

Wide wings will always become more common because they are the strongest wing type in any environment.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process where certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as wide and narrow wings in insects, favoring narrow wings for maneuvering in stormy conditions. The evidence shows population change potential with narrow-wing insects producing more offspring (28 versus 12) in stormy years over the last six years. To check understanding, compare reproductive success in the current environment and predict which trait will increase based on ongoing conditions. A common misconception is that organisms choose to change traits like wing shape in response to sensing weather, but natural selection relies on heritable variations. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by amplifying traits with reproductive advantages in prevailing environments. Over generations, this adapts populations to recurring challenges like frequent storms.

9

A population of rabbits shows variation in ear length: short ears and long ears. A heat wave lasts for many summers. Rabbits with longer ears lose heat more easily.

Evidence collected:

  • Average number of offspring that survive to adulthood per parent: short ears = 1.1, long ears = 2.4
  • Trait distribution:
    • Before heat waves: 70% short ears, 30% long ears
    • After 6 generations: 35% short ears, 65% long ears

Which statement about natural selection is supported by the evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

Because the heat wave was hot, each rabbit grew longer ears to cool off, and the population changed in one generation.

Rabbits with longer ears had higher reproductive success in the hot environment, so the population’s trait distribution shifted toward longer ears over generations.

Natural selection only changes individuals, so the population percentages are not relevant evidence.

Long-eared rabbits were morally better adapted, so nature rewarded them with more offspring.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process where certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as short and long ears in rabbits, favoring longer ears for better heat loss during heat waves. The evidence shows population change with long-eared rabbits having higher offspring survival (2.4 versus 1.1), shifting from 30% to 65% long ears over six generations. To check understanding, assess if the trait with higher reproductive success correlates with the observed population shift in percentages. A common misconception is that individuals grow longer ears in response to heat and inherit them, but natural selection works on pre-existing genetic differences. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by promoting traits that improve reproduction in specific conditions. Over generations, this leads to populations more resilient to environmental stresses like prolonged heat.

10

A population of birds shows variation in beak size: small beaks and large beaks. A drought causes mostly hard, large seeds to be available for several years.

Data:

  • Generation 0: 70% small beaks, 30% large beaks
  • During the drought, average surviving chicks per pair: small beaks = 0.8, large beaks = 2.1
  • Generation 4: 35% small beaks, 65% large beaks

Which statement about trait distribution is supported by the evidence? (Natural selection affects populations, not individuals.)

Birds with small beaks tried harder to crack seeds, so their beaks grew larger and the change was inherited.

Because the model uses percentages, it cannot be evidence; only the names of traits matter for natural selection.

Large beaks became more common because birds with large beaks produced more surviving chicks when hard seeds were common.

The drought directly changed the DNA of every bird so that all birds in the next generation had large beaks.

Explanation

Natural selection is the process where certain traits become more or less common in a population over generations due to differences in survival and reproduction. Natural selection acts on existing variation in traits, such as small and large beaks in birds, favoring large beaks for cracking hard seeds during droughts. The evidence shows population change with large-beaked birds having more surviving chicks (2.1 versus 0.8), increasing from 30% to 65% large beaks over four generations. To check understanding, verify if the trait with higher chick survival rises in population percentage, aligning with the data trends. A common misconception is that individuals enlarge their beaks through effort and pass it on, but natural selection selects from genetic variations without individual changes. In general, natural selection shifts trait frequencies by promoting traits that enhance reproduction in resource-limited conditions. Over generations, this adapts populations to challenges like seed scarcity during droughts.

Page 1 of 5