Geometry Quiz: Informal Arguments For Circle Solid Formulas
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Informal Arguments For Circle Solid FormulasQuestion 1 of 20
Using Cavalieri's principle to compare the volumes of a cone and a pyramid with the same base area and height, which statement best explains why they have the same volume formula V=31Bh?
ABoth solids have identical cross-sectional areas at every height level parallel to their bases
BBoth solids have proportionally similar cross-sectional areas that decrease linearly from base to apex
CBoth solids have cross-sectional areas that follow the same quadratic relationship with height
DBoth solids have bases with equal areas and identical rates of volume change per unit height
Geometry Quiz: Informal Arguments For Circle Solid Formulas
Practice Informal Arguments For Circle Solid Formulas in Geometry with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Informal Arguments For Circle Solid Formulas, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Geometry.
How to use this quiz
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
All questions
Question 1
Using Cavalieri's principle to compare the volumes of a cone and a pyramid with the same base area and height, which statement best explains why they have the same volume formula V=31Bh?
Both solids have identical cross-sectional areas at every height level parallel to their bases
Both solids have proportionally similar cross-sectional areas that decrease linearly from base to apex (correct answer)
Both solids have cross-sectional areas that follow the same quadratic relationship with height
Both solids have bases with equal areas and identical rates of volume change per unit height
Explanation: Cavalieri's principle states that if two solids have equal cross-sectional areas at every height, they have equal volumes. For a cone and pyramid with the same base area and height, the cross-sections are similar to the base but scale down proportionally (linearly) as height increases. Choice A is incorrect because the cross-sections aren't identical in shape. Choice C incorrectly describes the relationship as quadratic. Choice D confuses the concept with rate of change rather than cross-sectional similarity.
Question 2
The circumference formula C=2πr can be justified by inscribing regular polygons in a circle. If Pn represents the perimeter of a regular n-sided polygon inscribed in a circle of radius r, which expression correctly represents the limiting argument?
Explanation: For a regular n-sided polygon inscribed in a circle, each side subtends a central angle of n2π. The side length is 2rsin(nπ), so Pn=n⋅2rsin(nπ). Using limx→0xsinx=1, this approaches 2πr. Choice B uses cosine incorrectly. Choice C uses tangent and gets πr instead of 2πr. Choice D uses tangent which would give an incorrect limit calculation.
Question 3
The area of a circle can be approximated by dividing it into n congruent sectors and rearranging them into a shape resembling a parallelogram. As n increases, which statement best describes why this method approaches the exact area πr2?
The sectors become increasingly triangular, and n triangles with base n2πr and height r give area πr2
The parallelogram's area exactly equals πr2 regardless of n, but the shape looks more rectangular as n increases
The parallelogram's base approaches πr and height approaches r, while the "steps" become negligible (correct answer)
The rearranged sectors form a shape with perimeter 2πr and average width r, giving area πr2
Explanation: This question tests your understanding of limits and how approximation methods converge to exact values. When you encounter problems about approximating curved areas with straight-edged shapes, focus on what happens to the key dimensions as the approximation gets finer.As you divide the circle into more sectors and rearrange them into a parallelogram-like shape, two crucial things happen. The base of this parallelogram approaches half the circle's circumference, which is πr, since you're alternating sectors that point up and down. The height remains r (the radius). Most importantly, as n increases, the jagged "steps" along the top and bottom edges become smaller and smaller, making the shape increasingly rectangular. This gives you area = base × height = πr×r=πr2.Choice A incorrectly focuses on triangular approximations rather than the parallelogram method described. While you could approximate a circle with triangles, that's not what's happening here with the sector rearrangement.Choice B is wrong because the parallelogram's area is only approximately πr2 for finite n. The exact area emerges only in the limit as n→∞.Choice D confuses perimeter with the relevant dimensions. The rearranged shape's perimeter isn't what determines its area—you need the specific base and height measurements.Remember: when studying limit-based approximations in geometry, always identify which dimensions are approaching their target values and which sources of error are disappearing. The convergence happens because irregularities become negligible, not because the math is exact from the start.
Question 4
A circle is cut into many equal sectors and then rearranged by alternating the sectors up and down to form a shape that looks like a parallelogram (not drawn to scale). The curved edges become the top and bottom boundaries, and the straight radii form the left and right sides. Which reasoning explains why the area formula for a circle is A=πr2?
Because the rearranged shape has base about πr and height r, so its area is about (πr)(r)=πr2. (correct answer)
Because the circle's area must be πr2 since π is defined using circles.
Because the rearranged shape has base r and height πr, so its area is r+πr.
Because the perimeter of the circle is 2πr, the area is also 2πr.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments to derive the area formula for a circle. The geometric setup involves cutting a circle into many equal sectors (like pizza slices) and rearranging them by alternating up and down to form an approximate parallelogram. The dissection idea is that the curved edges of the sectors become the top and bottom boundaries of the new shape, while the radii form the vertical sides. When we rearrange the sectors this way, the base of the parallelogram is half the circumference (πr) and the height is the radius (r), so the area is base × height = πr × r = πr². This conclusion is justified because the rearrangement preserves the total area of the original circle. A common misconception (choice C) is to add the dimensions instead of multiplying them, while another error (choice D) confuses perimeter with area. To transfer this strategy, ask yourself: how does cutting and rearranging preserve the total area while revealing a familiar shape whose area we can calculate?
Question 5
A right square pyramid is compared to a right square prism with the same base area B and height h. The pyramid is shown sliced into thin horizontal layers; the prism is also sliced at the same heights. Which reasoning explains why the pyramid's volume is 31Bh using a slicing/dissection argument?
At each height the pyramid slice is similar to the base, and the collection of shrinking slice areas accounts for one-third the prism's volume with the same B and h. (correct answer)
Since both solids have the same base area B, they must have the same volume, so the pyramid volume is Bh.
Since the pyramid has four triangular faces, its volume is four times the prism's volume, so V=4Bh.
Since the pyramid's edges slope, its volume equals its lateral surface area, so V=31Bh.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments to explain the pyramid volume formula through cross-sectional comparison. The geometric setup compares a right square pyramid to a right square prism, both with base area B and height h, by examining horizontal slices at matching heights. The key insight is that pyramid slices are similar to the base but shrink quadratically: at height x from the tip, the slice area is (x/h)²B. When we consider the collection of all these shrinking slices from tip to base, their areas account for exactly one-third of the prism's total volume. This gives V = ⅓Bh without needing calculus. A common error (choice B) assumes equal bases mean equal volumes, ignoring the tapering effect. To apply this reasoning, ask: how does the pattern of shrinking similar cross-sections determine the volume fraction?
Question 6
A circle is cut into equal sectors and rearranged into a nearly rectangular shape by alternating the sectors. The height of the new shape is labeled r. The top edge is formed from half of the circle's curved boundary, and the bottom edge is formed from the other half.
Which conclusion follows from the dissection shown and supports the formula A=πr2?
Note: The number of sectors is not given, and the drawing is not to scale.
The base of the rearranged shape approaches 21C, so its area is (21C)r=πr2. (correct answer)
The base of the rearranged shape equals C, so its area is Cr=2πr2.
The height of the rearranged shape equals the diameter, so its area is (21C)(2r)=2πr2.
The rearranged shape has the same perimeter as the circle, so its area must be πr2.
Explanation: This problem employs informal geometric arguments to support the circle area formula A=πr². The geometric setup features a circle cut into equal sectors rearranged into a nearly rectangular shape with height r, where the top and bottom edges use half the circle's curved boundary each. The dissection involves alternating sectors to form this shape, approximating a rectangle as the number of sectors increases. The connection to the formula arises because the base approaches half the circumference or πr, so the area is (πr)r = πr², matching the original circle. This justifies the formula since the area remains unchanged through rearrangement. A distractor misconception is thinking the height is the diameter, doubling the area incorrectly. For transfer, ask how the preserved area in rearrangements can reveal relationships in other shapes like polygons approximating circles.
Question 7
A student argues that a cylinder's volume can be found by "unrolling" it into a rectangular solid. If a cylinder has radius r and height h, which statement identifies the flaw in this reasoning?
The circumference 2πr cannot be accurately measured when the cylinder is unrolled into a flat rectangle
The unrolled shape loses the circular cross-section information needed to calculate the πr2 base area
The unrolling process changes the height dimension, making the volume calculation impossible using this method
The unrolled shape is a rectangle with dimensions 2πr×h, but this represents surface area, not volume (correct answer)
Explanation: When dealing with 3D geometry problems, you need to clearly distinguish between surface area (2D measurements) and volume (3D space). This question tests whether you understand what happens when geometric transformations are applied to formulas.The student's reasoning contains a fundamental conceptual error. When you "unroll" a cylinder's curved surface, you do get a rectangle with dimensions 2πr×h (the circumference becomes the width, and height stays the same). However, this rectangle represents the lateral surface area of the cylinder, not its volume. Volume measures the space inside a 3D object and requires all three dimensions - you can't calculate volume from a 2D shape. The correct volume formula V=πr2h accounts for the circular base area (πr2) multiplied by height, which captures the actual 3D space.Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A incorrectly suggests measurement issues with circumference, but 2πr can be measured accurately. Choice B wrongly implies that losing circular cross-section information is the problem - the real issue isn't about losing information but about confusing surface area with volume. Choice C incorrectly claims the height changes during unrolling, but height remains constant in this process.Choice D correctly identifies that the unrolled rectangle gives surface area, not volume, which is exactly the flaw in the student's reasoning.Study tip: Always ask yourself what quantity a formula actually measures. Surface area formulas involve 2D measurements, while volume formulas must account for all three dimensions of space.
Question 8
A cylinder can be thought of as a limiting case of a prism as the number of sides of the base polygon increases indefinitely. If a regular n-sided prism has base area An and the inscribed circle has area Ac, which statement correctly describes how this limiting argument supports the cylinder volume formula?
As n→∞, both An→Ac and the prism volume Anh→Ach, justifying V=πr2h (correct answer)
As n→∞, the ratio AcAn→1 while the volume ratio approaches 32
As n→∞, the perimeter approaches the circumference but the area relationship remains constant
As n→∞, both the surface area and volume formulas converge to their circular analogs simultaneously
Explanation: As the number of sides increases, the regular polygon approaches a circle, so An→Ac=πr2. Since prism volume is base area times height, Vn=Anh→Ach=πr2h. Choice B incorrectly suggests the volume ratio isn't 1. Choice C focuses on perimeter rather than area. Choice D is vague about the convergence process and doesn't specifically address the volume formula derivation.
Question 9
A cylinder is compared to a prism using horizontal slices: every slice of the cylinder has area πr2, and every slice of the prism has the same area. Which claim is NOT supported by this Cavalieri-style argument for the cylinder's volume?
The cylinder and prism have equal volumes because their cross-sectional areas match at every height.
The cylinder's volume equals the prism's volume, so the cylinder volume is πr2h.
The cylinder's lateral surface area must equal the prism's lateral surface area because the slice areas match. (correct answer)
If the common height is doubled while slice areas stay the same, the volume doubles.
Explanation: This problem examines informal geometric arguments using Cavalieri's principle for cylinder volume. The setup compares a cylinder to a prism where horizontal slices at every height have equal areas (πr² each). Cavalieri's principle tells us that equal cross-sectional areas at every height imply equal volumes, supporting choices A and B. The principle also supports choice D because doubling the height while keeping slice areas constant doubles the volume. However, choice C incorrectly claims that equal cross-sectional areas imply equal lateral surface areas, which is false—the cylinder's curved surface has area 2πrh while the prism's lateral area depends on its base perimeter. A common misconception is thinking that Cavalieri's principle applies to surface area when it only applies to volume. To apply this reasoning, remember: Cavalieri's principle connects cross-sectional areas to volume, not to surface area.
Question 10
To derive the volume of a cone using a dissection argument, consider slicing the cone with planes parallel to its base. If the cone has base radius R and height h, and a slice is taken at height y from the base, what is the radius of the circular cross-section, and how does this lead to the volume formula?
Radius is R(hy), and integrating πr2 from 0 to h gives 3πR2h
Radius is R(1−hy), and integrating πr2 from 0 to h gives 3πR2h (correct answer)
Radius is R(1−hy), and integrating πr2 from 0 to h gives 32πR2h
Radius is hR(h−y), and integrating 2πr from 0 to h gives πR2h
Explanation: When deriving a cone's volume through dissection, you're using similar triangles to find how the radius changes at different heights, then integrating to sum up all the circular cross-sections.Picture the cone from the side as a triangle. At height y from the base, the remaining height to the apex is h−y. By similar triangles, the ratio of radius to height remains constant throughout the cone. At the base: hR. At height y: h−yr. Setting these equal: hR=h−yr, so r=R(1−hy).To find volume, integrate the area of each circular slice: V=∫0hπr2dy=∫0hπR2(1−hy)2dy. Expanding and integrating gives 3πR2h.Option A incorrectly uses R(hy), which would make the radius grow as you move up the cone—the opposite of reality. Option C uses the correct radius formula but claims the integral yields 32πR2h, which is wrong; they likely forgot to square the radius or made an integration error. Option D uses an equivalent but unnecessarily complicated radius expression and integrates 2πr instead of πr2—this gives circumference times height, not volume.Study tip: Always visualize the geometry first. Similar triangles are key to understanding how dimensions scale in cones, pyramids, and other tapered shapes.
Question 11
A cylinder and a right rectangular prism have the same height h. At every height, a horizontal slice of the cylinder is a circle of radius r, and a horizontal slice of the prism is a rectangle with area πr2. Which explanation correctly uses Cavalieri's principle to justify the cylinder volume formula V=πr2h?
Since both solids have the same surface area at each height, their volumes are equal, so V=πr2h.
Since cross-sections at every height have equal area and the heights match, the volumes match, so V=(πr2)h. (correct answer)
Since the cylinder's base area is 2πr, multiplying by height gives V=2πrh.
Since both solids look about the same from the side, their volumes must be equal, so V=πr2h.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments based on Cavalieri's principle to justify the cylinder volume formula. The geometric setup compares a cylinder of radius r and height h with a rectangular prism of the same height, where every horizontal slice of the prism has area πr². Cavalieri's principle states that if two solids have the same height and equal cross-sectional areas at every height, then they have equal volumes. Since the prism's volume is (base area) × height = πr² × h, the cylinder must also have volume V = πr²h. This conclusion follows because the matching cross-sections guarantee equal volumes. A common error (choice C) confuses base area with circumference, calculating V = 2πrh instead. To transfer this strategy, ask: when do equal cross-sectional areas at every height guarantee equal volumes?
Question 12
A pyramid with a square base can be dissected into smaller pyramids to justify the volume formula. If the original pyramid has base side length s and height h, and it's divided into n2 smaller pyramids each with base side length ns, what is the relationship between the volumes?
Each small pyramid has volume 31⋅n3s3⋅h=3n3s3h, and n2 of them give 3ns3h
Each small pyramid has volume 31⋅n2s2⋅nh=3n3s2h, and n2 of them give 3ns2h
Each small pyramid has volume 31⋅n2s2⋅h=3n2s2h, and n2 of them give 3s2h (correct answer)
Each small pyramid has volume 31⋅ns2⋅h=3ns2h, and n2 of them give 3s2h⋅n
Explanation: When you encounter pyramid dissection problems, you're exploring how the volume formula V=31Bh works through decomposition. The key insight is understanding what happens to each dimension when you subdivide the pyramid.The original pyramid has a square base with area s2 and height h. When divided into n2 smaller pyramids, each small pyramid has a square base with side length ns, so its base area is (ns)2=n2s2. Crucially, all small pyramids maintain the same height h as the original pyramid because they all extend from the base to the apex.Using the volume formula, each small pyramid has volume 31⋅n2s2⋅h=3n2s2h. Since there are n2 such pyramids, the total volume is n2⋅3n2s2h=3s2h, which matches the original pyramid's volume.Answer A incorrectly uses n3s3 for the base area, treating it as if the base were cubic rather than square. Answer B wrongly assumes each small pyramid has height nh, but the height doesn't change during this type of dissection. Answer D uses ns2 for the base area instead of n2s2, missing that area scales with the square of the linear dimension.Remember: in pyramid dissections, carefully track which dimensions change and which stay constant. Base areas scale with the square of side lengths, but height often remains unchanged.
Question 13
Using Cavalieri's principle, why do a hemisphere and a cylinder with a cone removed (both with radius r and height r) have equal volumes? Consider the cross-sections at height y from the bottom.
At height y, the hemisphere has area πr2−y2 and the cylinder-minus-cone has matching linear decrease
At height y, the hemisphere has area π(r2−y2) and the cylinder-minus-cone has area πr2−π(r−y)2
At height y, both solids have circular cross-sections with the same radius r2−y2
At height y, the hemisphere has area π(r2−y2) and the cylinder-minus-cone has area πr2−πy2=π(r2−y2) (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter Cavalieri's principle problems, you're looking for situations where two different solids have identical cross-sectional areas at every height. If this condition holds, the volumes must be equal.For these two solids at height y from the bottom, let's find the cross-sectional areas. The hemisphere's cross-section is a circle. Using the Pythagorean theorem on the hemisphere's circular profile, the radius at height y is r2−y2, giving area π(r2−y2).The cylinder-minus-cone is trickier. The cylinder contributes πr2 at every height. The cone we're removing has radius r at the bottom (height 0) and radius 0 at the top (height r). At height y, the cone's radius decreases linearly to r−y, so the cone's cross-sectional area is π(r−y)2. Wait - that's not right for our setup. Actually, if the cone has its tip at the bottom, its radius at height y is y, giving area πy2. So the cylinder-minus-cone has area πr2−πy2=π(r2−y2).Since both cross-sections have identical area π(r2−y2) at every height y, answer D is correct.A incorrectly gives the hemisphere's radius instead of area. B uses the wrong cone orientation. C incorrectly claims the cylinder-minus-cone has circular cross-sections with radius r2−y2 - it has circular cross-sections, but with a different radius calculation.Strategy tip: In Cavalieri problems, always set up coordinate systems carefully and double-check whether cones have their tips at the top or bottom of your height range.
Question 14
A cone is sliced horizontally into many thin layers and rearranged (without stretching) into a stepped shape that approximates a prism-like solid. The rearrangement keeps each layer's area the same and keeps the total height h. Which reasoning explains why this supports the cone volume formula V=31πr2h?
Because each layer keeps the same area and the heights add to h, the rearranged solid has the same volume as the cone, matching one-third of the cylinder with base πr2. (correct answer)
Because the cone's curved surface can be flattened into a sector, the volume must be 31πr2h.
Because the cone has circular slices, its volume equals the circumference times height, so V=2πrh.
Because the rearranged stepped solid looks like it has base area πr2, its volume is πr2h.
Explanation: This problem demonstrates informal geometric arguments for the cone volume formula using layer rearrangement. The geometric setup involves slicing a cone horizontally into many thin circular layers and rearranging them into a stepped solid. The key insight is that this rearrangement preserves each layer's area while maintaining the total height h. Since the cone's cross-sectional areas grow quadratically from tip to base, the rearranged stepped shape approximates a solid with volume equal to the cone's. This volume equals one-third of a cylinder with base πr² and height h, giving V = ⅓πr²h. The preservation of layer areas and total height ensures volume is conserved. A common error (choice D) forgets the one-third factor that comes from how the areas scale. To apply this reasoning, ask: how does preserving cross-sectional areas during rearrangement help reveal volume relationships?
Question 15
A circle is cut into many equal sectors and rearranged into an almost-rectangle by alternating the sectors. The height is the radius r, and the base is half the circumference. Which conclusion follows from the dissection shown that supports the formula A=πr2?
The base is πr because it is half of 2πr, so area is (πr)⋅r. (correct answer)
The base is 2πr because it matches the full circumference, so area is (2πr)⋅r.
The height is πr because arcs become straight, so area is r⋅πr.
The area equals the circumference times the diameter, so A=(2πr)(2r).
Explanation: This problem demonstrates informal geometric arguments for the circle area formula through dissection. The geometric setup shows a circle cut into many equal sectors that are rearranged into an almost-rectangular shape by alternating the sectors. The dissection reveals that when sectors are alternated, half point up and half point down, creating a shape where the height equals the radius r. The base of this almost-rectangle is half the circumference (½ × 2πr = πr) because only half the circle's edge forms each horizontal boundary. Since area equals base times height, we get A = πr × r = πr². A common misconception (choice B) uses the full circumference as the base, forgetting that the sectors alternate. To apply this strategy elsewhere, consider how rearranging preserves area while transforming the shape into something with a known area formula.
Question 16
A cone of height h and base radius r is compared to a cylinder with the same base radius r and height h. At a height x above the cone's tip, the cone's cross-section is a circle whose radius scales proportionally with x. Which reasoning explains why the cone's volume is V=31πr2h (without using calculus)?
Stacking slices shows the cone uses one-third the volume of the matching cylinder because slice areas grow from 0 to πr2 in the same way each time. (correct answer)
A cone has volume 31πr2h because that is the standard formula for cones.
Because the cone's surface area is one-third the cylinder's surface area, the cone's volume is one-third the cylinder's volume.
Because the cone's cross-sections are rectangles, comparing them to the cylinder gives V=31πr2h.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments to explain why a cone's volume is one-third that of a cylinder with the same base and height. The geometric setup compares a cone and cylinder, both with base radius r and height h. The key insight is that at height x above the cone's tip, the cone's cross-sectional radius scales proportionally as (x/h)r, making the area scale as (x/h)²πr². When we imagine stacking these growing circular slices from tip to base, the way the areas increase quadratically results in the cone occupying exactly one-third of the cylinder's volume. This gives V = ⅓πr²h without needing calculus. A common error (choice C) incorrectly relates surface area ratios to volume ratios. To transfer this strategy, consider how cross-sectional areas that grow quadratically from 0 to the base area result in the one-third relationship.
Question 17
A circle is cut into many thin concentric rings. Each ring is cut at one point and "unrolled" to form a long thin rectangle. The rectangle's length matches the ring's circumference, and its width matches the ring's thickness. Which argument correctly justifies A=πr2 from this rearrangement?
Adding the areas of the unrolled rectangles is like adding circumferences times thickness, which builds up to half of 2πr times r, giving πr2. (correct answer)
Since each ring has circumference 2πr, the circle's area is 2πr.
Because the unrolled rings make a triangle, the area is 21r2.
Because the diameter is 2r, the area is π(2r)2=4πr2.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments to derive the circle area formula through a ring dissection. The geometric setup involves cutting a circle into many thin concentric rings, like tree rings. Each ring is cut and unrolled into a thin rectangle whose length equals the ring's circumference and width equals its thickness. For a ring at radius r with small thickness dr, the rectangle has area approximately 2πr × dr. When we sum all these rectangular areas from the center (r=0) to the edge (r=R), we're essentially adding up circumferences times thicknesses, which gives ½ × 2πR × R = πR². A common error (choice B) confuses the final area with just one circumference. To transfer this strategy, consider how unrolling curved shapes into rectangles can reveal area relationships through accumulation.
Question 18
A cylinder of height h is filled with many identical thin circular disks of radius r stacked with no gaps. The stack exactly matches the cylinder. Which argument correctly justifies the volume formula V=πr2h using this dissection idea?
Each disk has area πr2, and stacking disks to height h makes volume equal to base area times height, so V=(πr2)h. (correct answer)
Each disk has circumference 2πr, so stacking to height h gives V=2πrh.
Because the cylinder's surface area is 2πrh, the volume is also 2πrh.
Because the disks are circles, the cylinder's volume is πr2+h.
Explanation: This problem uses informal geometric arguments to justify the cylinder volume formula through disk stacking. The geometric setup shows a cylinder of height h filled with many thin circular disks of radius r, stacked with no gaps. The dissection idea is straightforward: each disk has area πr², and stacking them to height h means the total volume equals the base area times height. This gives V = πr² × h = πr²h, which matches the standard cylinder formula. The stacking preserves both the circular cross-section and fills the entire height without gaps. A common misconception (choice B) uses circumference instead of area, calculating V = 2πrh. To transfer this strategy, consider how stacking identical cross-sections builds volume as (cross-sectional area) × (total height).
Question 19
A right circular cylinder has radius r and height h. Imagine slicing it into many thin horizontal layers (like a stack of coins). A right prism has the same height h, and its base is a region with area πr2. Which explanation correctly uses Cavalieri's principle to justify the cylinder volume formula V=πr2h?
At every height, each cross-section of the cylinder and prism has the same area πr2, so the solids have equal volume, giving V=πr2h. (correct answer)
The cylinder volume is πr2h because that is the memorized cylinder formula, and slicing does not change it.
At every height, the cylinder's cross-section is a circle but the prism's is a polygon, so their volumes cannot be compared.
Because the cylinder's lateral surface area is 2πrh, its volume must be 2πrh.
Explanation: This question applies Cavalieri's principle to justify the cylinder volume formula through informal geometric reasoning. The setup compares a cylinder with radius r and height h to a prism with the same height and base area πr². When both solids are sliced horizontally at any height, each cross-section of the cylinder is a circle with area πr², and each cross-section of the prism has the same area πr². Since corresponding cross-sections have equal areas at every height, Cavalieri's principle tells us the volumes must be equal. Therefore, the cylinder's volume equals the prism's volume: (base area) × height = πr²h. Option D incorrectly confuses lateral surface area with volume, a common misconception.
Question 20
A cylinder of radius r and height h is compared to a stack made of many thin circular disks, each disk having radius r. The stack has the same height h as the cylinder. Which conclusion follows from this slicing idea to justify V=πr2h?
Because each disk has area πr2 and the stack reaches height h, the total volume matches the cylinder's volume, so V=πr2h. (correct answer)
Because the cylinder's curved surface can be unrolled into a rectangle, the volume is the rectangle's area 2πrh.
Because disks are flat and a cylinder is curved, stacking disks cannot model the cylinder's volume.
Because the cylinder formula is πr2h, any slicing argument must lead to that formula.
Explanation: This question uses a slicing argument to justify the cylinder volume formula through informal reasoning. A cylinder with radius r and height h can be conceptualized as a stack of infinitely many thin circular disks, each with area πr². When these disks are stacked to height h, their combined volume equals the sum of their individual volumes. Since each disk contributes area πr² and the stack reaches height h, the total volume is πr²h. This matches the cylinder's actual volume, validating the formula. Option B incorrectly relates volume to the lateral surface area, while option C wrongly claims that geometric shape differences prevent volume comparison. The key insight is that volume can be understood as accumulated cross-sectional area.