Governments and Philosophies
Help Questions
GED Social Studies › Governments and Philosophies
A political philosophy that is defined by trying to resist social change or desiring a return to a previous social order is called
reactionary.
conservative.
liberal.
libertarian.
revolutionary.
Explanation
The political spectrum is usually constructed as follows: On the far left are revolutionaries, on the left are liberals, in the middle are moderates, on the right are conservatives, and on the far right are reactionaries. Reactionary political philosophy is defined by the repeated attempt to resist social change or, even further, to desire a return to a previous, and more rigid, social order.
A political philosophy that is defined by trying to resist social change or desiring a return to a previous social order is called
reactionary.
conservative.
liberal.
libertarian.
revolutionary.
Explanation
The political spectrum is usually constructed as follows: On the far left are revolutionaries, on the left are liberals, in the middle are moderates, on the right are conservatives, and on the far right are reactionaries. Reactionary political philosophy is defined by the repeated attempt to resist social change or, even further, to desire a return to a previous, and more rigid, social order.
A political philosophy that is defined by trying to resist social change or desiring a return to a previous social order is called
reactionary.
conservative.
liberal.
libertarian.
revolutionary.
Explanation
The political spectrum is usually constructed as follows: On the far left are revolutionaries, on the left are liberals, in the middle are moderates, on the right are conservatives, and on the far right are reactionaries. Reactionary political philosophy is defined by the repeated attempt to resist social change or, even further, to desire a return to a previous, and more rigid, social order.
The political theory that states that a democratic society benefits from competing ideas from a wide spectrum of individual and group opinions is called
pluralism.
republicanism.
liberalism.
progressivism.
nominalism.
Explanation
Pluralism is the name given to a political theory—widely accepted in most modern democracies—that states that a democratic society benefits when there are many competing and varied individual and group opinions working together, or in competition with each other, to direct public policy.
Which of these Enlightenment philosophers could best be considered as the foil for John Locke’s optimism about humanity?
Thomas Hobbes
Immanuel Kant
Sir Thomas More
Dante
Voltaire
Explanation
John Locke believed in a social contract between rulers and ruled that heavily limits the power of the ruler and provides inalienable rights for the ruled. Although Locke, by modern standards was still somewhat conservative about human nature (he still favored monarchy over democracy) in his own time Locke was about as liberal as it was possible to be about human nature and political theory (without being considered dangerously insane). Hobbes, on the other hand, was a renowned pessimist about the human condition and an even more renowned royalist. Hobbes fled England during the Civil War, and upon his return published his most famous work, The Leviathan, which outlines Hobbes’ belief that life is nasty, brutish, and short, and that in a state of nature mankind would rip itself to shreds. A strong, absolute government was needed to enforce law and order. Together, their views helped shape generations of politicians’ viewpoints, but compared to one another they were chalk and cheese.
Which of these Enlightenment philosophers could best be considered as the foil for John Locke’s optimism about humanity?
Thomas Hobbes
Immanuel Kant
Sir Thomas More
Dante
Voltaire
Explanation
John Locke believed in a social contract between rulers and ruled that heavily limits the power of the ruler and provides inalienable rights for the ruled. Although Locke, by modern standards was still somewhat conservative about human nature (he still favored monarchy over democracy) in his own time Locke was about as liberal as it was possible to be about human nature and political theory (without being considered dangerously insane). Hobbes, on the other hand, was a renowned pessimist about the human condition and an even more renowned royalist. Hobbes fled England during the Civil War, and upon his return published his most famous work, The Leviathan, which outlines Hobbes’ belief that life is nasty, brutish, and short, and that in a state of nature mankind would rip itself to shreds. A strong, absolute government was needed to enforce law and order. Together, their views helped shape generations of politicians’ viewpoints, but compared to one another they were chalk and cheese.
Which of these Enlightenment philosophers could best be considered as the foil for John Locke’s optimism about humanity?
Thomas Hobbes
Immanuel Kant
Sir Thomas More
Dante
Voltaire
Explanation
John Locke believed in a social contract between rulers and ruled that heavily limits the power of the ruler and provides inalienable rights for the ruled. Although Locke, by modern standards was still somewhat conservative about human nature (he still favored monarchy over democracy) in his own time Locke was about as liberal as it was possible to be about human nature and political theory (without being considered dangerously insane). Hobbes, on the other hand, was a renowned pessimist about the human condition and an even more renowned royalist. Hobbes fled England during the Civil War, and upon his return published his most famous work, The Leviathan, which outlines Hobbes’ belief that life is nasty, brutish, and short, and that in a state of nature mankind would rip itself to shreds. A strong, absolute government was needed to enforce law and order. Together, their views helped shape generations of politicians’ viewpoints, but compared to one another they were chalk and cheese.
The political theory that states that a democratic society benefits from competing ideas from a wide spectrum of individual and group opinions is called
pluralism.
republicanism.
liberalism.
progressivism.
nominalism.
Explanation
Pluralism is the name given to a political theory—widely accepted in most modern democracies—that states that a democratic society benefits when there are many competing and varied individual and group opinions working together, or in competition with each other, to direct public policy.
The political theory that states that a democratic society benefits from competing ideas from a wide spectrum of individual and group opinions is called
pluralism.
republicanism.
liberalism.
progressivism.
nominalism.
Explanation
Pluralism is the name given to a political theory—widely accepted in most modern democracies—that states that a democratic society benefits when there are many competing and varied individual and group opinions working together, or in competition with each other, to direct public policy.
In a parliamentary democracy, the executive leader is chosen by .
the elected members of the legislative branch
a vote of the population
the elected members of the judicial branch
the monarch
the unelected members of the judicial branch
Explanation
One of the primary differences between a presidential democracy (like the governments of the United States and France) and a parliamentary democracy (like the governments of Germany and the United Kingdom) is that in a parliamentary democracy, the people do not directly elect the Prime Minister; instead, they vote for a representative of a political party in the legislature, and the majority party in the legislature chooses a Prime Minister. In modern times, it is generally known before the election of the legislative branch the person each party would choose for their leader, so the difference is nominal in terms of the amount of power held by the people.