Evaluate Reasonable Compensation Strategies
Help Questions
CPA Tax Compliance & Planning (TCP) › Evaluate Reasonable Compensation Strategies
The IRS may challenge compensation paid by a closely held C corporation to a shareholder-employee as unreasonable if:
The compensation is excessive relative to the services performed, suggesting it is a disguised dividend - allowing the corporation to deduct a distribution that would otherwise not be deductible.
The compensation is paid in the form of bonuses rather than a fixed salary.
The compensation equals the compensation paid to non-shareholder employees in similar roles.
The shareholder-employee owns less than 50% of the corporation's stock.
Explanation
Unreasonable compensation in a C corp context typically involves overpaying shareholder-employees to disguise nondeductible dividends as deductible compensation. Answer B is correct. Market-rate compensation (A) is the safe harbor. Small ownership (C) doesn't trigger IRS concern. Bonus form (D) is not itself improper.
In an S corporation context, the IRS may challenge compensation paid to a shareholder-employee as unreasonably low if:
The shareholder-employee receives compensation above industry benchmarks.
The shareholder-employee works fewer than 40 hours per week for the corporation.
The shareholder-employee takes little or no salary while receiving large distributions - allowing avoidance of payroll taxes (FICA) on amounts that should be characterized as wages.
The S corporation has multiple shareholders receiving different compensation amounts.
Explanation
S corp shareholders who work for the company must receive reasonable compensation as wages - distributions avoid FICA, so underpaying wages and overpaying distributions is a common IRS target. Answer A is correct. Above-market pay (B) is an S corp shareholder-employee concern, but lower pay is the typical S corp abuse. Different amounts (C) are acceptable. Hours worked (D) alone don't determine reasonableness.
Courts typically use multiple factors to evaluate whether compensation is 'reasonable.' Which of the following is NOT a commonly used factor?
Whether the employee is related to the company's founder.
Compensation paid to comparable employees at similar companies.
The financial condition of the company and the size of the business.
The employee's qualifications, experience, and duties.
Explanation
Family relationship to a founder is generally not a factor in the reasonable compensation analysis - courts look at economic, market, and performance factors. Answer D is correct. Qualifications (A), market comparables (B), and company financials (C) are all commonly used factors.
An independent investor test is used by some courts to evaluate reasonable compensation. Under this test:
Compensation is benchmarked against payments to independent contractors performing similar services.
Compensation must be approved by independent directors of the corporation.
Compensation is reasonable if an independent investor would receive the same amount.
Compensation is reasonable if, after paying the compensation, the return on equity is sufficient to attract an independent investor - if the return on equity is adequate, the compensation is presumed reasonable.
Explanation
The independent investor test asks whether the return on equity after paying the compensation would still be acceptable to an outside investor - if yes, the compensation is reasonable. Answer B is correct. The test is about investment returns, not compensation amounts to investors (A). Board approval (C) is a governance practice. Independent contractor benchmarking (D) is a different approach.
A closely held C corporation pays its sole shareholder-employee a $500,000 salary. After paying the salary, the corporation has only $10,000 of net income. The IRS examines the reasonableness of the compensation. A key consideration is:
Whether $500,000 is reasonable for the type and quality of services provided, considering market comparables - the fact that it leaves minimal corporate income is relevant as evidence of disguised dividends.
Whether the $500,000 is consistent with the shareholder's prior year salary.
Whether the compensation is paid in equal monthly installments.
Whether the corporation has ever paid dividends to the shareholder.
Explanation
The near-total absorption of corporate income as compensation is circumstantial evidence of disguised dividends - the key test is whether the amount is reasonable for the services. Answer C is correct. Prior dividend history (A) is relevant but not the key factor. Prior year consistency (B) is one factor but not determinative. Payment timing (D) is irrelevant.
If a C corporation pays unreasonable compensation to a shareholder-employee, the disallowed portion is treated as a constructive dividend. The corporation's tax consequence is:
The disallowed portion is deductible as a dividend paid deduction.
The corporation receives a refund of taxes previously paid on the amount.
The corporation's basis in the shareholder-employee's stock is increased.
The disallowed portion is nondeductible - the corporation has additional taxable income equal to the disallowed compensation, taxed at the 21% flat rate.
Explanation
Disallowed compensation increases the corporation's taxable income - it is not deductible as a dividend. Answer A is correct. Dividends are not deductible for C corporations (B). No refund arises from compensation disallowance (C). Stock basis adjustments are not affected (D).
For an S corporation shareholder-employee, the distinction between compensation and distributions matters because:
Distributions are always taxed at higher rates than compensation.
Distributions affect the shareholder's at-risk amount while compensation does not.
Compensation (wages) is subject to FICA/payroll taxes while distributions are not - minimizing wages and maximizing distributions reduces payroll tax burden, which the IRS monitors.
Compensation is not subject to income tax while distributions are.
Explanation
The key difference is FICA treatment - wages are subject to payroll taxes, distributions are not. This creates the incentive to minimize wages in S corps. Answer C is correct. Distributions are not taxed at higher rates (A). Both compensation and distributions are subject to income tax (B). Distributions reduce stock basis affecting at-risk, but FICA avoidance is the main concern (D).
A C corporation that has historically paid no dividends and consistently absorbs all profits through compensation to shareholder-employees is most at risk for:
The personal holding company tax if income is predominantly from passive sources.
The IRS recharacterizing a portion of compensation as constructive dividends - the lack of dividend history combined with high compensation is evidence that compensation is being used as a substitute for dividends.
Criminal prosecution for tax evasion.
The accumulated earnings tax based on excessive retained earnings.
Explanation
Using all-compensation/no-dividend policy to avoid double taxation is the classic IRS target - compensation may be recharacterized as dividends to prevent deductibility. Answer A is correct. The AET (B) applies to accumulated retained earnings, but the scenario shows no retained earnings. PHC tax (C) relates to passive income. Criminal prosecution (D) requires fraudulent intent.
An S corporation pays its shareholder-employee a reasonable salary of $75,000. The S corporation has additional net income of $150,000 that flows through to the shareholder as a distribution. The net income distribution:
Is treated as self-employment income subject to SE tax.
Is subject to FICA taxes since it flows through the corporation.
Is subject to the 3.8% net investment income tax automatically.
Is not subject to FICA or SE tax - S corporation distributions (beyond reasonable wages) are excluded from employment taxes, which is the key tax advantage of S corporation status for active owner-employees.
Explanation
S corporation distributions are not subject to FICA or SE tax - only the reasonable salary portion is subject to payroll taxes. The 3.8% NIIT doesn't automatically apply to S corp active owners. Answer C is correct. Distributions are not subject to FICA (A). S corp income is not SE income (B). Active S corp owners are generally excluded from NIIT on their S corp income (D).
Which of the following actions best protects a C corporation from an IRS challenge to shareholder-employee compensation?
Documenting that compensation was authorized by related-party shareholders at an annual meeting.
Paying a large year-end bonus if the corporation had a profitable year.
Establishing compensation using an independent compensation study, board approval by disinterested directors, a contemporaneous employment contract, and benchmarking against industry data.
Paying compensation equal to the prior year amount adjusted for inflation.
Explanation
Best practices to defend reasonable compensation include independent studies, objective board approval, contemporaneous documentation, and market benchmarking. Answer D is correct. Inflation adjustment (A) doesn't establish market reasonableness. Profit-based bonuses (B) may be challenged if total compensation is excessive. Related-party approval (C) lacks independence.