AICPA Statements
Help Questions
CPA Regulation (REG) › AICPA Statements
The AICPA Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS) are best described as which of the following?
Rules enacted by Congress that establish minimum standards for all paid tax return preparers
Voluntary guidelines that supplement but never supersede Treasury Department Circular 230
Enforceable professional standards issued by the AICPA that establish the minimum level of conduct required of members in tax practice
Standards that apply only to CPAs in public accounting firms, not to those in industry or government
Explanation
The SSTS are binding professional standards issued by the AICPA and are enforceable against AICPA members through the Institute's disciplinary process. They represent the minimum standards of conduct for members in tax practice and apply regardless of the member's employment setting. Option B is incorrect; the SSTS are not merely voluntary and in some respects impose obligations beyond Circular 230. Option C is incorrect; the SSTS apply to all AICPA members in tax practice, including those in industry, government, and academia. Option D is incorrect; the SSTS are issued by the AICPA, not Congress.
Under SSTS No. 1, a CPA may recommend a tax return position if the position meets which minimum standard?
The position has a 50% or greater probability of being sustained if challenged by the IRS
The position has a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits, and if that standard is not met, the position must be disclosed on the return
The CPA believes the position represents the most favorable tax outcome available to the client
The position has previously been accepted by the IRS without challenge in the same client's case
Explanation
SSTS No. 1 establishes a two-tier standard. A CPA may recommend a position if it has a realistic possibility of success if litigated (approximately a one-in-three chance or better). If the position fails the realistic possibility standard but is not frivolous, the CPA may still recommend it provided adequate disclosure is made on the return. Option A overstates the threshold; the realistic possibility standard does not require more-likely-than-not probability. Option C has no basis in the SSTS. Option D incorrectly suggests prior acceptance creates ongoing authority.
A CPA discovers that a client's prior-year return contains a material error. The client refuses to file an amended return or inform the IRS. What obligation does SSTS No. 6 place on the CPA?
Inform the client of the error and its potential consequences, and if the client refuses to correct it, consider whether to continue the professional relationship
Withdraw from the engagement immediately upon the client's first refusal
Report the error to the IRS immediately, without client consent, to avoid complicity
Continue to represent the client in all current matters, including the year containing the error
Explanation
SSTS No. 6 requires the CPA to promptly advise the client of the error and the potential consequences, including penalties and interest. The SSTS do not require the CPA to notify the IRS without client consent - the CPA lacks unilateral authority to disclose confidential client information. If the client refuses to correct the error, the CPA must consider whether to withdraw. Option A incorrectly requires IRS notification without consent. Option B ignores the CPA's obligation to at minimum advise the client. Option C is premature; the SSTS require advising before considering withdrawal.
SSTS No. 7 governs advice to taxpayers. What does this standard require of a CPA providing written tax advice?
Written advice carries less legal authority than oral advice because documents can be challenged by the IRS
Written advice should be based on the CPA's knowledge of all relevant facts and applicable law, and should identify significant assumptions and key limitations on the advice
Written advice is only required for tax shelter transactions and listed transactions
Every written tax opinion must include a disclaimer warning that the IRS may reject the position
Explanation
SSTS No. 7 requires that tax advice be based on a complete understanding of the client's relevant facts and the applicable tax law. The CPA should communicate significant assumptions, limitations, and the basis for any conclusions. Option A is incorrect; SSTS No. 7 does not mandate a generic IRS disclaimer. Option C is incorrect; written advice is not inherently weaker than oral advice, and the authority of advice depends on its quality and basis rather than its form. Option D is incorrect; SSTS No. 7 applies broadly to all tax advice given to clients, not only shelter-related opinions.
After filing a client's return, a CPA discovers a computational error that caused a $3,000 tax underpayment. Under SSTS No. 6, what is the CPA's first obligation?
Notify the IRS of the error before contacting the client
Promptly inform the client of the error and recommend corrective action
Determine whether the error was caused by client negligence before taking any action
File an amended return immediately without notifying the client in advance
Explanation
SSTS No. 6 requires the CPA to promptly advise the client when an error is discovered. The CPA cannot unilaterally file an amended return without client authorization, and notifying the IRS without client consent would violate client confidentiality. The client must be informed of the error and its consequences and given the opportunity to decide how to proceed, including whether to file an amended return. Option A bypasses the required client notification. Option B violates client confidentiality. Option D delays obligatory disclosure while investigating fault.
A client's prior-year return contains an unresolved error that the client has declined to correct. The current-year return is accurate. Under the SSTS, may the CPA sign and file the current-year return?
Yes, but the CPA should advise the client to correct the prior-year error and consider whether to continue the relationship if the client refuses
No; the CPA must refuse to sign until the prior-year error is corrected
Yes; the CPA has no obligation to mention the prior-year error when signing the accurate current-year return
No; the CPA must withdraw from the engagement immediately
Explanation
The SSTS do not automatically prohibit signing an accurate current-year return simply because a prior-year error exists. The CPA should advise the client about the prior-year error (SSTS No. 6) and recommend correction. If the client refuses, the CPA must evaluate whether continued representation is appropriate. However, signing the current-year accurate return is permitted while that evaluation takes place. Option A imposes a categorical refusal not required by the SSTS. Option C is premature. Option D incorrectly suggests the CPA has no obligation regarding the prior-year error.
When a CPA uses estimates on a tax return under SSTS No. 4, what is the CPA's primary obligation regarding those estimates?
Label every estimated figure with the word 'estimated' on the face of the return
Obtain independent third-party verification of each estimated amount
Require the client to certify in writing that all estimates are accurate
Be satisfied that the estimates are reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with other information known to the CPA
Explanation
SSTS No. 4 requires that estimates be reasonable under the circumstances and not inconsistent with information otherwise known to the CPA. The standard does not require labeling estimates on the return face, client certifications, or independent verification. The CPA exercises professional judgment to assess whether each estimate is a plausible approximation of the actual amount. Options A, B, and D impose procedural requirements not found in SSTS No. 4.
During tax preparation, a client reveals that prior years' returns intentionally omitted $50,000 of cash income. The client asks the CPA to prepare only the current-year return. Under SSTS No. 6, what must the CPA do?
Immediately file amended returns for all prior years on the client's behalf
Report the client to the IRS without delay to avoid personal exposure to complicity
Inform the client of the consequences of the prior omissions and recommend correction, and consider whether to continue the engagement if the client refuses to address the matter
Prepare the current year accurately and treat the prior-year disclosure as outside the scope of the engagement
Explanation
SSTS No. 6 requires the CPA to advise the client of the error or omission and recommend corrective action. The CPA cannot unilaterally file amended returns without authorization, and cannot report the client to the IRS in violation of confidentiality. If the client refuses to correct the matter, the CPA must assess whether continued representation is appropriate. Option B exceeds the CPA's authority without client consent. Option C violates client confidentiality. Option D ignores the professional obligation imposed by SSTS No. 6 when an error or omission is discovered.
A CPA evaluates an aggressive tax planning strategy that has approximately a 25% probability of success if challenged. Under SSTS No. 1, what should the CPA do?
Not recommend the position unless it can be disclosed, and even then must evaluate whether the position is frivolous before recommending it
Recommend the position freely because any position with a nonzero probability is acceptable
Recommend the position because clients have a right to take aggressive tax positions
Recommend the position because it has been reviewed by a tax attorney
Explanation
A 25% probability of success does not meet the realistic possibility standard (generally interpreted as approximately one-in-three or better). For positions below the realistic possibility threshold, the CPA may only recommend the position if it is adequately disclosed on the return and is not frivolous. An undisclosed position below the standard cannot be recommended. Attorney review does not substitute for the CPA's own professional judgment under the SSTS. The client's preference for aggressive positions does not override the SSTS standards.
A CPA advises a client that a home office deduction is probably deductible. The client later reveals facts that would have changed the advice, which were not volunteered and not specifically asked about. Which analysis of the CPA's conduct is most accurate?
Tax advice is inherently unreliable when clients fail to disclose all facts, so no professional standard applies
The CPA bears no responsibility because the client had ultimate decision-making authority
The advice may have been appropriate given the facts known at the time, but the CPA should have made sufficient inquiries to identify obviously relevant facts; failure to ask about clearly pertinent circumstances may be a professional deficiency
The advice may have been deficient; SSTS No. 7 requires advice based on knowledge of all relevant facts and law, and omitting industry-specific factors identified in IRS guidance may fall short of reasonable care
Explanation
SSTS No. 7 requires that tax advice be based on the CPA's knowledge of all relevant facts and applicable law. The home office deduction depends on specific factual requirements - including exclusive and regular business use - that a client may not volunteer without prompting. Where the client later reveals facts that would have changed the analysis, the advice may be deficient if a competent practitioner would have identified and asked about those facts. Answer B is correct. Option A correctly notes the inquiry obligation but characterizes the advice as potentially appropriate, which understates the risk when pertinent facts go unasked. Option C is incorrect; client decision-making authority does not discharge the CPA's obligation to provide advice based on complete facts. Option D is incorrect; SSTS No. 7 continues to impose professional standards even when clients fail to disclose relevant information.