Writing Standards: Writing Arguments and Counterclaims (CCSS.W.7.1)
Help Questions
Common Core 7th Grade ELA › Writing Standards: Writing Arguments and Counterclaims (CCSS.W.7.1)
Cell phones should be stored away during class so students can focus. Even silent phones pull attention; when a notification lights up, eyes leave the lesson. In a district pilot last spring, teachers collected phones at the door and returned them at dismissal. Disruptions fell, transitions sped up, and students completed more in-class practice. Most importantly, learning improved: first-period quiz averages rose, and time on task increased during independent reading. Access to families and emergencies was still protected, because the office remained the point of contact and every classroom had a landline. Keeping phones in lockers also promotes fairness for students who do not own the newest devices, reducing pressure to respond to group chats. Schools are responsible for creating conditions where every minute of instruction counts. By removing a known distraction, we help students use class time for what it is meant for—thinking, collaborating, and learning.
Which detail best supports the author's claim that phones should be stored away during class?
Some students say phones help them relax at lunch.
In a district pilot, average first-period quiz scores increased after phones were stored in lockers.
Modern phones can run many educational apps.
Our school has strong Wi‑Fi coverage.
Explanation
Choice B offers specific evidence that links storing phones to improved quiz scores, directly supporting the claim. The other options are unrelated or counter the argument.
Middle schools should make homework optional, focusing instead on meaningful practice in class. After a full day of learning, many students head to jobs, care for siblings, or travel between households. When practice happens with teacher feedback, misunderstandings are corrected immediately, which prevents bad habits. Research on middle-grade homework shows diminishing returns: assigning more does not guarantee better learning. Several districts now offer choice boards or independent reading instead of nightly packets, and they report calmer classrooms and more complete classwork. Optional homework still allows motivated students to extend their learning, while removing a barrier for those balancing responsibilities outside school. Teachers can communicate long-term projects early and provide time during the day to plan. If we want students to approach school with energy and curiosity, we should avoid turning evenings into another shift of required work.
Which detail would best support the author's claim that homework should be optional in middle school?
Some students enjoy doing math puzzles at home.
Many families eat dinner at different times.
Elementary schools already send home weekly newsletters.
When a nearby middle school made homework optional for a semester, benchmark scores held steady while missing-assignment reports fell by 40 percent.
Explanation
Choice D provides concrete, relevant results from a comparable school, showing that optional homework did not harm achievement and reduced missing work, which supports the claim.
Our middle school should begin the day later so students can learn when their brains are most alert. Medical groups recommend eight to ten hours of sleep for adolescents, yet a recent survey at our school found that most students arrive tired. Early bells push bedtimes earlier than families can reasonably manage, especially when activities and homework run past dinner. Districts that shifted middle school start times reported fewer tardies and nurse visits in first period. Teachers also observed that students participated more and needed fewer reminders to stay on task. Bus schedules can be adjusted by swapping routes with the high school, and clubs can meet before school for those who prefer an early start. A later opening is not about convenience; it is about aligning the school day with how teenagers actually learn, so the first class of the day is a place for progress, not yawns.
Which detail best supports the claim that starting school later improves learning?
After moving the first bell to 8:45, average first‑period test scores at a similar school rose by about half a letter grade.
The gym is available earlier in the morning.
Some students enjoy seeing the sunrise on the way to school.
Teachers recently received new laptop carts.
Explanation
Choice A directly links a later start time to improved academic performance, which supports the claim about learning. The other options are unrelated to learning outcomes.
The cafeteria should offer a daily plant‑based entrée so every student has a nutritious option. A growing number of students cannot or do not eat dairy or meat, and they should not have to settle for side dishes. Balanced plant‑based meals—such as bean chili with rice or lentil pasta—provide protein, fiber, and iron while reducing saturated fat. Cost analysis from nearby schools shows these dishes are often less expensive per serving than meat-based options. When our cafeteria piloted a plant‑based day last month, the entrée sold out before the final lunch, and waste bins were noticeably lighter. Offering this choice also lowers our environmental footprint, a value many students care about. Our food service vendor has confirmed it can supply ingredients within the current budget. Providing a daily plant‑based entrée is a practical way to increase inclusion, improve nutrition, and reflect our community's goals.
Which sentence would best strengthen the conclusion of the argument?
Some students bring lunches from home.
Cooking club members are excited to test new recipes.
By adding one plant‑based entrée each day, the school can expand choice without raising costs and encourage more students to eat a full, healthy meal.
The cafeteria tables were rearranged last week.
Explanation
Choice C restates the claim and clearly links it to the key benefits—choice, cost, and nutrition—making the conclusion stronger. The other options are irrelevant or merely anecdotal.
Teachers want students' attention; therefore, our school should require cell phones to be off and put away during class. Research shows that even a silent phone on a desk pulls focus, lowering note quality and memory. While some argue phones enable quick research, teachers already provide vetted devices that block distractions and ensure equity for students who cannot afford the latest models. In addition, notifications interrupt discussions and increase careless errors on written work. Emergencies can still be handled through the main office, which protects safety without constant screen checks. Moreover, limiting phones during instruction models healthy technology habits that students can carry into jobs. For these reasons, putting phones away during class supports deeper learning. A clear policy, paired with consistent reminders, will help everyone learn more efficiently.
Which detail best supports the author's claim that cell phones should be off and put away during class?
In a recent classroom study, students who could see their phones scored lower on quizzes and took fewer notes than those whose phones were stored away.
Many students enjoy learning with new apps at home.
Some teachers already collect phones in a basket at the start of class.
The school library is open after school for extra help.
Explanation
Choice A gives specific, relevant evidence showing visible phones reduce learning, directly supporting the claim to keep phones put away. The other choices are true or common, but they are vague or off-topic and do not show an effect on learning.
Homework should be limited but not optional. Short, purposeful practice helps students move skills from class to long‑term memory. For example, a set of five problems or a brief reading can reinforce a lesson without overwhelming families. Some argue homework adds stress; however, setting time caps and offering choice boards address that concern while keeping practice meaningful. Homework also teaches planning. When students break tasks into small steps, they arrive ready to contribute the next day. Teachers can post clear directions and accept work within a flexible window to support busy households. Because the goal is mastery, not minutes, assignments should focus on the most important ideas and avoid busywork. With these guidelines, homework becomes a tool for learning rather than a burden. This balanced approach respects both learning and life.
Which sentence would best strengthen the conclusion of the argument?
Some students participate in sports or clubs after school.
Homework policies differ from teacher to teacher.
Adopting brief, targeted assignments gives students needed practice while keeping evenings manageable.
Many schools start at different times during the year.
Explanation
Choice C clearly reinforces the conclusion by explaining how short, focused homework meets learning goals without overload, directly aligning with the claim. The other options are true statements but do not connect the claim, reasons, and conclusion.
Middle schools in our district should start later in the morning. Adolescents' sleep cycles shift, making it difficult to fall asleep early and wake up before sunrise. When schools move start times closer to 8:30 a.m., attendance rises and first‑period grades improve. In addition, well‑rested students are safer walking or biking in daylight. Some families worry that sports and jobs would be disrupted; however, neighboring districts adjusted practice schedules and found participation remained steady. Bus routes can be staggered by moving elementary start times slightly earlier, which many families prefer. Teachers benefit, too, because alert students participate more and require fewer behavior reminders. A later start is a practical, research‑supported change that helps learning without sacrificing activities. Communities that tried this reported calmer mornings and fewer nurse visits for headaches.
Which piece of evidence best supports the author's claim that middle schools should start later?
Parents need to arrive at work on time each morning.
Start times vary widely between districts in our state.
Many students say they feel tired during homeroom.
Districts that moved the first bell to 8:30 a.m. reported higher first‑period grades and fewer tardies within a semester.
Explanation
Choice D provides specific, outcome-based evidence (grades and tardies improving after later start times) that directly supports the claim. The other choices are general, unrelated, or do not show an effect of the proposed change.
Our cafeteria should offer more plant‑based entrées each week. Adding hearty bean bowls, veggie chili, and grain salads would include students who are vegetarian, lactose‑intolerant, or avoid certain meats for cultural reasons. Expanding choices can also reduce our environmental footprint because producing legumes generally uses less water than raising livestock. Some worry that new dishes would be costly or wasted. To address this, the nutrition team could run taste tests, gather feedback, and pilot recipes that use ingredients we already buy. Student surveys last spring showed strong interest in more meatless options, especially on Mondays. Clear labeling and inviting presentation would help unfamiliar foods feel approachable. With careful planning, more plant‑based meals can meet diverse needs while staying within budget. Bulk ordering beans and grains keeps pantry staples inexpensive across the month.
Which detail would best add relevant, credible evidence to support the claim about cost?
Vegetables are healthy for people of all ages.
A report from a nearby district found that serving two plant‑based entrées per week lowered average lunch costs per tray compared with meat‑based meals.
Some students bring lunch from home.
Cafeteria staff work hard to prepare meals on time.
Explanation
Choice B provides a specific, credible comparison from another district showing lower costs with plant‑based entrées, directly supporting the claim about affordability. The other options are true or common facts but do not address cost.
Middle schools should shift the first bell to at least 8:45 a.m. Adolescents' sleep cycles naturally run later, so early start times deprive them of rest that fuels focus and memory. When districts push the morning back, attendance and health improve: fewer tardies, fewer first-period nurse visits, and calmer hallways. Teachers also report smoother discussions because students are alert enough to participate thoughtfully. Critics worry that later dismissal will complicate sports and after-school jobs. That concern matters, yet districts that adjusted bus routes and practice schedules found workable solutions, including shared fields and slightly shorter practices. Most importantly, learning benefits: well-rested students concentrate longer, retain new material, and make safer decisions on their way to school. For a community that values both achievement and well-being, aligning school with adolescent biology is a practical, evidence-based step.
Which detail best supports the author's claim that later start times improve academic outcomes?
Cafeteria lines shorten when lunch periods are staggered.
Teachers report smoother discussions because students feel more alert.
In one district, moving the start time 60 minutes later raised first-period grades by nearly a letter on average within a semester.
Some students say they feel happier walking to school in daylight.
Explanation
Choice C gives specific, relevant evidence (grade improvement) that directly shows academic gains tied to later start times. The others are vague, off-topic, or not focused on academic outcomes.
Homework should be optional in middle school, assigned only when it clearly deepens understanding. Research on this age group shows little connection between heavy nightly worksheets and long-term achievement, while excessive assignments often crowd out reading for pleasure, family time, and sleep. When students choose extension tasks that match their interests—finishing a chapter of a novel, building a model for science, or interviewing a grandparent for history—they practice skills with purpose. I recognize the argument that practice builds fluency. However, that practice can occur during class through guided problem sets, targeted small-group work, and re-teaching. Optional homework preserves rigor by focusing on quality over quantity and encourages students to take ownership of learning. Schools should adopt policies that allow teachers to offer meaningful choices rather than blanket requirements that add busywork.
Which sentence would best strengthen the conclusion?
By focusing on quality over quantity, teachers can maintain high expectations while giving students control over their time beyond the bell.
Many students participate in sports and clubs after school.
Homework has been around for a long time in many countries.
Optional homework is a controversial topic in some communities.
Explanation
Choice A is a clear, logical concluding statement that ties the claim to the reasons about quality, rigor, and student ownership. The others are vague or off-topic and do not reinforce the argument.