What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Evaluate Evidence For Social Behavior Advantages, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for Biology.
Study Evaluate Evidence For Social Behavior Advantages in Biology with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which option indicates kin selection rather than reciprocity: helping siblings or helping unrelated strangers once?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Helping siblings. Helping relatives indicates selection based on genetic relatedness.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 100
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Evaluate Evidence For Social Behavior Advantages, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for Biology.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Helping siblings. Helping relatives indicates selection based on genetic relatedness.
Answer: Anti-predator benefits are context-dependent and drive social advantage. Context-dependency shows specific conditions where sociality provides benefits.
Answer: Helping siblings. Helping relatives indicates selection based on genetic relatedness.
Answer: Higher capture success in groups. Higher success rates demonstrate cooperative hunting effectiveness.
Answer: Higher pathogen transmission due to close contact and density. Close contact in groups facilitates disease spread between individuals.
Answer: Naïve individuals find food faster after joining groups. Improved foraging success demonstrates information transfer within groups.
Answer: Constant attack rate (per group) with lower risk per individual. Fixed attack rate with more individuals reduces per-capita risk.
Answer: Random assignment to groups. Random assignment eliminates selection bias and confounding variables.
Answer: Reproductive division of labor, cooperative brood care, overlapping generations. Highly organized societies with specialized reproductive roles.
Answer: Group vigilance reduces individual vigilance costs, improving foraging time. Shared vigilance allows individuals to allocate more time to feeding.
Answer: Reproductive success, often measured by surviving offspring produced. Fitness measures evolutionary success through reproductive output.
Answer: Net advantage depends on overall lifetime reproductive success. Total lifetime reproductive success determines evolutionary advantage.
Answer: Helping can increase inclusive fitness if beneficiaries are relatives. Helpers gain inclusive fitness through relatives' reproductive success.
Answer: Competition costs rise; net advantage is uncertain without reproduction data. Increased competition may offset other benefits of group living.
Answer: Predators have more difficulty targeting one individual in a group. Groups make it harder for predators to focus on one target.
Answer: A social interaction that increases fitness of all participating individuals. All participants benefit, making cooperation stable and advantageous.
Answer: Helping can increase inclusive fitness if beneficiaries are relatives. Helpers gain inclusive fitness through relatives' reproductive success.
Answer: A social interaction that increases fitness of all participating individuals. All participants benefit, making cooperation stable and advantageous.
Answer: Number of surviving offspring that later reproduce. Reproductive success is the ultimate measure of evolutionary fitness.
Answer: Kin selection. Relatives share genes, making helping them evolutionarily beneficial.
Answer: Fitness cost to the individual performing the act. Lower costs make altruistic behaviors more likely to be selected.
Answer: A behavior that benefits another individual while costing the actor fitness. Actor pays a cost while recipient gains a benefit.
Answer: It increases another individual's fitness or survival probability. Cooperation specifically requires helping others, not just social interaction.
Answer: Huddling reduces heat loss and lowers energy expenditure. Shared body heat reduces individual energy costs in cold conditions.
Answer: Helping that is favored when help is later returned by the recipient. Future reciprocation makes current help evolutionarily beneficial.
Answer: Coefficient of relatedness between actor and recipient. Higher relatedness makes altruism more likely to evolve.
Answer: Comparing fitness costs to fitness benefits to predict selection outcomes. Determines whether natural selection favors or opposes the behavior.
Answer: Nonbreeders help raise offspring, increasing offspring survival. Helpers assist parents, improving offspring survival and success.
Answer: Kin selection. Relatives share genes, making helping them evolutionarily beneficial.
Answer: Repeated interactions with ability to recognize and punish cheaters. Recognition and punishment prevent exploitation of helpful individuals.
Answer: Individual chance of being attacked decreases as group size increases. Larger groups spread predation risk across more individuals.
Answer: Individual chance of being attacked decreases as group size increases. Larger groups spread predation risk across more individuals.
Answer: More individuals detect predators sooner, increasing group survival. More group members means faster predator detection overall.
Answer: Higher survival or reproductive output in social versus solitary individuals. Compares fitness outcomes between social and solitary strategies.
Answer: Increased food-finding efficiency via information sharing. Group members share information about food locations.
Answer: Fitness benefit to the recipient of the altruistic act. Greater benefits make altruistic acts more evolutionarily favorable.
Answer: Anti-predator benefits are context-dependent and drive social advantage. Context-dependency shows specific conditions where sociality provides benefits.
Answer: Repeated help between nonrelatives. Repeated exchange between non-relatives indicates reciprocal cooperation.
Answer: Controlled experiment manipulating group size or social access. Experiments control variables to establish causal relationships.
Answer: A third factor correlated with group living and the measured outcome. Confounds can create false correlations between sociality and outcomes.
Answer: Increased disease transmission is a cost of group living. Higher parasite loads indicate disease transmission costs of grouping.
Answer: Increased food-finding efficiency via information sharing. Group members share information about food locations.
Answer: Correlation does not demonstrate that sociality causes the benefit. Correlation alone cannot establish that sociality causes the benefit.
Answer: Fitness benefit to the recipient of the altruistic act. Greater benefits make altruistic acts more evolutionarily favorable.
Answer: Preexisting health status confounds the sociality–survival relationship. Health status affects both group joining and survival outcomes.
Answer: Direct fitness plus fitness gained by helping genetic relatives reproduce. Includes both personal reproduction and benefits from helping relatives.
Answer: Coefficient of relatedness between actor and recipient. Higher relatedness makes altruism more likely to evolve.
Answer: Both individuals gain. Mutual benefit distinguishes mutualism from one-sided altruism.
Answer: Ranked social order that influences access to resources and mates. Social rank determines priority access to valuable resources.
Answer: Lower metabolic rate in huddles. Lower metabolic rates demonstrate energy savings from group thermoregulation.
Answer: Correlation does not demonstrate that sociality causes the benefit. Correlation alone cannot establish that sociality causes the benefit.
Answer: Behavior involving interactions among individuals of the same species. Focuses on interactions within a species rather than between species.
Answer: Repeated interactions with ability to recognize and punish cheaters. Recognition and punishment prevent exploitation of helpful individuals.
Answer: Reduced individual predation risk through dilution and vigilance. Group membership decreases individual risk of predator attacks.
Answer: Lower metabolic rate in huddles. Lower metabolic rates demonstrate energy savings from group thermoregulation.
Answer: Nonbreeders help raise offspring, increasing offspring survival. Helpers assist parents, improving offspring survival and success.
Answer: Evolutionary function explaining how behavior increases fitness. Focuses on why the behavior evolved and its fitness benefits.
Answer: Comparing fitness costs to fitness benefits to predict selection outcomes. Determines whether natural selection favors or opposes the behavior.
Answer: Yes, because 0.5×10=5 and 5>4. 0.5×10=5, and 5>4 satisfies Hamilton's rule.
Answer: Immediate mechanisms such as hormones, neural circuits, and development. Focuses on how behavior works mechanistically in the individual.
Answer: Competition among individuals of the same species for limited resources. Same-species competition occurs when resources are limited.
Answer: Ranked social order that influences access to resources and mates. Social rank determines priority access to valuable resources.
Answer: Group hunting that increases capture success or allows larger prey capture. Multiple hunters increase success rate or enable larger prey capture.
Answer: Increased competition for food, mates, or nesting sites. Group members compete for the same limited resources.
Answer: Immediate mechanisms such as hormones, neural circuits, and development. Focuses on how behavior works mechanistically in the individual.
Answer: A third factor correlated with group living and the measured outcome. Confounds can create false correlations between sociality and outcomes.
Answer: A behavior that benefits another individual while costing the actor fitness. Actor pays a cost while recipient gains a benefit.
Answer: rB>C. Altruism evolves when relatedness times benefit exceeds cost.
Answer: Group vigilance reduces individual vigilance costs, improving foraging time. Shared vigilance allows individuals to allocate more time to feeding.
Answer: It increases another individual's fitness or survival probability. Cooperation specifically requires helping others, not just social interaction.
Answer: Direct fitness plus fitness gained by helping genetic relatives reproduce. Includes both personal reproduction and benefits from helping relatives.
Answer: Care of offspring by individuals other than the genetic parents. Non-parents provide care, benefiting offspring and sometimes themselves.
Answer: Higher survival or reproductive output in social versus solitary individuals. Compares fitness outcomes between social and solitary strategies.
Answer: Increased competition for food, mates, or nesting sites. Group members compete for the same limited resources.
Answer: rB>C. Altruism evolves when relatedness times benefit exceeds cost.
Answer: Huddling reduces heat loss and lowers energy expenditure. Shared body heat reduces individual energy costs in cold conditions.
Answer: More individuals detect predators sooner, increasing group survival. More group members means faster predator detection overall.
Answer: Both individuals gain. Mutual benefit distinguishes mutualism from one-sided altruism.
Answer: Behavior involving interactions among individuals of the same species. Focuses on interactions within a species rather than between species.
Answer: Reproductive success, often measured by surviving offspring produced. Fitness measures evolutionary success through reproductive output.
Answer: Fitness cost to the individual performing the act. Lower costs make altruistic behaviors more likely to be selected.
Answer: Number of surviving offspring that later reproduce. Reproductive success is the ultimate measure of evolutionary fitness.
Answer: Earlier predator detection. Earlier detection directly supports the many-eyes vigilance hypothesis.
Answer: Higher pathogen transmission due to close contact and density. Close contact in groups facilitates disease spread between individuals.
Answer: Preexisting health status confounds the sociality–survival relationship. Health status affects both group joining and survival outcomes.
Answer: Increased disease transmission is a cost of group living. Higher parasite loads indicate disease transmission costs of grouping.
Answer: Net advantage depends on overall lifetime reproductive success. Total lifetime reproductive success determines evolutionary advantage.
Answer: Care of offspring by individuals other than the genetic parents. Non-parents provide care, benefiting offspring and sometimes themselves.
Answer: Predators have more difficulty targeting one individual in a group. Groups make it harder for predators to focus on one target.
Answer: Repeated help between nonrelatives. Repeated exchange between non-relatives indicates reciprocal cooperation.
Answer: Naïve individuals find food faster after joining groups. Improved foraging success demonstrates information transfer within groups.
Answer: Competition costs rise; net advantage is uncertain without reproduction data. Increased competition may offset other benefits of group living.
Answer: Higher capture success in groups. Higher success rates demonstrate cooperative hunting effectiveness.
Answer: Constant attack rate (per group) with lower risk per individual. Fixed attack rate with more individuals reduces per-capita risk.
Answer: Yes, because 0.5×10=5 and 5>4. 0.5×10=5, and 5>4 satisfies Hamilton's rule.
Answer: Random assignment to groups. Random assignment eliminates selection bias and confounding variables.
Answer: Earlier predator detection. Earlier detection directly supports the many-eyes vigilance hypothesis.
Answer: Reduced individual predation risk through dilution and vigilance. Group membership decreases individual risk of predator attacks.
Answer: Controlled experiment manipulating group size or social access. Experiments control variables to establish causal relationships.
Answer: Evolutionary function explaining how behavior increases fitness. Focuses on why the behavior evolved and its fitness benefits.