The Articles of Confederation
Help Questions
AP U.S. History › The Articles of Confederation
In a secondary account of the Articles of Confederation era (1781–1789), the author notes that Congress could negotiate treaties and manage western lands but had difficulty responding to interstate economic conflicts. The author argues that the system encouraged states to prioritize local interests over national coordination. Which development best illustrates this problem under the Articles?
The president directing federal troops to suppress resistance in Massachusetts
Congress enforcing a uniform national income tax to pay war debts
States imposing tariffs and trade barriers against one another
The Supreme Court striking down state laws that violated federal treaties
Congress compelling Britain to evacuate western forts by threatening embargoes
Explanation
This question examines problems arising from the Articles' emphasis on state sovereignty over national coordination. The Articles gave states primary authority while Congress handled external affairs, creating conflicts when state and national interests diverged. States imposing tariffs and trade barriers against each other perfectly illustrates this problem - states prioritized local economic interests over national coordination, creating interstate commerce conflicts that Congress couldn't resolve. The other options describe federal actions that were impossible under the Articles, which lacked executive power (C), judicial authority (D), direct taxation (B), or effective coercive power over foreign nations (E).
A historian assessing the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) argues that the Confederation Congress could not compel states to follow the Treaty of Paris (1783), harming U.S. credibility. Which example best fits this claim?
Federal courts consistently enforced treaty obligations against states
The president negotiated a new treaty without Senate input
Congress imposed direct taxes to compensate Loyalists for confiscated property
Congress ordered the immediate emancipation of enslaved people as part of treaty enforcement
Several states obstructed British creditors from collecting prewar debts despite treaty terms
Explanation
This question examines Congress's inability to enforce the Treaty of Paris against recalcitrant states. The treaty required various actions, including allowing British creditors to collect pre-war debts, but several states passed laws obstructing these collections. Congress could negotiate and ratify treaties but couldn't compel state compliance, damaging U.S. international credibility. This demonstrated a key weakness: the gap between Congress's diplomatic authority and its enforcement power. The other options describe federal actions or powers that didn't exist under the Articles, which lacked executive authority, federal courts, and direct taxation power.
A historian argues that under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789), states often pursued conflicting monetary policies, worsening economic instability. Which practice would be most consistent with that argument?
Different states issuing paper money and adopting debtor-relief laws that varied widely
The Supreme Court requiring uniform bankruptcy rules across all states
A federal executive department regulating state-chartered banks
Congress prohibiting states from levying any taxes
Congress enforcing a single national currency backed by a central bank
Explanation
This question examines monetary instability under the Articles. Congress could coin money, but states also issued their own paper currencies and adopted varying debtor-relief laws, creating a chaotic financial system. Different currencies circulated with varying values, and states pursued conflicting monetary policies that worsened economic instability. Some states issued large amounts of paper money to help debtors, while others maintained harder money policies, creating confusion and undermining business confidence. The other options describe federal monetary controls that didn't exist under the Articles, which lacked the power to create a central bank or regulate state banking.
A historian notes that the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) were replaced because many leaders believed the union needed the ability to act directly on individuals rather than only on states. Which change in the U.S. Constitution most directly addressed that concern?
Granting Congress power to tax and regulate commerce, enforceable through federal law
Requiring unanimity of states to pass ordinary legislation
Eliminating the possibility of admitting new states
Making treaties optional guidelines rather than binding law
Allowing states to coin money without restriction
Explanation
This question examines the fundamental change from the Articles to the Constitution regarding government authority. The key difference was granting Congress power to tax and regulate commerce with enforcement through federal law, allowing the government to act directly on individuals rather than only through states. This addressed the main weakness of the Articles by providing reliable revenue sources and enforcement mechanisms. The Constitution created a federal system where the national government could operate independently of state cooperation in its areas of authority. The other options would have weakened rather than strengthened national government or describe features not central to the Articles' problems.
A political scientist reviewing the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) notes that Congress depended on state compliance for revenue and troops. The scientist argues this created chronic financial instability. Which fact best illustrates that instability?
States routinely met congressional requisitions in full and on time
Congress funded itself primarily through excise taxes collected by federal agents
The Articles required states to surrender all land taxes to the national treasury
Congress struggled to pay debts and soldiers because it relied on voluntary state contributions
Congress could print unlimited stable currency backed by federal taxes
Explanation
This question addresses the chronic financial problems under the Articles due to Congress's dependence on state contributions. Congress could only request funds from states through requisitions but had no power to compel payment. States frequently ignored these requests or paid only partial amounts, leaving Congress unable to service national debt, pay soldiers, or fund basic operations. This created persistent financial instability that undermined the national government's effectiveness. The other options incorrectly describe revenue systems that didn't exist under the Articles, which specifically denied Congress direct taxation power.
A secondary source on the 1780s explains that the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) did not provide for a national judiciary, leaving many disputes unresolved at the national level. Which type of conflict was most likely to be difficult to settle under this system?
A case in which a federal judge enjoined a state election law
A constitutional challenge to an executive order
A Supreme Court review of a federal statute regulating railroads
A federal court appeal involving a national income tax
Boundary disputes between two states
Explanation
This question addresses the absence of a national judiciary under the Articles. Without federal courts, many types of disputes - especially those involving multiple states - were difficult to resolve at the national level. Boundary disputes between states were particularly problematic because there was no neutral federal authority to adjudicate conflicting claims. The Articles provided some mechanism for interstate disputes through special tribunals, but this was limited and cumbersome. The other options describe types of federal judicial review that require federal courts and federal laws that didn't exist under the Articles.
A secondary source describes the Confederation Congress under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) as lacking coercive power over states. Which statement best captures what “lacking coercive power” meant in practice?
Congress could dissolve state militias and replace them with federal troops
Congress could nullify state laws through a presidential decree
Congress could imprison state governors who voted against national policies
Congress could request money from states but could not force them to pay
Congress could directly tax citizens but chose not to
Explanation
This question clarifies what "lacking coercive power" meant in practice under the Articles. Congress could make requests and pass resolutions, but it couldn't force states to comply with national policies, including financial requisitions. States could simply ignore congressional requests without facing any penalties or enforcement actions. This voluntary compliance system proved inadequate because states often prioritized local interests over national needs. The other options describe coercive powers that Congress explicitly lacked under the Articles' design, which preserved state sovereignty by denying the national government enforcement mechanisms.
A historian notes that the Confederation Congress under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) could request troops from states but could not draft soldiers directly. Which implication follows most logically from this arrangement?
The president could compel enlistment through executive orders
The Supreme Court could order states to supply soldiers
Military readiness depended heavily on state willingness to contribute manpower
Congress maintained a large permanent army independent of state control
Congress could station federal troops in any state without consent
Explanation
This question explores military limitations under the Articles' system of requesting rather than drafting troops. Since Congress could only ask states to contribute soldiers rather than directly conscripting individuals, military readiness depended heavily on state willingness to provide manpower. States might refuse or delay troop contributions, especially for conflicts that didn't directly threaten their interests. This voluntary system proved inadequate for maintaining consistent military strength or responding quickly to security threats. The other options describe military powers that Congress lacked under the Articles.
A scholar summarizes the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) as creating a unicameral Congress where each state had one vote and most significant measures required approval from nine states, while amendments required unanimity. Which consequence most directly followed from these voting rules?
Small states lost influence because representation was based on population
States were prevented from conducting their own diplomacy with foreign nations
Congress frequently enacted sweeping reforms quickly because a simple majority was sufficient
Congress could regulate interstate commerce without state consent
National policy was often difficult to change or implement due to supermajority and unanimity requirements
Explanation
This question focuses on how the Articles' voting rules affected governance. The unicameral Congress gave each state one vote, and most significant measures required nine of thirteen states to approve, while amendments needed unanimous consent. These supermajority and unanimity requirements made national policy extremely difficult to change or implement, as even small minorities could block action. This created governmental gridlock and prevented necessary reforms. Options A and B misstate the actual voting rules, while D and E describe institutional features (bicameralism, interstate commerce regulation) that didn't exist under the Articles.
A secondary source excerpt about the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) argues that the system preserved state sovereignty by giving states the primary role in governance. Which provision best reflects that emphasis on state authority?
Federal courts held exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between private citizens
Each state retained its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, with limited powers delegated to Congress
The national executive could appoint state governors and judges
A national bill of rights restricted state governments from limiting speech
Congress could veto any state law by a simple majority vote
Explanation
This question examines the Articles' emphasis on preserving state sovereignty. The system was designed as a confederation where states retained their primary sovereignty, freedom, and independence, only delegating limited specific powers to Congress. Article II of the Articles explicitly stated this principle, making clear that states remained the primary governing authorities. This reflected Revolutionary-era fears of centralized power and the desire to maintain local control. The other options describe federal powers over states that were intentionally excluded from the Articles' design to preserve state autonomy.